Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SIDDHARTHA VARMA

604 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600

PUSHPARAJ AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …

BOD SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

MRITUNJAY JAI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mritunjay Jai Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a charge-sheet, which was reflected in an office report dated 4 May 2026. The Court noted that …

BABU SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

JAWAHAR LAL AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jawahar Lal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …

SHIVAM AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivam and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the police had …

OM PRAKASHversusState of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Om Prakash filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The petition was heard after the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the police, as per the legal cell report dated 4 May 2026. The court noted that the petition sought to quash the …

SMT. KALAWATI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Kalawati and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already …

POOJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Pooja and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

SMT. ARCHANA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Archana Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against her. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the police had already submitted the charge-sheet in the case. The court held that since the charge-sheet was filed, the writ …

KALEEM KHANversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Kaleem Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call, but the petitioner was not present while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the …

IMRAN ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Imran Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already …

JUBAIR ALAM AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The High Court noted that the filing of the charge …

MAHENDRA SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Mahendra Singh and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the …

DILSHAD @ DILLA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been …

CHIRAG RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Chirag Rawat filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The court examined an office report dated 2 May 2026 which confirmed that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

BOBBY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that the …

SHIVPUJAN @ MODH. UMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Shivpujan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report …

LOVKUSH @ RAMACHARYA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Lovkush @ Ramacharya Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEY @ SANTOSH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 02.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

SHIWAM @ ASHUTOSH DUBEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Shiwam @ Ashutosh Dubey and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

KM. NAJIS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the petitioners. The Court noted that the filing …

SHIVANI MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivani Mishra and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the police had …

RANJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Ranjeet filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed …

SATISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satish Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in the …

NAFEES AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director …

BAJRANG LAL HARIRAM TIBREWALA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Bajrang Lal Hariram Tibrewala and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that the police had already submitted a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal …

VIJAY KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The High Court noted that the police had already filed a charge sheet, as per a report dated 2 May 2026. Since the charge sheet was on record, the court held that the petition, which sought to …

SONU YADAV @ RAJESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sonu Yadav (alias Rajesh Yadav), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 …

DEEPAK AND ANOTERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The …

SAHAB KHAN @ SAHABUDDIN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02‑05‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

MANIRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Maniram and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the …

UDAI PRAKASH PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …

SUSHILA DEVI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

ANITA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Anita Katiyar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by counsel. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as …

RAJESH PANDEY @ SONU PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SACHENDRA SINGH YADAV @ SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sachendra Singh Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5596 of 2023) challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

SACHIN @ SONU TIWARI AND AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court examined an office report dated 2 May …

DEVENDRA PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Devendra Pal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court …

HEMENDRA SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

VIRENDRA MAURYA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …

HANS NATH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge sheet …

DEEPAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepak Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5345 of 2022) in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court …

RAJIYA BEJUM AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajiya Bejum and six others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

VIJENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijendra Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been …

ABDUL RAHMAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

In Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5603 of 2022, Abdul Rahman and five others filed a petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petitioners were not present at the hearing, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court examined a …

AAKANKSHA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police. The Court observed that …

MUMTAZ BEGAUM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mumtaz Begaum and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, opposed the petition. The court examined an office report dated 02 May 2026 indicating that the charge sheet …

BIJENDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Akash filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against him. The petition was heard before a division bench of the Allahabad High Court, with counsel Vishnu Shankar Mishra representing the petitioner and G.A. for the State. The court noted …

AJAY KATIYAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court …

SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that, per a report dated 02‑05‑2026, the charge sheet in the matter had …

JAYANT GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that once a charge sheet is filed, …

SYED MOHAMMAD AJAJUL HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …

SMT KIRAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Kiran Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police's Legal Cell, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been …

DHIRAJ SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Dhiraj Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5355 of 2025) in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others, opposed the petition. The petition was heard in the …

SURAJ PASWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Suraj Paswan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court …

MAHESH PRASAD RAJAK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mahesh Prasad Rajak and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against the …

SURJEET SINGH @ BILLAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Surjeet Singh (Billar Singh), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the …

BHAGWAN PASWAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR, alleging impropriety. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed against the …

MAHENDRA JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners Mahendra Jaiswal and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating …

ALOK KUMAR DUBEY AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Alok Kumar Dubey and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, were represented by the Additional Government Advocate. The High Court examined the office …

