Created by Fuzzy Cloud

VIKRAM D CHAUHAN

196 judgments · newest first · showing 1–196

SMT RAMRATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Ramrati, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Juvenile Magistrate (Crime Against Women) in Basti to decide her domestic violence case (Parivad Case No. 42 of 2026) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that undue delay would cause irreparable …

AYASHA KHANversusMOHAMMAD AHMAD

The petitioner, Ayasha Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Fatehpur, to decide a pending case (Case No. 258/2026) filed under Section 147 of the BNSS. The petitioner argued that the trial court had delayed …

SAPNA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sapna Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mirzapur, to dispose of a pending maintenance case (Case No. 128 of 2024) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner, represented …

JULEKHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Julekha and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mirzapur, to decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 423 of 2022) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. They alleged undue delay and asked …

LALIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Lalit Kumar, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Meerut, to conclude a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 129/2023) filed under Sections 417 and 494 of the IPC. The petitioner argued …

NIRDOSH CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nirdosh Chaudhary in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 218, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the IPC and Sections 13, 13(i)a, 13(i)b, 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant argued that the transaction was …

AADHAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petition filed by Aadhar Construction Company under Article 227 sought to set aside two lower court orders, contending that Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) should apply to a complaint case and allow the proceedings to be stopped. The petitioner argued that the original …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Rahul was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 223 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. He is not named in the FIR but his name appears in the confessional statement of a co‑accused, and he has been in custody since 24‑06‑2026. …

SMT. SEEMA ANJUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Seema Anjum, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.03, Muzaffarnagar to decide a pending family law case (Case No.1468/11 of 2024) within a stipulated time, alleging that delay would cause irreparable injury. …

AJAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Ajay Kumar Singh filed a petition under Article 227 challenging an order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Special Judge) under the Essential Commodities Act and an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC that refused registration of an FIR …

SHER ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sher Ali, a truck driver, was arrested after his vehicle carrying 525 bags of urea was intercepted. He claims he is falsely implicated, is not the owner of the goods, and seeks bail on parity with co‑accused who have already been released. The State’s counsel highlighted his criminal antecedents but …

DINESH KUMARversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside an order dated 27 February 2024 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate in Basti and a revisional order dated 5 November 2024 passed by the Session Judge. The relief sought was the quashing of both the magistrate's …

AKHIESH KUMAR CHAUBEYversusDR. NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner‑accused filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash a revisional judgment and an earlier order, alleging that he was denied a fair chance to cross‑examine the complainant after the complainant’s evidence was closed. The trial court had allowed the complainant’s recall …

HARDEV SINGHversusS.P.E./C.B.I. DEHRADUN

The appellant, Hardev Singh, filed a criminal appeal (No. 3212 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, counsel for the appellant informed the court that Hardev Singh had died on 16 October 2022. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, issued a report on 9 September …

FATIMA BEGUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Fatima Begum, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C.-II, Deoria, to decide Domestic Violence Appeal No. 97 of 2025 within a stipulated period. The appeal concerns an order dated 13 October 2025 passed in …

TARA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Tara Singh, a contractual employee, was arrested with Rs 12,000 allegedly received from co‑accused Sudhir Kumar, a junior engineer, under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Amendment 2018). He has been in custody since 21 July 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The …

PARMESHVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Parmeshveer, a government Lekhpal, was arrested after a trap team recovered Rs.20,000 of a demanded Rs.40,000 in a consolidation proceeding. He is charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, with a maximum penalty of seven years, and has been in custody since 18 July 2026. The …

KUSUM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Kusum Devi, filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal case (Crime No.101 of 2025) from Varanasi to Jaunpur on the ground of threat to her safety as complainant. The court noted that the case involves offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …

ABDUL JABBAR SIDDIQUI @ ABDUL JABBARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Abdul Jabbar Siddiqui applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Prevention of Corruption Act, where the alleged conduct occurred in 1999 but the FIR was lodged only in 2009. The applicant argued that there was no need for custodial …

NARENDRA KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Narendra Kumar Tiwari, a Kanoongo, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.20,000 for land measurement, leading to a charge under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since July 18, 2026, and faces a maximum penalty of seven years, but has no …

SHASHANK TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shashank Tripathi, a police constable, was charged under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) for allegedly taking a bribe of Rs.70,000, of which Rs.60,000 was paid to a co‑accused investigating officer and Rs.10,000 was seized. He has been in custody since 8 …

SMT SWATI MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Swati Mishra, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Prayagraj, to decide her maintenance case (No. 818 of 2024) filed under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner argued that the …

CHANDRADEO YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 17-10-2006 and the related proceedings in S.S.T. No.12 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 420, 471, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. …

SALAMUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Salamuddin, the accused in Criminal Case No. 4593 of 2026 under Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kasganj to dispose of the case within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the trial had …

