Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN

153 judgments · newest first · showing 1–153

ALL GOVERNMENTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ C No. 35360 of 2026) was filed by All Government against the State of U.P. and three others. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioner, Ashok Kumar Lal, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The court …

MANGERAMversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a second writ petition alleging continued illegal mining on his agricultural land at Nali and Chak Marg, claiming damage to crops and seeking a mandamus to stop the mining and compensation for losses. The court noted that the earlier petition had been consigned after the State …

M/S RUDRABALI TRADERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

M/s Rudrabali Traders filed a writ petition alleging that a mining lease granted to respondent No.5 (Vindhya Construction) overlapped its own lease due to altered geo‑coordinates, and sought a certiorari to quash the lease and obtain related records. The State of U.P. countered, submitting that an …

VIKASH CHANDRA GUPTAversusPURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHER

Vikash Chandra Gupta filed a writ petition seeking compensation for the death of his three children, who died while playing with a kite. The supply company, Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd, had previously paid ex gratia compensation to two other families whose children died from electrocution. …

JAGANNATH PRASAD SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jagannath Prasad Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to forward his medical reimbursement file, submitted on 18 April 2025 for Rs.107,051, to the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of Ghaziabad for decision. The petition alleged that the respondent (the State …

SATISH SHANKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher appointed in 1993 and terminated on 12 May 2015, filed a claim petition before the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal, which remained pending for eleven years. The Tribunal dismissed the petition as not maintainable, invoking Section 4(5) of the U.P. Public …

SMT SUSHILA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Sushila Devi, appointed as an Assistant Teacher in 1993, was terminated on 12 May 2015 and filed a claim petition before the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal. The petition remained pending for eleven years before the Tribunal dismissed it on 17 July 2026 as not maintainable, invoking …

UDAI SHANKER SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Assistant Teacher terminated in 2015, filed a claim petition before the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal, which remained pending for eleven years. The Tribunal dismissed the petition on 17 July 2026 as not maintainable, invoking Section 4(5) of the U.P. Public Service …

ASHUTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ashutosh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition (WRIT‑C No. 32586/2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The standing counsel submitted instructions indicating that the Sub‑Collector of Jaunpur assumed charge on 3 June 2026 and that the order passed in RIT petition No. …

AMARNATH PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction to the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ghazipur to decide a revision filed under Section 48(1) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act concerning land in Arazi No.103. The revision arose after the respondent No.4 approved the petitioners' application for restoration …

ANANT BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anant Bahadur Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment and order dated 15 April 2026 passed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy by filing an …

SHARDA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sharda Devi filed a writ petition seeking cancellation of land consolidation proceedings against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner argued that the consolidation process should be halted. The court examined the record and noted that the required CH Form No. 41 and CH Form No. 45, …

DHARMVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmveer Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the cancellation of consolidation proceedings that were initiated under Section 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The High Court had earlier directed the State's standing counsel to obtain instructions, which …

RAM NEVAS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 20 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 16 October 2025 and 5 February 2026 issued by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in Case No. 0988 of 2023, which allowed an amendment by respondent No.3 and rejected the petitioners' application to recall the first order. …

YASHWANT SINGHversusPRIYANKA SINGH

Yashwant Singh filed a first appeal against Priyanka Singh in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant was represented by counsel Vinod Kumar Yadav, while no counsel was listed for the respondent. The appellant’s counsel failed to take any procedural steps to advance the appeal. The Court observed …

UMA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Uma Devi and two others, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Urban Ceiling authority that rejected their representation to have land entries restored in their names. They alleged that notices required under Sections 10(5) and 10(6) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and …

RAM LAKHANversusSTATE OF U.P. and OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioner, Ram Lakhan, filed a writ petition seeking correction of revenue records and a restraining order against the State of Uttar Pradesh concerning a 13,427.58 sq.m. parcel of land originally held by his predecessor Jagannath. The land was declared excess vacant under the Urban Land …

RAM LAKHAN @ LAKHAN LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the State and other respondents to halt proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, to record the disputed 7,636.21 sq m land in their name, and to prevent interference with their possession. The land originally belonged to Moti Lal …

PYARE LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Pyare Lal filed a writ petition seeking restoration of his name in the revenue records for a 12,901.65 sq m land in Madauka village, alleging that notices under Sections 8(3) and 10(5) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 were never served and that possession of the land …

