Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
80 judgments · newest first · showing 1–80
The applicant Lokendra Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate II, Kanpur Nagar, to dispose of Criminal Case No. 3060 of 2014 (State vs. Lokendra Singh), originally pending since 2009 under IPC sections 379 and 411. The applicant …
The applicants, Sachin Saini and three others, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed that they no longer wished to pursue the application and requested that it be dismissed as withdrawn, with …
The applicant Rahul Kumar filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking an order directing the trial court to expedite a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which had been listed since July 18, 2025. The applicant argued that the case had not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking a direction to the District & Sessions Judge, Bhadohi, to expeditiously decide a pending stay application filed in Criminal Revision No. 108 of 2026 against an order dated 08.06.2026 passed …
The applicant, Vinay Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Prayagraj, to decide a pending application dated 12 June 2025 filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C./358 BNSS in the criminal case State …
The applicant, a informant in a criminal matter (State vs. Ravi Jaiswal), filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking an order directing the trial court to expedite the hearing of the pending case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition …
Arjun Yadav, the complainant in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 2502 of 2021), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction that the Special Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, conclude the trial within the period prescribed by …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.)/J.M. Court No. 2, Siddharth Nagar, to decide a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Complaint No. 5666 of 2026) at an early date. The applicant argued that the accused …
The applicant, Hari Om Mishra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Third, Gorakhpur, to conclude the trial in Crime No.19 of 2025 (State vs. Krishna Mohan Mishra & others) which had been pending since …
Poonam Devi filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to conclude a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Complaint No. 17710 of 2023) against Arjun Singh. The applicant argued that the accused’s non‑cooperation and a non‑bailable …
The applicant, Shivpyari Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Auraiya, to expedite the trial of S.C. No.1371 of 2023 (State of U.P. v. Ramraj & others), a murder case under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC. The …
The revisionist Aas Mohammad filed Criminal Revision Defective No. 1714 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a prior order. Counsel for the revisionist, Shahid Ali Siddiqui, informed the court that the revisionist no longer wishes to pursue the remedy. The court considered the request …
M/s Gurudev Auto Mobiles, through its proprietor, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, to expedite the trial of a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No. 22 of …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a pending family court case (Case No. 972 of 2019) filed under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The case had been pending since 2019 and, despite multiple dates fixed for …
Anand Yadav, the accused in State v. Anand Yadav (Case No. 156 of 2023), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO) at Orai to expedite the trial, which involves charges under Section 377 IPC, …
The applicant, Nischhal Agrahari, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court to decide a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No.1368 of 2023) expeditiously. The trial court had …
Monu Kumar Gupta, an accused in Criminal Case No. 9633 of 2024 (State vs Hardeep Singh & others) filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli, decide the case within a stipulated period. The State opposed …
The applicant, Ramesh Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, to decide his criminal case (Criminal Case No. 794 of 2018) within a stipulated period, alleging that no prosecution witness had been examined since the …
The applicant, Sandeep Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Special Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, to conclude a pending criminal case (Case No. 3480 of 2021) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case has been pending since …
The applicant, Sangita, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge to conclude the trial in State v. Sangita (S.T. No. 946 of 2021) expeditiously. The trial concerns an alleged murder under Section 302 IPC and has been …
The revisionist, through the juvenile’s natural guardian, filed a criminal revision under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015, seeking to set aside the Juvenile Justice Board’s order dated 27‑01‑2026 and the appellate court’s order dated 03‑07‑2026, and to obtain bail …
The applicant, Rahul Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of Family Court III, Gorakhpur, to expedite the pending criminal case (Sindhu v. Rahul) under Section 144 B.N.S.S. The applicant argued that the case had been pending since …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a pending Section 128 Cr.P.C. proceeding for recovery of maintenance arrears. The trial court had issued notices, a recovery warrant and a letter to the Superintendent of Police, …
The applicant, Nasim Ahmed, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to conclude the pending Session Trial No. 408 of 2019 (State vs. Abdul Mazid and others), which involves offences under Sections 498A, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …
The applicants, including Smt. Reema, filed an application under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. on 1 June 2026 in the Family Court, Etah, seeking relief from neglect by the husband, Shri Dilshad, and the case remained pending. They moved the High Court under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. requesting the …
Varun Singh filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 17‑12‑2024 against Manish Chaturvedi. A summons was issued on 11‑03‑2025 and the case remains pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Ghazipur. The applicant moved the High Court under Section 529 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order directing the trial court to frame charges and decide two pending criminal cases (Case No. 7200 of 2025 and Case No. 8668 of 2025) within the stipulated period. The applicant, who is an informant, …
Neeraj Kumar Dubey, an informant, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) FTC CAW, Bhadohi, to expedite the trial of criminal case No. 2249/2015 (crime No. 207/2015) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406, 354, 316 IPC …
The applicant, wife of the accused, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide the pending dowry‑prohibition case (State v. Diamond Kumar) expeditiously, alleging that the accused were not appearing despite issuance of …