DURGESH JAISWAL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, accused in a domestic violence case (Smt. Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Durgesh Jaiswal and others), filed a transfer application under Section 12(1) of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, alleging threats and seeking relocation of the trial to another district. The court noted a prior decision …

VINOD JAISWAL @ VINOD KUMAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vinod Jaiswal, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash orders dated 07.07.2026 and 14.07.2026 passed by the Gram Nyayalaya, Kerakat, on a criminal case (Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC) alleging that the prosecution had failed to produce its key witness, Dr. A.P. Singh, …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ashok Kumar filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner argued that the accused had been arrested, rendering the petition moot. The Court examined whether a petition under Article 227 can continue when the subject …

VIJAY NATH PANDEY ALIAS SURESH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vijay Nath Pandey, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside two orders: one dated 30 July 2026 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) directing the lodging of a First Information Report (FIR) in a civil matter, and another dated 10 August 2026 by the Session Judge in a …

SATISH YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Satish Yadav and three others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, citing inherent defects in the filing. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party, were represented by …

SMT SHRUTIversusPRADEEP SHARMA @ PANKAJ

The petitioner, Smt Shruti, a wife, filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking a direction that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 4, Ghaziabad, expedite the pending complaint (Case No. 04 of 2025) and decide it within the …

SMT SHALINI KAPILAversusNEERAJ KAPILA

The petitioner, Smt Shalini Kapila, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District and Sessions Court, Agra, to conclude pending criminal and domestic violence proceedings against the respondent, Neeraj Kapila. The petition concerned Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 7225 of …

SHIV TIWARI @ ASHUTOSH TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF UP

The petitioner, Shiv Tiwari @ Ashutosh Tripathi, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court's intervention to ensure a timely decision on a recall application filed on 06.03.2026 in Session Trial No. 1263 of 2020 (State vs. Shyam Bajpai and others). The petitioner argued that the …

MANOJ KUMAR GAUR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar Gaur and five others filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash an order dated 17 September 2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and to restrain the State from registering a …

KAUSHIK SHUKLAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Kaushik Shukla filed a petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the State to release seized money of Rs.2,190,000 and other articles, based on an order of the Judicial Magistrate dated 18‑09‑2025. The State had filed Criminal Revision No.271/194 of 2025, which remains pending …

SHIV KESHARWANI ALIAS ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shiv Kesharwani, filed a criminal transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to challenge any future rejection of the transfer. The court granted this …

SMT JUHI KHAN AND ANOTHERversusJAWED KHAN

The petitioners, Smt Juhi Khan and another, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jhansi, to expedite the pending case No. 481 of 2025 (Smt Juhi Khan & others v. Jawed Khan) that was proceeding under Section 144 of the …

VIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vijay Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑3, Gorakhpur, to conclude a pending complaint (Case No. 5036 of 2020) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner argued …

SHAZIA HIDAYATversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Shazia Hidayat, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VII, Aligarh to expedite the trial of complaint No‑3126/2019 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioner alleged that the proceedings …

LK SINGH LALIT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by L.K. Singh, a director of an engineering college, who was implicated in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs.14 lakh and offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 120B of the IPC and Section 13(2) …

DR. AJMAL SHAH NAWAZversusSTATE OF U.P.

Dr. Ajmal Shah Nawaz, a director of an engineering college, was implicated in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs.14 lakh meant for the college, which was deposited into a private individual's account. He sought anticipatory bail under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 120B of the …

SANJEET KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered the bail application of Sanjeet Kumar, the owner of M/s Ganga Trading Company, who was arrested in connection with alleged supply of areca nuts in violation of Sections 132(1)(a), (b) and (i) of the CGST Act, 2017. Kumar had been in judicial custody since 1 February 2026, …

SHIV NARAYAN PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Shiv Narayan Pandey filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to set aside the trial court's order dated 25 June 2026 that dismissed his complaint (No. 2284 of 2023) and to summon respondents 2 to 6 for punishment. The High Court observed that the petitioner has an …

FAIZ AHMAD KHANversusSMT. NUZHAT JAMEEL AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Faiz Ahmad Khan challenged a cost order of Rs 50,000 imposed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court in a criminal matter, arguing that the amount was excessive and that he could not pay it. He sought modification of the order under the supervisory powers of Article 227 of …

RAJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a summoning order dated 18‑04‑2022 and a subsequent judgment, alleging that the cheque in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case was handed to a third party and that the complaint was filed with delay. The petitioner …

RADHIKA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Radhika Devi and her minor daughter, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, to decide an execution case (No. 1514 of 2025) within a stipulated period. They argued that the execution proceedings, involving the …

DILIP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Ram Prasad Yadav, sought permission to withdraw the petition and retain the liberty to file a fresh petition later. The court considered the request and found no …

BHAGWAT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Bhagwat Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging an order dated 29 July 2026 passed by the Additional Session Judge, Agra, which set aside a trial court order of 28 August 2024 that had dismissed a criminal complaint for lack of evidence and non‑appearance of the …