TOTA RAM AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioners, heirs of the late Tungal, claimed continuous possession of land in Village Manak Mau, asserting that they never received notices under Sections 8(3), 10(1), 10(5) or 10(6) of the U.P. Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976, and that the State’s vesting order of 1981 was …

GYAN PRAKASH MAURYA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners, heirs of Bhagwan Das, sought to have a parcel of land recorded in their names under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, after the original owner’s death in 1978. They contended that the ex‑parte proceedings and notices issued under Sections 8, 9 and 10 of the Act were …

DILSHAD HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Dilshad Hussain, challenged a 2009 order by the Saharanpur Collector that declared the land in dispute as belonging to the Saharanpur Development Authority, seeking to have the revenue entries corrected and his possession recognized. The land had been subject to proceedings under the …

VIJAY KUMAR AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Agrawal, filed Writ Petition No. 35297 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Anil Kumar, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to contest the matter and sought to withdraw the petition. The Court …

HARISH CHANDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, heirs of the original landholder Sukh Dev, filed a writ petition seeking the removal of State entries in the revenue records and restoration of title to their names for three plots of land in Umarpur Neva. The land had been declared excess vacant land under the Urban Land (Ceiling …

VINAY KUMAR NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinay Kumar Nishad, sought a writ directing the State and related authorities to abate the proceedings of a 1976 ceiling case concerning a 1,403.22 sq. m. plot in Prayagraj and to correct revenue records in his favour. The original ceiling return was filed by his parents, and while a …

VIJAY KUMAR AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U P AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Agrawal, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Subsequently, the petitioner expressed a desire not to contest the matter and sought to withdraw the petition. The petitioner's counsel, Anil Kumar, formally communicated this request to the …

NEETU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Neetu Devi filed a writ petition seeking a corrected date of birth certificate after the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate ordered issuance upon payment of a late fee. The Block Development Officer refused to accept the fee and issue the certificate. The High Court examined the magistrate's order and the …

ANKIT RAJversusINDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS

Ankit Raj filed a writ petition against Indian Oil Corporation Limited and two others, seeking relief. The petitioner later obtained a No Objection Certificate and completed the dealership, rendering the petition moot. He requested the court to dismiss the petition and allow him to file a fresh …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Virendra Singh filed Writ Petition No. 33196 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. During the hearing, counsel Ms. Pritika Tiwari, appearing on behalf of advocate Shailendra, informed the Court that the petitioner no …

VIPUL KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vipul Kumar Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, to decide his pending application for a character certificate. The State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents contended that the matter could be considered by the …

YASMIN SULTANAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Yasmin Sultana filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the Union of India and two other respondents. The petitioner sought relief on grounds that were not specified in the brief judgment. Counsel for the petitioner, Vikas Pal and Vinod Kumar Maurya, argued …

M/S AZHARI BRICK WORKSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

M/S Azhari Brick Works filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate to consider its representation dated 16 July 2026 and to protect it from dispossession of its brick kiln. The petition alleged a breach of agreement with a private respondent …

MAHENDRA SINGH DHANGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mahendra Singh Dhangar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Rajesh Kumar Pandey, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and preferred to seek any other appropriate legal remedy. The petitioner …

SUDHIR KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sudhir Kumar petitioned the Allahabad High Court for a character certificate from the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, alleging that the authority had not acted on his representations. The State of U.P. and other respondents opposed the petition. The Court, without examining the merits, directed …

CHAKRADHAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Chakradhar Dubey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Deepak Kashinath Dubey, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek an alternative remedy. The respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, were represented by Ayush Mittal, …

RAM BIR SINGH DHANGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Etah and another respondent to decide his representation dated 31‑12‑2025 and upload his caste certificate on the e‑district website. The petitioner alleged that his representation had not …

RIYAJ AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Riyaj Ahmad, purchased a JCB vehicle (Regn. No. UP91AT3448) at auction but the Regional Transport Officer failed to issue a registration certificate or transfer registration to his name despite multiple representations. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking direction for the …

M/S TULSYAN COAL COMPANYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

M/s Tulsyan Coal Company filed a writ petition against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed under “Old Pending Cases for Priority Hearing” for the year 2008. When the case was called in the revised list, the petitioner’s counsel, Anand Tewari, was not present. The court therefore …

FIRERAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Fireram, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Sanyukta Sangathan) of Bulandshahar to consider and decide his land acquisition application dated 17 July 2012 within the time prescribed by law. The respondents contended that the …

MANVEERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Manveer filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Executive Officer of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) to consider and decide his application dated 25 August 2026 within the time prescribed by law. The respondents argued that the application could be decided …

HIMWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Himwant Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition contained certain discrepancies, rendering it procedurally defective. The petitioner’s counsel, Ramendra Asthana, acknowledged the defect and suggested that the petition could be dismissed, allowing …

SANTOSH KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Santosh Kumari challenged the acquisition of her property by a notification dated 04‑02‑2026, having filed an objection under Section 15 of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which remained pending before the District Magistrate/Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jhansi. …

KANEEZ TAHIRA RIZVIversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRIN SECY REVENUE AND 3 ORS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Kaneez Tahira Rizvi, filed a writ petition (Writ A No. 3002 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary Revenue and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the matter had been …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sunil Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments, unauthorized structures and blockages of a public drain in Trans Yamuna Colony, Agra, alleging overflow and unsanitary conditions. He claimed the municipal authority had not acted on his grievance. The …

VANSH PUNDIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vansh Pundir, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Registrar of Birth and Death, Nagar Nigam Saharanpur, to cancel his birth certificate which incorrectly recorded his date of birth. He alleged that his earlier representation dated 2 August 2023 for cancellation was …

VINOD KANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinod Kant, sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 05‑09‑2025 that withdrew his personal Gunner Security, and a writ of mandamus to compel the State to restore the security. He alleged that the court had failed to consider an intelligence report dated 29‑10‑2022 …

SUDHIR KUMAR TIWARI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Sudhir Kumar Tiwari and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, the petition had become infructuous. The respondents did not object to this submission. The …

ANAND PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Anand Prakash filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Arpit Malviya, submitted that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The respondents' counsel, Anil Kumar Singh Baghel, did not oppose this …

SYED ABBAS MURTAZA SHAMSIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Syed Abbas Murtaza Shamsi filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 15‑04‑2026 issued by the Municipal Commissioner under Section 331(1)(2) of the U.P. Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam, seeking demolition of his house. He contended that the notice was invalid because the inspection …

JAVED IQBALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Javed Iqbal filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 15‑04‑2026 issued under Section 331(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959, which sought demolition of his house in Varanasi. He sought certiorari to quash the notice and mandamus to restrain the authorities from …

SMT. SHAHIDA BANO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Shahida Bano and another filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 331(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 and seeking a mandamus to stop demolition of their house in Varanasi. The petitioners argued that the notice was unlawful and that the demolition …

DAYA SHANKAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Daya Shankar Tiwari filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel certain respondents to dispossess other occupants from his house and to restrain entry under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, and also to direct the District Magistrate, Deoria to …

SABIR ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sabir Ali filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition raised factual disputes that the court found could not be verified on the pleadings. The judges held that because the essential facts were in dispute, the …

MOHAMMAD NIYAMAT ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Niyamat Ali Khan filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Varanasi Development Authority under Section 27 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 and another notice under Section 331(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959. The …

SUDHIR KUMAR TIWARI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 16‑04‑2026 that demanded a reply within three days for the cancellation of a lease agreement intended to last for thirty years. They contended that no legal provision permits such a short notice period for terminating a long‑term lease …

JAVED ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Javed Alam filed a writ petition seeking the quashal of a notice dated 23‑04‑2026 and a mandamus directing the respondents to refrain from any coercive or demolition action concerning his house at Chowk, Varanasi. The respondents produced an instruction dated 30‑04‑2026 and an inspection …

SMT. SUBHADRA DEVI @ SAHODHRA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Subhadra Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Aligarh to consider and decide a representation she had submitted on 20 June 2024, which remained pending. The petitioner alleged undue delay and requested the court to compel the …

YATENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Yatendra Kumar Jaiswal and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents not to install an electricity transformer on the gate of their residence and to compel the Collector, Chandauli (respondent No. 2) to decide a …

ANKUR YADAVversusSMT. RINKY YADAV

Ankur Yadav filed a first appeal against Smt. Rinky Yadav in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Anwar Ali, informed the court that the appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. The respondent's counsel did not object to this request. The court, noting the …

