Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
604 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Jiwan Bima Rashratiya Sahkari, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner’s counsel later moved that the petition should be dismissed as it had become infructuous. The …
The petitioner, Mohar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. did not object to the withdrawal. The Court allowed the withdrawal application, dismissed the writ …
Petitioner Smt Neetu filed a writ petition seeking information on whether a demolition order exists concerning Plot No. 46, which was carved out of a larger plot in Village Arra, Kanpur Nagar. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 18 September 2026 to the Kanpur Development Authority (KDA) …
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Pandey and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and the Special Land Acquisition Officer to determine, award and pay full compensation for land acquired in 1981 for a dam project, along with interest and solatium. They alleged that …
The petitioner, Anup Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel identified defects in the petition and expressed a desire not to pursue it further. The State respondents and the contesting respondent’s counsel raised no objection …
The petitioners alleged that respondents No. 7 and 8 sold a portion of land, which did not belong to them, to respondent No. 6 under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. They sought a direction to the Collector to adjudicate …
Virat Paradise Private Ltd filed a writ petition alleging that the Public Works Department placed red marks outside its campus, ostensibly to facilitate demolition of its boundary wall. The petitioner claimed no encroachment existed, supported by a PWD report dated 26‑02‑2026, and sought a direction …
Anand Kumar Agarwal filed a writ petition challenging remarks made by a respondent regarding alleged encroachment on a road adjacent to his plot, which he claimed was not his responsibility as the land belonged to the Public Works Department. The Varanasi Development Authority produced an order …
The petitioners sought compensation for the remaining 0.1610 hectares of land after a sale deed of 0.3000 hectares was declared void. They requested that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition for compensation. The petitioners were informed that any …
The petitioners sought compensation for 0.1610 hectares of land after a sale deed covering 0.3000 hectares of the total 0.4610 hectares was declared void. They approached the High Court seeking a writ for the same. Subsequently, the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the writ and instead …
Petitioner Zaheeruddin @Zaheer Mistri and another filed a writ petition challenging a sealing order dated 28 July 2026. The petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition and instead join an appeal filed under section 28(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 before the …
Petitioner Sanjay Verma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Vice Chairman of the Agra Development Authority to demarcate plot no.602 in Chhipi Tola, Sabji Mandi, Agra. The Court examined whether the petitioner could be compelled to demarcate the plot under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to halt construction on their private land and to compel the State to initiate land acquisition proceedings with full compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State …
The petitioner, Vishal Pandey, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The respondent's counsel and the Standing Counsel raised no objection to the dismissal. The Court considered the lack …
The petitioner, Nakshatra Vinay Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging an arbitral award. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court examined Section 34 and concluded that the petitioner indeed …
Harbhajan Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an arbitral award. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court examined Section 34 and concluded that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Hansraj Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (respondent No.2) to decide his application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to register a sale/sub‑lease deed for Plot C‑519. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Chaudhary filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to decide his application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to execute a sale/sub‑lease deed for a plot in NRI City. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision in Civil Appeal …
Mrs. Abha Chaudhary filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to decide her application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to register a sale deed for a plot in NRI City. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision (Civil Appeal No.11052 of 2025) …
The petitioner, Sakeel Ahmad Khan, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition alleged issues related to betterment or improvement charges, but the record showed that no such demand had been raised. The court examined …
The petitioner, Smt. Lokesh, was allotted Plot No. VL-51 by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA) which was later cancelled on 10 February 2025 on the ground that the land had been re‑allotted to other tenure‑holders. The petitioner challenged the cancellation and the …
The petitioner, Anand Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that it should be dismissed as not pressed and that the petitioner may file a fresh petition later. The State …
The petitioners, Jitendra Dhar Dwivedi and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the pendency of the petition, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal …
Petitioners Pradeep Kumar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because a charge-sheet had been filed in the underlying criminal case. The court examined this submission and found …
The petitioners, Madina Masjid and another, challenged a notice dated 20 July 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA) ordering demolition of constructions on a 0.1940‑hectare plot where the Masjid stands. They sought certiorari to quash the notice and …
