Created by Fuzzy Cloud

VIBHA KANKANWADI

216 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

SAKEB ABDUL HAKIM OSMANI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, appointed on a contractual basis as District Disaster Management Officers/Divisional Disaster Management Coordinators, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking regularisation of their services and grant of permanency with all attendant benefits. The State, through its AGP, …

SHANKAR KACHRU KEDAREversusPUNJABAI SHANKAR KEDARE AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The appellant, Shankar Kachru Kedare, filed an appeal in the Bombay High Court Family Court against Punjabai Shankar Kedare and another. The appellant's counsel was absent, and the appellant failed to provide a fresh address for Respondent No.2 despite being granted accommodations. The court noted …

KAILAS PITAMBAR KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kailas Pitambar Koli, was initially appointed on compassionate grounds as a Watchman (Class‑4) in Jalgaon Municipal Corporation in 2005, despite possessing qualifications for a Class‑3 post. He repeatedly submitted representations between 2007 and 2021 requesting a revised …

VAIBHAV SHASHIKANT DHARMADHIKARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vaibhav Dharmadhikari, was appointed on compassionate grounds as a Coolie (Class‑4) in Jalgaon Municipal Corporation in 2005, although his qualifications entitled him to a Class‑3 post. He repeatedly submitted representations in 2005, 2007, 2016, 2017 and 2018 requesting a revised …

MARUTI LIMBAJI GOCHADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed two writ petitions in the Bombay High Court seeking interest payable under Section 80 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State pointed out that the petitioners had already filed applications …

PANJAB PRAKASHRAO PATIL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking to quash a 2015 communication that declared the reservation of certain lands in Hingoli for public amenities to have lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The respondents argued that a purchase …

JAYRAM DATTU KAWADE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a complaint on 11 February 2025 alleging corruption and requested respondent No.2 to investigate. Respondent No.2, by order dated 28 August 2025, constituted a committee, with respondent No.4 as a member, to conduct the inquiry. The petitioners claimed that the inquiry remained …

GAJANNAN NAYABRAO MOGALversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Gajannan Nayabrao Mogal, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Union of India and other respondents to decide a second appeal (dated 23‑12‑2024, bearing No. JC700772K) that he had filed, and to consider his claim for medical benefits under the applicable law. The …

AMOL SHIVAJI DHASversusTHE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Amol Shivaji Dhas, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State Information Commission to decide his second appeal dated 10 November 2025 within a stipulated period. The respondent's Additional Government Pleader waived service of notice and, on behalf of the Commission, …

SHAHEEN ALTAF SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shaheen Altaf Shaikh filed a criminal application seeking correction of the first paragraph and the second part of the operative order dated 24 June 2025 in Criminal Application No. 160 of 2025. The applicant contended that the order should have included Sections 304‑B, 306 and 498‑A of the Indian …

HEMANT SOMNATH KOTHAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182/2025 to 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that an alternative statutory remedy was available to them and that they intended to pursue that …

SACHIN SHANKAR DHAMANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (WP Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, alleging violations of their rights. During the hearing, the petitioners, …

PANDHARINATH BENIRAM KOTHAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (WP 1182/2025 to WP 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, alleging grievances that required judicial intervention. During the hearing, …

SUBHASH BENIRAM KOTHAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, represented by Mr. A. T. Jadhavar, argued that an alternative statutory remedy was available to address their grievances. They subsequently …

SATISH UDDHAV KOTHAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182/2025 to 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from alleged violations. The petitioners, represented by Advocate A. T. Jadhavar, informed the Court that an alternative statutory remedy was …

VIJAY SHANKAR CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, represented by Advocate A. T. Jadhavar, claimed that an alternative remedy was available to address their grievances. They subsequently informed …

PRAVIN BHILA KOTHAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (WP 1182/2025 to WP 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from alleged violations. The petitioners, represented by Mr. A. T. Jadhavar, argued that an alternative statutory remedy was available to …

SAYYED NASIR SAYYED ZAFARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (WP 1182/2025 to WP 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief presumably under constitutional or statutory provisions. The petitioners, through counsel, informed the Court that an alternative remedy was …

