Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15 judgments · newest first · showing 1–15
Vipin Jaiswal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in connection with Crime No.423 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). He claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that co‑accused Gaurav Jaiswal and Pankaj Jaiswal had already …
The applicants, Divya Sharma and Abhijeet Sharma, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1114 of 2025 concerning Crime No. 397 of 2024, wherein they were charged under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust. They …
The applicant, Basant Kumar Singh, sought cancellation of a bail order dated 22‑12‑2023 that had been granted to the opposite party No. 2 in a case under IPC sections 387, 427 and 506. The request was based on an alleged assault by the bailee on an informant, resulting in a gun‑shot injury, for …
Petitioner Chhote Lal filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 26126 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel, and they expressed loss of interest in pursuing the case. The respondent's counsel was present, and the Court invoked the …
Petitioner Mohammad Tayyab filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.15187 of 2021 against the Commissioner Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and another. No appearance was made on behalf of the petitioner and the petitioner’s counsel indicated loss of interest in pursuing the case. The Court invoked the …
Neeti Verma filed a criminal transfer application (No. 22 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No appearance was made on behalf of the applicant, and the counsel for the opposite party was the only one present. The court observed that both the applicant and her counsel had lost interest in …
Petitioner Kaushal Prasad Tiwari filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. His counsel sought additional time to prepare the case, but the matter was listed peremptorily and could not be adjourned. The court held that, in the absence of any instruction to the contrary, the petition …
Petitioner Chandralekha Singh filed a petition under Article 227 challenging a Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) order dated 02‑09‑2024, alleging that the order was passed without any hearing and was prima facie suspicious. The respondent, Canara Bank Regional Office, contended that an appeal against the …
The petitioner, Kshetriya Sri Gandhi Ashram Akbarpur, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The petition was to be presented by counsel Anil Kumar Tiwari, but no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the hearing date. The respondent, the State of U.P. …
Petitioner Raghvendra Pandey filed writ petition No. 1689 of 2005 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court noted that the list of cases was being revised and, due to the absence of the petitioner’s …
Petitioner Feroze Ahmad filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 5661 of 2014) against the State Bank of India before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The petition was listed under the ‘cases shall not be adjourned’ category and was called out in the revised list. No counsel or party appeared on …
Krishna Kumar Pandey filed a writ petition (No. 4999 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Secretary of Secondary Education and four other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing but no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the …
Petitioner Madhav Raj Gupta filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) to decide his application under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus to restrain respondent No. 10 from obstructing his access to his house. The …
The petitioner, Ram Shankar Gupta, obtained several unsecured credit facilities from the respondent bank in 2015 and subsequently defaulted, leading the bank to declare the account a Non‑Performing Asset and invoke the SARFAESI Act to recover the dues by taking possession of the secured assets. The …
The State of Uttar Pradesh, acting as the revisionist, challenged a December 16, 2025 order of the Special Judge that dismissed its application under Order XXI Rule 99 read with Rule 101 of the CPC, which sought relief after the expiry of a 99‑year lease on land originally vested in the State’s …