The petitioner, Brijraj Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. (respondent No. 3) to upload his new caste certificate on the E‑District website in place of the old 1988 manual certificate, and also to decide his representation dated 18‑08‑2026 within the stipulated …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the railway authorities to pay compensation for land on which a railway track was constructed without formal acquisition. The State Government had issued a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 establishing a District …
The petitioner alleged that certain lands were taken over without proper acquisition, referencing an acquisition that occurred in 1976, but failed to specify the date of possession. The respondent argued that the claim was stale and should have been raised in the year of acquisition, relying on the …
Petitioner Niranjan Singh filed a writ petition alleging inaction on a representation he had made to the Commissioner of Police, Commissionarate, Ghaziabad. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh, argued that the appropriate forum for deciding the representation was the District …
The petitioners' land was acquired by the National Highways Authority of India under the National Highways Act, 1956 and a compensation award was made, but no rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) award was issued as required by the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency …
Petitioners Prateek Dev and five others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to release their land in Village Manchna, Mainpuri, which had been earmarked for acquisition under a government order dated 06‑03‑2025 for a bypass project, or to pay compensation as …
The petitioners, Rabal Singh and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The Standing Counsel for the State and the counsel for …
Petitioner Zeeshan Ahmad Fareed filed a writ petition seeking to quash a show‑cause notice issued under Section 27(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, and to restrain the demolition of Mustafa Masjid, invoking Supreme Court directions in In Re: Directions in the matter …
The Aims Green Avenue Welfare Association filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39073 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that the petition contained mistakes and …
The petitioners, Sandeep and four others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to allot them 10% of developed Abadi land as per a 2011 Full Bench order in Gajraj v. State of U.P., and additionally 4% …
The petitioner, Smt Nirmala Devi, filed a writ petition challenging an appellate order dated 12 May 2026 passed under Section 27(2) of the U.P. Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973. The respondent authorities argued that the petitioner could seek a revision before the State Government. The Court, …
The petitioners, owners of plot no. 266‑Kha (2.47 acres), alleged that the State of U.P. and other respondents were illegally dumping seized and abandoned vehicles on their land. They filed a writ petition seeking an injunction to stop the dumping. The Court examined the records and held that the …
The petitioners, Green View Heights Apartment Owners, filed a writ petition challenging a complaint dated 18 July 2025 filed against the Ghaziabad Development Authority and others. The respondents informed the Court that the complaint had been adjudicated and an order was passed on 15 July 2026, a …
The petitioner, Mustkin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief pending the filing of a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the filing of the charge-sheet rendered the writ petition …
The petitioners, Dilshad and ten others, challenged the appointment of a specific individual as a fair price shop agent, alleging impropriety. They filed a public interest litigation seeking to set aside the appointment. The petition relied on Clause 13(3) of the U.P. Essential Commodities …
Arjun Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of an alleged encroacher (respondent No.5) from Gaon Sabha land (Gata No.90). The State of U.P. and six other respondents opposed the relief, arguing that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue …
Arun Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of alleged encroachers (respondents 4‑10) from three plots of Nagar Palika land (Plot Nos. 2091, 2261 and 1932). The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Nagar Palika, contended that the petitioner could obtain …
The petitioner, Sachchidanand Verma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents (the State of U.P. and the Azamgarh Development Authority) to decide a pending case (No/AZDA/ANI/2024/0000750, State vs Renu Verma) and his application dated 16‑02‑2026 expeditiously. The petitioner …
The petitioners challenged a demolition order dated 2 December 2021 that was preceded by a final notice on 31 July 2021 and a subsequent notice on 13 August 2021. They argued that the Prayagraj Development Authority’s inaction from 2021 to 2026 amounted to a waiver of the notice and the order, and …
Petitioner Rekha Bhati filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA) to decide on her application for transfer of allotment rights of a residential plot in favor of a third party, Subhash Chandra, and also sought direction to the …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) to execute a lease‑back deed for their 0.1150‑hectare share of plot No.152M, to prevent any allotment of that share to others, to protect their possession, and to consider a representation …
The petitioner, Sandeep Titoriya, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court alleging that he represented the aggrieved public. The court was asked to determine whether the petitioner had the requisite standing to file the writ and whether the petition was pressed. Counsel …
The petitioner, Najare Alam, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division to decide on a representation dated 9 July 2026 and to ensure deposit of Employees Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees State Insurance (ESI) contributions for …
Petitioner Smt. Sunita filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38281 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The counsel for Greater Noida and the standing counsel also expressed no objection to the …
Shashank filed a public interest litigation alleging that private individuals had encroached upon Gaon Sabha land in Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner sought the High Court's intervention to stop the encroachment. The Court examined whether it could entertain the petition or whether the petitioner had …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the NOIDA Authority and related officials to demolish an unauthorised construction on Plot D‑07, Sector 40, Noida, and to restrain further violations of the sanctioned building plan. They also requested inspection, measurement, and enforcement …