PRAMOD RAMDAS KOTHAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (WP/1182/2025 to WP/1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from alleged violations. The petitioners, represented by Advocate A. T. Jadhavar, informed the Court that an alternative statutory remedy was …

DILIP BABULAL BHADANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182‑1259 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that the petitioners, through their counsel, informed the bench that an alternative statutory remedy was available to them and that they …

DINESH DEVIDAS PENDHARKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large group of petitioners filed separate writ petitions (Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that an alternative remedy was available and that they intended to pursue that remedy instead of the writ …

DEEPAK JAYWANT BAGADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182‑1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, alleging violations of their rights. During the hearing, the petitioners’ counsel …

PANJAB PRAKASHRAO PATIL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking to quash a 2015 communication by the Maharashtra Urban Development Department that declared the reservation of certain lands in Hingoli district to have lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, and to …

Vitthal Mojiram SulaneversusSanjay Belsare

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Vithal Mojiram Sulane filed a continuous petition (No. 143 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After the court indicated it was unlikely to grant any relief, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition. The court accepted the request and disposed of …

ANJALI MAROTIRAO MUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, due to paucity of time, adjourned a large number of writ petitions and civil applications to specified future dates. The order lists each petition and the date to which it is adjourned. It also directs that any interim relief or undertaking in these …

AJAY JAGAN VYAWHAREversusTHE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a Mechanical Engineer employed by the Urban Development Department, was subjected to a departmental inquiry for alleged misconduct and financial irregularities arising in 2020. After a preliminary inquiry, a charge memo dated 17‑08‑2023 was served and an inquiry report was submitted …

VISHNUDAS KESHAVRAO CHATEversusKAMALBAI VISHNUDAS CHATE AND AOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Vishnudas Keshavrao Chate, filed an appeal in the Family Court at Aurangabad. The appellant's counsel was absent at the hearing despite a prior order warning that a further absence would lead to dismissal. No reason was provided for the continued non‑appearance, and the court inferred …

MAHADEO ASHRU BABARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Mahadeo Ashru Babar filed writ petition No.3353 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The Court, after hearing the petitioner’s counsel, indicated its reluctance to grant any relief. Consequently, the petitioner, through his …

AVINASH HARI KOLHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Avinash Hari Kolhe filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and another party. The applicant was represented by Mr. Y. H. Jadhav, while the respondent State was represented by Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP. The court, after noting a subsequent …

BHASKAR VITTHAL BHOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

In a civil application filed by Bhaskar Vitthal Bhole against the State of Maharashtra, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) noted that the matter was initially not listed but was taken on board upon mentioning. The applicant sought an amendment to the application due to a subsequent event. …

SUNIL VITTHALRAO SUSUNDRE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Sunil Vitthalrao Susundre and others, filed a civil application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, in connection with Writ Petition No. 2836 of 2026. They informed the court that they intended to file a separate petition regarding the matters raised. The learned Advocate …

CHARUSHILA @ SHAILAJA BHIMRAO JADHAVversusBHIMRAO TARAKCHAND JADHAV

DISMISSED

The appellant, Charushila @ Shailaja Bhimrao Jadhav, filed two family court appeals (Nos. 26 and 24 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Manoj M. Kadtu, repeatedly failed to appear at scheduled hearings on 29.01.2026, 13.02.2026 (after being granted …

SHANKAR BHAURAO MOTE AND ANOTHERversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Shankar Bhaurao Mote and another filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Union of India and others. The petitioner's counsel, appearing virtually, informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court …

X Y ZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

A 17-year‑old minor, a victim of rape, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking termination of her 27‑week pregnancy. The medical board, after examination, recommended termination via intra‑cardiac KCl injection, noting the fetus would be non‑viable. The Court, relying on constitutional …

MS MERRYGOLD ENTERPRISESversusTHE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

MerryGold Enterprises filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the authorized officer and others. The petitioner argued that the respondents had taken possession of the subject matter, rendering the petition ineffective. The respondents contended …

BALRAJ PRAKASH PANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation challenging the land acquisition for the proposed Jalna Township Project at Kharpudi village. The petitioner submitted a copy of a notification dated 23-29 July 2020 showing that the land acquisition had been denotified. The court observed that this …