PRAMOD KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Pramod Kumar Pandey, a physically handicapped husband, filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal case (Case No. 906 of 2025) from Gorakhpur to Deoria on the ground of inconvenience. The court noted a prior decision (Transfer Application (Criminal) No. 282 of 2021) which …

RAMAWADHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramawadh, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C‑II, Chandauli to expedite the trial of Criminal Case No. 2274 of 2016 involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 324 and 325 IPC. The petitioner argued that a …

SHEIKH MOHAMMAD ARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sheikh Mohammad Arif, who is alleged to be involved in offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 120B of the IPC and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicant, a college …

BHAGYA REKHAversusRAKESH KUMAR YADAV

The petitioner, Bhagya Rekha, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court's intervention to expedite a pending Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code case (maintenance) before the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No.4, Prayagraj, which had been pending since 27 September 2023. The …

KARUNAPATI SHUKLAversusALOK BANERJEE

The petitioner, Karunapati Shukla, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the ACJM Court in Prayagraj to expedite the pending criminal complaint (Case No. 1850 of 2025) against Alok Banerjee. He argued that a speedy trial is essential and requested the High Court to impose a …

DURGAWATI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Durgawati and her son, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Siddharth Nagar, to decide an application filed under Section 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Execution Case No. 835 of 2022) within a …

SANJAY DUBEversusAVNEESH UPADHAYA

The petitioner, Sanjay Dube, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court to dispose of suit No.207/XII/2025, which involves a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, within a stipulated period. The petitioner …

SMT. MADHUMALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Madhumala, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging two orders: one of the Additional Sessions Judge, POCSO Court, and another of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, which refused to summon her father-in-law and mother-in-law (respondents 3 and 4) in a criminal …

ARJUN SIROHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Arjun Sirohi, a Secretary of a Krishi Mandi Utpadan Samiti, who was alleged to have demanded a bribe of Rs.10,000 in connection with a contract dispute under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicant …

SUJEET KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sujeet Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 7 January 2025 and the cognizance order dated 5 May 2026 in Special Sessions Trial No.334 of 2026, which arose under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant …

VIVEK KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vivek Kumar Jain, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the pending petition and to file a fresh one. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the court allow this withdrawal. The …

MANOJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manoj Singh, the complainant, filed a transfer application seeking to move Bail Application No.4864 of 2026 (Anup Kaushik v. State of U.P.) from the Aligarh District and Sessions Court to another district court, alleging that the opposing party No.2 is a practicing advocate. The applicant relied on …

M/S V.P. BUILDERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s V.P. Builders filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate Court No.10, Mathura to dispose of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (case No. 54778 of 2025) in a time‑bound manner. The …

VIJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vijay Kumar Gupta filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the order dated 31‑08‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Balia, which had allowed a revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act despite the revision being time‑barred. The petitioner argued that the …

SMT USHA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought quashing of a criminal case (cognizance order dated 12‑9‑2016 and Case No.5305 of 2016) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, on the ground that the parties had reached a settlement through mediation on 18‑9‑2024. The State’s Additional Advocate …

MAHESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 6‑Nov‑2022 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No.1203 of 2021, Meenu Singh v. Mahesh et al.) involving offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and sections 3 …

NAVEEN KUMAR JAIN AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought quashing of a cognizance order and pending criminal case arising from a commercial dispute, alleging that the parties had entered into a settlement on 19 June 2019, which was verified by the court on 10 December 2024. The respondent and the Attorney General did not contest the …

NEESHU TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Neeshu Tyagi, driver of a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, was arrested for demanding Rs 1 lac to influence a pending case and was charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since 30 March 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The State opposed …

MUKHTAR AHMADversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mukhtar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order issued by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) in Varanasi. The FIR relating to an alleged offence that occurred in 2005‑06 was lodged only in 2017, and …

ANKUR GARGversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ankur Garg, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 29‑January‑2025 issued by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in a complaint under Sections 132(1)(b), (c) and (i) of the CGST Act, 2017. The applicant contended that …

DARSHAN SINGHversusJATAN SINGH ALIAS JANAM SINGH

The applicant, a 74‑year‑old litigant, filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal complaint (Case No. 12563 of 2020) from Meerut to Hapur on the ground of inconvenience. The court noted that the Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts in Uttar Pradesh, 2020, provide a digital …

SMT SANJU KUMARIversusVEERPAL SINGH

The petitioner, Smt. Sanju Kumari, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mathura, to expedite the disposal of a pending family law case (Case No. 183 of 2025) arising under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. Police Station. …

PUNEET KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Puneet Kumar challenged the dismissal of his appeal against an order passed under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, which had led to the confiscation of 479 quintals of rice. The appeal before the Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr, was dismissed on the ground of want of prosecution …

MAHENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mahendra Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the order of sanction in a criminal case. The applicant, through counsel Santosh Yadav, sought permission to withdraw the application while reserving the right to contest the sanction order before a …

BHANU PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhanu Pratap Singh, a retired executive engineer, in a case under Sections 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 alleging excess income of Rs.52 lakh. The applicant argued that the allegations …

SUDHEENDRA KUMAR SINGHversusRINKI SINGH

The petitioner, Sudheendra Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Azamgarh to expedite the disposal of Complaint Case No. 291 of 2020, which involves offences under Sections 498A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

PAWAN NAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a transfer application seeking to move a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 853 of 2023) from the Special Court in Gautambudh Nagar to another court. The applicant alleged that the trial court violated the mandatory six‑month disposal period …

JITENDRA SINGHversusSUMIT YADAV

The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Varanasi, to decide his pending complaint (Case No. 591 of 2025) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act within a fixed period. The petitioner argued …

MOHAMMAD IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Imran, a stenographer accused under IPC sections 420 and 120‑B and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly certifying a document. The applicant claimed innocence, no criminal history, and argued that the …

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Anil Kumar, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.10,000 in exchange for a report, an offence alleged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since 24 July 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The primary issue before the court was whether …

AMIT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amit Sharma, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to set aside an ex-parte stay order dated 02.01.2026 granted by the Sessions Judge, Mathura, in Criminal Revision No. 1 of 2026 (Smt. Meera Sharma & Others v. State of U.P. & Others). The petitioner argued …

MANGAL CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Mangal Chauhan, died while his criminal appeal was pending before the Allahabad High Court. The court, on 30 July 2026, ordered a living status report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ghaziabad. The magistrate confirmed the appellant's death on 29 August 2026. Consequently, the …

SUBHASH BABU @ TITUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Subhash Babu @ Titu, who was arrested in connection with a alleged demand of Rs.10,000 by co‑accused Raj Kumar and is charged under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant has been in custody since 10 October 2025 and …

SANGEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 20 OTHERS

Petitioner Sangeeta Devi filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. …

ABHISHEK SHARMA AND 6 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Abhishek Sharma and six others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Amit Kumar Pandey, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted the request, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issues were …

SMT. MOHINI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, wife/informant of the accused, sought transfer of a criminal case from Kalpi Magistrate Court to a court in Jalaun, citing inconvenience due to a 50 km distance. The applicant argued that participation via video‑conferencing would serve the ends of justice. The court referred to its …

LALTI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusBABU LAL

The petitioners, Lalti Devi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Family Court, Ghazipur, to dispose of a pending Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case (Misc. Case No. 193 of 2020) within a fixed time. The petitioner, represented …

AMRIKA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Amrika Devi and her minor son, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑III, Jaunpur, to expedite the trial of a pending Section 125 Cr.P.C. case (Amrika v. Sudhakar). The petition argued that the …

JANAKIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Janaki, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court in Jaunpur to conclude the pending family law case (Case No. 1704 of 2024) against Pankaj within a fixed time. The petitioner, represented by counsel Vivek …

SMT. DARAKSHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, an informant, filed an application on 11‑August‑2025 under Section 240 of the Criminal Procedure Code in criminal case No. 2972/2023, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner sought a direction from …

RAMENDRA @ GUDDUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramendra, an Assistant Store Keeper, was arrested in connection with the alleged loading of three trucks with 525 bags of urea and charged under several sections of the BNS and the Prevention of Corruption Act. He has been in custody since 14 May 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The State …

POOJAversusSOORAJ PRAKASH GUPTA AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pooja, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to the Civil Judge Junior Division, FTC (14th Financial Commission), Sonebhadra, to decide Matrimonial Case No. 259 of 2024 filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women …

RAKESH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a criminal transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a transfer application could be withdrawn at the applicant's request. Relying on procedural …

SMT KIRTI PANDEYversusSMT. PUSHPA PANDEY AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Kirti Pandey, a complainant-wife whose husband had died, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 9, Kanpur Nagar, to expedite the trial of case No. 7630 of 2019 under IPC section 406 and to decide the respondents' discharge …

SMT. SHARDA VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sharda Verma, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the High Court's intervention to expedite the hearing of her matrimonial case (No. 2301/2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (S.D.), Kanpur Nagar, which involves claims under …

ABDUL JABBARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abdul Jabbar, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief against the State of U.P. and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Agresh Agrawal, informed the court that the petition …

RAJESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh and another filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no merit to proceed. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as …

MUKESH BABU TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mukesh Babu Tripathi filed a criminal transfer application (No. 335 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicant, through counsel Azad Khan, sought permission to withdraw the petition at the stage it was pending. The court considered whether a …

CHANDRAPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The applicant, Chandrapal, filed a criminal transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a transfer application could be withdrawn at the applicant’s request. Finding no …

UMAKANT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Umakant Yadav, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a criminal case involving alleged forgery and cheating related to a land dispute in Jaunpur. The prosecution alleged that a forged entry dated 26‑10‑1994 was entered in consolidation …