SUNIL MUSADDIversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunil Musaddi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Palika Parishad, Mirzapur to demolish the Musaddi Dharmshala, which was deemed dilapidated, and also requested police protection for the demolition. The petition relied on a notice dated 09-10-2025 issued by …

ANIL KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 (State of U.P. and others) to pay his pending dues with interest and to close the agreement. He alleged that a representation he filed on 4 March 2022 before respondent No.3 remained …

ADITYA PRASAD SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aditya Prasad Sonkar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to decide his representations dated 10 October 2025 and 23 March 2026 within a reasonable time. He alleged that despite multiple representations, the authorities had not …

M/S S.S. ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s S.S. Enterprises and another, filed a writ petition alleging that the Municipal Commissioner of Nagar Nigam, Bareilly had failed to pay them the full amount due under a work order dated 25‑08‑2021 for construction of a CC road and drainage. They claimed a total liability of …

THE METHODIST CHURCH IN INDIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Methodist Church in India filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Respondents 2 and 3 objected that the petition was filed in the name of the Church without establishing that it is a legal entity capable of suing. The petitioner’s counsel could not provide any documentation to …

DIGVIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Digvijay Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17684 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The respondent’s counsel, Ms. Vatsala, contended that the petitioner was not the aggrieved party and that the …

RAMESH CHANDRA KESARWANI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash demolition notices dated 13‑02‑2026 issued by the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat Mauaima and a mandamus directing the authorities not to proceed with demolition. The petitioners had already submitted their objections to the …

SUNIL PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunil Pal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide his representation dated 12-03-2026, which was pending before them. The petition alleged that the respondents had failed to act on his representation. The Court observed that the …

SITA RAM AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sita Ram Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer, Sirsa, to consider and decide a representation dated 03‑06‑2026 that had not been acted upon. The petitioner alleged undue delay in the decision of his representation and requested the Court …

ISHWAR SARAN SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Mau to examine and decide their representation dated 29 September 2022 in light of a Government Order dated 14 June 2024 issued by the Special Secretary, U.P. Government. The High Court, after hearing counsel, …

MOHD TARIQ SIDDIQUI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohd Tariq Siddiqui and another challenged a notice dated 10.04.2026 issued by the Executive Engineer, Nagar Nigam, Bareilly, which directed removal of alleged encroachment without granting a hearing. They also sought a mandamus to prevent demolition of their construction, which was …

KHAN SAJEDA BIBI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged a notice dated 21‑04‑2026 that demanded they produce documents concerning land in Gata No. 169 and threatened to deem their possession illegal if they failed to comply. The petitioners had filed a reply on 25‑04‑2026 raising objections, but the respondents proceeded to …

MERAJUL HASAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Merajul Hasan and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to consider a representation dated 06-04-2026 and pass a reasoned order after hearing. The petitioner alleged that no decision had been taken on the representation. The Court examined the petition …

DILIP KUMAR SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Sonkar, challenged a government order that increased his contribution for a security guard from 10% to 50% of the guard's cost, demanding payment of Rs. 4,11,927 for six months. He argued that his annual income of Rs. 6,12,830 made the amount unaffordable and that the …

MAYANK SHYAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of two public notices and mandamus directing the respondent to follow a 2020 notification and grant rooftop permission for a private building. Respondent No.2 produced an order dated 23.04.2026 showing that the tender in question had already …

M/S SAMVEDNA DEVELOPMENT SOCIETYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Samvedna Development Society, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The respondents argued that the agreement dated 01.03.2024 contained an arbitration clause, making the writ petition …

LAKHILALversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Additional District Officer of District Panchayat Mathura to (i) extend the one‑year allotment of agricultural land allotted through public auction, (ii) compensate for a five‑month loss due to delayed possession, and (iii) decide a …

GOPICHANDRA SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Gopichandra Srivastava filed a writ petition seeking to quash a demolition notice dated 08‑09‑2025 and an eviction notice dated 09‑03‑2026, alleging that the demolition notice was issued without a hearing and violated natural justice. He also prayed for mandamus to restrain demolition and …

TASLEEMversusState of UP AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Tasleem filed Writ Petition No. 22067 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was argued by counsel Irshad Ahmad and Navin Kumar Srivastava. Respondents were represented by Aditiya Kumar Singh, …

