Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
667 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The petitioner, Randhir Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.399/2025) alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault and attempted murder. He contended that the allegations were fabricated, no injury was recorded, and …
The petitioners, a group of residents from Surkhelpar village, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Rampravesh Nath Tiwari, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to …
The petitioners, three brothers named Sanjit, Uday and Anand Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a police case (No.258/2025) alleging assault and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in an assault on an …
The petitioner, Musaraf Hussain, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in Panapur P.S. Case No. 285 of 2025, where his sister‑in‑law was found dead by hanging. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others strangulated the victim, invoking Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. …
The petitioner, Vikash Jayswal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Excise P.S. Case No. 3339 of 2025, which involved the seizure of 1.620 liters of foreign liquor and the apprehension of five individuals. He asserted that he was neither the owner of the godown nor the liquor and had a clean …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kushwaha, was implicated in Excise Case No. 500 of 2025 for alleged offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, on the basis that a motorcycle he owned was used to transport 21 litres of liquor. He contended that he had merely lent the motorcycle to …
The petitioner, Nasiban Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bypass PS No. 599 of 2025) alleging offences under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 112 litres of …
The petitioner, Lal Mohan Yadav, was implicated in a case (Patliputra P.S. Case No. 556 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Amendment Act, 2022 after police recovered 55.60 litres of country‑made liquor from a garbage heap and two informants …
Ramayan Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 16.6 litres of liquor was seized, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had merely lent the motorcycle to Awadesh Paswan and had no involvement with the liquor, which was recovered …
Petitioner Bablu Sah, the former owner of a car from which 144 litres of foreign liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He contended that he had sold the vehicle before the alleged offence and that no …
The petitioner, Sonu @ Santosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 438 of 2022) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016, where police recovered 115.2 litres of foreign liquor and a co-accused named the petitioner. …
Manish Ratan, the owner of a four‑wheel vehicle, was implicated in a case (Guthani P.S. Case No. 179 of 2023) involving the seizure of 139.68 litres of foreign liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that the vehicle had been transferred to Md. Khurshid …
Petitioner Chhotu Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Katra P.S. Case No. 300 of 2025) under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated because the …
The petitioner, Mithun Kumar, feared arrest in a case (Sangrampur P.S. Case No.175 of 2025) alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for transporting 16.8 litres of country‑made liquor recovered from co‑accused Ankaj Kumar. He contended that …
Lalli Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly selling 26 litres of wine. The prosecution claimed that secret information linked the petitioner to the sale, while the petitioner …
Petitioner Bipin Kumar sought anticipatory bail after police seized 20 litres of Mahua liquor from a motorcycle he owned, alleging his involvement in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He contended that the bike was lent to a friend and he had no …
Deepa Kumari, the owner of a scooty, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 580 of 2024) for allegedly transporting 80 litres of country-made liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that she did not flee the scene, …
Aman Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after police seized 334.5 litres of English liquor and alleged that the liquor belonged to him. The petitioner argued that …
Petitioner Raghubir Kumar feared arrest in connection with PS‑Runnisaidpur Case No. 16 of 2026, registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 after police recovered 57.75 litres of whisky in a raid at an open field. He argued that he was falsely implicated, …
Vinay Paswan sought anticipatory bail after police recovered 20 litres of illicit country-made liquor from his residence in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He argued that he was falsely implicated because the house is jointly owned …
Petitioner Chandan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kankarbagh PS No.1074/2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, where 88 litres of illicit liquor were seized from an auto. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was being …
Krishna Das, accused under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly being involved in a firearm offence, applied for bail while in custody since 15‑04‑2025. The prosecution alleged that he and a co‑accused were on a motorcycle when police apprehended other suspects, and a loaded …
Nandu Rai, the petitioner, was in custody for offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 448, 201 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, arising from a shooting incident linked to a land dispute in Sahar. The prosecution’s case is based …
The petitioners, Shambhu Nath Choudhary and Amit Choudhary, had been granted anticipatory bail by the Patna High Court on 7 November 2025, subject to surrendering before the lower court within four weeks. They filed a petition seeking an extension of the surrender deadline, alleging they were unable …
The petitioner, Mahesh Yadav, had been granted provisional anticipatory bail on 12-12-2025 with a condition to surrender before the lower court within four weeks. He filed a petition seeking an extension of the surrender period due to unavoidable circumstances. The petitioner’s counsel argued that …
Ram Pukar Singh, the petitioner, had been acquitted by the trial court in a criminal case arising from PS Chenari, Rohtas. He subsequently filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel argued that, since the trial court had already acquitted him, the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 20‑03‑2024 of the Judicial Magistrate‑Ist Class‑Cum‑Additional Munsif, Begusarai, which had taken cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The trial in the underlying …
