Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
200 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents when the matter was listed for hearing. The court noted the absence of any party or counsel. Consequently, …
Damodar Yadav filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 14039 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and five other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing after a mention by the petitioner's counsel, Virendra Singh. When the matter was taken up, no party, …
Arvind Kumar Maurya filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel or party appeared to argue the case. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, under procedural rules, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive …
The petitioner, Dr. Suresh Chandra Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. On the date of hearing, no counsel or party appeared to press the petition. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, pursuant to procedural rules, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No …
Petitioner Uma Shanker Dubey, through counsel Prem Prakash Yadav, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 10210 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court but later expressed a desire not to pursue the petition. The respondent State of U.P. and others, represented by counsel C.S.C., Haushila Prasad Mishra, …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed Writ Petition No. 4418 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief against the State of U.P. and eight other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Manish Prajapati, informed the court that the petitioner no …
The petitioner, Suresh Chandra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to release his retirement benefits, including pension and gratuity, and to decide a pending application dated 23.05.2026. The petitioner alleged that payments were due following …
The petitioner, Mohd. Salman Ansari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to release his pending June 2023 salary of approximately Rs. 90,000‑100,000, along with interest at 18% on the General Provident Fund and gratuity amounts that had been …
The petitioner, Narendra Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order dated 14 September 2026 that moved him from the District Institute of Education and Training in Kanpur Nagar to the District Inspector of Schools in Farrukhabad. He argued that the transfer would impede his ability to …
Ram Dhani Prasad was appointed as Officiating Principal of an educational institution on 01‑04‑2025 following a Committee resolution, but the required financial approval from the District Inspector of Schools was not granted despite submission of all documents. The petitioner relied on a recent …
The petitioners, a group of candidates for the Trained Graduate Teacher (Sanskrit) post, challenged the final answer key dated 28 July 2026, specifically Question No. 96, seeking its quashment and a mandamus directing the authorities to treat option C as correct and revise their marks and selection …
The petitioner, Viplav Prakash Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to grant a revised salary matrix, increments, and selection pay scale based on a final selection list dated 23.08.2016. The petition also requested the court to issue any other …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh, a senior lecturer appointed as Officiating Principal of a college, challenged the respondents' order dated 08.03.2025 which denied him the salary of a Principal. He argued that, under the precedent set in Veeresh Chandra Mishra v. State of U.P., an officiating …
The petitioner, Harish Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to accept his managerial contribution for grant of General Provident Fund, pay salary arrears of Rs. 3,66,773 from 5 Oct 1987 to July 1993, and settle pensionary dues, as well as …
The petitioner, Suman Lata, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Registrar (Respondent No.2) to reconsider her request for extension of work on a contract service basis and to decide a representation filed on 31-08-2026 within the stipulated time. The respondent's counsel indicated …
Lakhraniya Devi filed a writ petition challenging a 7 May 2018 order that denied arrears of salary and retirement benefits to her late husband, a primary school teacher who retired in 2000 and died in 2004. The petitioner argued that the husband’s appointment on 15 April 1964 was lawful, as …
A petition under Article 227 (No. 3705 of 2017) was filed by Krishna Gopal and another against Smt. Raj Kumari and others. The matter was listed as 'Likely to be Infructuous' and no counsel or parties appeared before the court. The bench noted the absence of any representation to press the petition. …
Petitioner Nidhi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, counsel for the petitioner, Sri Suryansh Pandey, submitted that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition. The court entertained the withdrawal application and allowed it. Accordingly, the writ …
The petitioner, a government servant, was arrested in connection with an FIR and subsequently suspended under Rule 4(3)(a) of the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999. After being released on bail, he filed a representation under Rule 4(3)(b) on 19‑08‑2026, seeking relief from …
The petitioner, Sanju Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the result declaration dated 26‑08‑2026 for the Sanskrit subject and mandamus to declare specific exam questions as out of syllabus or incorrect. The petition relied on an expert committee report that had revised the …
The petitioners, Ashok Singh and others, filed a writ petition alleging that while arrears of salary had been paid, the interest component due on the delayed payment was not released. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and the University, contended that the grievance should be addressed by …
Anup Kumar Dwivedi, who served as an officiating principal of an intermediate college from 31 July 2018 until his retirement on 31 March 2025, filed a writ petition seeking pensionary benefits on the basis of his last drawn pay as officiating principal. The petitioner relied on earlier judgments of …
The petitioner, Kumud Kumari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to regularize her appointment as Principal after serving as an adhoc Principal for over five years. She alleged that the Director of Education (Secondary) had requested details of such employees in July …
The petitioner, Prof. Chandra Shekhar Upadhyay, challenged a disciplinary resolution dated 08.03.2019 passed by the Board of Governors of IIT Kanpur, which imposed punishment on him. He argued that the charges were identical to those faced by Prof. Sanjay Mittal, whose disciplinary findings were set …