The petitioners, Vikram Singh and nine others, challenged a 21‑April‑2022 order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer that rejected their application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the ground that it was filed 14 days after the award was passed. They relied on a prior …
Petitioners Lila Singh and another challenged the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer dated 21‑04‑2022 which rejected their application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the ground that it was filed 14 days after the prescribed period. They relied on a prior decision …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23.05.2025 that gave rise to a criminal case under sections 352, 351(1) and 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Both parties later informed the court that they had entered into a compromise and a matrimonial alliance. The …
The petitioners, including Guddi Devi, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 24‑05‑2025 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. They contended that they are adults who voluntarily married each other and that Guddi Devi's age was incorrectly …
Petitioners Naresh Kumar and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They later moved an application seeking dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The Standing Counsel for the respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court examined the application, noted the lack of …
The petitioners' land was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and they received compensation, but no rehabilitation and resettlement award under the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, …
The petitioner, Vishwanath Singh, sought restoration of a kiosk allotment originally granted in 1988 after it was cancelled in January 2025 for non‑payment of a premium that had accrued to Rs. 2,52,374.55. He also requested that the authority consider his application under the One‑Time Settlement …
Balwan Sing filed a review application challenging an order dated 24 April 2026 in Writ‑C No.10711 of 2026. The High Court examined the petition and observed that the applicant had approached the Court belatedly. Relying on several Supreme Court decisions, the Court held that the delay precluded any …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the respondent Awas Vikas Parishad to restrain the sale and construction on agricultural land (plot no. 193, 0.534 hectare) and to prevent interference with possession. A parallel civil suit (Original Suit No. 306 of 2005) was already pending for the same …
The petitioner claimed that plot no. C/84 in Ghaziabad was allotted to him but possession was not handed over, prompting a District Consumer Forum order directing the Ghaziabad Development Authority to refund his deposits with 12% interest. The Authority allegedly continued demanding additional …
Shyamsundar Singh, a recorded tenure holder of two plots in Deoria, challenged the compensation awards dated 16‑02‑2024 and the supplementary award dated 10‑07‑2024 issued by the Additional District Magistrate under Section 3‑G of the National Highways Act, 1956. He contended that the mandatory …
The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Union of India to pay compensation for Arazi No. 472, alleging a right over the land. The State Government had issued a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 providing that such claims be examined by a District Level Committee for compensation under the …
Petitioners Dilip Kumar Gupta and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 08‑07‑2026 in the case of Vitula Devi v. Dilip Kumar Gupta & Ors., and a mandamus directing the National Highway Authority of India not to disburse …
The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the State respondents, particularly respondent No.2, to pay compensation for their land that became unusable after submergence caused by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam. They relied on a prior coordinate bench decision (Writ‑C No.25521 of 2022) which …
The petitioner, Ms. Kusum Bhati, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. The respondents objected, arguing that a petition cannot be filed merely against a notice. The Court accepted the respondents' preliminary objection, directing …
The petitioners, M/s KMP Industries, challenged a notice dated 23 June 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation, arguing that it was contrary to the Uttar Pradesh Warehousing and Logistics Policy, 2018 and a Government Order of 23 July 2020. The respondents contended …
The petitioner’s land was acquired for widening a road to an airport, and he agreed to sell the land for Rs. 77,04,330 and his house for Rs. 1,47,212. After the acquisition, possession was taken and the house was demolished. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking compensation, alleging that …
Petitioner Bhure Ali challenged two notices dated 10 July 2026—one issued under the Uttar Pradesh (Regulation of Building Operations) Act, 1958 and another under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006—seeking demolition of his house. The petitioner argued that the State must give him notice and …
The petitioner, Raghunath, sold a parcel of land to respondent No.3 under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, intending to transfer only 0.0426 hectare. He alleges that an additional 0.0970 hectare was taken without his …
The petitioners claimed that their agricultural land was rendered unusable after being submerged by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam and sought a mandamus directing the State to pay compensation and decide their application dated 20‑02‑2026 within a stipulated period. They relied on a prior …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State and a district level committee to pay compensation for land submerged by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam and to decide their compensation application within a stipulated period. They relied on a prior coordinate bench decision …
The petitioners sought compensation after an award was passed under the National Highways Act, 1956. A notice dated 01‑04‑2016 required them to submit certain documents to the Prescribed Authority, but the record did not show whether they complied. The Court directed the petitioners to furnish all …