Raja Kumar petitioned for bail in Sessions Trial No. 138 of 2025 concerning an alleged kidnapping of a minor, charged under Section 140(2) of the B.N.S. Act. The prosecution’s case is based on a forced confessional statement, with the petitioner not named in the FIR, no incriminating material …
Sunil Mandal was arrested in connection with a case registered on 10 October 2021 alleging murder, attempt to murder, criminal conspiracy under Sections 302, 307, 120(B) of the IPC and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that Mandal, along with others, fired at the …
The petitioner, Suresh Kewat, was charged under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly demanding dowry and, when the demand was not met, strangling the informant's daughter to death. He has been in custody since 28 November 2022 and only one prosecution witness has been …
The petitioners, Alok Sahni and Anil Ram, were arrested in connection with a theft case (Section 395 IPC) arising from a 2012 police report. They were not named in the FIR; their names appeared only in the confessional statement of a co-accused and no incriminating material was recovered from them. …
The petitioners, Alok Sahni and Anil Ram, were arrested in connection with a theft case (Section 395 IPC) arising from a 2012 police report. They were not named in the FIR; their names appeared only in the confessional statement of a co-accused and no incriminating material was recovered from them. …
Reena Devi, a widow and sister‑in‑law of the complainant, filed an application to quash the cognizance order dated 04‑09‑2024 that had taken her into account under Sections 323 and 498A of the IPC. The complaint alleged dowry demands, assault and an attempt to kill, but the petitioner argued that …
Raju Sah petitioned the Patna High Court to quash the order of the Gopalganj Sessions Court that refused release of his seized truck, which contained 3.10 kg of ganja. The petitioner argued that the refusal was illegal because no confiscation proceeding under the NDPS Act had been initiated, relying …
The petitioner, Syed Zaki Anwar, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising out of PS case No.373 of 2021. He later sought the court’s permission to withdraw that application. The petitioner also requested that he be allowed to raise all points available to him at the time …
The petitioner, Md. Nawab Sajid Iqbal, filed an application seeking quash of FIR No.445/2023 registered under IPC Sections 116, 420 and 34 alleging demand of money in a land settlement context. The prosecution relied on a viral audio clip in which the petitioner was heard demanding Rs.50,000, and a …
The petitioners, Awadhesh Singh, Vijay Kumar Singh and Mira Devi, filed an application invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash the order of cognizance dated 29‑11‑2021 taken by a Judicial Magistrate in connection with an FIR that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian …
The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.317 of 2025) against the State of Bihar and Ramanand Singh. The petition was pending before the Patna High Court. On 12-02-2026, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court, …
The petitioners – Jay Prakash Sharma, his son Osho and Binod Kumar Chaubey – were charged under IPC sections 323, 341, 379 and 34 following a complaint by former security guard Ambika Rai alleging assault, theft and intimidation. The petitioners contended that the complaint was filed in retaliation …
The petitioner, Ranvir Kumar @ Rana Yadav, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous case pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner requested that, if allowed to withdraw, she be granted the liberty to raise all points available to her at the time of …
Mahadeo Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous petition arising out of a 2019 rape case. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Pramod Kumar, sought to withdraw the application while reserving the right to raise the same points later. The State, represented by Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, opposed the …
The petitioner, Jayram Singh, filed an application in the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous petition. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nafisuzzoha, requested the court's permission to withdraw. The court granted the permission to withdraw the application. …
The Patna High Court considered an application for bail by Raj Kumar Yadav, who is in custody for a 2010 robbery (IPC Section 395) involving the theft of money and a mobile phone from a van driver. The prosecution alleged that he had evaded the authorities for more than two years before being taken …
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Rahul Kumar, who is in custody for an alleged mobile‑snatching offence charged under Section 304(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case is based on the confession of a co‑accused, while the defence argued that the …
The petitioner, Sameer Singh, was arrested in connection with a murder case (S.T. No. 439 of 2025) involving the killing of an informant's father and charged under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was one of the co‑accused, while the …
The petitioner, Monu Kumar, who is in custody, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he murdered his wife and disposed of her body. He contended that his wife died of tuberculosis, that his confession was obtained by force, …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud case (Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 519 of 2025) and charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Information Technology Act, 2000. The prosecution alleged that two mobile phones and customer data recovered from the …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a fraud case alleging he duped an informant of approximately two crore rupees and impersonated an employee of the Food Corporation of India. He faces charges under IPC sections 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), 34 (common …
The petitioners, three young students, were arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S. Act alleging kidnapping of a minor girl. The father of the girl reported her missing, and the prosecution alleged the petitioners abducted her with intent to take …
Petitioners Aftab Ansari and Shamshad Ansari, who are in custody for alleged murder under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, sought bail. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused recorded seven …
