Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
223 judgments · newest first · showing 201–223
Vivabo Product Private Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Upasna Agrawal, sought permission to withdraw the petition on the ground of inherent defects in the pleadings and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The court issued notice …
Kundan Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash a recovery notice dated 26‑06‑2025 issued by a private bank for pending EMIs and ECS bounce charges, to restrain coercive recovery proceedings, and to allow payment in instalments. The respondents argued that …
The petitioner, Balvir Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 10‑10‑2025 and a notice dated 24‑02‑2026 issued by a private bank under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner argued that the High Court could intervene in the bank's …
Petitioner Santosh Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing State Bank of India to reschedule two of his loan accounts. The bank contended that a settlement had been reached in a National Lok Adalat on 14 March 2026, wherein the petitioner would pay an upfront …
Petitioners Lokesh Kumar Joshi and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an order dated 28.01.2026 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) in a case involving Jana Small Finance Bank, and to restrain the bank from taking physical possession of …
Petitioners M.M. Industries and Smt. Meenu Bansal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondent bank to reconsider an OTS (One Time Settlement) proposal dated 11‑09‑2025 and to restrain the bank from taking any coercive action against them. The bank contended …
Ashok Kumar Jaiswal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while counsel for the respondents were present. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time or the petitioner's lack of interest. Consequently, the …
Petitioner Smt. Nasreen Kausar filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 74227 of 2011) before the Allahabad High Court. Neither the petitioner nor her counsel appeared for the hearing, though the State's standing counsel was present. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the …
The petition (Writ No. 37629 of 2011) filed by Rahmat Fruit Centre against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others sought relief, but no counsel appeared for the petitioner. The respondent’s counsel informed the court that a later writ petition (No. 5874 of 2022) had already been decided, rendering …
The petitioner, a society registered under the U.P. Goshala Act, 1964, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order dated August 2024 that rejected its claim for payment under a government order of September 2023, on the ground that it was a religious institution running a goshala. …
The petitioner, Kadeer Khan, challenged the disconnection of his electricity supply, alleging that no charge-sheet had been filed against him for the alleged theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act and that he had been regularly paying his dues. The court noted that the Department’s …
The petitioner, Mohd Farid Khan, challenged a sale notice issued by a financial institution for recovery of a loan of Rs.28,97,633.05 under the SARFAESI Act. He offered to pay the full amount if granted a time‑extension. The bank agreed to accept an initial payment of Rs.8 lakh by 18 April 2026 and …
The petitioner, Saurabh Vohra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar (respondent 3) to enforce a recovery certificate dated 6 January 2026 issued under Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation …
Petitioner Shashi Jain filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to enforce a recovery certificate dated 06.10.2023 issued under Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, pursuant to an …
The appellant, Ram Niwas Singh, claimed that his appointment as Assistant Clerk in a Higher Secondary School in 1979 was valid and that the recovery of his salary by the State was unlawful. The dispute centered on whether the post to which he was appointed actually existed and whether the District …
The writ petition (Writ C No. 35096 of 2010) was filed by Kabristan Dhake Wala Thru Secretary Village and another against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending for several years and, by the date of hearing in 2026, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The …
The petitioner, Ajab Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 4025 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's standing counsel was present. The court noted that the matter, dating back to 2010, appeared to have become infructuous due to the …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 62718 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The matter was listed for hearing, but on the date of hearing no petitioner or their counsel appeared. The respondent counsel, including R.K. Shukla …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 19162 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. Over the years, the petitioners failed to appear before the Court and did not file any illness slips for their counsel, indicating a lack of …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 43844 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition remained pending for several years and, on the date of hearing, no representative of the petitioner appeared before the court. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an order dated 17 May 2025 in which the District Collector entertained an application by a private tenure holder concerning possession of land that was already the subject of a civil suit. The petitioners argued that the …
The petition filed by M/s Aarti Industries through its proprietor against Central Bank of India, Khurja Branch was consigned to the records. The Court directed that the order in Writ‑C No. 42640 of 2024 in the case of M/s Pooja Industries v. Central Bank of India, Khurja Branch be referred to for …
The petition filed by M/s Pooja Industries under writ jurisdiction sought relief against Central Bank of India, Khurja Branch. The respondent contended that the petitioner and the bank had reached a settlement under the One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme, with a settlement amount of Rs.13,90,000. The …