The applicant, Amit Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial of case No. 121 of 2023 (Computer No. 28027 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 323, 324 and 504 of the IPC. He argued that he was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a pending criminal miscellaneous application under Rule 6(5) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules, 2005 and to expedite execution of a maintenance order (Case No. …
The applicant, Smt. Reena Rani, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.2, Bulandshahr, to decide a pending maintenance case (Misc. Case No. 973/2025) filed under Section 147 B.N.S.S. against her husband, who had …
The applicant, Amit Kumar Pandey, an informant in State Vs. Gulab Giri (Session Trial No. 109 of 2026), sought a direction from the High Court to compel the trial court to conclude the case within the stipulated period, citing non‑appearance of accused despite issuance of bailable and non‑bailable …
The applicant, an informant, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Criminal Case No. 18163 of 2025 (pertaining to offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the CrPC) within a stipulated period. The applicant argued …
The revisionist alleged that after a dispute in which a wall and door were broken, he was booked for breach of peace, released on bail, and subsequently assaulted by the opposite parties who attempted to throw him into a well. He sought to lodge an FIR for the assault, but the police failed to …
Santraj Yadav filed a criminal revision under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the police to lodge an FIR against his daughter‑in‑law and her brother, alleging false allegations. The trial court had dismissed the application as false and frivolous, noting that the dispute …
A criminal revision was filed by Rahul Kesharwani challenging the District Magistrate's order rejecting the release of a vehicle under Section 5A of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the revision could be filed before the High Court. The Court …
The revisionist, Dharmveer Gautam, filed a criminal revision seeking to quash the charge framed by the Additional Session Judge, FTC‑I (Crime Against Women) Jaunpur under Section 376(2)(N) IPC in a rape case allegedly occurring in Mumbai. He contended that the FIR and victim’s statement, recorded …
The appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 412 IPC for a robbery alleged to have occurred on 28 June 1982, based on recovery of an anklet and identification in a parade. The trial court sentenced him to four years’ rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the appellant, now 67, contended that the …
The appellant Surendra Kumar was convicted by a Sessions Judge in 1983 for attempting murder under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC, receiving seven years of rigorous imprisonment for shooting an injured person in the eye. He appealed, arguing that the incident occurred 45 years earlier, …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Arsh Ali challenging the Special Judge’s order that rejected his application for discharge under Section 250 of the B.N.S. The revisionist argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no arms were recovered from him, and the prosecution relied …
Sunil Shukla and others filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting their application for discharge in a case under Sections 147, 323, 336, 427 and 307 IPC. They alleged that the FIR was false, motivated by an enmity over a shop, that the alleged theft …
The revisionist, Sarjan, filed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of his appeal by the District and Sessions Judge, Basti, on the ground that he failed to deposit the required 20% of the court fee within the stipulated time. The revisionist, who is presently incarcerated, offered to make …
The revision petition No. 6734 of 2025 was filed by Sher Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was presented before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 86, before Hon'ble Justice Subhash Chandra Sharma. Counsel for the petitioner were Shweta …
The revisionists Himanshu Singh Yadav and Sher Singh were charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 304 for assaulting a person who later died from septicemia. They sought to quash the trial court’s order refusing their discharge application, arguing that the death was not a direct result of the …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, appellant No.3, Sri Ram alias Bachcha, died as per a report dated 13‑04‑2026, and earlier appellant Nos.1, 2 and 4 had also died. The court examined whether a criminal appeal can continue when …
The revisionist alleged that a group of persons assaulted Sarswati Devi, stole cash and jewellery, and committed trespass on disputed property, filing an application under Section 173(4) CrPC seeking registration of an FIR. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate treated the application as a …
The revisionist Kanhaiya Maurya filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He argued that the cheque amount had been repaid, that the opposite party had not returned the cheque, …
The Allahabad High Court heard a criminal revision filed by Smt. Priti Saxena seeking to quash a charge of bigamy under Section 494 IPC that was framed on 12‑12‑2025. The revision also included an application for condonation of delay, relying on Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The petitioner argued …
The revisionist Rakesh Yadav filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging the District Magistrate, Chandauli's order dated 05.02.2026 that rejected the release of a vehicle seized under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8). The …
The revisionist sought to set aside a Session Judge's order rejecting an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon Kallan (opposite party no.2) in a murder trial. The FIR named Ravindra as the principal accused and mentioned a belief that Kallan also participated. Witness statements, including …
The appeal was filed by Raja Ram and another appellant, Sri Krishna, against the State of U.P. During the pendency of the appeal, the report of the CJM Shahjahanpur dated 20.03.2026 confirmed the death of appellant No.2, Sri Krishna. Earlier, the appeal of appellant No.1, Raja Ram, had already been …
A criminal revision (No. 806 of 2026) was filed by Satyapal Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and nine others. The revisionist's counsel, Vikas Singh, applied to withdraw the revision. The court considered the request and, noting the revisionist's intention to withdraw, dismissed the revision …
The revisionist, Sachin, filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Session Judge's order refusing to recall witness PW‑2 for further cross‑examination under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that certain points remained unaddressed and that the trial court failed to …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court’s order of formal framing of charge dated 16‑12‑2024. The revision was presented 401 days after the impugned order, and the petitioners sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court examined the …