The petitioner, Rahul Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case (Buniyadganj PS Case No. 296 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault and other violent crimes. He contended that his inclusion was false and stemmed from a property dispute, noting that the …
Petitioners Lakhindra Das and Raj Kishor Das, who were in custody for alleged assault and other offences under several sections of the B.N.S., filed a bail petition. They contended that the case was fabricated amid a land dispute with the informant, who had previously assaulted them, and asserted …
The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar Mourya, was in custody for offences under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, 1959, alleged to have fled the scene of a crime where a country‑made pistol and live cartridges were recovered. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating …
Shankar Kumar was arrested in connection with a tractor sale fraud alleged under multiple sections of the B.N.S., including offences relating to forgery, cheating and conspiracy. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner conspired with Mukesh Kumar to sell a tractor by falsifying its registration …
The petitioner, Satyendra Nut, who is in custody, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 305(a) of the B.N.S. concerning alleged theft of gold ornaments. The prosecution alleged that unknown persons entered the complainant's house and stole the ornaments, and the petitioner’s name …
The petitioner, Md. Jawed, was arrested after police intercepted his motorcycle and recovered 195.48 grams of smack, leading to charges under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated merely as the vehicle owner …
The petitioner, Sahil Kumar, was charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for a robbery allegedly involving the snatching of cash from a motorcycle at gunpoint. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR was initially lodged against unknown persons and no …
The petitioner, Rajan Kumar Gupta, was in custody for offences under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 27, 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, relating to the murder of an informant's son. The prosecution relied on the confessional statements of co‑accused, …
The petitioner, Santosh Sah, applied for regular bail in a case registered under the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 20.79 kg of ganja. He claimed false implication, lack of criminal antecedent, and inability to afford such a large quantity, asserting that the seizure list was fabricated. The …
The petitioner, Sahil Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) where cash was allegedly snatched from an informant. He applied for bail, arguing that he was falsely implicated and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed the bail on the ground …
Manu Singh was charged under IPC sections 323, 341, 307, 504, 506 and 34 for allegedly assaulting an informant with a lathi‑danda and iron rods. He applied for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that no specific overt act could be attributed to him, and that he has a clean antecedent. …
The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the application had become infructuous. The court, after considering the submission, held that the petition was no longer viable. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 317(3), 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly keeping a stolen motorcycle in his residence. The prosecution alleged that the motorcycle was recovered from the petitioner’s house during a raid, …
Munna Chauhan and his wife Pratima Devi, who are in custody, applied for bail in a case (Kateya P.S. Case No. 354 of 2024) alleging they assaulted and caused the death of an informant's mother, offences charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution claims the …
Vishal Raj and Dharmendra Kumar, arrested on 20 October 2025, were charged under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for alleged possession of a pistol, live cartridges and gambling articles. The petitioners contended that …
The petitioner, Vinay Kumar Mishra, filed an application to quash FIR No. 742 of 2023 dated 22‑09‑2023, which alleged offences under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The FIR incorrectly named the petitioner while the alleged offender was actually his brother, Ashwani Kumar Mishra, who had …
The petitioner, Md. Wakil Alam Ansari, a junior engineer in the Electricity Department, was charged under IPC sections 323, 379, 504 and 506 for allegedly demanding a bribe, assaulting the complainant and stealing copper wires. He contended that the complaint was filed in retaliation for an FIR he …
Petitioner Rajiv Kumar Asthana filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar and Shobha Mallik. The petitioner later expressed a desire to withdraw the present application and instead raise all his grievances before the Principal Judge of the Family Court in …
The petitioners Yashpal Bharti and his family sought to quash an order dated 08‑04‑2024 passed by the Additional District Judge‑III, Gaya, which directed them to provide temporary residence and a monthly allowance of Rs 10,000 to Nish Raj, the complainant under the Protection of Women from Domestic …
The petitioners Sunil Tiwari, Chhotu Tiwary and Prem Shankar Tiwary were granted anticipatory bail on 14 January 2020 in connection with offences under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 363 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. On 23 July 2024 the Additional Sessions Judge, Saran, cancelled that bail in …
The petitioner filed an application in the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. After hearing arguments, the petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s permission to withdraw. The court granted the permission, allowing the withdrawal. …
Petitioner Nishu Rai filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from a case registered in 2021. The petitioner was acquitted in the underlying criminal case. The respondent, Manjiv Mishra, appeared before the court and informed that the acquittal rendered the application …
The petitioners, Rahul Kumar and Nisha Devi, filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding (Cr. Misc. No.5776 of 2024) arising from a police case. The State of Bihar and Shakshi Kumari were opposite parties. The petitioners failed to appear at the scheduled …
Petitioners Rahul Kumar and Annirudh Kumar filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5976 of 2024 before the Patna High Court. They later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested withdrawal, and the court granted …