Petitioner Rajesh Singh filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary arrears for the period 12 November 2020 to 31 May 2025. The District Inspector of Schools (Prayagraj) had forwarded his claim to the Director of Education (Secondary), Uttar Pradesh, via a letter dated 24 January 2026, but no …
Petitioner Ramesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Principal of a Government Industrial Training Institute and the Director of Training and Employment to release his Government Provident Fund of approximately Rs. 33.63 lakh. The court noted that the petitioner had …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Arya, sought compassionate consideration under Clause 5(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Transfer Policy dated 05.05.2026, claiming his son’s 50% intellectual and mental disability warranted relief. He relied on a recent decision of this Court (Shailendra Vikram v. State of …
The petitioner, Vinay Prakash Singh, challenged an order dated 05.05.2026 issued by a University that rejected his claim without providing any reasons. He argued that the order suffered from a lack of application of mind and was inconsistent with the benefits granted to a similarly situated …
Ram Niwas Sharma, a retired caretaker of a government inter‑college, filed a writ petition seeking his retirement dues. The High Court earlier directed him to make a representation before the Deputy Director of Education, which was disposed with the observation that the District Inspector of Schools …
Mrs. Meena filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 03.09.2026 issued by M/s Nirmal Facility Management Service Private Limited. The respondents, including the State of U.P., raised a preliminary objection that the order was passed by a private limited company, and therefore the petition …
The petitioner, Smt. Smit Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking relief regarding arrears of salary. The State of Uttar Pradesh filed a compliance affidavit indicating that the arrears of Rs. 92,880, covering July 2023 to 31 August 2026, had been paid to the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel …
The High Court, acting on a compliance affidavit filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh, noted that arrears of salary amounting to Rs.6,45,965 covering July 2023 to August 2026 had been paid to the petitioner, Smt. Madhur Dwivedi. The petitioner’s counsel confirmed receipt of the payment. Since the …
The petitioner, Sushma, filed a writ petition seeking to extend the benefit of a judgment dated 09.07.2026 in Special Appeal No. 467 of 2026 to herself, as she was not a party to the earlier proceedings. The respondent‑Commission argued, citing a later judgment (14.09.2026, Writ‑A No. 13927 of 2026, …
The petitioner, Mulayam Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide his claim and a representation dated 08‑07‑2026, alleging that his services were terminated on 30‑12‑2017 and that the authorities had not responded to his RTI applications. The respondents …
The petitioners applied for the post of Assistant Teacher (Computer) but were rejected on the ground that they did not possess the prescribed qualification of B.Tech/B.E. in Computer Science or its listed equivalents. They contended that a B.Tech in Information Technology should be treated as …
The petitioner, Priti Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Selection Board to re‑examine specific questions and re‑evaluate her marks in the Trained Graduate Teacher Examination‑2021. She argued that the delay in …
The petitioner, Mohd. Khalid Siddiqui, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 14159 of 2026) in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order that rejected his claim. After filing, the petitioner learned that his claim had indeed been rejected and sought to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s …
The petitioner challenged the cancellation of his result on the ground that, although the numeric entry of the Question Book Number on the OMR sheet was correct, an extra bubble was inadvertently marked in another column. The respondents, including the State and the examination commission, argued …
The petitioners challenged the validity of question No. 96 in a Teacher Grade T (T.G.T.) recruitment examination, alleging it was outside the prescribed syllabus. The respondent Commission submitted a revised expert committee report dated 26.08.2026, which held that question No. 61 was out of …
The petitioner, an ad‑hoc Assistant Teacher appointed in 1993 and regularized in 2017 under Section 33‑G of the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, reached superannuation on 31‑03‑2026 but his pension calculation excluded the ad‑hoc service period. He filed a writ petition seeking …
The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, a contract employee of Zila Panchayat Inter College, Prayagraj, filed a writ petition alleging that he was asked to return to the outsourcing agency without notice, violating Clause 10(4) of a Government Order dated 19‑09‑2025 which prohibits removal of outsourced …
The petitioners Diwakar Patel and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, appeared and expressed the desire to withdraw the petition. The court recorded this request and proceeded to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive …
Kuldeep Singh, who has been working as an adhoc Principal for over six years, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to regularize his post. He argued that the Director of Education (Secondary) had requested details of such employees in 2019 and …
The petitioner, a temporary Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking to halt a permanent appointment advertised on 09-07-2026, arguing that his honorarium must be released before any such appointment. He also sought to link this petition with an earlier writ (Writ‑A No.8123 of 2024) …
Petitioner Shama Parveen filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Wazirganj, Budaun demanding payment of electricity dues. The respondents argued that the notices were the only procedural step and that the petitioner …
Petitioner Ravindra Singh Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to decide a representation dated 31 July 2026 concerning the alleged illegal restriction of water flow from the Nali to a pond in …
Petitioners Pramod Kumar Pandey and two others filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh State Medical Faculty, Lucknow to register their Bachelor of Physiotherapy degrees. The petitioners argued that the matter was not res integra, citing a 2018 Lucknow …