Kuldeep Kumar filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the police to register an FIR against two accused for alleged assault and damage to his motorcycle. The trial court dismissed the application, holding that the facts were solely in the …
The petitioners (revisionists) filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel expressed that they no longer wished to pursue the revision and requested its withdrawal. The court considered the petitioner's request and, finding no objection, dismissed the criminal revision …
The revisionist, Karunashankar Gupta, filed a criminal revision under section 227 of the CrPC challenging the Additional District and Sessions Judge's order rejecting his application for discharge in a case arising from FIR No. 504 of 2020. The FIR, lodged by the victim, alleged physical relations …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, dated 25 March 2026, which directed the police to lodge an FIR under Section 173(4) read with Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioners argued that the order was illegal and …
Ram Gopal filed Criminal Revision No. 5006 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist was represented by counsel Prem Sagar Verma and Tripathi B.G. Bhai. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the revisionist expressed …
The revisionist challenged the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting a discharge application and refusing to omit charge under Section 308 IPC, alleging that the medical report supporting the charge was forged. The High Court examined the medical evidence, noting that the CT scan was performed …
The case arose from a night-time assault and shooting on 10‑11 June 1977 in Azamgarh, for which seven accused were convicted under IPC sections 147, 307/149 and 323/149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. During the pendency of the appeal, six of the accused died, leaving only appellant Sarda …
The revisionist, Vivek alias Kamal Singh Shyoran, challenged the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate refusing his discharge in a case arising from an FIR lodged by Block Pramukh Santosh Devi, alleging blackmail and threats. He contended that the FIR was false, that the informant’s …
The revisionists, Tilakram and two others, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 11 March 2026, which dismissed their application for discharge in a case involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. They contended that the …
Shivkumar filed a criminal revision under Section 226 of the CrPC challenging the order of a Judicial Magistrate who had dismissed his complaint alleging abuse and threats by parties 2 and 3. The complaint stemmed from a civil dispute over a conditional sale deed and repayment of money, where the …
The revisionist, Indradev Vishwakarma, was charged with an attempt to commit rape under the POCSO Act, alleging the victim was about 14 years old. He contended that the victim was actually a major, that the FIR was lodged after a delay of one and a half months, and that the victim’s statements …
The petitioners (Viri Singh and others) filed a criminal revision challenging the Special Judge’s order dated 09‑02‑2026 that dismissed their application for discharge and framed charges under IPC sections 147, 323, 354, 504 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. They contended that the victim’s statements …
The revisionists Tej Narayan Singh and others filed a criminal revision challenging an ex‑parte order dated 16‑03‑2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria, which attached their immovable property under Section 107(4) of the B.N.S.S. The order was issued without giving them a hearing, …
Mehboob Alam filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 23‑02‑2026 of the Additional District & Session Judge (Special Judge, POCSO Act) which formally framed charges against him under Section 74, Section 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The revisionist argued that …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Devendra Yadav challenging the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting his discharge application in a case under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. Yadav argued that the FIR was false, the injuries were caused by a blunt object and did not …
Budhai Maurya and two others filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Session Judge’s order dated 31.05.2025 that rejected their application to contest the charge sheet. The revisionists alleged that the FIR and subsequent charge sheets were based on false allegations, that independent …
The revisionist, a juvenile detained in a Juvenile Care Home, filed a criminal revision under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015, seeking to set aside the Juvenile Justice Board’s order denying bail and the appellate court’s affirmation of that order. The revisionist …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an ex‑parte order dated 10 October 2017 passed by the Additional Session Judge, which had allowed the opposite party, Smt. Gulnaj Bano, to reside in a house. The order arose from an appeal against an …
The applicants and the State entered into a compromise concerning criminal case No. 6186 of 2016, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The compromise was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on 21‑01‑2026, and both parties and the A.G.A. raised no …
The revisionist, Ila Sharma, filed Criminal Revision No. 8769 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel Gyan Chandra Yadav informed the court that the revisionist no longer wishes to pursue the revision and requested its withdrawal. The court accepted the request and dismissed the revision as …
The High Court entertained a criminal revision filed under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 on behalf of a 16‑year‑old juvenile (revisionist) who was in a Juvenile Care Home. The revision challenged the orders of the Juvenile Justice Board and the Additional …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against five members of the husband’s family in a case filed under Section 498A IPC, Section 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR and charge sheet alleged only …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 2396 of 2016) arising from an FIR that alleged dowry demand and harassment in a matrimonial dispute. The FIR named the husband (applicant No.1) and five of his …
This is an application under Section 482 filed before the Allahabad High Court by Raj Kumar Nagar against the State of U.P. and another. The application was registered as Application U/S 482 No. 40887 of 2014 and was heard by Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma, J. The order states that the present …
The applicants Jagdeesh Prasad and Raj Kumar Nagar sought to quash a revision order dated 30‑08‑2014 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Special Judge, SC/ST Act) which had set aside a magistrate's order rejecting a protest by the informant. The informant had alleged that the applicants forged …