The petitioner, Md. Akhlaqur Rahman, filed an application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive …
The petitioners filed an application invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash an order dated 09‑01‑2023 of the Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioners produced a …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 14‑12‑2023 of the SDJM, Bikramganj, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC §§504, 323 and 498A against them based on a complaint alleging dowry demands, assault and other cruelty. The High Court observed that the complaint contained only …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous proceeding, alleging that the matter had become infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel requested liberty to raise any points available at the relevant stage. The State of …
Guddu Kumar filed an application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO) dated 5 July 2024 that allowed the recall and re‑examination of prosecution witnesses PW‑2 to PW‑9. The petitioner alleged that the witnesses had been …
The petitioner, Rajnath Jaiswal, was named in an FIR (Danapur PS Case No. 1449 of 2023) for offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and Arms Act section 27. He filed an application seeking quash of the FIR, relying on a compromise petition filed earlier before the Additional Chief Judicial …
Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. filed a petition in the Patna High Court challenging an order taking cognizance in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner argued that the Revisional Court had set aside the order taking cognizance, rendering the petition ineffective. The court examined whether …
The petitioners filed an application in the Patna High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.6076 of 2024, which arose from a police case registered in 2019. The petition sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The learned counsel for the petitioners moved that the …
The petitioners filed an application invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order dated 09.01.2023 that had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They submitted a compromise deed …
Arbind Kumar, who is in custody, applied for bail in an NDPS case (Sections 21(3), 22(c), 25, 29) arising from the seizure of contraband medicines from a commercial tempo. The prosecution’s case is based on secret information and the recovery of the drugs, while the petitioner’s name appears only in …
Karu Paswan, arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 9.70 grams of heroin, sought regular bail for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The prosecution alleged he helped co‑accused flee after the seizure, …
The petitioner, Ramesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where police seized a car containing 147.78 litres of foreign liquor and five cartridges, and alleged that a large group attempted to free the vehicle. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no possession of …
The petitioner, Bhimsen Singh, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding and later sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court, after hearing the counsel, granted …
The petitioner, Shambhu Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 307 and 34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting an informant on 13 February 2023. He contended that he was falsely implicated as retaliation for a prior case he had filed against the informant, pointing to a 49‑day delay …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar (also known as Nitish Shukla and Nitesh Kumar), filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 84749 of 2024) arising from a 2018 police case in Vaishali district. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Anish Kumar, sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned …
Rita Kumari filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 20 July 2024 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, which had taken cognizance of a complaint under Sections 504 and 506 of the IPC alleging that she failed to pay the full amount for a horoscope and gems purchased from the …
M/s Ravi Medical Agency, a licensed wholesaler and C&F agent, challenged the order of the Special NDPS Judge that refused to release 12,000 bottles of codeine‑containing syrups seized during transport. The petitioner argued that the medicines were covered by valid wholesale licences, GST …
The petitioners Jyoti Devi, Rinki Devi, Mantu Verma and Gita Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. The respondents were the State of Bihar and Rina Kumari. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the parties had settled the …
Pankaj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 after a seizure of buprenorphine and pheniramine injections from his possession. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no independent …
The petitioners, a group of family members of Surendra Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.5839 of 2024) before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and another respondent. The petition sought relief (details not specified) but later the petitioners, through counsel, …
The petitioners filed applications seeking quash of the order dated 13‑08‑2024 that had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 498A and 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They produced a compromise petition and a supplementary affidavit showing that the matrimonial relationship …
The petitioners, Jairam Singh, Raj Kumar, and Sohan Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and Muro Devi. The petitioners, through counsel, indicated that they would not press the present application and intended to file a fresh application before the trial …
The petitioners, a group of relatives, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the trial had progressed and evidence was being taken, and they wished to withdraw the application. The court granted permission …
The petitioners, three villagers, sought quashing of FIR No. 37/2022 filed under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act, alleging that the case stemmed from a dispute during Saraswati Puja and was false and concocted. They claimed no charge‑sheet had been filed, they were granted …
The petitioners, Brajesh Pandey and Shashi Kala Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the proceedings, they informed the court that the dispute had been settled amicably between the parties outside of court. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the …