ATIKURRAHMANversusState of UP AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Atikurrahman, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 05‑09‑2024 passed by respondent No. 4 concerning permission to run a local Tuesday market. The petitioner argued for a direction to allow filing a fresh representation before respondent No. 4 and for a …

VIJAY NARAYAN MISHRAversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Vijay Narayan Mishra, the petitioner, sought an order for an electricity connection to a house/shop he occupies, while the respondent Gulab Devi Jaiswal claims ownership and has a pending suit for permanent injunction. The court examined the inspection report, which confirmed that Mishra is in …

SANGITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sangita Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 3712 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. However, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. The Court noted the absence of representation and, under procedural rules, dismissed the …

RANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rani Devi, filed Writ Petition No. 5399 of 2018 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted the …

FARHAN QURESHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Farhan Qureshi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20.01.2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, alleging that he is a prospective accused though not named in the FIR. The State argued that the petition was not maintainable because the …

SANJEEV KUMAR AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sanjeev Kumar and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 10‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under several IPC sections. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that any bail …

RAM BHAROSI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ram Bharosi and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 29.01.2026 lodged by the widow daughter‑in‑law of petitioner‑1 under sections 329(3), 329(4), 324(4) and 351(4) of the B.N.S. The petitioners later withdrew the challenge to the FIR and …

SINDHU KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sindhu Kumari and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 21‑02‑2026 under Section 87. After hearing, the petitioners voluntarily withdrew the relief sought but requested that the writ be disposed with a direction to the lower court to consider their …

JAHEER ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Jaheer Alam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police (respondent No.2) to conduct an inquiry under Section 173(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code concerning an incident dated 24‑04‑2025 and to consider a representation dated 22‑09‑2025. The Court …

PARWATI PRAJAPATI @ PARWATI DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Parwati Prajapati and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 22‑02‑2026 lodged by a third‑party informant under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions. The State argued that an earlier FIR dated 03‑02‑2026 had …

JANGALI @ BHAKUDI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Jangali @ Bhakudi and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sant Ram Nigam, Nitin Dwivedi, Rama Kant Yadav and Vivek Kumar Yadav, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear at the hearing, even after a …

RAM MILAN VISHWAKARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Milan Vishwakarma and three others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5541 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Amresh Kumar and Shashi Ranjan Srivastava, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear to press the petition. The respondents, …

ABHISHEK @ ABHISHEK KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Abhishek Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 28‑01‑2026 and the subsequent charge sheet filed under various provisions of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The State argued …

MAHI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mahi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel – Adwitiya Prakash Tiwari, Amit Singh and Anshuman Singh – were listed in the cause list but failed to appear even on the revised call. The State’s counsel, G.A., was …

RUBY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ruby and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑12‑2025 lodged by Smt. Nesha under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The State, through the Attorney General, argued that the petition lacked any allegation about the petitioners' income …

RAKESH KUMAR MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rakesh Kumar Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27.01.2026 registered under Sections 351(2), 352 and 333 of the BNSS. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that the investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet …

RAJKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajkumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08-10-2025 registered under Sections 115, 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. The State, through the Advocate General, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed under …

SURESH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Suresh Kushwaha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑11‑2025 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew his challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court decide his …

SHIVESH ALIAS BHOLU PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Shivesh alias Bholu Pandey and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and later added section 117(2), as well as Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act. After arguments, the …

BHEEM SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Bheem Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 11‑04‑2024 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The State argued that the petition was filed more than two years after the FIR, constituting an inordinate delay and invoking the …

AJAY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ajay Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR dated 21‑06‑2025 registered under Sections 123, 303(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that …

DHANPRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Dhanprasad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition listed advocates Krishna Kumar Patel and Sangam Lal Kesharwani as counsel, but they did not appear to press the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …

VIKAS CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Vikas Chaudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking an ad‑interim mandamus directing the DGP of Lucknow to reinvestigate Crime No. 173 of 2023 under IPC sections 504 and 506 and to submit a fresh police report. The State argued that the investigating officer had already filed a …

M/S HAMARA PUMP NASIRPUR HPC PETROL PUMPversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/S Hamara Pump Nasirpur Hpc Petrol Pump, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a withdrawal application stating that the cause of action no longer survived and it no longer wished to pursue the writ. The Court examined the …

