Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
47 judgments · newest first · showing 1–47
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a compensation award of Rs.12,573 made by the land acquisition officer, seeking to enforce a higher award of Rs.56,653 granted by the Joint District Judge, Nashik, in a land acquisition matter (Reference No. 98/1995). The issue was whether the lower award …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a land acquisition award granted to Smt. Yamunabai R. Jagtap, contending that the award of Rs. 9,952 was insufficient compared with the higher award of Rs. 26,870 ordered by the 6th Joint CJSD, Pune on 26 July 2000. The appeal was listed as a meagre‑value …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the award granted to Shankar Manglu Vadgaonkar in a land acquisition matter, contending that the amounts awarded by the acquisition officer (Rs.12,573) and the Joint District Judge (Rs.56,653) were inappropriate. The appeal was listed among other first …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a land acquisition award to Murlidhar Ganpat Narale, contending that the compensation fixed by the acquisition officer (Rs. 6,240) was inadequate compared to the amount awarded by the Joint District Judge, Nashik (Rs. 28,080). The appeal involved a modest …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a land acquisition award granted to Motiram Ragho Fasale, challenging the amount awarded by the acquisition officer (Rs. 12,573) versus the higher sum awarded by the Joint District Judge, Nashik (Rs. 56,653). The appeal was listed among other first appeals involving …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a judgment awarding Bharati Kishor Thakkar Rs.21,600 in a land acquisition matter (Reference No.278/1993), contending that the award by the land acquisition officer of Rs.6,960 should stand. The High Court noted that the amounts involved were meagre and the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a land acquisition award granted to Shri Mohan Govind Shinde, contending that the compensation of Rs.2,531 awarded by the acquisition officer was insufficient compared to the Rs.18,497 awarded by the 6th Joint CJSD, Pune in a prior judgment dated August 5, 2000. The …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a land acquisition award granted to Hari Gopala, contending that the amounts awarded—Rs.2,524 by the acquisition officer and Rs.11,590 by the Joint District Judge—were incorrect. The appeal was listed among other small‑value matters, and the learned Additional …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal against a judgment of the Joint District Judge, Nashik, which awarded the respondent, Balwant Mukund Deshmukh, Rs.1,82,580 in a land‑acquisition matter (Reference No.103/1995). The acquisition officer had earlier fixed a much lower compensation of …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a land acquisition award to Murlidhar Ganpat Narale, contending that the compensation fixed by the acquisition officer (Rs. 6,240) was inadequate compared to the amount awarded by the Joint District Judge, Nashik (Rs. 28,080). The appeal involved a modest …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the compensation awarded in a land acquisition matter involving Kalu Aba Kilbile & Ors. The acquisition officer had awarded Rs.264, while the Joint District Judge had awarded Rs.1,42,060. The appeal was listed among other first appeals due to the small …
The Bombay High Court considered two interim applications filed by Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (the appellant) seeking condonation of a two‑year delay in filing an appeal and a stay of execution proceedings relating to an enhanced compensation order for land acquisition. The …
The Army Institute of Technology and other petitioners filed three writ petitions challenging actions of certain university officials, including two professors and the Chairman. Both sides agreed that the matters should be remanded for fresh proceedings before the university's Grievance Committee. …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the award granted to Kisan Gopala Deshmukh and others in a land acquisition matter (Reference No. 137 of 1995). The acquisition officer had awarded Rs. 15,679, whereas the jurisdictional District Judge had awarded Rs. 77,740. The appellant argued that the …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Kalwa filed a first appeal (No. 465 of 2026) against Chetana Raghupati Reddi and others, with a cross objection filed by the same appellant against Salubai Barku Thorat and another party. Several interim applications were also filed by the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a land acquisition award where the Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation at Rs. 25,250, while the jurisdictional reference court (11th Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Pune) had awarded Rs. 1,40,000. The appellant’s Additional Government Pleader (AGP) …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a compensation award of Rs. 7,650 granted by the District Judge, Nashik, in a land acquisition matter (Reference No. 55 of 1991), contending that the acquisition officer had awarded only Rs. 1,830. The learned Additional Government Pleader, noting the small …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the award of compensation granted to the heirs of the deceased Bhima Pandurang Chavan in a land acquisition matter. The acquisition officer had awarded Rs. 6,034, whereas the District Judge, Nashik, had awarded Rs. 24,954. The appellant sought a revision of …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the award of compensation in a land acquisition matter involving Dhondiram Bhau Hasan Naik and others. The acquisition officer had awarded Rs.5,200, whereas the District Judge had awarded Rs.23,400. The appellant argued that the lower court's award was …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a land acquisition award to the High Court, contending that the award of Rs. 1,877 by the acquisition officer was insufficient compared to the Rs. 8,030 awarded by the Joint District Judge, Nashik. The learned Additional Government Pleader expressed willingness to …
The High Court of Bombay, while reviewing an order dated April 2, 2026, discovered that the appearance of the petitioner had not been recorded. A praecipe was filed requesting correction of this omission. The Court ordered that the appearance of the petitioner be recorded as Ashwini Janardan …
The petitioners, owners of land parcels Gat No.28/1 and Gat No.30/1, challenged an order dated 31 October 2023 that directed matters concerning their lands. They alleged that the Gram Panchayat’s letters to the Tahsildar (June 27, 2022 and a withdrawal on July 14, 2022) did not mention their parcels …