KARUNA KANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought amendment of the prayer clause and impleadment of a revenue officer as a respondent. Both applications were allowed as the opposite parties raised no objection. The core dispute concerns a co‑owned, un‑partitioned property where the petitioner claims ownership, while the …

YOGESH KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Yogesh Kumar Tiwari, a Lekhpal, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.10,000 for land measurement and was charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since July 1, 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The applicant sought bail, arguing that he would …

DR. VIVEK GUPTAversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petition was filed in the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking relief against the State and four other respondents. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. …

SMT. GULAFSHAN ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Gulafshan Ansari, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the High Court to direct the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) of Court No.7, Kanpur Nagar to expedite the trial of Criminal Case No.727 of 2025, which involves a claim under Section 12 of …

VED PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petition filed by Ved Prakash, a government servant and father, sought to set aside an order dated 08 July 2026 issued by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, which initiated recovery of a maintenance amount of Rs.6,000 per month under Section 144(3) of the Bharatiya …

JITENDRA KUMAR KANAUJIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Kanaujia, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a writ of mandamus to compel Judicial Magistrate IV, Prayagraj to decide Criminal Case No. 2576 of 2024 (under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) against Daud Khan. The petitioner, who is the complainant, …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Petitioner Ajay, who had been granted bail in six criminal cases, sought relief from the High Court to avoid furnishing separate sureties for each case, requesting that a single common surety be accepted. He relied on a Supreme Court judgment in Hani Nishad v. State of UP (SLA No. 8915 of 2018) …

SMT. ALIA PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Smt. Alia Parveen filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Shamli, to expedite the disposal of Case No. 573 of 2025, which is pending under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The …

RICHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Richa, filed a transfer application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking to move a criminal complaint from Sambhal to Moradabad on the ground of personal threat. The applicant argued that justice would be served if she could appear via …

RAVIKANT AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, who had obtained a decree in a civil suit over a land dispute, were assaulted by the respondent after the respondent's appeal was allowed. The petitioners filed an FIR on 27 March 2023 and the respondent later lodged a criminal complaint under IPC sections 324, 504 and 506. The …

RAKESH KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, a Revenue Inspector, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs 10,000 for land measurement, an offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since 8 August 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The State …

KANHAIYA LAL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Kanhaiya Lal Sharma, filed a criminal appeal (No. 1576 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Saharanpur reported on 3 June 2025 that the appellant had died on 19 October 2023. Upon receiving this …

ASHUTOSH THAKURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ashutosh Thakur, was arrested in connection with a loan fraud case (Crime No. 988 of 2018) alleging forged documents and money transfers, though he was not named in the FIR. He sought bail, claiming no criminal history, no direct involvement, and that he had already returned the …

SABA KHANAMversusFAISAL UDDIN

Petitioner Saba Khanam, the wife, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Agra, to expedite a pending maintenance proceeding under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Case No. 706 of 2024). The petition argued that the case had been …

SHASHIKANT SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shashikant Sonkar, a Village Development Officer, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs 10,000 to approve a bill of Rs 99,240 and was caught with the money. He is charged under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended 2018) and has been in custody since 25 March 2026. …

AJAY LOHIAversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

The petitioner, Ajay Lohia, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court against the Central Bureau of Investigation. The petition was represented by counsel Anita Singh and Dinesh Kumar Misra, while the respondent CBI was represented by Rahul Srivastava. …

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Satish Chandra Sharma, a Lekhpal, was arrested after a complaint that he demanded Rs 5,000 for handing over possession. He has been in jail since 21 January 2026 and claims he has been falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, citing his criminal antecedents, but offered no evidence that he would …

FAIZAN @ BABLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Faizan @ Bablu, accused of offences under Sections 376, 354, 384, 506 IPC and Section 67(a) of the IT Act, filed an application under Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the sealed pen‑drive containing a video of the victim. The trial court rejected the application, …

MULAYAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Mulayam Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but was later implicated for transferring money to a constable in a case alleged under the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that the transfer was a personal loan for a marriage and that there was no …

SHIVSHANKAR PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shivshankar Pal, a Gram Panchayat Adhikari, was arrested for demanding a Rs 10,000 illegal gratification in connection with a Rs 1,25,000 bill, an offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He has been in custody since 21‑01‑2026 and has no prior criminal record. The …

SUSHILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a criminal transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a transfer application can be withdrawn at the applicant's request. Applying the procedural rule …

ATUL KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Atul Kumar Singh, who is charged under Sections 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income (Rs 73,44,894). No arrest was made during the …

MEENA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Meena Devi filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The Attorney General informed the court that a re‑investigation had been completed and a final report was submitted on 26 December 2024. The petitioner …

