Created by Fuzzy Cloud

TEJ PRATAP TIWARI

18 judgments · newest first · showing 1–18

JUVENILE XversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Juvenile X, aged 17 at the time of the alleged offence, was detained since March 2021 and denied bail by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act. The appellant appealed under Section 101(5) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, contending that none of the grounds for bail …

AJUGYA NARAIN TIWARI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief, but no applicant appeared before the court. The State's counsel was present. The High Court dismissed the application on the ground of want of prosecution, …

NADEM MIANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Nadem Mian, filed a criminal appeal under Section 380 of the B.N.S.S.S. challenging an order dated 14‑11‑2025 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No.2, Bareilly, which had dismissed an application filed under Section 379 read with Section 215 of the B.N.S.S.S. The …

MUNNA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Munna Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking permission to withdraw securities he had furnished in favor of the accused, Rajendra Singh, in a criminal appeal. The appeal pertained to a case involving offences under Sections 452, 354Kha, 504, 506 IPC, the …

SHAHNAWAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Shahnawaj, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a cognizance order dated 06‑10‑2025. He did not contest the merits of the case but requested liberty to file a bail …

BABALU @ VIMAL KISHORE PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Babalu @ Vimal Kishore Pandey filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside the cognizance and summons order dated 01.11.2025 passed by the Special Judge. The appellant did not wish to …

SIPAHI SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC offences, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons. Their counsel did not contest the merits but requested …

MOGALI ALIAS BANTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Mogali alias Banti, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the IPC for alleged caste‑based abuse and other offences. The appellant argued that the alleged abuse was not made in public view, a requirement under Section 3(1)(Dha) of the SC/ST Act. The State …

NITESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Nitesh Kumar, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside the charge sheet and related orders and, more specifically, to obtain liberty to file a bail application before the trial …

SMEER RAGHAVversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The counsel for the applicant later moved that the application be withdrawn. The State's Advocate General was present but made no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the …

RAGHUVENDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of charge sheet No.31/2024 relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, which …

ANTUversusSTATE

The appellant, a police officer, was convicted under Section 307 IPC and the Arms Act for shooting a Sub‑Inspector during a night patrol in 1981. He appealed, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the requisite intent to murder, that the investigation was tainted by bias, and that he deserved …

KARUN KUMAR BALIYAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two criminal cases (Nos. 8152 of 2018 and 8601 of 2020) pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Muzaffarnagar, which arose from a crime reported under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 …

JAN MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and a cognizance/summoning order dated 04.04.2022 in a case involving Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely …

RAKSHA PAL AND OTHERSversusSTATE

The appellants Sadhu Singh and Amit Singh were convicted under IPC Sections 304 read with 34 and 325 read with 34 for the death of Atar Singh and injuries to Bhure Singh. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution evidence, noting the absence of timely medical reports, contradictions in …

SHESH PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, a fertilizer retailer, was convicted under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for alleged shortage of urea and calcium bags and sentenced to three months imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, seeking the benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, …

ANURAG KASHYAP AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 36984 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, …