Petitioners Arvind Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The State filed a charge-sheet in the matter, after which the petitioners' counsel, Abhay Kumar Singh, moved that the petition be dismissed as it was no longer pressed. The …
The petitioners, Ramdev and ten others, filed a writ petition seeking that their representation/objection dated 13 March 2026 be considered by the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) of Tehsil Pindra, District Varanasi. They requested the court to direct the SDO to decide the matter. The court, without …
The petitioner, M/s Unnati Udyog Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered the submission and found no merit in proceeding further. No substantive …
The petitioner, Smt. Rajeshwari Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Housing Commissioner of U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad to decide a representation dated 25 March 2026 concerning the mutation of property records for Plot No. 14, Phase II, Navasheel Dham, Bithoor. The …
The petitioner, Omwati Widow, challenged a demolition order dated 3 April 2026 issued by the Noida Authority. The respondents argued that the appropriate remedy was a revision petition under Section 41(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, as empowered by Section 12 of …
The petitioners, Kashmira Singh and six others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Amit Kumar, prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed and sought liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents did not object to the …
Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking compensation for their land parcels, which they claim fall under the Uttar Pradesh Land Pooling Policy, but have been in possession of the Aligarh Development Authority since 2019 for a transport project. The Authority contended that the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During proceedings, counsel for the petitioners identified procedural defects in the petition. They requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, while also seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The standing …
The petitioner, Madhusudan Yadav, complained that a road was being cut through his land to provide access to the house of Bhanu Pratap Yadav. The High Court observed that the dispute is essentially factual and therefore beyond the scope of writ jurisdiction. It noted that a civil suit (Original Suit …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State authorities to consider their pending land acquisition grievance applications, conduct fresh joint measurement of their land, reassess and pay fair compensation, and restrain demolition of their residence. The State argued …
The petitioner applied for a unit under a 5,000‑dwelling Residential Housing Scheme that was to be allotted by lottery, and the draw was held on 10 July 2018. He sought confirmation of his selection through a Right to Information (RTI) request but received no response, and subsequently approached …
The petitioner, Umesh Prasad Chaurasiya, a recorded tenure holder of a plot in Deoria, challenged an award dated 16‑02‑2024 passed by the Additional District Magistrate under Section 3‑G of the National Highways Act, alleging that no notice inviting objections was published as required by Section …
The petitioners, recorded tenure holders of two small plots in Deoria, challenged a supplementary award dated 20‑07‑2024 that determined compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956. They contended that the award was passed without the mandatory notice required by Section …
The petitioners, Mehtab Alam and another, claimed that their land became unusable due to the construction of an expressway and that the Uttar Pradesh Expressways Industrial Development Authority (UPEIDA) had ordered on 7 August 2025 to provide them an alternative plot, which had not been …
The petitioners, Aakansha Bahuguna and three others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners moved that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The standing counsel for the respondents did not oppose this request. The …
The petitioner, Hansraji, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to investigate alleged illegal construction of a road (Rasta) on his land, to hear his objections, and to provide compensation if the land was acquired unlawfully. He also requested expedited consideration of his …
M/s Sun International Limited filed a writ petition challenging the finalization of a bid by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). The petitioners sought relief, but the respondent counsel informed the court that the bid had already been finalized, eliminating any pending cause of …
The petitioners, Hira Singh Rawat and 48 others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to execute a sublease deed for flats in Greater Noida and to decide a representation dated 27.07.2026 within a stipulated time. They also sought costs and any other appropriate relief. …
The petitioner, M/s Tridev Enterprises, entered into an agreement with the State of U.P. to capture stray animals on the Bundelkhand Expressway and subsequently claimed Rs.89,17,448. When the amount was not paid, the petitioner filed a writ petition and also submitted a representation on 5 June 2026 …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Nevatia, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 7814 of 2021) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Subsequently, the petitioner's counsel submitted an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the …
The petitioner, M/s Svarrnim Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition (Writ No. 31488 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later expressed a desire not to pursue the petition and applied for its withdrawal. The respondent State of U.P. and others, through their counsel, …
The petitioner, Smt. Samundari Devi, challenged an order dated 23.07.2026 directing demolition of a structure on Plot No. 215 in Greater Noida, alleging that no prior notice was given. The respondents, the State of U.P. and the Greater Noida Authorities, contended that the demolition order itself …
The petitioner, Dev Narayan Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the removal of a poultry farm operated by respondents 5 and 6, alleging severe pollution, and also sought an order compelling the District Magistrate to decide his complaint within a fixed period. The court …