NEELAM DHAR DUBEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, residing in Gorakhpur, filed a transfer application seeking to move a domestic violence complaint (Case No. 1400 of 2025) from the court of Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar to the court of Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur, citing distance as the ground. The respondents opposed …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rajesh Kumar, a junior engineer, was arrested under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a higher amount than the prescribed compounding fee. He has been in custody since 22 January 2026, while his co‑accused has already been released on bail. The State opposed bail …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ashok Kumar, a Junior Engineer with the PWD, was arrested on allegations of demanding Rs.50,000 for the clearance of bills, under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (amended 2018). He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and had been in custody since 12 …

TANIA SANYALversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Tania Sanyal under CrPC Section 482, relating to an FIR that alleged offences under IPC Section 109 and Sections 12, 13(1)(b), 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The charge‑sheet had been filed …

SATISH KUMARversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Satish Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under IPC s.109 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, claiming that he was never arrested during the investigation and had fully cooperated with the CBI. A charge‑sheet was filed on 29‑Nov‑2024 and a summons issued on 25‑Aug‑2025. Relying on …

BHASKAR BHUVANversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

The applicant, Bhaskar Bhuvan, sought anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 and the Prevention of Corruption Act after a charge‑sheet was filed in a corruption case. He had not been arrested during investigation and had cooperated with the CBI. Relying on Supreme Court judgments in Musheer Alam v. …

M/S BHAGESHWARI PAPER LTDversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

M/s Bhageshwari Paper Ltd filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summons dated 8 October 2025 issued by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in a complaint under Sections 9 and 9AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the CGST Act. The applicants argued that …

ANOOP CHANDRA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, a Revenue Inspector, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.10,000 in a land‑mutation case and was caught with the money. He has no prior criminal record and has been in custody since 19‑Feb‑2026. The State opposed bail but did not allege any risk of evidence tampering, witness …

NIKHILESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Nikhilesh Kumar, owner of a motor vehicle seized in Criminal Case No. 214 of 2025, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that released the vehicle subject to a personal bond of Rs.8,00,000 and additional sureties. He …

BHARAT SINGH @ RAMHARAKH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Bharat Singh and Ramharakh Singh, sought to set aside an order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge and a subsequent order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate that rejected their application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging harassment by a court …

ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge (POCSO), Shamli, to decide Criminal Revision No.45/2024, which has been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the delay violated the principle of speedy justice and …

HARISHARAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for four individuals accused of offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 471, 120B and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicants, who were lekhpals, claimed innocence and argued that there was …

KISHUNDEV PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kishundev Pandey, a Gram Panchayat Vikas Adhikari, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Crime No. 11 of 2019) alleging offences under several IPC sections and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, stemming from a 2019 FIR concerning alleged misconduct in a road construction project …

AMREEN BANO ALIAS GUDIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Amreen Bano, the wife and informant, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a court order to expedite criminal case No. 471 of 2024, which involves offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 354(KA), 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner argued that a speedy …

RASHMI PATRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rashmi Patra filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal proceeding from the Court No.‑01, Mathura to the Court No.‑01, Varanasi, invoking Section 173(4) of the BNSS and also requesting permission to appear via video‑conferencing. The applicant argued that video‑conferencing would serve …

GEETA DEVIversusKAMLESH PATEL

The petitioner, Geeta Devi, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District & Sessions Judge, Varanasi, to decide a pending criminal revision (Nigrani No.534 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the revisionist, Kamlesh Patel, had caused undue delay …

AIJAZ AHAMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aijaz Ahamad, filed a transfer application seeking to move a Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case (Case No.1188 of 2022) from the Family Court in Aligarh to another district court, alleging threat to his safety. He argued that his participation via video conferencing would serve the …

ANKUR SHUKLA @ ANKUSH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ankur Shukla and others, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge to pass a reasoned order on a stay application pending in Criminal Revision No. 443 of 2025 and to keep the execution of an order dated 13‑08‑2025, issued under Section 133 …

GULJAR ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Guljar Ali and Jakir Ali, who run an educational institution and were implicated in a 2014 FIR alleging misappropriation of scholarship funds. The charge sheet was filed in 2025, and the applicants claimed they were falsely …

VIJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSMT. RINKY GUPTA

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Gupta, filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. He later sought permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue other legal remedies. The learned counsel submitted a request for withdrawal. The Court considered the …

CHANDRAKESHAV PRASAD MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Chandrakeshav Prasad Mishra filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Mirzapur to expedite the pending complaint case No. 659/2023 filed under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner argued that the complaint, filed …

ALIYAR RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Aliyar Ram, a former Assistant Development Officer, who was alleged to have been involved in the illegal sale of food‑grains under the fair‑price shop system. The offences alleged against him included sections 409, 420, …

VAIBHAV DHAMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, an Air Force officer, filed a transfer application seeking to move four criminal cases pending in Bareilly to another district, citing his posting and inability to attend court. He argued that video conferencing would enable his participation. The court referred to its earlier …