ANIL VISHNU SUDRIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Anil Vishnu Sudrik filed writ petition No. 8272 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. After a considerable lapse of time, the petitioner argued that the petition had become infructuous and requested permission to withdraw it. …

DAMODHAR GANPATRAO GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a former primary teacher, sought a writ of mandamus directing the education authorities to fix his salary and grant retirement benefits as per the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions for the period 19 January 2006 to 1 May 2018. He claimed that his D.Ed. degree was cancelled in 2005, he …

MARKHELKAR SAMDANI ABDUL WAHEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, former primary teachers appointed to Scheduled‑Tribe reserved posts, retired on 30‑06‑2024 and were denied pension because the Zilla Parishads insisted on a fresh Tribe Validity Certificate. The petitioners relied on a 17‑Nov‑2014 order in Writ Petition No. 2716/2014 which protected …

BAIG NAWAB SAHEBJANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, former primary teachers appointed under a Scheduled Tribe reservation, were protected by a 2014 High Court order that waived any future reservation benefits but barred adverse action for lack of a Tribe Validity Certificate. After retiring in June 2024, the Zilla Parishads refused …

NARENDRA SHIVPRASAD MALIWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the establishment of a Primary Health Center at Circle Manatha, Taluka Hadgaon, District Nanded. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Jay Veer, stated that the purpose of the petition had been fulfilled. The Additional …

PRAKASH SINGA GAVITversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Prakash Singa Gavit, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a writ directing oil companies to honour the Scheduled Areas (Maharashtra) Order, 1985 by reserving LPG distributorships for Scheduled Tribe dealers in Maharashtra’s scheduled areas and to apply the same reservation …

ANITA SAMBHAJI KARDULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Anita Sambhaji Kardule filed a writ petition seeking directions for the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to decide her applications dated 28 January 2025 and 13 June 2025 within the stipulated period. The court allowed amendment of the petition and, upon the respondents' waiver …

GORAKHNATH RANGNATH YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

Gorakhnath Rangnath Yadav filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner sought an adjournment to comply with a prior order dated 17 January 2026. The Court granted a final adjournment, directing the petitioner to file an additional affidavit with documents by 6 …

SHAINATH KARBHARI GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shainath Karbhari Gaikwad, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to measure his land (Gut No. 99, new Gut No. 30) in Ghusur village, acquire 40 R of it and award compensation. The Court examined whether it could compel the authorities to carry out the …

PRAKASH ASHROBA NIRVAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award dated 29 September 2025 and the preceding administrative actions, alleging procedural violations, illegal involvement of the Collector and the Chief …

ANNAPURNA VAIJNATH MASURE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists, challenged the compensation award for lands acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, arguing that the District Level Committee’s minutes and a later award were illegal because they were passed without the statutory hearing required under …

MANDODARI SONAJI PANCHAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State. They argued that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …

RAMKISHAN DATTARAO TAKE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State of Maharashtra, the MSRDC and various officials. Their main grievance was that the District Level Committee …

VASANT KISHANRAO JADHAV AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the role of the District Level Committee in the acquisition process. They argued that the Land Acquisition Officer’s determination of compensation …

RATNAMALA UDDHAVRAO JAVALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State of Maharashtra, the MSRDC and various officials. They argued that the District Level Committee’s meeting on …

BHARAT VITTHAL DHAWASE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to respondent No.3 to decide two representations dated 15 July 2025 and 6 August 2025. Respondent No.3, through counsel Mr. Pulkundwar, waived service of notice and gave an undertaking to decide the representations within two weeks of …

BESSY KUZHIMANNILE MATHEWversusBANK OF BARODA THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Bessy Kuzhimannile Mathew, paid a sum as sale consideration to Bank of Baroda and later sought a refund of that amount along with interest. The Bank, through its counsel, undertook to refund the principal amount within four weeks, which the court accepted as a binding undertaking. …

SANGAMESHWAR GOVIND SHINDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, six Zilla Parishad teachers in Latur district, challenged transfer orders dated 22‑08‑2025 on the ground that the postings placed them more than 30 kilometres away from their spouses, allegedly contravening Government Resolutions of 07‑04‑2021 and 18‑06‑2024 which require such …