Petitioner Kurban Ali filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking issuance of a fresh passport, which was pending with the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 275 of 2007) …
The petitioners, Pankaj and another, challenged an objection raised by respondents 4 and 5 to the removal of a tamarind tree that had fallen on the petitioners' land. They argued that the tree was originally standing away from the disputed land, which is already the subject of writ petition 8928 of …
The petitioner, Smt. Sarita Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a notice dated 01‑07‑2026 issued by Respondent No.3, alleging that her reply submitted on 30‑06‑2025 had not been considered. The Standing Counsel for the respondents raised no objection to disposing of the …
The petitioner, Umeshankar Shukla, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking protection of his possession rights under a decree dated 21 May 2025 in Original Suit No. 122 of 2026. The High Court examined whether the petitioner could obtain relief through a writ or should …
Shiv Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State Bank of India to de‑freeze his account (No. 20239675247) which had been frozen following a complaint from an investigating agency about doubtful transactions. The bank contended that the freeze was …
The petitioner, Mohammad Munna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking re‑issuance of his passport for a ten‑year period, relying on a trial court order that gave a no‑objection but did not specify a duration. The Regional Passport Officer had instead issued a passport valid for only one …
The petitioner, Helal Ahmad, challenged the Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta's proceeding with a complaint concerning the execution of a sale deed that is also the subject of a pending civil suit (O.S. No.1614 of 2024). The petitioner argued that under Section 8(1)(b) of the Lokayukta Act, 1975, the …
Shabnam Parveen filed a writ petition challenging the Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta's jurisdiction to entertain a complaint concerning the execution of a sale deed, which is also the subject of a pending civil suit (O.S. No.1614 of 2024) filed by the same complainant. The petitioner argued that under …
The petitioner, claiming ownership of a plot in Village Kaila, Ghaziabad, challenged a demolition notice issued by the Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam under Article 226 of the Constitution. He had filed a reply to the notice on 21‑08‑2026, which remained unconsidered. The respondents, representing the …
Petitioner Sunny Jaiswal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (case crime no. 54 of 2025 under Section 223 IPC) was pending against him. The Court held …
Petitioner Afzal Ahmad challenged the Regional Passport Officer's closure of his passport re‑issuance file on the ground that he had not obtained a no‑objection certificate from the trial court where he faces a criminal case. The petitioner, who is residing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, argued that the …
The petitioner, Pushpa Devi, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order rejecting her claim for financial assistance under the Mukhya Mantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana, 2020, on the ground that her deceased husband was a government employee and thus not a "farmer". She submitted evidence …
The petitioner, Sweta Rana, sought relief concerning indecent photographs allegedly posted online and related chat material. The Court had previously ordered the masking of questionable material on 19.08.2026. Respondent No.2, Amit Rawat, appeared in person and affirmed that the cellphone containing …
Petitioner Prashant Kumar Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 1215 of 2028 under IPC sections 323, 504, 506) was pending against …
Petitioner Brij Mohan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to UIDAI and its regional office to correct his name from 'Ramvriksh' to 'Brij Mohan' in his Aadhaar record. The respondents contended that the petitioner must first obtain a Gazette notification of the name change as …
Petitioner Mohammad Irfan, residing in Saudi Arabia with an expired passport, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and others to issue a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC). The respondents argued that because his passport had expired, Irfan must …
The petitioners, senior residents who have completed one year of service under a government bond, applied for No Objection Certificates (NOC) to take up Assistant Professor posts after selection. The State Government refused to grant the NOC, citing its own order dated 27.07.2026, which the …
The petitioners, Jagannath and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to disturb their peaceful possession of a 0.1140 hectare plot of land in Jaunpur. The High Court examined the petition and observed that the relief sought …
Petitioner Chhedi Chauhan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for re‑issuance of a passport. The respondents, including the Union of India, issued a show‑cause notice citing a criminal case (Case Crime No. 1193 of 2013) under Section 3(1) of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Sub Registrar's refusal to register a sale deed that had been executed earlier in his favour but later concealed when the vendor executed a subsequent sale deed in favour of a third party, which was registered on 29 December …
Petitioner Taqdeer Ali filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the issuance of his pending passport application. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case pending against him under Sections 354, 506 and 323 of the …
Petitioner Saloni filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the Union of India to correct her name in the Aadhaar database from ‘Sanoli’ to ‘Saloni’. The respondent argued that a mere representation is insufficient and that, under the Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011, the petitioner …
Petitioner Sadanand Gupta filed a writ petition alleging that the State of U.P. and four others interfered with his peaceful possession and restrained him from constructing on land for which he holds a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction. The petitioner claimed non‑compliance with the …
Petitioner Sane Ali and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash the orders of the Registrar of Marriages under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which refused to solemnise and register their marriage. The Registrar declined on the ground that …
Neeraj Garg filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Indian Overseas Bank to de‑freeze his account (No. 153202000001017) after it was frozen on a complaint from an investigating agency about doubtful transactions. The bank argued that the freeze was justified pending …