HARSH MITTALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Harsh Mittan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Court, Aligarh, to expedite the pending complaint (Case No. 184/2024) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Rajendra Singh. The petitioner argued that the trial was …

IRSHAD ALI ALIAS SHERUversusMUID IMTIYAZ AND 2 OTHERS

Irshad Ali alias Sheru filed a criminal transfer application (No. 281 of 2026) against Muid Imtiyaz and two others. The applicant's counsel, Balbir Yadav, informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the transfer and sought dismissal of the petition, citing inherent defects and …

MOHD. SHIFAT @ SIFATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside an order dated 25-02-2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Banda, in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 409/XI/2023, and to stay the recovery proceedings in that case. The petition also sought liberty to file a …

DINESH KUMARversusMURARI LAL AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Dinesh Kumar, an informant, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act) of Bareilly to decide an application filed under Section 358 of the BNSS, which has been pending since 2025 and relates to a …

RAJAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rajan Sharma, a Consolidation Lekhpal, was arrested for demanding Rs.2,00,000 and allegedly accepting a settlement of Rs.20,000 for a demarcation report, and was caught with the money. He is charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended 2018) and has been in custody …

SMT NIL KAMALversusASHOK KUMAR

The petitioner, a wife, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to decide a pending application under Section 125(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Misc. Case No. 1765 of 2023). The application had been pending since 2023, and …

VINOD KUMAR VERMA ALIAS VINOD KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Vinod Kumar Verma and another against the State of U.P. and another. The counsel for the applicants, Babu Lal Ram, Kamalesh Kumar Nishad, Om Prakash Singh, and Renu Singh, were listed, but none appeared before the court on …

SHYAMBABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a criminal revision thereafter. The Court granted the request, dismissing the petition as withdrawn and expressly granting liberty to …

RAKHI @ REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a wife, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Amroha, to expedite a pending maintenance proceeding under Section 125(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (case No. 164 of 2024, Rakhi v. Amit …

AVANISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Avanish Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Fatehpur, to decide the pending Misc. Case No. 273 of 2025 (Avanish Kumar v. Amita Devi) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the lower court had …

NIKITA SHARMAversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Nikita Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Additional District Judge (POCSO III) in Gautambudh Nagar decide the pending Session Trial No.1582 of 2022 (State vs. Sumit Jha) without unnecessary adjournments. The case involves offences under IPC …

SMT. AMITA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Amita Agarwal, filed a transfer application seeking to move Criminal Case No.30159 of 2023 (under Section 406 IPC) from Agra to Bareilly on the ground of inconvenience. The court noted that the Uttar Pradesh Rules for Video Conferencing (2020) provide a digital alternative that …

SMT AMITA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Amita Agarwal, a complainant in a criminal case under Section 406 IPC, filed a transfer application seeking to move the case from Agra to Bareilly on the ground of inconvenience. The respondent State opposed the transfer. The Court noted that the Rules for Video Conferencing for …

SMT AMITA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Amita Agarwal, filed a transfer application seeking to move Criminal Case No.30158 of 2023 (under Section 406 IPC) from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑II, Agra to a parallel court in Bareilly, citing inconvenience. The respondent State opposed the transfer. The Court …

NASIR RANA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Nasir Rana and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No.17940/9 of 2025 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar. They contended that they were not named in the FIR dated 5‑12‑2024 and that their alleged …

RAM KUNWARversusBOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHAERS

Ram Kunwar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the Board of Revenue. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the list was revised. Consequently, the court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. The judge dismissed …

SURENDRA SINGHversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Surendra Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 2248 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the matter. The court noted the …

SMT. RAM MURATIversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Ram Murati, filed writ petition No. 3324 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the case. The court noted the absence …

JAGDISH AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 5385 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the date of hearing, and the petition remained unprosecuted. The Court noted the absence of any prosecution of the …

PRASOTTAM AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 5135 of 1982 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to advance the petition. The court noted that the petition remained unprosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ …

SMT. INDRA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Indra Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 42560 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and three others. The petitioner's counsel, Rajendra Prasad Tiwari and Vinay Kumar Tiwari, were listed but did not appear before the court. The respondents were …

MANJU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manju Devi filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of her retirement dues from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. No counsel appeared on her behalf at the hearing. Respondent No.4, represented by Advocate Shobhit Pratap Singh, informed the court that the …

RAM NARESH SINGHversusMANAGING DIRECTOR, U.P. JAL NIGAM AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Naresh Singh, a former employee of U.P. Jal Nigam, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the employer to pay his retirement dues, including gratuity, leave encashment, arrears of dearness relief at rates ranging from 164% to 212%, and interest of 9% from 29 February 2024. The …

KAMLESH KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court had earlier ordered on 15 December 2025 that the petitioner's representation be heard before deciding the matter. Respondent No.4 later claimed that a further hearing was unnecessary, asserting that the earlier hearing had already been provided, which appeared to conflict …