The petitioners filed applications seeking quash of the order dated 13‑08‑2024 that had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 498A and 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They produced a compromise petition and a supplementary affidavit showing that the matrimonial relationship …
The petitioners, comprising a husband, his in‑laws and a sister‑in‑law, sought to quash the order rejecting their discharge application under Section 239 CrPC in a dowry harassment case filed under Sections 498A and 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the …
The petitioners, Dinendranath Mowar and Mritunjay Mowar, sought to quash an FIR registered under sections 109, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. after they entered into a compromise with the informant, who is their relative. The compromise was filed before the trial court, and the petitioners argued …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Vaishali district, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and another respondent. They later sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted a …
The petitioners Vicky Kumar, Vishal Kumar and Saurabh Kumar filed an application to quash FIR No. 144 of 2025 registered at Soh Sarai police station, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. They claimed that the dispute had been fully settled through compromise and that, except …
Vinay Kumar, the grandson of the informant, filed an application to quash the order dated 14‑05‑2010 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, which had taken cognizance of alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery (IPC §§419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471) against him and others. The …
The petitioners, three residents of Gangajal Bakarpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.267/2025) alleging assault and grievous injuries under several IPC sections. They contended that the injuries were minor, occurred on non‑vital parts of the body, and that the …
The petitioner, Chhotan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a robbery case (PS Case No. 455 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 281, 304, 3(5) and later 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a gang that snatched …
The petitioners, two brothers-in-law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry death case (Bochahan P.S. Case No. 190 of 2025, G.R. No. 3964 of 2025) where they were alleged to have demanded dowry and participated in the victim's torture and murder. They argued that they live …
Mithun Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.19/2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 504, 302 and 506 IPC, where he was accused of assaulting an informant’s family and causing the death of the informant’s father by pressing his testicles. The …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 251 of 2023) involving offences under several IPC sections including assault, robbery and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleges that Kumar, along with others, assaulted an …
The petitioners, Bibi Hazra, Md. Siraj Uddin and Md. Shohrab Raja, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 264 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 120(B), 504 and 506 for allegedly executing a forged sale deed. They contended that the matter was a civil …
The petitioner, Ramswarup Bhuiyan, filed an application seeking liberty to withdraw that application and instead make a prayer before the lower court. The petitioner’s counsel requested the High Court to permit this withdrawal. The issue before the Court was whether the petitioner could be allowed …
Nagmani Yadav, a daily‑wage labourer, feared arrest in a theft case (Govindpur PS Case No. 315 of 2025) involving alleged misappropriation of wheat and rice, alleged under Sections 305(e) and 334(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. The FIR does not name him, but his name appears in a …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Rajgarhia, owner of Mata Transport, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS‑168/2025) under Sections 8(c), 21(c) and 25/29 of the NDPS Act for allegedly transporting a consignment of codeine cough‑syrup seized from a tempo. The prosecution’s case relied on …
The petitioners, Raj Nath Ray and Vikki Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS‑Madhaurah Case No.267 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault with a sharp weapon. They contended that the allegations were false, citing …
Kuldeep Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Tekari P.S. Case No. 325 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, assaulted an informant with sticks, while the petitioner claimed he was the informant’s uncle and that …
Paras Jain applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged forgery of a sale deed, where he is described as the identifier of the forged document. He contended that the substantive allegations pertained to co‑accused executors and beneficiaries, and that he received no …
Ankush Kumar sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging assault, chain snatching and other offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted an informant, causing injuries and …
The petitioner, Piyare @ Saddam Hussain, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 240/2023) alleging offences under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a stolen motorcycle. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had sold the motorcycle to Maksood Alam, …
Petitioner Sanjeev Sah sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a theft case (PS Sarai Case No. 273 of 2025) where two accused thieves alleged that stolen goods were sold from his shop. The petitioner argued that no incriminating articles were recovered and that his inclusion was merely on …
The petitioner, Haidar Ansari, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging assault, robbery and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted an informant and his brother, causing head injuries and stealing …
The petitioners, six brothers from the Mahto family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2023 case (Kesariya P.S. Case No.167) involving alleged arson and offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 436, 504, 506 and 34. They claimed the allegations were false, arising from a land dispute, and …
Kamlesh Mandal filed an application before the High Court seeking to withdraw that application and instead request regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued for liberty to withdraw and to make a fresh bail prayer. The Court held that the withdrawal could be permitted and that the lower court …