Petitioner Varis filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the defreezing of his bank account (No. 41386040652) which had been frozen following a complaint to an investigating agency about suspicious transactions. The respondent bank argued that the freeze was justified pending investigation. …
The petitioner, Ram Milan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a court direction for a land measurement exercise, alleging trespass and interference by respondents No.4 and No.5. He already has a civil suit (O.S. No.603 of 2019) concerning the same land and had earlier obtained a …
Petitioner Sahabuddin filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 163 of 2020) under Sections 3 and 4 of …
Petitioner Nirdesh Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a passport valid for ten years as prescribed under the Passports Act, 1967. Respondents argued that, because the petitioner is involved in a criminal case, only a one‑year passport may be issued, subject to a No Objection …
Petitioner Smt. Nayanpati, through counsel Parv Agarwal, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 30824 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later expressed a desire not to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The court considered the request and, without examining any …
The petitioner was denied a fresh passport on the ground that a criminal case (Case Crime No. 753 of 2009) was pending, although the investigating officer had submitted a final/closure report which the magistrate had accepted on 27‑07‑2010 and no charge sheet was filed. The petitioner argued that, …
The petitioner, Faiyaz Husain, challenged an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridpur, Bareilly, which stayed a summoning order in Criminal Case No.1523 of 2025 but failed to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) required for obtaining a passport and travelling abroad. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Sanjay Bharti, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to consider and decide his representations dated 22.01.2026 and 04.06.2026 with a reasoned order. The respondents submitted instructions indicating that the representation …
The petitioners purchased a property from the original owner, Hari Singh Kushwaha, after a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction was passed against Om Prakash in 2021. Om Prakash appealed the decree, and while his second appeal was pending, the court ordered that no third‑party rights could be …
Petitioner Ravindra Rai filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that the petitioner had been served a show‑cause notice because of several criminal cases pending against him under the Indian Penal Code, the Scheduled Castes …
Petitioner Mohammad Esa filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0531 of 2023) under Sections 3 and 25 …
The petitioner, Aman Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents, including the Union of India, issued a show‑cause notice because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0319 of 2025) is pending against the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking re‑issuance of his passport with the date of birth corrected to match his High School Certificate. He alleged that the passport issued in 2014 contained an incorrect date of birth and that his subsequent application for correction was …
Petitioner Rahul Yadav, who had been issued a passport valid for one year due to his involvement in a criminal case, sought a ten‑year passport as prescribed under the Passport Act, 1967. The trial court had earlier granted a No Objection Certificate (NOC) with a rider limiting the passport to a …
The petitioner, Amarjeet, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking disposal of a pending reply dated 08.08.2026 to a notice issued on 05.08.2026. The petitioner had also applied for the supply of certain documents to enable an effective reply. The Court observed that the …
The petitioners, a school management committee, filed a writ petition alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents were interfering with the peaceful functioning of their institution located on land claimed to belong to the Narcotics Department, Government of India. The petitioners …
Petitioners, a group of six individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh State Medical Faculty, Lucknow to register their Bachelor of Physiotherapy degrees. The petitioners argued that the matter was not res integra because …
Petitioner Basant filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents, particularly respondents 2 and 3, to provide police protection at his house and to evict respondents 5 and 6 who were alleged to have taken illegal possession of his property. The petition also …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, filed Writ No. 35526 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner expressed a desire not to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The standing counsel for the State of U.P. raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting …
Petitioner Smt Reena Patel filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to decide a representation dated 25‑08‑2026 within a time frame fixed by the Court. The Court examined whether such a direction could be granted as a writ remedy. …
Petitioner Dushyant Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Reserve Bank of India and Canara Bank to de‑freeze his bank account (No. 110238672813) which had been frozen on a complaint from an investigating agency alleging doubtful transactions. The respondent …
Satkar Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the renewal of his passport, which was pending before the Regional Passport Officer. He is a bail‑granted accused in NCR No. 0097 of 2020 under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court’s …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Kanpur Police Commissioner to enforce a temporary injunction granted in his civil suit, alleging that the respondent had dispossessed him despite the injunction. The court noted that the temporary injunction …
The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the re‑issuance of his passport, which was pending before the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents contended that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0034 of 2024) under …
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav filed a writ petition challenging an alleged illegal encroachment on public land identified as Garha (Arazi No. 19, 0.2060 hectare). The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and six others, contested the claim. The Court examined whether the writ jurisdiction was the …
