Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
202 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of transfer dated 9 February 2013. The High Court examined the petition and concluded that there was no surviving cause of action or issue to be adjudicated. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for lack of any remaining substantive …
Chaya Anurath Sanap filed Writ Petition No. 199 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition sought relief through a writ, but the Court examined the prayer and found that the petition had become infructuous. No …
Ajit Lakhminchand Bothra sought condonation of delay in filing a review application against the order dated 21‑01‑2015 in Writ Petition No. 740/2015. The review was filed on 06‑01‑2016 after the Supreme Court, on 13‑04‑2015, allowed the withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition. The respondents did not …
Madhukar Ramchandra Palve filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking a court direction that Zilla Parishad Nos. 4 and 5 consider representations he had made. The petitioner argued that the authorities had not acted on his representations. The Court examined whether the Zilla Parishad was obligated to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging a bogus allotment of land (Survey No. 56, Kadiwadgaon village, Beed district) and sought court‑ordered action against the authorities. They relied on a representation dated 29‑01‑2014 submitted by the Tahsildar, which indicated that an inquiry had been …
The petitioners, representing several groups of forest dwellers, sought to withdraw their writ petitions while requesting that the interim relief remain in force. The Court considered the petitioners' request and the role of the Committee constituted to protect their rights. It ordered that all the …
The petitioner, Jalgaon Zilla S. T. Karmachari Sahakari Path Pedhi Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. Over the course of the proceedings, a substantial lapse of time occurred. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the …
Petitioners Pramod Madharao Badgujar and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition was filed under the appropriate writ jurisdiction. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel …
The petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 2089, 2091, 2096, 3012, 3013 of 2016) seeking a mandatory direction that the State of Maharashtra frame a specific policy within a fixed timeline. They argued that the earlier order in Writ Petition No. 2087 of 2016, which dealt with a similar …
The petitioners, Baburao Vithal Sanap and another, filed a writ petition seeking rental compensation for land that had been acquired, claiming entitlement from the date of possession until the award under the Land Acquisition Act. The High Court examined whether such a claim could be entertained …
The petitioners, owners of land in Tisgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their property, alleging that the statutory requirements under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act – notably publication in two widely‑circulated newspapers and posting of a public notice – were not complied …
The petitioners, Janardhan Nivrutti Panchal and Kalindabai Vishnu Chavan, filed civil applications seeking an early date of hearing for appeals pending since 2013 concerning compensation claims against the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, represented by the Collector of Latur, opposed the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their grievance under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act had been addressed, the related amount withdrawn, and an appeal pending, but a representation filed on 30.11.2015 with the Chief Administrator of CIDCO remained undecided. They sought a …
Tulshiram Ramchandra filed a writ petition and several related civil applications seeking to vacate an interim relief that had been in force for a long period. The Court noted that the interim relief had been operating for an extended time and ordered that the petition be placed for final disposal …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The petitioner, Kalikadevi Bahuuddeshi... Krida Va Sanskrutika Mandal, filed Writ Petition No. 11667 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through its President S.V. Kshirsagar, sought relief but later instructed its …
The Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Gadkhamb, represented by its President Bapuro Khushal Patil, filed writ petition No. 4621 of 2017 against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents seeking relief regarding its pay scale. The petitioner argued that its pay scale had not been fixed …
The petitioners, a large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and payment of arrears, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra …
The petitioners, a large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007 and 2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is continuous and the scheme has been renamed but …
Petitioners Chandrakant Babasaheb Garje and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted leave to withdraw, disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, and vacated any interim relief …
The petitioners, Kesharbai Ramlal Salambad and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, they applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and permitted the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed …
The petitioner, Ranjana Baba Mane, filed a writ petition challenging her disqualification as a member of the Gram Panchayat on the ground that she had not submitted a caste validity certificate. The High Court examined whether the petition could be entertained given that the term of the Gram …
The petitioner, Sunita Rama Khude, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The Court had previously ordered on 27 March 2026 that failure to appear on the next date would result in dismissal for want of prosecution. The petitioner did not appear on the scheduled date of 10 …
The petitioner, a retired lecturer, challenged clauses 3 and 4 of a 1983 Government decision that limited service‑continuity protection to teachers absorbed within the same management, alleging violation of Article 14. He argued that earlier circulars and resolutions (1975, 1976, 1981) entitled him …