The petitioners filed an online mutation application with the Kanpur Development Authority on 28 June 2022 (Computer ID No.124130) and alleged that it had not been decided. They approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction for the Authority to decide the application. The respondents, …
The petitioner, Smt. Umesh Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently sought to withdraw it, intending to file a fresh petition with the correct parties. The respondent State of U.P. and two other respondents, through their counsel, raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Jain, received a notice for non‑payment of water‑connection installation charges and paid the amount under protest, claiming that only one connection was provided and the charge for a second connection was erroneous. He filed a representation on 1 July 2026 seeking …
Bhagat Singh filed a revision petition under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, seeking a speedy decision. The respondents agreed that the revision should be decided expeditiously. The Court, without examining the merits, directed that the revision be decided as soon …
The petitioners sought the quashing of a building permission and No Objection Certificate granted to private respondents for land that allegedly lies within a prohibited highway safety buffer zone, and also demanded mandamus directing the District Magistrate to decide a restoration application and …
The petitioner sought to quash a notification acquiring his land in Rehra village, to set aside a circle‑rate list that omitted his property, and to compel the Collector and the acquiring authority to revise the circle rate and award compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1989. Relying on the …
The petitioner, Ranjana Goswami, paid money on behalf of Sardar Manohar Singh to the Varanasi Development Authority and sought the execution of a sale deed either in her name or in the name of Sardar Manohar Singh, but the Authority failed to act. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar Chauhan, complained that his neighbour (respondent No.6) was polluting the atmosphere and dumping garbage on his land. He filed a complaint with the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) on 10 November 2025, which issued a notice to the respondent on 22 November …
The petitioners, GS Express Ltd., challenged the declaration of Respondent No.7 as the L‑1 bidder and technically qualified in Tender No. YEA/GM(P)/2026/495, alleging procedural irregularities, improper consideration of subcontractor experience, and incorrect bid capacity calculations. They sought …
The petitioners, who are existing street vendors, applied for vending shop allotments under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014, but the Noida Development Authority failed to issue licenses or allotment letters despite completing surveys and selection. The petitioners filed a writ petition …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Varanasi to consider their grievance and decide an application dated 20‑05‑2026 within a stipulated time. The State respondents pointed to a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 which provides that such claims should be …
The petitioners purchased flats from OMEX Company based on a brochure promising that 60% of the land would be used for sports and recreational facilities. The builder later sought to convert the land for commercial purposes, prompting the petitioners to submit a representation to the Greater Noida …
M/s Star Brick Industries, operating a brick‑kiln, sought renewal of its Consolidated Consent to Operate under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The consent, originally valid until 31 July 2026, was revoked on 19 August 2025 for alleged non‑compliance, but the revocation was …
Manorama Tripathi filed a writ petition alleging that Plot Nos. 238‑Ka and 238‑Kha in Village Bhaluhi Madaripatti were taken over by respondents without any acquisition process or compensation. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy under a Government Order …
Raju @ Rajesh filed Criminal Appeal No. 1583 of 1985 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as recorded in an office report dated 8 September 2026 based on the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s report. The court was required to consider …
The appellant, Ekhlaq, filed a criminal appeal but died on 11 April 2018. The court received an office report confirming his death and noted that no relative filed an application for substitution. Since the appellant was deceased and no substitution was made, the appeal could not proceed. The court …
The petitioner, Md Oqais Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26-07-2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4), 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …
The petitioners, Khajan Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 06‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 420 and 120B of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited their relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. …
Madhur Srivastav filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 19 July 2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the SC/ST Act, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held …
Vipin Bansal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1965. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the Code of Criminal …
Petitioner Sandeep Soni sought to quash an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 filed under sections 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it …
Jugendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 07‑08‑2026 (Case Crime No. 0190 of 2026) that alleged offences under sections 74, 76, 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner later limited his relief to protection under …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 09.03.2026, registered under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S, alleging false implication. The respondent State argued that a cognizable offence was disclosed and interference was not warranted. The Court …
Gautam Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 74 and 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The petitioners, Mithlesh Yadav @ Dada and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 110, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While initially asking for …