The petitioner, Meera Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Ayukta of Gorakhpur to issue a death certificate for her missing husband, who had been absent since August 2015. The petitioner argued that a civil death had occurred after seven years of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to dismantle an abandoned handpipe obstructing access to his bhumidhari land, relying on a spot inspection report. He also highlighted a pending application dated 22 July 2026 that had not been …
The petitioners, heirs of a former bhumidhar named Jograj, sought a writ of mandamus to correct revenue entries and be recorded as bhumidars of several land parcels in Bareilly, alleging that the State had declared the land surplus under the U.P. Urban (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and taken …
The appellant, a general‑category candidate, was selected for a Junior Clerk post advertised in 1997, received an appointment letter and served from September 1997 until his termination in 2000 on the ground that the vacancy was only temporary. The State argued that the appointment was illegal …
The petitioners, claiming two‑thirds share in several plots, sought to have proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 quashed and the revenue entries restored, invoking Section 3 of the Repeal Act, 1999. The land had been declared surplus, vested in the State, and …
Lal Chandra Pandey filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 57512 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that a contemporaneous order in Writ‑A No. 11385 of 2026 and a letter dated 09‑03‑2026 …
The petitioner, Dr. Rakesh Singh, challenged the appointment and salary disbursement of a Class‑IV employee (respondent No.7) alleging that the appointment order dated 21‑Nov‑2007 was fraudulent and that subsequent orders granting financial approval were passed without giving the petitioner a …
Lal Chand Pandey, a former Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and education authorities to consider his claim for regularization under Section 33‑G of the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board Act, 1982, after the arrears of salary for …
The petitioner, Brij Lal Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the Lecturer (PGT) recruitment selection and to direct a re‑evaluation of his answer sheet, alleging that the correct answer to question 32 was (A) but the commission marked (C) as correct, resulting in a loss of four …
Dr. Neelam Gaur filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court alleging inaction by a Probation Officer in proceedings under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The petitioner sought relief through the writ but later …
The Committee of Management of Rishi Bhumi Inter College filed a writ petition seeking the court’s intervention to expedite the decision on its applications dated 1 April 2026 and a reminder dated 17 July 2026, which were pending before the Director of Education (Secondary), Uttar Pradesh. The …
Petitioners Hare Ram Pandey and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, requesting that they be allowed to challenge any orders that might be passed thereafter. The court considered whether a …
Kashinath Pandey, appointed as a Certificate Writer at Sampurnanand Sanskrit University in 1992, challenged the university's refusal to regularise his position, arguing that his juniors appointed similarly had already been regularised. The court noted that the earlier judgment in Nigameshwar …
Petitioner Chandrasen Dubey filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay his salary for 12 days of sanctioned medical leave (28.03.2026 to 12.04.2026) and to consider his earlier representations for selection grade. The State, through its standing counsel, …
The petitioner, Sibbu Kumar Patel, a foreman at a Government Industrial Training Institute in Ghazipur, challenged a transfer order on the ground that he has a 40% permanent disability in his left eye. He relied on Clause 5(iv) of the Transfer Policy dated 05.05.2026, which exempts employees with …
The petitioner, Radhey Shyam Vishwakarma, was initially appointed as Assistant Clerk in 1973 and later appointed as Assistant Teacher on 20 July 1992 to fill a short‑term vacancy created by the promotion of another teacher. He sought regularisation under Section 33‑F of the U.P. Secondary Education …
The plaintiff‑appellant Bhanu Datta Pathak sought to cancel a registered will dated 06‑12‑1971 executed by his grandfather Shankar Dutt Pathak in favour of the defendant‑respondent Hari Dutt Pathak and to obtain a partition of ancestral property. The trial court held the will invalid on grounds of …
The petitioner, Meena Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay her salary from 1 January 1994 to 15 May 2007 along with pension benefits. The State argued that the petition was barred as a second writ for the same relief, since the salary claim …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 07.08.2026 by the District Inspector of Schools, Mirzapur, which directed the continuation of a principal’s suspension despite the statutory requirement that any suspension exceeding 60 days must be approved in writing under Section 16G(7) of the 1921 Act. …
Shrikant Sharma, an Assistant Teacher who has been functioning as Officiating Principal (Karyawahak) since 1 July 2019, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to pay him the salary of a regular Principal for the period he acted in that …
The petitioner Mahendrapal Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders dated 27.02.2025 and 03.06.2025. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that an appeal against those orders was already pending and requested permission to withdraw the writ petition, …
The petitioner, Smt. Shabnam, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a recovery certificate dated 24.03.2026 issued under Sections 33 and 47 of the Stamp Act, and to obtain a mandamus restraining further coercive action and a stay of the recovery proceedings pending an appeal before the …
The petitioners, a society, challenged the actions of certain respondents who allegedly took forceful possession of the society's institution after an election held on 01‑06‑2025 and subsequent amendment of its bye‑laws on 12‑11‑2025. The petitioners claimed that a respondent filed an objection on …
The petitioner, Md. Tasneem Reza, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) to decide his representation and allow him to appear for Ph.D. admission in Mechanical Engineering for the 2025-26 session. The university required clearance from the Office of the …
Petitioner Suchit Kumar Dixit filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a recovery citation dated 20‑04‑2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Rules 158 and 162 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, which was based on an order dated 28‑09‑2021 in State v. Suchit …