The petitioners, Tukaram Dagadu Gaikwad and Pushpalata Manohar Khambete, filed writ petitions (Nos. 11663 and 11666 of 2017) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that the substantive issue raised in the petitions had already been decided by a …
The petitioner, Narayandas Shankarlal Agrawal, filed Writ Petition No. 4869 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for …
The petitioner, Shivraj Dnyanoba Ghule, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an unspecified action of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Shri Nagargoje Ankush N., requested permission to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioners, owners of land in Tisgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their property by the State of Maharashtra and CIDCO, alleging procedural violations under the Land Acquisition Act, including non‑compliance with the dual‑newspaper publication requirement of Section 6(2) and the …
The applicant, Shankar Ambadas Jadhav, filed a civil application seeking relaxation of a condition imposed by the High Court on 9 January 2009, which required him to furnish a bank guarantee for the withdrawal of a deposited amount. The condition became moot after the first appeal in the same matter …
The petitioner, Vikas Kishanrao Dharurkar, filed a writ petition challenging the Election Commission's notification dated 17 February 2017 that delimited wards for the Parbhani City Municipal Corporation elections. The petition sought to set aside the notification on grounds of its validity. The …
The petitioner, Mhatardeo Bhimaji Pakhare, filed Writ Petition No. 11655 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. Over the years, no substantive progress was made and the petition remained pending. The petitioner’s counsel …
A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012 sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural Development …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 3232 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Over the years, the petition remained pending and, by the efflux of time, became infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition could no longer be pursued. The Court …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur that were acquired for a minor irrigation project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates of Rs.1.5-2.4 lakh per hectare, which the claimants challenged as inadequate, arguing the …
The High Court of Bombay heard a massive group of appeals arising from a land‑acquisition proceeding for the Katpur minor‑irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court and the acquiring body (the State) contested the same award. The claimants …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The High Court of Bombay heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the reference court. The claimants argued that the land was …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) filed several stamp duty appeals against multiple respondents, many of whom were deceased. The corporation sought condonation of substantial delays—up to 2832 days—in bringing the legal heirs of the deceased onto the record and in …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered several civil applications filed by Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation seeking condonation of delay in bringing legal heirs of deceased respondents and in filing stamp appeals. The court examined a delay of 2,832 days in …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer undervalued their land, which they contended was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. The claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the land was irrigated and the rate of Rs.4,00,000 per acre was inadequate. The State …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging that the lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and enhanced by the Reference Court, arguing …
The High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for the Katpur minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were taken from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court, arguing that the land was irrigated and …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur that were acquired for a minor irrigation project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates of Rs.1.5‑2.4 lakh per hectare, which the claimants challenged as inadequate, seeking Rs.20 …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing stamp duty appeals and in bringing the legal heirs of deceased respondents on record. The court examined whether the substantial delays—up to 2832 days—could be …
The petitioners filed three civil applications seeking an early date of hearing for appeals pending since 2013 concerning compensation claims against the State of Maharashtra. The applications were filed before the High Court at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The Court examined the request and noted the …
The petitioners filed three civil applications seeking an early date of hearing for appeals pending since 2013 concerning compensation claims against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the appeals had been pending for an extended period and required a definitive schedule for final …
The petitioner, Sarika Yuvraj Patil, filed a writ petition (No. 3974 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for an extended period. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that, due to the efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous. The court …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a group of appeals arising from the acquisition of 104 hectares of land for the Katpur minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, arguing that the …
The case involved a large group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares of agricultural land were acquired. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for a minor irrigation project, alleging the lands were irrigated and the award was too low. The State (acquiring body) …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The case involved a large group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was far too low and …
The case involved a group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was inadequate, asserting the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (the owners of 104 ha of agricultural land) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, arguing …