SRI SOORAJ BHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or present counsel when the matter was listed. The respondents' counsel was present. The court, noting the absence of any representation for the petitioners, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …

MAHAFOOJ ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a farmer holding recorded tenure of two agricultural plots in Banda district, alleged that respondents No.5 and 6 had illegally encroached upon his land and were conducting mining activities that damaged his crops. He claimed to have made representations to the competent authorities …

GUDDU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Guddu and another, filed a writ petition challenging the non-issuance of a caste certificate. The petitioner's counsel limited the relief sought to petitioner No.1, arguing that petitioner No.2's claim could not be entertained in the present petition. The Court dismissed petitioner …

MUMTAZ AHAMDversusPURVANCHAL VIDHUT VITRANA NIGAM VARANASI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner applied for an electricity connection which was rejected by the second respondent, the Executive Engineer, without any notice. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the rejection. The respondents argued that the petition was of no utility and sought a direction to the …

JOGINDRA SINGH PAL AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Khatauli to consider their representation dated 27‑12‑2025 for issuance of English versions of Scheduled Caste certificates already granted to them. The State’s standing counsel argued that the petition should not be kept …

ASHISH KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State Public Service Tribunal, Uttar Pradesh, to decide his pending claim petition (No. 2179 of 2024) within a time frame set by the court. The petition argued that the Tribunal had unduly delayed the disposal …

BALBEERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 08.01.2026 and mandamus to restrain the respondent from interfering with his possession and demolishing his house at Village‑Admadpur Sadat. The respondent produced instructions from an oil company indicating that any …

MOHD. RASHID KHANversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ C No. 9285 of 2026) was filed by Mohd. Rashid Khan against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire not to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The respondents were represented by counsel comprising C.S.C., Punit Kumar …

M/S H.R. CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

M/s H.R. Construction Company, a contractor engaged in electrical distribution works, filed a writ petition seeking release of a payment of Rs.1,95,998 plus GST that it alleges the respondent authority has withheld despite multiple representations. The respondents argued that the petition need not …

SMT. SUSHILA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sushila Devi, filed a writ petition alleging that the respondent authority had failed to issue her a character certificate despite her representations. The petitioner sought a direction for the issuance of the certificate. The respondents argued that the petition could be …

MANU DEEP SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

The petitioner, Manu Deep Sharma, filed a writ petition (Writ No. 9310 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The court observed discrepancies in the petition and held that it was not properly pressed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds. The court, however, granted the …

MAHAVIR YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Mahavir Yadav, filed a writ petition alleging that the District Magistrate of Jaunpur had failed to issue him a character certificate despite multiple representations. The respondent State of U.P. argued that the petition could be disposed of without merits and suggested a direction …

ANAND KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Anand Kumar Singh applied for a character certificate, which was rejected by the competent authority on 06.08.2025. He filed a writ petition challenging the order, alleging it was passed without applying mind and in violation of the guidelines laid down by this Court in Anil Kumar v. State of U.P. …

PINTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Pintu filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Mau, to consider his application and issue a Scheduled Tribe caste certificate. He had submitted a representation on 30‑12‑2025, but no decision was rendered. The respondents …

SHIVRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shivraj Singh filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the Superintendent of Police, Auraiya, alleging that despite multiple representations the authority had taken no action. The State of U.P. and another respondent opposed the petition. The court, without examining the merits, …

APV REALTY LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Apv Realty Ltd., filed Writ Petition No. 10484 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and other respondents. The petition was found to contain discrepancies that rendered it procedurally defective. The petitioner’s counsel …

SMT. SAVITRI DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Savitri Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the removal of 33 KV and 11 KV electricity cables from her land in Babhnauli, Kushinagar, and ordering the Executive Engineer to decide a representation she had filed on 30‑12‑2025. The petitioner alleged that no decision had been …

RAJA BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged the authority's order rejecting his application for a character certificate, alleging that the order was passed without applying the mind and ignored the guidelines laid down by this Court in Anil Kumar v. State of U.P. (Writ‑C No.718 of 2025). The respondents argued that a …

HRIDAY NARAYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hriday Narayan Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the District Magistrate, District Mau, alleging that despite multiple representations, the authority had taken no action. The respondent authorities contended that the petition could be disposed of …