The petitioner, Sukhai, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court had previously deferred the matter on 21 April 2026 because the petitioner had not filed a vakalatnama and the undelivered cover was not returned. On the date of hearing, no representative of the petitioner …
Petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they filed a withdrawal application, citing the facts stated therein. The State and other respondents did not object to the withdrawal. The court allowed the withdrawal application, dismissed the writ petition as …
The Committee of Management of Schiller Institute filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 07.04.2026 passed by the Commissioner, Meerut Region, which allowed an appeal under Section 25(2) of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 without condoning delay. The petitioners argued that the appeal …
The Committee of Management of Kisan Inter College challenged a District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) order dated 18‑04‑2026 that rejected the election of its members. The petitioner argued that, under the Government Order of 19‑12‑2000, the DIOS was required to refer any dispute to the Regional …
The petitioners, Committee of Management of Shiv Parvati Society, challenged an order cancelling their society's registration, alleging the order was passed without jurisdiction as no application for cancellation of their society was filed. The respondents argued that the petition is not …
The petitioner, Vaibhav Saharawat, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The last order dated 15 May 2025 listed the case among the top‑10 and named Shri Ashutosh Tiwari as counsel for the respondents. The court later received a report on 4 June 2025 indicating that Ashutosh …
The Ishan Institute of Law filed a writ petition (Writ No. 6933 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner sought relief, but the Respondent No.1 filed a personal affidavit indicating that the appeal …
Petitioner Jai Prakash Kesarwani filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Prayagraj Division to decide Stamp Appeal No. 1535 of 2025, filed under Section 56(1) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, within a short period. The Court noted that the Standing Counsel for the State …
The Delhi Flour Mills Co. Ltd. filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Collector of Gautam Budh Nagar not to take any coercive actions, such as recovery proceedings or attachment of assets, under an order dated 11‑09‑2025. The petition was filed while an appeal under Section …
The Committee of Management of Nehru Vidyapeeth Inter College filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 10 April 2026 issued by the Joint Director of Education, Varanasi, which declared past elections illegal and appointed a principal to conduct fresh elections. The petitioners argued …
The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities not to harass him for recovery of a stamp duty deficiency of Rs. 69,35,000 that was determined against the vendee, Kailash Chandra Saxena, under Section 47A(3) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The …
The petitioners, Apartment Owners Association Antriksh Greens and another, filed a writ petition seeking permission to withdraw the same. Their counsel, Kunjesh Kumar Dubey, requested the court's approval for the withdrawal. The court considered the request and dismissed the writ petition as …
Dr. Vaishno Dutt filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17375 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and seven other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Anand Kumar and Vinod Kumar Yadav, later submitted that the relief sought had become infructuous. The …
The petitioners, The Arya Vidya Sabha Azamgarh and four others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners moved that the petition be withdrawn as it had become infructuous. The court considered the withdrawal application and found no …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Shri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, applied to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The court entertained the withdrawal application and allowed it. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as …
The petitioners filed a writ petition and later sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with the court granting the petitioners permission to refile a …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners applied to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The court entertained the withdrawal application and allowed it. Consequently, the writ petition was …
The petition was filed by Akshaj Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. Counsel for the petitioner, Krishna Dutt Awasthi, and counsel for the respondents, C.S.C. and Rohit Pandey, appeared before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The matter was briefly heard …
The petitioners, Babu Lal and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court, on 2 December 2025, directed the petitioners to engage another counsel. A subsequent report dated 18 April 2026 indicated that the petitioners could not be located and their cover was returned …
The petitioners, Shri Sardar Singh and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court, on 2 December 2025, ordered the petitioners to engage another counsel. A subsequent report dated 18 April 2026 indicated that no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and no …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for its hearing. No counsel or parties were present to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The judgment notes that the petition may be recalled if the …
The petitioners, led by Shalini Chaudhary, challenged an ex‑parte order dated 01‑01‑2024 passed under Sections 4(1) and 4‑B of the 1860 Act, alleging that the meetings of the Executive Committee on 22‑10‑2023 and the General Body on 17‑12‑2023 were forged and that new members were inducted before …
Vimal Singh filed a writ petition seeking admission to Class VI of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Duredi, Banda, asserting that his birth certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat records his date of birth as 01‑07‑2013, which falls within the eligibility window. The school denied admission relying on a …
The appellant, Smt. Radha Rani, filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice on 9 February 2026 directing the appellant to engage new counsel. Despite this, the postal department returned the notice as undeliverable on 8 April 2026. No counsel appeared on behalf …