The High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, while the acquiring body contested the same award as …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Latur and challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging it was too low and that the land was irrigated, warranting a higher rate. The acquiring body appealed, contending the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a mass of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the award of Rs 4,00,000 per acre for dry land (and higher rates for irrigated land) was inadequate and that they …
Petitioner Madhukar Gobra Rathod filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra to decide his representation dated 16 January 1990, and alternatively to initiate land acquisition proceedings for a parcel of land. No counsel appeared for the petitioner. The Court examined the …
The petitioner, Ravikumar Sukhdeo Raybhole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. Over the course of the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, due to the passage of time, …
The case involved Vishwanathappa Nagshettiappa Kapse (deceased) represented by his legal heirs against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant's counsel, Shri Ravibhushan P. Adgaonkar, sought an extension of time to deposit a specified amount. The respondent, the State, was represented by Ms. Rashmi …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 4946 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioners’ counsel informed the court that there was nothing left to pursue in the petition. Consequently, the court found the petition to be infructuous. The judges …
Shiva Trusts Rajesh Bhaiyya Tope College of Pharmacy filed writ petition No. 9378 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the Pharmacy Council of India. The petition remained pending for several years. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, by reason of the efflux …
The petitioner, Shiva Trusts Pratibhatai Pawar College of Pharmacy, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petition was filed in 2015 and, due to the passage of time, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court considered whether …
The petitioner, Smita Mahadeo Lendave Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and, finding no impediment, granted leave to withdraw. …
A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012 sought regularisation, permanency benefits and creation of super‑numerary posts, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural …
The petitioners, Tukaram Bhiva Aaglave and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a matter that they claimed was already decided in an earlier order dated 13 January 2026 and in the reported case of Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan & Ors. v. State of …
The petitioner, Maharashtra Association for Canoeing and Kayaking through its member Amrut Madhavrao Mundhe, filed a writ petition. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that due to subsequent developments, the reliefs sought no longer survived. The court, noting this, …
M/s. Namrata Construction Company filed Writ Petition No. 4331 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. …
The petitioners, junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, claimed that they had worked continuously and were entitled to regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary. The State of Maharashtra, the Union of …
The petitioner, Kondappa Sadashiv Kore, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Indian Railways to construct a new railway station at Kallam Road near Kasbe Tadwale and to order all trains to halt there. The High Court examined whether it had the jurisdiction and expertise to entertain such …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 400‑day delay in filing appeals arising from the same land acquisition proceedings. The court, relying on its earlier order in CA No.4670/2012, held that the delay was condonable. It allowed all the pending civil …
Petitioners Prabhakar Venkatrao Patil and Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahkari Society filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Latur and the State Co-operative Election Authority respectively. No appearance …
The petitioners filed two writ petitions (Nos. 4311/2016 and 4312/2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that, due to the passage of time, the petitions had become infructuous. The Court examined whether the petitions could still be …
Ratan Asaram Wagh, suffering from alcoholic liver cirrhosis, applied to the Education Officer for reimbursement of liver transplant expenses, but was denied because the disease was not listed in the Government's medical reimbursement scheme. He filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a …
Petitioners Bhaiyasaheb Limbaji Shitole and Sunil Zoting Bhalerao filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court granted them a final opportunity to appear, setting a deadline of 23 January 2026, and warned that failure to appear would result in dismissal. The …
The petitioner, Shakil Abdul Raheman Qureshi, filed a writ petition (30-WP-6574-2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. An order dated 09.01.2026 required the petitioner to appear, but he failed to do so. The court noted the non‑appearance and, under procedural rules, dismissed the …
The applicant, Burzin Jangoo Printer, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited in the High Court following a judgment (MACP No.133/2018) that awarded Rs.14,00,000 as compensation against The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. The insurer appealed the award on the ground of …
The petitioner, Chandrakant Sakharlal Suratwala, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by a bank under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The court examined whether the petitioner could contest the notice and whether an alternative remedy existed. It held that the petitioner has an …
Ravindra Baliram Chavan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking that the State authorities consider his representation dated 20 March 2014. The petitioner argued that the authorities had failed to act on his representation, causing prejudice. The respondents, the State of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking directions to decide representation and hold an enquiry against a respondent. The case remained pending for several years and was adjourned at the petitioners' request in July 2018. The court observed that the petitioners had lost interest in …