Ashwani Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail in connection with PS Fulwariya Case No.135 of 2025, wherein he is accused of assaulting the informant's brother and son with a sword, under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended that the allegations are …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Motihari Muffasil P.S. Case No. 357 of 2025) alleging kidnapping, assault and theft under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the allegations were false, stemming from a land dispute, and that …
The petitioners, Om Babu Sah, Ram Babu Sah and Lavkush Sah, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Ekma P.S. No. 338 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleges that the accused brutally assaulted the informant with a …
Ramjivan Kumar Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS‑346/2025) alleging his involvement in forging a sale deed for a piece of land. He claimed to be a bona‑fide purchaser and argued that the forged deed, if proven, made him a victim rather than a perpetrator. The State and the informant …
The petitioners, Abhay Kumar and Jagat Rai, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with PS Neora case No.141 of 2025, wherein they were accused of assaulting the informant’s husband and causing injuries. They contended that the allegations were fabricated, arising from a …
Sunita Kumari, a teacher appointed in 2010, was implicated in a case (Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 69 of 2023) for allegedly producing a forged intermediate mark‑sheet to obtain her appointment, attracting charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B. Anticipating arrest, she applied for …
The petitioner, Md. Alkama, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a land‑dispute case (Bargaon PS Case No. 52 of 2025) that alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused …
The petitioners, Chandani Devi and Sanjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS case No.173 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault on an informant. They contended that they were falsely implicated, …
Kamlesh Mandal filed an application before the High Court seeking to withdraw that application and instead request regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued for liberty to withdraw and to make a fresh bail prayer. The Court held that the withdrawal could be permitted and that the lower court …
The petitioners, Ricky Rai, Golu Kumar and Jai Prakash, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Bakhtiyarpur Police Station Case No. 322 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. including assault and robbery. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioners, a group of family members from Dhakain village, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Pammi Kumari. They later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the pending application. The learned counsel for the petitioners, …
The petitioners, Lalu Mahto and his sons, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and Kari Devi. They later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the application for withdrawal be allowed. The …
The petitioner, Arif Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court. On 30-01-2026, his counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of …
Nitish Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. The petitioner sought liberty to raise all points and submit any documents available to him at the time of charge framing, requesting the trial court to consider these pleadings and …
The petitioners Sunil Kumar Sharma, Pankaj Sharma, Radhika Devi and Nandani Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.71520 of 2024) arising from a police case in Bhagalpur. Their counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a petition in a …
The petitioners, senior officials of L&T Finance Ltd., sought quashing of a cognizance order dated 18‑07‑2023 that alleged their involvement in offences under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the seizure of a Sonalika tractor. The complainant claimed …
The petitioners, four residents of Rampur Ugan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and another respondent. During the hearing on 29-01-2026, counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the application, stating that they …
Harendra Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in Parsa Bazar Police Station Case No. 340 of 2025 for alleged assault under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (B.N.S.). The prosecution alleged that he threw a brick at an informant, injuring his face, and also …
The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2021 case alleging criminal breach of trust, cheating and conspiracy under IPC sections 406, 419, 420 and 34. The prosecution claimed they misappropriated money from an informant and failed to execute a sale deed, while …
Petitioner Prince Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that he lured a minor girl for marriage. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, together with another person, induced the informant's minor …
Munni Devi, a 58‑year‑old woman, was implicated in a case (PS 103/2025) alleging assault on an informant's son with bricks, charged under several sections of the B.N.S. She contended that the allegations were vague, she was falsely implicated, and she had a clean criminal record. The State opposed …
Manju Devi and Bijli Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related murder case (PS case No. 187/2025) where they were alleged to have conspired with Arjun Sah to kill the informant’s daughter. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 80(2), 238, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and …
The petitioners, a group of seven residents of West Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 204 of 2025) that alleged offences under several IPC sections including assault and robbery. They contended that they were falsely …
The petitioner, Md Tahir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Pranpur P.S. Case No. 136 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault and theft of Rs. 25,500. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, abused and assaulted an informant …
The petitioner, Md Naimuddin, was accused in a 2024 case of rape, criminal intimidation and false evidence under Sections 376, 406 and 493 of the IPC. He contended that the allegations were fabricated, arising from a dispute over a money loan, and that the police investigation had concluded the case …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Janta Bazar PS Case No. 263 of 2025) alleging assault, robbery and other offences under various sections of the B.N.S. They claimed the allegations were false, a retaliatory filing, and that they had no prior criminal record. The …