MANOHAR SHIVAJI PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Manohar Shivaji Patil, a Shikshan Sevak who had cleared both Maha‑TET and CTET, was implicated in a alleged TET examination scam. He filed Writ Petition No.4775 of 2023 and obtained an interim order protecting his salary but withholding any increment until the court’s further direction. The Project …

BEBINANDA CHANDRAKANT MUSKAWAD LATURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the construction of a Primary Health Center at Gudsoor, Tal. Udgir, District Latur. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the PHC had been constructed, rendering the purpose of the petition fulfilled. The court considered …

RAMSWARUP CHANDRABHAN AHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Ram Swarup Chandrabh an Aher filed a writ petition seeking a direction to Respondent No.2 to decide a pending revision petition within three months. The respondent's Attorney General pleaded and waived notice, stating that the revision petition would be decided within four months, which …

POPAT RAMNATH THORAT AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for Respondent No.3 to decide an application filed under Section 36‑A on 12‑Nov‑2020. The Attorney General for the respondents waived service of notice and, on behalf of Respondent No.3, undertook to decide the application within three …

SUDHAKAR TABAJI TEMKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a motion for "speaking to minutes" to correct clerical errors in an earlier order dated 17 January 2026 concerning several writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. The error involved the incorrect listing of …

SANTOSH VITTHAL DAREKARversusCHHAYA SANTOSH DAREKAR

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Santosh Vitthal Darekar, filed a family court appeal against Chhaya Santosh Darekar in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court directed the petitioner to provide a spare copy of the petition for service on the respondent by 6 March 2026. If the spare copy is supplied, the …

SONUBAI CHANDRASHEKHAR SHELARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner challenged a Government Resolution dated 30.01.2025 that granted a uniform 10 grace marks to all graduate candidates for Anganwadi Helper appointments, alleging arbitrariness and discrimination. She also contested the appointment of another candidate who, under the new marking system, …

RATNA MAGAN BHAMARE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, employees of Zilla Parishad schools in tribal and PESA areas, sought directions for the grant of the Ekstar (one‑step promotional) pay‑scale and arrears of salary as per Government Resolutions dated 06.08.2002, 14.08.2008 and 29.02.2024. The State of Maharashtra contended that the …

MAHADEV HANMANT SHINDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of writ petitions (Nos. 221 of 2026, 262 of 2026, 1710 of 2026, etc.) pending before it. The court considered the Administrative Order No. R(J-1)/216/2026 dated 11 March 2026, which recommended relocation of the cases. The judges noted …

NARAYAN BABURAO JADHAV AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, appointed as Assistants to Extension Officers in 1967 and later promoted to Junior Engineers, sought seniority and a higher pay scale under the Government Resolution dated 16 April 1984, which had been granted to similarly situated employees. They filed a writ petition in 2026 after …

NAGESH NARAYAN BARBINDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a former watchman who served temporarily from 1995 and was regularised in 2021, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction that his temporary service be counted for pension benefits upon retirement in October 2025. He submitted a representation on 4 September 2025 …

AJAY MANOHAR SHELKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ajay Manohar Shelke, filed a public interest litigation challenging the delay and handling of his complaint dated 16 September 2019 by certain respondents. The respondents (Nos. 3 and 4) submitted an affidavit-in-reply stating that they had finally considered the grievance and issued …

VISHNU BANKAT KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a retired Class‑III employee, challenged a 2022 order directing recovery of Rs.1,86,654 from his retirement benefits for allegedly not having passed the mandatory MSCIT examination between 2008 and 2014. He had been granted an exemption from the exam in 2014 upon turning 50, and …

ARUNA SEGA GAVITversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Aruna Sega Gavit, a former Assistant Teacher appointed in 1996 and reinstated after a termination was set aside, retired and sought the forwarding of her pension proposal to the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar. Despite a directive from the Education Officer on 20 July 2025, the school …

VASANT PANDURANG PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Vasant Pandurang Patil filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Collector of Sambhajinagar to forward pending reference applications to the competent authority within a month and for the competent authority to decide those references within a year. The respondent's Attorney …