JADUNATH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

MOHAN SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohan Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging the registration of an FIR by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet in the matter, as indicated by a report from the Director …

SMT. PRACHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Prachi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed …

SHALIGRAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Shaligram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet, as indicated by a report dated 02.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SMT. ANU GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Anu Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge …

SHRI AMIT GARGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shri Amit Garg, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The High Court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed by the police, as per the report dated 02.05.2026. Since the charge sheet was on record, the Court held that the writ …

UMA SHANKAR AND 16 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police. The Court observed …

AMIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Amir and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 2 May 2026 …

NAFEES MISTRI ALIAS NAFEES KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nafees Mistri, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …

SMT. GUNJAN KUMARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the accused. The …

SWETA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners, Sweta and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, while the State's Advocate General was present. The Court noted the absence of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition …

ASIF NASEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

RAMESHWAR YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge sheet is filed, …

SHAHRUKH @ SHAHRUKH NIREMAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The court examined an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 which confirmed that the charge‑sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. …

BHIMSENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Bhimsen filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet had already …

ASIF NASEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet …

ASIF NASEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SWATANTRA RAJPOOT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

GURJEET DIWANversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gurjeet Diwan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a …

RAMU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …

HASEEN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet rendered …

MUNNA LAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Munna Lal and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the …

TALEWAR @ TALE SINGH AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …

KRISHNA CHAURASIA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court examined whether the petition could proceed given the …

SANGEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against her. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …

OM PRAKASH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director …

TIKA RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner Tika Ram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate appeared. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already …

DEVRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Devraj Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from …

SURYA KUMAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The High Court noted that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed, as per a report from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Police. Since the charge sheet was on record, the Court held …

DINESH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report from the …

BINEET KUMAR @ CHUNKAUNA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Bineet Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, opposed the petition. The court noted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a …

UPDESH SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Updesh Singh and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been …

GURU DUTT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Guru Dutt and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a charge sheet, as reflected in an office report dated 22‑04‑2026. The Court …

RAMPYARE YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rampyare Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by …

SAKSHI TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sakshi Tiwari and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet …

NARENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …

BRIJESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijesh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by …

ZAMIR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …

ASHU YADAV @ ASHISH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Ashu Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already …

YOGENDRA MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Yogendra Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already …

IKRA BI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ikra Bi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

BHUPENDRA @ SHAHENSHAH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director …

MANISH VARSHNEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing …

KHURSHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the …

PRADEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Pradeep filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report from …

MURARI ALIAS KRISHNA MURARIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Murari alias Krishna Murari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by counsel. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had …

BABU ALIAS BABULALversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Babu alias Babulal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already …

RAJEEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Rajeev filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the FIR registered against him. The petition was filed after the investigation had progressed and a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the police. The respondents, the State of …

NAUSHAD KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Naushad Khan and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Advocate General, opposed the petition. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had …

ASGAR HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Asgar Husain, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 …

RIZWAN AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rizwan Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in …

SMT. RAJANI SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Rajani Shakya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Director …

RAMPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …

AKASH TYAGI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Akash Tyagi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that …

MAMTA BAJPAYEE @ MAMTA TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mamta Bajpayee and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet …

SAHIL MAGGU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sahil Maggu and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in …

SURENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surendra Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by its Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in …

SAFI ULLAH @ NANKAU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Safi Ullah and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State submitted a charge sheet on 22 April 2026, as reflected in the legal cell’s report. The Court observed that the filing of the …

SAURABH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …

MOHD. ASIM AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd. Asim and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, appeared before the bench. The court noted that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed, as …

MUKESH KUMAR @ DR MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet …

TALIB AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Talib and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

GAURAV GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Gaurav Gupta and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the non‑submission of a charge sheet in the case. The petitioner’s counsel noted that the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P., had sent information that a charge sheet had been filed, …

RAKESH CHANDRA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Rakesh Chandra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

GOVIND NISHADversusState of UP AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Govind Nishad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner representation present. The court noted that the charge …

MOHD ISLAM RAJAversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Islam Raja, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, but the petitioner was not present while the State's counsel appeared. The court noted that a charge sheet had already been filed, …

SMT NISHA PARAVEEN AND ANOTHERversusState of UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Nisha Paraveen and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge …

PAPPU AND 5 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

SMT GUDIYA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Gudiya Devi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the …

ROHIT CHOUDHARYversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Rohit Choudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

ASHISH MOHANversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashish Mohan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that a charge sheet …

SURAJ MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Suraj Mishra and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

MAHENDRA YADAV AND 7 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …

SEEMA DEVIversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Seema Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against her. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that a charge sheet …

RAVIKANTversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a …

NASIR HUSSAINversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, represented by counsel Brijesh Kumar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The State, represented by G.A., submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already …

SMT SAPNA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking compliance with the filing of a charge sheet. The High Court noted that the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P., had sent information that a charge sheet had been filed, but the petitioner's counsel sought …

MAHTAB ALI AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet rendered …

ZULFUKAR AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Zulfukar Ahmad and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

SHAMEEM ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shameem Ansari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the …

SWARN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Swarn Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court examined a report dated …

ANKIT KUMAR KHANDELWAL AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, …

MUBARAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mubarak, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner counsel appearing and the State represented by an Additional …

KULDEEP AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the police. The Court noted that …

CONSTABLE DRIVER AMJAD KHANversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Constable Driver Amjad Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an AGA. The court noted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report from …

PRABHAVATI DEVI @ PRABHAVATI AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Prabhavati Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The High Court …

SAURABH @ SUNNY AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Saurabh @ Sunny and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The respondents, the State of UP and two others, submitted a charge sheet in the underlying criminal case. The petitioners' counsel argued that the filing …

SMT SANA KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Sana Khatoon and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

AMBUJ PANDEYversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ambuj Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

JITENDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge-sheet …

SMT.SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sunita Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …

RAM NEWAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that …

VINEET MISHRA @ BANTI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

RAMJAN ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ramjan Ali and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had …

MAYANK SONKAR @ SHEETUversusSTATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mayank Sonkar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General …

RAVI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court …

NARAYAN DASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Narayan Das, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, but the petitioner was not present while the State's counsel appeared. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as …

ASHWANI SAGAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …

SMT. RUKHSAR AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Rukhsar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Director General of …

MOHD ARIF AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

SHIV BAHADUR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the police had already …

SMT. ANJALI SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, through the Director General of Police's Legal Cell, submitted a report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The …

SANIYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Saniya and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed …

AVDESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Avdesh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised list before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court examined …

SMT. SRISHTI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Srishti and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State of U.P. submitted a charge‑sheet, and the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police reported that the charge‑sheet had been filed. The …

GAURAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. The Court …

SUHAIL AHMAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Suhail Ahmad and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the …

MANISH KASHYAP AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Manish Kashyap and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet …

RAJEEV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 16‑04‑2026 from the Director General of …

ANURAG TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Anurag Tiwari filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The High Court examined a report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. The Court held that once a charge‑sheet is filed, a writ petition seeking to quash the …

X (JUVENILE)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

A juvenile petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 16‑04‑2026. The …

RAVI KULSHRESHTHA @ RAVI KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that …

SMT. MAMTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Mamta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of …

MOHD WASEEM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

ABHILAKH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Abhilakh Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑April‑2026 indicating that the …

VIKAS SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vikas Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet in the matter, as indicated by the report from the Director General of Police, U.P. The …

SANTOSH VARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Santosh Varma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a …

PREM CHAND PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State submitted a report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court examined whether a writ petition questioning the FIR could be entertained after the …

SATYA DEV GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against them. The State submitted a charge‑sheet, as reflected in a report dated 16 April 2026. The petition sought to quash the FIR after the charge‑sheet had been filed. The Court observed that once a …

LAV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court examined a report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating …

USMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Usman filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's AGA was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet in the case had already been filed, …

SMT. RANVIRI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Ranviri and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted …

RAJWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajwant Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SHAILENDRA SINGH & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Shailendra Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet …

BADAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioners Badan Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. The Court …

HARIDWAR SINGH AND 5 OTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

RAJESH AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the …

SMT SWATI AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Swati and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the …

SMT VAISHALI AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt Vaishali and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already …

RAKESH SHARMA AND 5 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Rakesh Sharma and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16-04-2026 indicating that …

SMT. SAVITA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Savita Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …

SAURABH SINGHversusState of UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

HARSHIT GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that once a charge‑sheet is filed, the …