The petitioner, Sukhdeo Amrut Patil, filed Writ Petition No. 9073 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for an extended period without any substantive developments. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioners, junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, claimed that despite continuous service they were denied regularisation and permanency benefits because of artificial technical breaks. The State of Maharashtra, the …
A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007 and 2012 sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural Development …
Shahik Jalil Shahik Chand filed Writ Petition No. 8160 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was pending for an extended period, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the cause of action had become …
The petitioner, Jamir Kueshi Dadamiya Kureshi, filed Writ Petition No. 4703 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Union of India and another party. The petition was pending for an extended period, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, due …
The case involved a large group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants alleged that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was inadequate. The claimants …
The case involved a large group of land acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court was too low and that the land was irrigated, seeking a higher rate and interest under Section 34 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
Shri Shaneswar Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Borgaon, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra and other authorities to grant it permission to operate an aided tribal ashram school at Janapuri, Loha, Nanded, which had been previously run by another institution that is …
The case involved a large group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the lands were irrigated and that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. The claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging it was too low and that the land was irrigated, not dry. The acquiring body appealed, contending the award was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The petitioner, Kishor Dinkar Sanap, filed a writ petition (No. 1412 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Over time, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after noting the petition was no longer viable, disposed of it as …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, while the acquiring body …
The High Court considered applications for condonation of delay in several first‑appeal matters where the original orders had been dismissed for default. The court examined a 103‑day delay and other procedural lapses, noting that all parties were served and present before the court. It held that the …
The petitioners sought a court order directing the school authorities to correct their caste entry in school records from "Mala Jangam" to "Hindu‑Nhavi". They relied on the Full Bench judgment in Janabai v State of Maharashtra, which held that under Clause 26.4 of the Maharashtra Secondary School …
The Society for Adoption Knowledge Awareness & Resource (Sakar) filed Writ Petition No. 7459 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition was originally filed on grounds that were not detailed in the …
The petitioner, Chandrakant Suresh Nargulla, was listed as number one on a waiting list for the post of Civil Engineering Assistant. A vacancy arose in 2017, and the petitioner claimed he should be appointed based on his position on the list. The court examined the terms of the waiting list and …
The petitioner, Dnyanoba Sitaram Mundhe, filed writ petition No. 868 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The matter was heard before Justices Kishore C. Sant and Sushil M. Ghodeswar. During the hearing, the parties informed the Court that they …
The petitioner, Idara-e-Behboodi Niswan Education Society, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Shri Kulkarni Girish N. (Mardikar), applied for leave to withdraw …
The petitioner, Babasaheb Kashinath Pardhi, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The Court noted that the issue had already been decided by a Full Bench in a prior case. It was admitted that the post in question did not receive a grant until 2005, making the …
The petitioner, Pragat Maharashtra Mandal Degloor, filed Writ Petition No. 8458 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through its counsel, submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The court …
The petitioner, Syed Khaja Miyan Syed Baba Miyan, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, in both the morning and subsequent sessions of the hearing. The court inferred that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the writ petition. Consequently, the court exercised its …
Petitioners Dattatray Hanmantrao Khandare and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners were represented by Smt. Surekha G. Chincholkar, while the respondents were represented by Mr. S. …
The petitioners, MANTHAN BEER SHOPEE SELU through proprietor R.M. Lokulwar, filed writ petition No. 11661 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition remained pending for several years. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
The petitioners, Dilip Vinayak Thorat and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later approached the Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The petitioners were represented by Advocate S.B. Kakde, while the State was represented by Advocate Saie …
Petitioners Vinayak Tukaram Tekale and another filed a writ petition (14 WRIT PETITION NO. 2774 OF 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the District Social Welfare Officer, Osmanabad and others. The petition sought relief under Article 226 of the Constitution …
Four writ petitions filed in 2016 challenged the jurisdiction of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) over pharmacy colleges, seeking relief regarding admissions and regulatory authority. The petitioners argued that the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) should have supremacy over …