The appellant, Kagaz Udyog Sahkari Samiti Ltd., filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice on 9 January 2026 directing the appellant to engage another counsel. Subsequently, a report dated 16 January 2026 indicated that the sole appellant had left without an …
The High Court, acting on its order dated 10‑02‑2026, issued a notice to the appellant to engage new counsel. The notice was sent by registered post but the service report dated 08‑04‑2026 indicated that the notice was returned as "deceased". No counsel or party appeared before the Court for either …
The petitioner, Ankita Tripathi, challenged a show‑cause notice issued by the principal of Bramhanand College for allegedly failing to disclose employment as required by a circular dated 24‑09‑2024. The petitioner argued that the circular should not apply to her because she had taken admission …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or present counsel when the matter was listed. The respondents' counsel was present. The court, noting the absence of any representation for the petitioners, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
Bajaj Agencies filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call, and no further steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The Court observed that the petition was …
The appellant, Gorakh Singh, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal for want of prosecution. The judges granted the appellant liberty to file a restoration application within one month if …
The petitioners, C/M P.M.S. Public School, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 72580 of 2010) against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners even after the revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for want …
The petitioners, represented by counsel Sachin Kumar Sharma, filed Writ Petition No. 5717 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and nine other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel prayed to withdraw the writ petition. The standing …
Gopal Singh filed a special appeal (No. 215 of 2007) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared for the appellant even after a revised call. The Court observed that the appeal had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for …
Petitioner Sudha Mishra filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative legal remedy. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh raised no objection to the …
The petitioners, a group of scheduled tribe members, filed a writ petition seeking a record of their forest rights from the State Government. They had earlier submitted an application on 12-12-2025 to the second respondent, which remained unconsidered. The petitioners argued that their request was …
The petitioner, Kamal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash a 21 April 2025 order rejecting his representation and a mandamus directing the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Koil to order police eviction of respondents 4 to 8 from a plot purchased by his wife. The petition was filed …
Petitioners Yogesh Kumar Sharma and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel Ashish Srivastava, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue any other legal remedies. The Court …
The petitioners, Bhola and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners' counsel prayed to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative remedy …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, was convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and fined Rs.2,000, a sentence that had been completed before the filing of the writ petition. He sought a writ directing the issuance of a passport without the requirement of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners prayed to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative remedy available under law. The Additional …
Petitioner Haleemuddin applied for a passport which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal case under Sections 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. P.S. Saraimeer, Azamgarh. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decisions in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) and Rahimuddin (2025) to argue …
The petitioners, Swastik Infratech and two others, challenged a one‑year debarment order issued by the Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department (PWD) after a work order for road repair was found to be substandard. They alleged that the debarment was a retaliatory act for their whistle‑blowing complaint …
The petitioner, Avusad, applied for re‑issuance of his passport which was being held up due to his involvement in a pending criminal case (Case Crime No. 0357 of 2025) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decisions in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. …
Petitioner Ashish Kumar Sharma applied for a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in two criminal cases under Sections 147, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) that mere pendency of …
Manoj Kumar Singh applied for a passport but the application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 867 of 2013) under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner relied on the Division Bench judgment in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of …
The petitioner, a member of the Gram Panchayat of Sonsa in Etah district, sought to have voters of Wards 9, 13 and 15 shifted from the polling station at Uchh Prathmik Vidyalaya, Sonsa to the polling station at Janta Inter College, Parson. He filed a representation on 9 October 2025, which was …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0672 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in …
The petitioner, Panna Lal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and nine other respondents. The petition sought dismissal on the ground that it was not pressed. The petitioner’s counsel, Sachin Kumar Sharma, specifically prayed for dismissal as not …
The petitioner, Rakesk Verma, filed Writ No. 9363 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and five other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the petitioner wished to explore …
The petitioner sought re‑issuance of his passport, which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal FIR (sections 506, 494, 498A IPC) pending in Kushinagar. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) that mere pendency of an FIR cannot bar …
The petitioner, Abhijeet Srivastava, filed a writ petition after lodging a complaint against a practicing advocate with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, which was subsequently transferred to the Bar Council of India. The petitioner objected to the advocate's response and sought the Bar Council of …