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Aurai P.S. Case No. 142 of 2025) under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act for allegedly carrying ganja. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, was in possession of the seized narcotics, while the …
The petitioner, Pratibha Kumari, was implicated in a FIR (Bibhutipur PS Case No.119 of 2025) for allegedly submitting a forged BTET certificate to obtain a Panchayat Teacher appointment in 2014, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. She contended that the certificate was genuine, that …
The petitioners (seven individuals) applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2024 police case alleging offences under various IPC sections, claiming false implication and a land dispute that led to a scuffle. One petitioner, Sipahi Yadav, was arrested during the pendency, rendering his …
The petitioners, seven residents of Madhobigha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS No.416 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. They claimed the FIR was filed two days after a land‑dispute‑related scuffle …
Shankar Tuddu sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Amarpur P.S. No. 728 of 2025) involving alleged assault on police officers under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no specific allegation or incriminating material …
The petitioner, Sumeer Kumar Das, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a rape case (Gaura P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025) alleging that the complaint was filed three years after the alleged incident and that the charges were motivated by a financial dispute. The prosecution alleged rape, threats to …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jogbani P.S. Case No. 125 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he, as a broker, introduced the truck owner for transporting the informant's …
Petitioner Md. Talib filed an application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, he was arrested. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the arrest made the application infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and held that the application could no longer be …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Pampy Kumar, requested the court’s leave to withdraw. The court, after hearing, granted permission …
The petitioner, Sujita Kumari, was implicated in a case (Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2025) alleging that she used a fake mark‑sheet to obtain a primary school teaching appointment, attracting charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. She contended that she had submitted a genuine …
The petitioners, Toofani Ram and Tara Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a police case (No.73 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant and her daughter‑in‑law under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the FIR did not specify how …
Avdhesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for allegedly dealing in PDS material, with an E‑Pos inspection showing 201.33 quintals supposedly in his godown, which was found empty. The petitioner claimed the material was stored in a nearby building due to …
The petitioners, Jitendra Prasad and Pawan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a rape case (Bairiya PS Case No. 201 of 2025) alleged under Sections 74, 64, 126(2) and 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that the complaint was filed after an undue delay of over four months, that …
Ram Vinay Sah and Bare Sah filed a petition in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a complaint in Sitamarhi. They sought the court's permission to withdraw their application. The State of Bihar, represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the withdrawal. The learned counsel for …
The petitioners, a group of family members of Uma Shankar Sahni, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and another respondent. They later contended that the matter had become infructuous and sought permission to withdraw the application. …
Shambhu Prasad, the petitioner, filed an application in the Patna High Court arising from Complaint Case No. 1436 of 2022 concerning alleged grievances against various officials. During the hearing, the petitioner appeared in person and informed the court of his intention to withdraw the present …
The petitioners, Ravi Shankar Soni, Munalal Soni and Madhuri Devi, filed an application before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf despite repeated notices, and the informant also failed to appear. The Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, Mr. Murli Dhar, was present. The …
Petitioners Smt. Nirmala Srivastava and Tarun Kumar filed an application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Ranveer Singh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated notices, and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appeared for the opposite party. …
Rita Devi, the widow of the late Santosh Singh, filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.796 of 2024 before the Patna High Court. Despite repeated notices, neither she nor any counsel appeared before the court on the scheduled date of 27-01-2026. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for …
The petitioners filed an application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the …
Petitioner Mukesh Kumar filed an application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel, Mr. Vinay Mistry, requested that the withdrawal be allowed with liberty to pursue other legal remedies. The Court, after hearing, granted the …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Rohtas district, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.2244 of 2024) before the Patna High Court. They later approached the court stating that they no longer wished to pursue the case and sought permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioners – Raj Deep, Sagar Deep and Binod Kumar Raut – challenged the order of the Jehanabad Sessions Court that rejected their application under Section 233(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking production of the deceased’s medical prescription and audio‑visual footage of the police …
The petitioner, Usha Pandit, filed an application in the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding against the State of Bihar. During the hearing on 27‑01‑2026, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that he would not be pressing the application at that stage. The court noted …