Four writ petitions (Nos. 6687, 6689, 6690, 6691 of 2016) were filed by pharmacy colleges challenging the admission process and the jurisdictional hierarchy between the Pharmacy Council of India and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). The petitioners contended that AICTE's …
Four writ petitions filed in 2016 challenged the jurisdiction of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) over pharmacy colleges, seeking relief regarding admissions. The petitioners argued that the Pharmacy Council should have exclusive authority over such matters. The Court observed …
The petitioner, Ms. Bharati Ramesh Tayade, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Nashik, to decide her claim dated 01/06/2012 within a stipulated time. No counsel was appointed for the petitioner, while Ms. J. P. Reddy, AGP, …
The petitioner, Sumit Jairam Patil, filed a writ petition seeking the approval of his appointment by the Education Officer (Secondary). The petition alleged that the proposal for his appointment was pending with the respondent. The Court examined whether the Education Officer was obligated to …
The petitioners, Late Haribai Warpudkar Gramin Mahila Sevabhavi Sanstha and another, filed Writ Petition No. 8325 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education. The petition was presented by Advocate Anshuman …
The petitioner, Archana Magasvargiya Mahila Vikas Pratishthan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later informed the Court that its grievance had been redressed. Accordingly, the petitioner sought …
The petitioner, Syed Shahin Sharafat Ali Borikar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. After the proceedings, the petitioner, through his advocate, requested leave to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of filing had been achieved. The Court …
The petitioner, Suryabhan Shankar Malunjakar, filed writ petition No. 6275 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner failed to appear for the first hearing and again did not appear when the matter was called for a second time. The Court observed that the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Sardar Patel Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a writ petition seeking certain reliefs against the State of Maharashtra and others. After filing, the Government issued a decision on 7 October 2024 granting the reliefs sought. The petitioner’s chairman communicated to the counsel that, …
The petitioners, junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) from 2007‑2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural Development Agency …
The petitioner, Vikas Kishanrao Kamble, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The Court noted that this issue had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment. It was admitted that the post in question had not received a grant until 2005, rendering the petitioner …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, presumably related to compensation. The petitioners later informed the court that they had already received and accepted the compensation. The court examined whether the petition remained maintainable after the relief had …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Shikshan Prasarak and Samajit Vikas Mandal, challenged a communication dated 14‑06‑2017 that permitted the Zilla Parishad to open an 8th‑standard class in the same village where the petitioners already run a school up to 8th standard. They argued that a …
The petitioners, Sandeep Krushnanath Kharad and others, filed a writ petition seeking benefits under the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Shetkari Sanman Yojana-2017 circular dated 28 June 2017. They later requested permission to withdraw the petition and instead approach the appropriate authorities with …
The petitioners, Pralhad Dhansing Rathod and another, filed Writ Petition No. 8938 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Assets Reconstruction Company India Ltd and others. The petition sought relief, but over the years the petition became stale. Counsel for the petitioners …
The petitioner, Jagannath Laxman Gaikwad, filed a writ petition seeking correction of his occupation in the title clause of a land record. He also requested that Respondent No.4 decide pending representations dated 5 April 2018 and 14 June 2018, which had remained unresolved for several years. The …
The petitioner, Rajendra Baburao Ubale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the respondent corporation asserted that the petitioner had died, a claim the petitioner’s counsel denied having received any instruction about. The court examined …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking an injunction to restrain the respondents from disturbing their peaceful possession. The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court examined whether such a prayer for injunction falls within the jurisdiction of the High …
The petitioners, a cultural organization, filed a writ petition seeking the authorities' approval of a fresh staffing pattern proposal for a school, contingent on student strength. They requested that the authorities consider the proposal within a reasonable time. The petition was heard by a …
The petitioners challenged a draft development plan published by the President of the Municipal Council, Jamner, arguing that the President lacked authority under the relevant town‑planning Act and that the plan should have been sanctioned by the Director of Town Planning. They also pointed to a …
The petitioners, Pradeep Kesarilal Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The learned Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that the issue had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan v. State of …
The State of Maharashtra filed numerous civil applications seeking condonation of a 400‑day delay in filing appeals arising from the same land acquisition proceedings. Relying on a prior order (CA No.4670/2012) that had condoned delay, the Court examined whether the present delay warranted …
The State of Maharashtra filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a 400‑day delay in filing appeals arising from the same acquisition proceedings. The State relied on a prior order of this Court dated 9 January 2015 in CA No.4670/2012, which had already condoned a similar delay. The Court …