LALI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Lali Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant her pension, pensionary benefits, arrears and 12% interest for the services of her deceased husband. The petitioner claimed that her claim was pending before the respondents. The …

MAZHAR ABBAS AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to continue regular payment of salary, service benefits, and post‑retirement dues, and to pay arrears of sixth pay with 8% interest. The court noted that the matter had already been decided by a Division Bench in Om Prakash & …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Kumar filed a writ petition seeking mandamus for the grant of First and Second Assured Career Progression (ACP) after 10 and 18 years of service, correction of his grade pay to ₹2400 for 2015‑2025 and ₹2800 thereafter, and a direction to decide his representation dated 5‑Feb‑2026. The …

KRISHNANAND NIRANJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Krishnanand Niranjan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to release his arrears of salary with interest. The petitioner claimed the salary claim was pending before the respondents. The State's standing counsel suggested that a fresh representation by the …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Alok Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Engineer of Harduaganj Thermal Power Station to decide his application for earned leave dated 15 July 2025. The petitioner alleged that the application had not been acted upon, causing undue delay. The respondents …

KHYALI SINGHversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD AND 4 OTHERS

Khyali Singh, a former Class IV employee of U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd, retired on 30 June 2011 and contended that the corporation released his retiral dues in a lesser amount than mandated by law, citing a letter dated 20 September 2024 that reduced payments and denied certain heads. He …

RAMA SHANKARversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD AND 4 OTHERS

Rama Shankar, a former Class IV employee of U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd who retired on 31 July 2010, challenged a letter dated 15 January 2025 that reduced his post‑retirement payments and denied certain heads of dues. He claimed that the corporation calculated his gratuity, EPF, salary …

SMT. SUMAN DEVIversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Suman Devi filed a writ petition seeking to quash a letter dated 24‑10‑2024 that reduced the post‑retirement dues of her husband, a former Class IV employee of U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd., and to compel the corporation to pay the full gratuity, EPF, salary arrears, leave encashment, …

KALLUversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD AND 4 OTHERS

Kallu, a former Class IV employee of U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd, retired on 31 May 2014 and alleges that the corporation released a lower quantum of his post‑retirement dues without considering his objection or granting a hearing. He filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the …

SHRI KANTversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 1244 of 1977) was filed by Shri Kant against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to advance the matter. The court noted that the petition remained unprosecuted despite being listed. The legal question was whether …

DULARversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Dular, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice on 24 July 2025 directing the petitioner to engage another counsel. By a report dated 17 March 2026, the court found that no counsel had appeared on the petitioner's behalf and no undelivered …

KHARPATTUversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 15079 of 1982) was filed by Kharpattu against the D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition when the matter came up for hearing. The Court observed that …

GANESH PRASADversusSHRI KANT

The petitioner, Ganesh Prasad, filed Writ Petition No. 1378 of 1980 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the case was listed for hearing. The court noted that the petition had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the …

SMT. LEELAWATIversusREGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Smt. Leelawati filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner. The court ordered the petitioner to engage a new counsel because the earlier counsel was a senior advocate. A notice sent on 28 January 2026 was returned undelivered, with the court …

RAGHUNATH PRASAD PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 15902 of 2010) was filed by Raghunath Prasad Pal against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner's counsel, Chandra Dutt and Pradeep Verma, did not appear before the court. Respondent No. 5 was represented by counsel Saumya Mandhyan. The court noted the absence of …

ARUN KUMAR @ RINKUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to summon his service record and to appoint him under the Dying‑in‑Harness Rules, 1974, for a compassionate appointment. He alleged that an order dated 24‑08‑2015 requiring him to produce documents had not …

CHHATRAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 ORS

The petitioner, a retired Technical Grade‑II employee, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his pending retirement dues, including pension, gratuity and commutation amount, which had been retained by the respondents despite the absence of any disciplinary punishment. The High Court noted …

SHRI RAM SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 39296 of 2017) was filed by Shri Ram Singh and three others against the State of U.P. and four others. The petitioners' counsel, Anil Kumar Singh, appeared before the court and informed that he had no instructions to represent the petitioners. The respondents' counsel, …

RAVI PRATAP SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Anil Kumar Singh, informed the court that he had no instructions to represent the petitioners. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition …

KAVITA SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Kavita Singh sought permission to withdraw the present writ petition and to amend the pleadings in a prior writ petition. Respondent Union of India and others, through their counsel, raised no objection to the request. The court considered whether the petitioner could be allowed to …

PRABHAKAR DATT MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SACHIV SAHAKARITA AND OTHERS

Dismiss

The petitioner, Prabhakar Datt Mishra, filed Writ Petition No. 37237 of 2008 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to argue the case. The court noted the absence of the …

SATYA PRAKASH SAXENAversusU.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satya Prakash Saxena, filed writ petition No. 140 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and others. The petition was listed before Hon’ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing. …