The petitioner, Sadanand Ram, filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.4418 of 2024 before the Patna High Court. He sought the court's permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise any future points that may arise in the case. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioner, Md. Nasimuddin, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, the sole petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the death rendered the application infructuous. The court considered whether the death …
The petitioner, Sanjay Tiwary, filed an application in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar through the Vigilance Investigation Bureau. During the pendency of the application, the sole petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the death rendered the application …
Sandeep Kumar Yadav filed an application to quash the cognizance order dated 14‑11‑2024 for offences under IPC sections 376, 420, 313, 379, 323 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the matter arose from a broken love relationship and that both parties have now settled their dispute through a …
The State of Bihar convicted Aman Singh and Sonal Singh for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, based on the testimony of the victims' widow and forensic evidence linking the accused to the use of swords. The appellants challenged the conviction, arguing procedural lapses such as delay in …
The petitioners, members of one family, were charged in two criminal cases arising from a family altercation in Pakaribarawan, Nawada, involving offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. Both the petitioners and the opposite party filed applications under the inherent jurisdiction of …
The petitioners, members of one branch of a family, were charged in two criminal cases arising from an altercation with a relative, Alam Mallick, involving offences under various sections of the IPC. They filed applications under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court seeking quash of the …
The State of Bihar convicted Aman Singh and Sonal Singh for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, based on the testimony of the victims' widow and forensic evidence linking the accused to the use of swords. The appellants challenged the conviction, alleging procedural irregularities such as a …
Sharmila Devi filed an application before the Patna High Court. Her counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
The petitioner, Dinesh Baitha, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar and Sharda Kumari. The petitioner failed to appear before the Court on two consecutive dates, 13-01-2026 and 21-01-2026, and no counsel was appointed on his behalf. The opposite …
Tunna Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2019 case alleging multiple offences under the IPC and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused demanded extortion and stabbed an informant, and that the petitioner assaulted another …
The petitioners, Sudish Kumar and Chhotelal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2022) alleging abduction of a minor girl, with charges under several IPC sections and the POCSO Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, …
The petitioner, Munna Mahato, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court of his intention to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to surrender before the trial …
Manish Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. He later sought permission to withdraw the application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Vishesh Kumar Choudhary, requested the court’s leave to withdraw. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be …
Hiramani Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail in a case alleging his participation in cross‑fire and the shooting of an informant's brother under Sections 109(1), 118(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed he fired at the victim, while the …
Heera Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging stone‑pelting and abuse after a dispute over playing a DJ, offences charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a personal rivalry and that no …
The petitioner, Rajesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Kasim Bazar No.60 of 2025) alleging assault under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and his father brutally assaulted the informant, causing grievous …
Rakesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging that he operated an ultrasound diagnostic centre without a license, violating sections of the Bihar Nursing Service Act and the Clinical Establishment Act. He claimed the allegations were false, stemming from an …
The petitioner, Vijay Singh, was implicated in a murder case (Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC) concerning the death of a schoolboy. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the informant’s suspicion and statements of witnesses, with no eyewitness to the alleged killing. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Md. Jafer Imam, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Rajgir P.S. Case No. 329 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, based on an informant’s claim that the petitioner received Rs. 16.5 lakh. The petitioner contended …
Dr. Pradeep Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged under Sections 498A and 504 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act alleging dowry demands and cruelty. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false, stemming from a strained marital relationship and …
The petitioner, Shashank Kumar, filed an application before the Patna High Court, likely seeking relief in a criminal matter. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the application would be withdrawn and that the petitioner would surrender before the trial court. The …
Petitioner Dhanji Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted the informant and …
Shahid Akhtar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case of alleged kidnapping of a 20‑year‑old girl, registered under Sections 366 and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the girl went missing after a phone call indicated she was in a …
The petitioner, Pappu Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Barh PS No.486 of 2023) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted an informant and …
The petitioner, Basant Tiwari, was arrested in connection with a case alleging molestation of a 10‑year‑old girl under Sections 74, 75, 78 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The petitioner contended that the FIR was false, arising from a personal …
The petitioner, Gopal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Ayarkotha P.S. Case No. 8 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to the disappearance of a truck carrying rice. The prosecution’s case is based on an …