The petitioners, Kaushal Kishore Rai and six others, filed a writ petition seeking a subsidy of Rs 1,50,200 for a 9 HP power trailer they had purchased, claiming entitlement under the Rajya Audyogik Mission, Uttar Pradesh and the Ekikrit Bagwani Vikas Mission (Rashtriya Bagwani Mission). The central …
Smt. Mansa Devi filed a writ petition seeking relief from the State of U.P. for its failure to decide her application filed on 13‑08‑2025 under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatana Kalyan Yojana after her husband’s death. The Court noted that the scheme is intended to provide social security to …
The petitioners, claiming to be forest dwellers, sought protection under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, asserting that the land they occupy is tribal land despite being within a reserved forest. The respondents, representing the …
The petitioners, claiming to be forest dwellers, sought protection under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, asserting that the land they occupy is tribal land despite being within a reserved forest. The respondents, including the …
Petitioner Azam Quraishi sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST Act. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar, which held that mere pendency of a …
Qamar Alam filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the revised call. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges granted the petitioner liberty to file a …
Vikram Singh applied for a passport which was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 314 of 2024) under Sections 324(4), 352, 115(2), 333 and 191(2) of the B.N.S, P.S. Sheeshgarh, Bareilly. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar …
The petitioner sought renewal of his passport, which was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 353 of 2025) under several IPC sections. He relied on earlier judgments that mere pendency of a criminal case does not automatically bar passport renewal if the petitioner obtains …
Petitioner Yogesh Chauhan sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0161 of 2021) under Sections 147, 323, 506, 452 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar …
The petitioner, Veena Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that her bank account was frozen after a Rs.10,000 online fraud transaction, reported by Coimbatore Police, was credited to her account. She claimed ignorance of how the amount was deposited and sought relief to access her funds. The court …
The petitioner, Brijkishor Kushwaha, applied for re‑issuance of his passport which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 36 of 2022) under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 506. He relied on the Division Bench judgment in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of India, arguing …
The appellant, Gopal Singh, failed to appear before the High Court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan, granted the appellant liberty to file a restoration application …
The appellant, Gorakh Singh, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan, granted the appellant liberty to file …
M/s J.J. Construction Company and another filed writ petition No. 35368 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. The petitioners failed to appear before the Court even after a revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the …
The appellants failed to appear before the High Court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal for want of prosecution. The judges, however, granted the appellants liberty to file a restoration application within one month if they wish. No substantive merits of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petitioners failed to appear even after the revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. However, the …
The petitioners, Mohammad Yamin and others, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call was issued. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The Court, however, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear even after a revised call. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges granted the petitioners liberty to file a restoration application within one month if they wish. No …
The petitioner, Anirudh Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that a representation filed on 30 August 2025 before the District Magistrate, Deoria, was pending. The petition sought judicial intervention regarding the pending representation. The Court noted that the matter was sub‑judice before the …
The petitioners, minor children Rifat Bano and Jigyansh, filed writ petitions after their biometric data were interchanged during Aadhaar enrolment at a Union Bank of India franchise. The error resulted in each child's biometrics being linked to the other's Aadhaar number, a fact admitted by the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the revised call. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. The judges, however, granted the petitioners liberty to file a …
The petitioner, Durga Prasad Asthana, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear even after a revised call. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. However, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a restoration application within one …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of encroachments on several plots of land in Chandauli district. The State submitted an affidavit showing that the revenue authorities had already set aside a 1997 order, restored the plots to their original category, and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ-C No. 67376 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. No petitioner appeared in court even after the revised call, indicating a lack of prosecution of the petition. The Court observed that …
The appellant, Arun Kumar Pathak, challenged a single judge’s order that denied his request to continue in a teaching post after the short‑term vacancy he filled became substantive. The court examined the procedure prescribed under the U.P. Secondary Education Service Commission (Removal of …
Smt. Meenakshi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 74572 of 2011) before the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared to press the petition on the scheduled hearing. The Court noted the absence of prosecution and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble …
The petition filed by the Cricket Association of Uttar Pradesh was heard before a two‑judge bench. The respondent Uttar Pradesh Cricket Association and others filed a counter‑affidavit, which was taken on record. The petitioner was served with a copy of the counter‑affidavit and sought time to file …