The petitioners, Rajkapoor and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 08‑07‑2026 under sections 74, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …
Ajay Kumar Gautam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2020 that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 504 IPC. While the original prayer was to set aside the FIR, the petitioner later limited relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC and …
Harilal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 under Sections 2, 3 and 5 of the Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984. During the hearing he limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Tetarbe filed a writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 16‑09‑2018 that alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 120‑B. The relief was later limited to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC. The Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a cognizable …
Petitioner Dhirendra Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The police had already forwarded a charge sheet, and the petitioner’s counsel, Ram Krishna Yadav, requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Additional Government …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 12‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4), 333, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While the petition later limited its relief to protection under section 35 of the …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 14‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 191(1), 316(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petition was later limited to a request for protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 191(1), 316(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioners limited their relief to protection under section …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 351(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioners limited their relief to protection under section 35 of …
Anurag Goyal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 08‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to a protection order under …
Adarsh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 14‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 352, 352(3), 79 and 67 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under section 35 of the same …
Petitioner Ravindra Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 02‑03‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 318(4), 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66C of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The relief was later limited to protection …
The petitioner sought to quash an FIR dated 14‑07‑2026 under sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, relying …
Mayank Bhatnagar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑07‑2026 under Section 316(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR, found that it …
The petitioners, Munna Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The police had forwarded a charge sheet in the matter, and the learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the court that the petition was no longer required. The …
Petitioner Aadhar Choudhary filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 31.07.2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The Court examined the …
Petitioners Mohd. Tasleem and others filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(2), 336(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. While initially asking for the FIR to be set aside, the petitioners later limited their …
Petitioners Dular Khan and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 61(2), 217, 229(2), 301 and 356(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. While the original prayer was …
Ajay Kumar Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 23.08.2026 that gave rise to Case Crime No.0132 of 2026 under sections 125, 351(3) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under section …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. After the charge sheet was submitted, the petitioners’ counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to …
Suraj Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The police subsequently submitted a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case. Upon learning of the charge-sheet, the petitioner's counsel, Brajesh Kumar Singh, moved that the writ petition be dismissed as …
The petitioner, Ravi Pratap, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a final report in the matter had been submitted. Both the petitioner’s counsel, Atul Kumar, and the respondent’s …
Rohit Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 4‑8‑2026 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 35 of the …
Manoj Kumar Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to recover his lost motorcycle, associated money and documents, and to compel the respondent to decide his representation dated 11 June 2026. The petitioner alleged that the motorcycle …
Petitioner Rajendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The State of U.P. and others filed a charge-sheet, after which the petitioner's counsel, Vijay Tripathi, moved that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court considered that …
The petition filed by minor Rishu Tiwari @ Shashwat Tripathi sought to quash an FIR dated 21‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The petitioner later limited relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC and Section 35 of the Bharatiya …
The petitioners, Firdaus and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 12 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under section …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed against the petitioners. The petitioners' counsel then prayed for dismissal of the writ petition on …
The petitioner, Jitendra Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but after being informed that the charge sheet had been submitted, he requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, reserving the right to pursue any other legal remedy. The respondent State of …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Goswami filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑02‑2026 under sections 125(b) and 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under section 41‑A of the CrPC and section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The petitioners, Tara Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after a charge sheet was submitted in their case. They later moved the court to dismiss the writ petition as not pressed, indicating they might seek other legal remedies. The respondent …