The petitioner filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 20 February 2024. The court examined whether a valid arbitration agreement existed between the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a judgment involving Vishwanath Sahadu Bagul, but the respondent did not appear. The learned Advocate General for the State indicated willingness to accept the court’s orders given the small monetary value and prolonged delay. The court, noting the meagre …
The High Court of Bombay considered three interim applications filed in separate arbitration appeals where the applicants failed to appear. The respondents, represented by counsel, sought condonation of the delay in filing the appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. …
The petition filed by Bhartiya Kala Prasarani Sabha challenged a May 17, 2024 order of the Assistant Charity Commissioner that allowed the Commissioner to hear the petitioner's and respondents' applications concurrently. The petitioner argued that the two respondents were not members of the trust as …
The petitioners, owners of flat C‑12A in Sai Vihar Residency Condominium, carried out interior and façade alterations—including demolition of brick walls and installation of a French window—without the written permission required under the condominium’s bye‑law No.31(b) and the exterior‑change …
The petition challenged an order of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum that set aside a bill of Rs 6,00,650 raised against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) for arrears arising from an erroneous classification of its electricity connection as ‘industrial’ instead of the ‘commercial’ …
The petitioner, Gunaji Janu Dhawade, challenged a July 26, 2024 order that rejected his appeal against a November 13, 2021 order denying him statutory benefits because of inconsistencies in how his name appeared in various documents. He argued that the variations—such as Gunaji Janu Dhawade, Janu …
The appellants filed an appeal under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an earlier order. While the appeal was pending, an arbitral tribunal was constituted under Section 11 and subsequently seized of an application under Section 17. The parties agreed that the …
The petitioner filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator for disputes arising out of three related agreements. The first agreement (Work Order) named Aurangabad as the arbitration venue, while a later Memorandum …
The petitioners, Veena Govind Malu and others, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator for disputes arising under three agreements dated August and September 2020. The petitioners invoked the arbitration …
The petitioners, Veena Govind Malu and others, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator for disputes arising under three agreements dated August and September 2020. The petitioners invoked the arbitration …
The petition filed by Padamshi Kalyanji Gajra sought the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve a dispute with Sainath Kharbav Developers LLP. The court noted that two respondents were absent when the matter was first listed, leading to procedural delays. After hearing the parties, they agreed to …
The petitioner, Nashik Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate which had expired on 31 January 2026. The respondent, Managing Director of Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Shraddha Ganesh Pasalkar, filed a praecipe seeking correction of a clerical error in the Court's order dated 2 February 2026. The error involved the word "interim" in line 6 of paragraph 1, which the petitioner requested to be read as "impugned". The Court exercised its inherent …
The petition filed by M/s Zamil Construction India Pvt. Ltd. sought relief in an arbitration matter before the High Court of Bombay. The petition was listed under the caption “For Dismissal” but the petitioner failed to appear despite multiple listings. The Court noted the petitioner’s continued …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 7829 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court. The matter was listed under the caption “For Dismissal,” but the petitioners failed to appear before the court. The court noted the absence of the petitioners despite multiple listings. Consequently, the court …
The petitioner challenged an order of the Grievance Redressal Committee that denied him a rehabilitation unit under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 because he had not produced any document showing possession of the premises prior to 2016. The committee …
The writ petition filed by Naaz Asif Shaikh & Ors. was listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. No appearance was made by the petitioners despite the listing. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The order directs that any further actions be taken upon receipt of …
The Bombay High Court, acting suo motu, reviewed an order dated January 28, 2026, to correct a clerical error concerning the appearance of the respondents. The court, after a chambers review, directed that the respondent's counsel be correctly recorded as "Mr. R.S. Datar, for Respondents." The …
The petition concerned the entitlement of a deceased Assistant Professor, who completed his Ph.D. in 2016, to the pay scale of an Associate Professor after three years of service, as per the AICTE norms and a 2010 notification. The petitioner argued that the designation should be upgraded with the …
The petitioners filed a review petition (RPW No. 83 of 2026) against the order in Writ Petition No. 12071 of 2024. The learned advocate for the original petitioner was unavailable to appear. The petitioner requested an adjournment, and the court agreed to stand the matter over to August 27, 2026. …
The petition challenged an order of the Education Officer that placed Suresh Kashinath Jarkad senior to Madhuri Khandeshe and Ankush Taware under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Services) Rules, 1981. The core issue was the date on which each teacher entered Category “C” …
The Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation filed an interim application seeking to recall the High Court's order appointing a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The corporation argued that the original arbitration clause was invalid because the …
Hariom Projects Private Limited filed an arbitration appeal against the Union of India and others, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from their agreement. The High Court, after hearing the parties, directed that the status quo be maintained for two weeks and that the …
The petitioner filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator for disputes arising under a sale agreement dated 3 January 2021. The arbitration agreement was invoked on 25 September 2025, and the respondent did …
