Created by Fuzzy Cloud

VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI

330 judgments · newest first · showing 201–330

VIPIN ALAIS SAJU ALIAS VIPIN KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vipin Alais Saju filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest in a case where a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, it was unclear …

THAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Than Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ …

KRISHNA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Krishna and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …

SHUBHAM BAHADUR @ SHUBHAM BHARTIYA @ TEETUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shubham Bahadur and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

SHARIF AHMAD AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sharif Ahmad and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was uncertain whether the trial court had taken …

MANISH KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Manish Kumar Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an …

MOINUDDIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, and the Court had earlier issued an interim order directing them to deposit a specified amount to explore settlement through the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The petitioners failed to comply with this deposit order. …

SMT. ARCHNA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Archna and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the uncertainty …

GAGAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against their arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ …

VIJAY KUMAR RAI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vijay Kumar Rai and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the …

KESAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

Petitioner Kesar Singh filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his arrest on 3-4 September 2024 and a remand order dated 4 September 2024, alleging that the arrest memo lacked any valid ground and was prepared on an outdated proforma, and that the remand order showed a non‑application of mind. …

RESHMA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Reshma and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …

PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioners Pradeep Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The …

BHAIYALAL MISHRA @ CHANDRASEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Bhaiyalal Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking protection from arrest. The State, through the Advocate General, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was uncertain whether the trial court had …

VIDHU SHEKHAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Vidhu Shekhar Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Rohit filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, …

DINESH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dinesh and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition alleged that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the …

CHANDRASHEKHAR BAJPAI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Bajpai and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was referred to mediation, which ultimately failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The …

MANSHA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …

AMIT PANDEY @ SUMIT PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Amit Pandey and Sumit Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …

ANUJ AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Anuj and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the …

VISHAL @ VISHAL YADAV (MINOR)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petition was filed by a minor, Vishal Yadav, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted that, pending …

SARVESH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sarvesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …

SATYAM KANNAUJIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satyam Kannaujiya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

AMIT KUMARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Amit Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest after a charge sheet was filed against him. The State informed the court that while the charge sheet had been submitted, it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …

SHIVA @ SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shiva @ Shivam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest after a charge sheet was filed by the investigating officer. The State of U.P. and two others responded, and the learned Additional Government Advocate indicated that while the charge sheet had been …

JITENDRA KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jitendra Kumar and four others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6718 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition alleged that mediation between the parties had been attempted but was unsuccessful. The …

MOHAMMAD YUSUF AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohammad Yusuf and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

SHIVAM CHODHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shivam Chodhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …

SHAILESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Shailesh Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. They contended that although a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer, the court had not yet taken cognizance of the police report. The State, represented by the …

MUKESH KHURANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mukesh Khurana filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order in the …

ABHISHEK CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

In a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, Abhishek Chauhan sought relief against arrest after a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, confirmed the filing of the …

NAEEMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Naeema and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …

HINA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hina and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The High Court earlier issued an interim order directing the petitioners to deposit a specified amount to explore settlement through the Mediation and Conciliation …

SATENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Satendra Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …

ANOOP KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Anoop Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …

PUNWASEE AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The Court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the …

NOOR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Noor and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and two others, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

HAJURA SIINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Hajura Singh and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim …

SUMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suman Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …

BABLI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Babli and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, noting the existence of an …

PRAVAL SINGH CHAUHAN ALIAS ANKURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Praval Singh Chauhan alias Ankur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and three others were respondents, and the petition was filed before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and others responded, indicating that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that arrest should …

RAMPRAKASH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …

RISHU DUBEY ALIAS MAHENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rishu Dubey filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …

MINOR X AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, including a minor, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the release of petitioner No.1, alleging that his arrest memo was incomplete and the remand order was issued on a printed proforma without proper judicial consideration. The petition relied on prior judgments (Umang Rastogi …

RAVIKANT YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Ravikant Yadav filed a habeas corpus petition alleging illegal arrest and remand, contending that the arrest memo lacked any valid ground and the remand order was issued on a printed proforma without application of mind. The petition relied on prior judgments, including Mihir Rajesh v. …

KARAN SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Karan Sahu filed a habeas corpus petition alleging illegal detention after a remand order was issued on a printed proforma without any application of mind. The petitioner contended that the remand order violated Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution and cited several Supreme Court …

DASHRATH @ SOMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dashrath @ Somi, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his detention under a remand order dated 21-05-2023 issued by the Remand Magistrate, District Jhansi, on a printed proforma. The petition argued that the remand order showed a non‑application of mind and violated Articles 21 …

NIRANJAN KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Niranjan Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the possibility of his arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that an interim order was already …

PRASHANT SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Prashant Sharma and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …

VIRENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Virendra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

RAMAKANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramakant, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and others responded, indicating that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that …

PINKI TRIAPTHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pinki Triapthi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

SIKSHA GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Siksha Gupta and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …

MONUversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Monu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …

KHUSBU YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel was not present, and no interim order had been passed. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as …

JASVEER KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Jasveer Kumar filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his arrest and subsequent remand under sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sahnita, the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and the Aadhaar Act, 2016. The petitioner contended that the arrest memo lacked a proper ground and was based on an …

TUFANI PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Tufani Pal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against certain accused. The court was informed that a charge sheet had been filed against Neeraj Yadav and Ajay Yadav, and a final report had been filed in favor of Vikas Yadav and Ramoo Yadav. The …

KUSHAL SHARMA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and the failure of mediation. Consequently, the judges dismissed …

ANIL THAKUR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Anil Thakur and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that a charge‑sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

AJAY BIND @ ACHHELAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ajay Bind @ Achhelal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …

BRAHMA SHANKAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that, despite the filing of the charge …

LAIQUE AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTTHERS

The petitioners sought relief to prevent their arrest pending the filing of a charge sheet. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ …

MUZAFFAR ALI AND 23 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Muzaffar Ali and 23 others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …

PRAVEEN MISHRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court …

SMT. MEENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Meena, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

USHA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Usha Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against arrest. The State informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The Court noted the …

AMIT MAURYA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the petition. No substantive …

GOMTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but no counsel appeared on his behalf. The Attorney General for the State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, though it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

ANURAG PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anurag Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ …

MAHARAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Maharaj, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and others responded, indicating that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that …

ROOPESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Roopesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …

JAIHIND YADAVversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Jaihind Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …

SMT SHIFA SALMANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Smt Shifa Salmani filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21857 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and eight others. The petitioner’s counsel was absent and no interim relief had been sought or granted. The court observed that the petition had …

SMT. SHOYEBA KHATOON AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Shoyeba Khatoon and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …

SAURABH @ YOGESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Saurabh @ Yogesh Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that without …

BABLU @ MOHAMMAD KASHIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bablu @ Mohammad Kashif, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

LALIT @ LALLEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Lalit @ Lalle, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

RAJNISH SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajnish Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …

SARTAJ @MOHD SARTAJ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sartaj and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, while the State's counsel indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

MUNAVVAR ALIAS MANVVAR AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Munavvar alias Manvvar and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of …

NOOR HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 51 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 22029 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel was not present, and no interim order had been passed. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, the court …

SINTU SINGH @ AJEET KUMAR SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ …

MOHAMMAD ALAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohammad Alam and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for them. The Attorney General for the State informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

ARSHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition was filed by Arshad seeking relief, but no counsel appeared for the petitioner. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, though it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …

RAHMAT ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rahmat Ali and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …

ABHAY SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Abhay Singh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The parties attempted mediation, which failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or respondents to argue the petition. The Court noted the …

RAMKARAN ALIAS KARIYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ramkaran alias Kariya and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and others responded, and the Attorney General informed the court that a charge sheet had already been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had …

SEEMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Seema, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21875 of 2025) against the State of U.P. and three others. The parties attempted mediation, which ultimately failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioner or the respondents to argue the petition. The Court …

MOHD. SALIM ALIAS LALUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mohd. Salim alias Lalu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest in a case where a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, it …

ABHISHEK TYAGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Abhishek Tyagi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, and the State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial …

ROHIT SHARMA @ ROHIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rohit Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in …

DHANANJAY YADAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Dhananjay Yadav and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. No petitioner appeared before the court. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had …

MOHD MUBARAKversusSTATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Advocate General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …

SHEELA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sheela Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …

ANKIT RASTAUGI @ DABBU @ ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ankit Rastaugi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the State, represented by G.A., informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …

SMT VINITA KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Vinita Kumari and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from possible arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, …

VINAYAK YADAV @ UNNUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinayak Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …

PAWAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Pawan Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from a possible arrest. The State of U.P. submitted a charge sheet, but the court was uncertain whether cognizance of the charge sheet had been taken by the trial court. Relying on the existence of an interim order in the writ …

MOHD. SHARIF ALIAS RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mohd. Sharif alias Raju filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against his arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The Allahabad High Court, noting the …

JYOTI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Jyoti and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted that, pending clarification on …

JITLAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …

INDRAJEET AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Indrajeet and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against their arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The Attorney General for the State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …

ANIL KUMAR MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Anil Kumar Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 22132 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. The petitioners argued that they might be arrested despite a charge sheet having been filed, but it was …

BRIJESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Brijesh Kumar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

SACHIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sachin Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State's Additional Advocate General informed that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …

ZAID AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Zaid Ahmad and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The …

ANAND BINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but did not appear before the court. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, yet it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …

SALEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Saleem, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted …

MOHD. AAMIL HASAN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohd Aamil Hasan and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

RANI AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Rani and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, through the A.G.A., informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The Court noted the existence of an …

CONSTABLE 3379 ATUL AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Constable Atul and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the petition …

SATISH AGRAWALversusState of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …

MAHESHCHAND AND 6 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Maheshchand and six others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

TARA CHAND AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Tara Chand and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

ISHTIYAK AHMAD AND 5 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought relief through a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the …

MANOJ KUMAR SAINversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar Sain filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and two others responded, stating that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear if the trial court had taken cognizance. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …

SUSHIL CHAUDHARY ALIAS SUSHIL KUMARversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sushil Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court …

KASIM AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kasim and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. In the absence of any representation, …

GAYATRI PRASAD VERMA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Gayatri Prasad Verma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …

OM KUMAR GUPTAversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Kumar Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

PARAM HANS GUPTAversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Param Hans Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court, after hearing counsel, directed the investigating officer to conclude the investigation against the petitioner and to inform the Court of the outcome. The matter was listed for …

KM SONALI AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Km Sonali and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …

JITENDRA SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Jitendra Singh and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 3323 of 2022) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioners' counsel was absent, and no interim relief had been granted. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous …

GUDDU AGNIOHOTRI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court examined a criminal appeal filed by Guddu Agnihotri and Abdulla against the State of U.P. After a report and death certificate confirmed that Guddu Agnihotri had died on 6 November 2002, the court also noted that Abdulla, the second appellant, was already dead, leading to a petition …

SALAUDDIN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition on 25 November seeking relief, but the court did not take up the matter for an extended period. During this delay, the petitioners faced intense pressure from the police, which compelled them to surrender and apply for bail. The …