The petitioners Kanhai and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16 July 2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the SC/ST Act. During the hearing they limited their relief to a protection order under section 35 of …
The petitioner R.K. Verma sought to quash an FIR dated 26 June 2026, registered under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and later limited the relief to protection under Section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, …
Petitioners Smt Pooja and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a final report had been submitted. Both the petitioners' counsel and the respondent's counsel agreed that the …
Rakesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR, found …
The petitioners, Anuj Kumar Pandey and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 04‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 75, 76, 333 of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. During the hearing the petitioners …
Petitioners Kapil Dhama and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26 July 2026 that alleged offences under sections 351(2), 352, 351(3) and 351(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While initially seeking quashal, they later limited their relief to …
Nirmala Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20500 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against her. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a charge sheet had been submitted in the underlying criminal case. On this …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 08.08.2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the SC/ST Act, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the B.N.S. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, citing Supreme …
Petitioners Imran and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered on 10‑08‑2026 under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya …
Petitioners Ashok Yadav and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 7‑8‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 351(3), 304 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under …
The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR dated 15 June 2026, registered under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging false implication. The State argued that the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence. The Court examined the FIR and, relying on …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but their counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had already been filed in the underlying case and therefore they did not wish to pursue the writ further. The court accepted this position and dismissed the writ …
The case arose from a violent incident on 14‑02‑1985 in Mainpuri where a group of accused, led by Havaldar Singh, attacked Kunji Lal, his companions and killed Mulaim Singh by firing guns. Kunji Lal, an injured eyewitness and brother of the deceased, gave oral information that led to an FIR and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that once a …
Petitioner Jitendra Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 925 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the charge sheet had already been filed and that no further judicial order was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioner, Mohammad Hanif, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …
The petitioners Vimal Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, as …
In a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed by Vimal S Lal, the petitioner sought relief despite a charge sheet having been submitted. The petitioner’s counsel argued that no further order was necessary after the charge sheet filing. The respondents did not contest this position. The Court …
The petitioner, Kiran, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the Court that the police had already submitted a charge sheet after completing the investigation. The …
The petitioner, Mayank Rawat, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings after a charge sheet was filed. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the submission of the charge sheet rendered any further judicial intervention unnecessary. The respondents, the State of U.P. …
Petitioners Anjana Jadaun and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that a final report in the matter had already been submitted and no further order was necessary. The court …
The appellant Mahipal was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution alleged that Mamta, the deceased, was killed by her in‑laws and husband over dowry demands, presenting witnesses who described throttling and a ligature …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The High Court observed that once a …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's learned AGA appeared. The court noted that the charge-sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioner Sanjay Ram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11‑05‑2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioner, Harikesh Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that the filing of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioner, Nuzul Akhtar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed …
The petitioners, Padamveer Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, appeared before the court. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …
The petitioner, Akanksha Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed that …
The petitioner, Sandeep Tiwari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners, Smt. Pooja and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the …
Praveesh Kuzhipally filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR registered against him. The State of Uttar Pradesh and four others filed a charge‑sheet, and the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police confirmed its filing on 11‑May‑2026. The …
The petitioner, Mohd. Tariq, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Director General of …
Petitioners Dinesh Maurya and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been …
The petitioners Arjun Prasad and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the police had already …