SMT PREMA DEVIversusREGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KANPUR AND OTHERS

Smt Prema Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Regional Transport Authority, Kanpur and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be dismissed as infructuous because the cause of action no longer existed. The court considered …

ANURAG YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anurak Yadav, employed as a Helper in Meja Energy Nigam Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition alleging that the police had registered an NCR under Sections 115(2) and 3151(2) of the BNS against him, and that the responding authority failed to provide the verification report confirming his …

MANOJ SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a recorded Bhumidar and co‑sharer of agricultural land in Gautam Buddha Nagar, claimed that his land was affected by the laying of a 400 kV Jalpura‑Khurja power transmission line and that he had not received compensation despite representations under the revised Government of India …

MAYANK RAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mayank Rawal, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 13‑01‑2026 that rejected his application for a caste certificate on the ground of being ‘incomplete’. He argued that the order was non‑speaking and violated natural justice as no reasons were given. The respondents …

BIJENDRA KUMAR AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Khatauli to decide on their representation dated 27‑12‑2025 for issuance of English versions of their Scheduled Caste certificates, which had already been issued in Hindi. The State's standing counsel argued that the …

MAHAK SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Khatauli to decide on their representation dated 27-12-2025 for issuance of English versions of their Scheduled Caste certificates, which had already been issued in Hindi. The State's standing counsel argued that the …

RAM NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Narayan, filed a writ petition alleging that the District Magistrate of Muzaffar Nagar had failed to issue him a character certificate despite his representations. The respondent State of U.P. argued that the petition should be dismissed and that the petitioner could simply …

RAMJI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a bona‑fide consumer of electricity, alleged that a faulty smart meter generated erroneous bills of Rs. 18,526 for February‑March 2025 and Rs. 1,28,025 for June 2025, despite regular payment of dues. He submitted multiple representations to the electricity department, which were …

HUMAYUUN ABBAS ZAIDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Humayuun Abbas Zaidi, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 18 February 2026 issued by Respondent No.3. The respondents contended that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy under Section 83(9) of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and …

KRISHNAKANT RAIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishnakant Rai, challenged a No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued by the District Magistrate, Jhansi, in favour of a private respondent and a subsequent order rejecting his candidature for a BPCL retail outlet. Earlier writ petitions (Writ‑C No.330/2026 and Writ‑C No.36640/2024) …

CHANDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Chandra Pal Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Chairman/Principal Secretary of the State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, U.P., to decide his appeal dated 16 July 2021, filed under a 1996 Government Order, within a time‑bound period. The State, through its standing …

SADASHIV MANI TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sadashiv Mani Tripathi, filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the District Magistrate, Kushinagar, alleging that despite multiple representations, the authority had not issued the certificate. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contended that there …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Rakesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the District Magistrate, Agra, alleging that his multiple representations had been ignored. The petitioner argued that the respondent authority failed to issue the certificate despite his grievances. The respondents contended …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar applied online for a character certificate, which was rejected by the competent authority. He challenged the rejection through a writ petition, alleging that the order was non‑speaking and failed to apply the guidelines laid down by the High Court in Anil Kumar v. State of …

KRISHNA RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Krishna Rawat filed a writ petition challenging the authority’s order rejecting his online application for a character certificate. He argued that the order was passed without applying mind and ignored the guidelines laid down by this Court in Anil Kumar v. State of U.P. (Writ‑C No. …

HEMSHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Hemshankar filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the Superintendent of Police, Bareilly, alleging that his multiple representations had been ignored. The State of U.P. and other respondents opposed the petition. The Court, without examining the merits, directed the petitioner to …

SMT. SANJA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sanja Devi, filed a writ petition in 2011 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel repeatedly sought adjournments, submitting illness slips on 11-02-2020, 19-02-2026, and again on the day of a peremptory hearing. The court noted that the petition concerned …

VINOD KUMAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 20159 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to prosecute the petition, while counsel for the respondents was present. The Court noted the absence of representation for the petitioners and …

KULDEEP NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kuldeep Narayan, filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 54797 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Consequently, the Court found that the petition lacked prosecution. The judges dismissed the writ petition for …

SUBHASH CHAND PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Petitioner Subhash Chand Prasad filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was to be presented by counsel H.P. Mishra, but no representative appeared on the day of hearing. The Court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted in the absence of a petitioner or …