Petitioners Soniya Ramesh Solanke and Aasha Nathu Marathe filed writ petitions challenging the State of Maharashtra. They moved a motion seeking a clerical correction in paragraph 2 of the order dated 23.01.2026, requesting the insertion of the words “and Nandurbar respectively”. The Court examined …
The case involved a large group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court and the acquiring body sought to overturn it. The Reference Court had fixed …
The petitioner, Sangharatna Narayan Chaudante, filed Writ Petition No. 9713 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Advocate Rahul M. Gaikwad, later moved the Court requesting leave to withdraw the …
The petitioners, former teachers at a government school, claimed arrears of salary and regularisation of their appointments, alleging they had worked from 2009 to 2018 without payment. They sought the court’s direction to compel the respondents to approve their appointments and pay dues. The court …
The petitioner, Nitin Shivram Limkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed …
Ashok Girdharlal Khandelwal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court, on 17 April 2026, warned that failure to appear on the next date would result in dismissal for want of prosecution. The petitioner did not appear on the scheduled date of 8 May 2026, …
The petitioner, Aniruddha Eknath Latpate, filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the Superintendent of Police, Parbhani, consider a representation he submitted on 25 November 2016. He relied on a prior judgment of this Court (Writ Petition No.12966/2017) which held that interest at 12% per …
The petitioner, Balasaheb Dagdu Pandit, filed a writ petition challenging a grievance that had been considered by the State of Maharashtra. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was absorbed into service and subsequently retired upon superannuation. The petitioner’s counsel informed the …
The petitioner, Vasant Rambhau Bhadane, was appointed as Mistri Grade‑II in 1983 and was placed on a time‑bound pay scale in 1995, becoming eligible for a higher pay scale from December 2007. Despite this entitlement, he was not paid the benefits of the second time‑bound scale before his retirement …
The petitioners, Anil Yashwant Kardure and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the National Highway Authority and the Collector of Osmanabad to pass a fresh award because their names were omitted from an earlier compensation award. They alleged that compensation had been paid …
The National Education Society sought the High Court’s intervention to compel the State of Maharashtra to approve its proposals for establishing Urdu‑medium schools in villages listed in the master plan. The petitioner alleged that the proposals, recommended by the district‑level committee, had been …
The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, filed multiple writ petitions seeking directions for the Government to absorb them into regular service. The Court examined whether any right had accrued to the petitioners to …
The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, filed writ petitions seeking a direction that the Government absorb them into regular service. The Court noted that their engagement was limited to a specific scheme and that …
The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA), filed writ petitions seeking a direction that the Government absorb them into regular service. They contended that their employment under the scheme gave them a …
The petitioner, Raju Banshi Kohok, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The learned Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that the matter had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. …
The petitioner, Arjun Jalaba Morea, was appointed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA). He filed a writ petition seeking direction that he be absorbed into regular government service. The Court examined whether a person appointed solely for a scheme can be …
The petitioner, a part‑time teacher at Asta High School, challenged the Education Officer's refusal to sanction his salary and the subsequent termination of his services. He claimed that his appointment was a permanent part‑time post approved by the authorities and that no inquiry or due‑process was …
Petitioner Vitthal Santram Dahatonde filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner learned that the matter had already been decided by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. …
The writ petition filed in 2017 by M/s Pranav Omprakash Khake and others against the Union of India remained unattended; no party appeared when the matter was called in both the morning and second sessions. The court observed that the petition appears to have been abandoned by the petitioners. …
The petitioners, a group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007 and 2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and three years’ arrears, contending that they have continuously served and that the Maharashtra Rural …
The petitioner, Vaibhav Prabhakr Kulkarni, sought allotment of a plot that had been purchased by his father in an auction conducted by a bank. The plot is designated for industrial use, but the petitioner submitted a proposal for a restaurant, a commercial activity, which the Maharashtra Industrial …
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Dhondiba Baburao Shep, sought condonation of a 282‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an award that enhanced their compensation. The Court examined whether the delay could be justified under the principles of equity and procedural law. Considering the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking recovery of a sum from the respondents. The Government, acting as a respondent, filed an affidavit stating that the amount in question had already been recovered from respondent No. 4. The court examined the affidavit and found that the relief sought by …
The petitioners, Gangabharati Mahila Bachat Gat, filed a writ petition challenging the order of allotment of a fair price shop by the State of Maharashtra. The respondents argued that an alternative remedy existed in the form of an appeal before the Commissioner. The Court examined whether the writ …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition …
The petitioner, Ramprasad Tulshiram Raut, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court had previously ordered on 10 March 2026 that the petition must be argued on the next date, otherwise it would be dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner failed to …
Petitioner Ratnamala Pralhad Salve filed a writ petition seeking an appointment as Anganwadi Sevika, invoking two government resolutions dated 12 March 2008 and 13 August 2014. The petitioner asked the court to direct the respondent authority to decide her claim and issue an appointment order. The …
Sharad Kisan Bhumbar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and, finding no impediment, …
The petitioner, Santosh Govindrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the case, the sole petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court of the death, raising the question of the petition’s continuance. The Court …
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands were acquired, filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition proceedings. The Court examined whether the delay could be excused and under what conditions. It held that …
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands were acquired, filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition awards. The High Court examined whether such delay could be condoned and whether the claimants could claim statutory …
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands were acquired, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition. The Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and under what conditions. It held that condonation …
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands had been acquired, filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition. The Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and whether the claimants could still claim …
The petitioner, Ganesh Vishwanath Daud, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The issue before the court was whether it could grant leave to withdraw a pending writ petition. The court …
Petitioners Sanjay Kalyan Kadam and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction restraining Respondent No.3 from proceeding with actions based on a measurement report filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records in a civil suit pending before the Senior Division Civil …
Petitioner Purushottam Sheshrao Neharkar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth and others. The petitioner, through his counsel, later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered …
The petitioner, Marathwada Gramin Apang Vikas Mandal, filed a writ petition but failed to cooperate with the court despite attempts by counsel to establish contact. The court noted the petitioner's non‑responsiveness and, on that basis, held that the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the …
Sahebrao Kachru Ghuge filed writ petition No. 27‑WP‑4567‑2018 seeking a direction that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 consider an application he made on 20 June 2016 for information. The petition alleged that the authorities had not yet acted on his request. The High Court examined whether it could compel …
The petitioner, represented by Mr. P.B. Joshi, sought leave to withdraw the writ petition filed against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The …
The petitioner, Ramabai Digambar Kulkarni, filed a writ petition seeking the return of land acquired in 1991 and handed over to the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) for an industrial area, alleging that the land remained unused. The MIDC rejected the request, stating the land …
The petitioner, an engineering student, mistakenly clicked the cancellation button on the Directorate of Technical Education (DTE) website, leading to the cancellation of his admission to Jawaharlal Nehru Engineering College. He filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his admission not be …
The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court despite a specific order dated 06.04.2026 directing their presence. The court observed that the petitioners were not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No …
The original claimants filed two civil applications seeking a court order directing the respondent to deposit a deficit amount arising from a miscalculation of days in a prior award, together with 12% interest. The court found that the discrepancy in calculation was undisputed and that the award had …
The petitioners, Vandana Vasantrao Ingale and another, filed a writ petition seeking pension under the old pension scheme. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, contended that the issue had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan v. State of Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Pranita Mangesh Lohare, filed a writ petition (No. 11116 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was pending for an extended period, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, due to …
M/s Brite Industries, through its authorized representative, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later moved the Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to approach the Court again if …
The original claimants filed two civil applications seeking a court order directing the respondent to deposit a deficit amount arising from a miscalculation of days in a prior award, together with 12% interest. The court found that the discrepancy in calculation was undisputed and that the award had …
The plaintiff, R.L. Steels and Energy Ltd., claimed that a storm on 5 July 2016 caused the collapse of its steel‑melting shed and damage to stock, invoking a Standard Fire and Special Perils policy issued by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. The insurer denied the claim, asserting that no storm occurred …
The petitioner, Sindhubai Vilas Adsul, filed a writ petition seeking reinstatement as a Peon/Saphai Kamgar in the Rural Hospital, Paithan. The High Court examined whether it had jurisdiction to entertain a service reinstatement claim and considered the applicability of the limitation period. The …
The petitioners, Jai Hind Education Trust, sought a writ directing the State not to force their second school to absorb eight surplus teachers as ordered by the Education Officer. The Education Officer had issued a directive on 10 November 2017 for the school to take in the eight teachers. During …
