Created by Fuzzy Cloud

VINOD DIWAKAR

61 judgments · newest first · showing 1–61

V,S, PALITUBEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petition under Article 227 was filed by V.S. Palitube against the State of U.P. and another. The High Court of Allahabad considered the petition and, after hearing, allowed it. The Court directed that the orders be as per the order dated in case Pappu Met @ Pappu v. State of U.P. and Another. No …

PAPPU MET @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, disposed of four writ petitions concerning systemic delays in criminal trials and non‑compliance with bail‑surety directions. In Pappu Met’s case, the court modified the bail order, reducing the personal bond to Rs …

SUHAIL KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged an ex‑parte order dated 25‑08‑2026 that dismissed their appeal against a stamp‑duty assessment on a gift deed, solely on the ground of delay. They argued that the deed, executed between close relatives, was exempt from stamp duty and that the delay was not wilful. The …

KAILASH AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged a order dated 14.07.2026 issued by the Deputy Registrar, Gorakhpur, which barred them from participating in the governing body meeting of Pipiganj Educational Society on the ground that their membership was time‑barred. They argued that the Deputy Registrar ignored the …

VISHWA PRAKASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vishwa Prakash Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Secretary of the U.P. Madhyamik Sanskrit Shiksha Parishad to consider his representation dated 28‑04‑2026 for re‑evaluation of answer scripts in four subjects. The Court examined …

MS SAYQUA INJEELversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Ms. Sayqua Injeel filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 23472 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the Union of India and other respondents. The petition was listed before Hon'ble Justice Vinod Diwakar. On the last date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the …

ROHIT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rohit Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later informed the court that he no longer wishes to pursue the relief sought. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be allowed to be withdrawn. The court considered the request and, finding no …

USHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Usha, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the University to issue his computerized mark sheet and degree for the B.Ed. course of 2012-13 after having passed the examination. Although the university initially generated a mark sheet on its portal, it refused to issue the …

ADITYA BIRLA FASHION AND RETAIL LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking to quash a communication (No. 938/Stamp Clerk/2023) issued by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Kanpur Nagar. The petition raised procedural and substantive objections to the said …

PRIYANKA DEVI @ PRIYANKA SINGHversusBOARD OF REVENUE UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Priyanka Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, Prayagraj, to decide her pending Stamp Appeal No. 997 of 2017. The petitioner alleged that the Board had not rendered any final decision despite the appeal being pending for years. The court …

ANUSHKA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anushka Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the University Controller of Examinations to conduct a back-paper examination for her B.Sc. Physics V semester or to declare her result as passed within a specific time. The petitioner alleged that the university had …

NIRMIT YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nirmit Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the university to award his B.Sc. (Ag.) degree, alleging that he had passed all examinations but that a clerical error showed zero marks in a remedial mathematics subject. The university contended that the petitioner …

UTKARSH SHUKLA MINORversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a minor, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the principal of St. Xavier Intermediate School to decide a representation filed on 08.08.2026, which remained pending. The petitioner argued that the school had not rendered any decision despite the representation being …

RAKESH PANCHAL @ RAKESH KUMAR AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the election held on 28 June 2026 for the Committee of Management of an institution, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the election and subsequent orders of the District Inspector of Schools that rejected their objection. The Court noted a preliminary objection raised …

MOHAMMAD HAMZAversusCHAIRMAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Hamza, filed a writ petition seeking correction of his name and his father's name in educational records maintained by the National Institute of Open Schooling. He alleged that the records erroneously listed his name as "Mohammad Humza" and his father's name as "Gayasuddin" …

RAIS AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Rais Ahmad filed a writ petition seeking a direction from the authorities to allow him to fill the examination form and pay the requisite fee for appearing in the 7th semester B.A. LL.B. examination, so he could complete the course within the stipulated time. The respondent university …

AJAY KUMAR KASHYAPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Kashyap, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for respondent No.3 to hand over the charge of the President's office of the Dinesh Nagar Apartment Owners Association to him, based on an order dated 30.05.2026 of the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Meerut …

UMESH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 37425 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioners informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the petition be permitted to be withdrawn. The court …

DIVYA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Divya College of Education, sought a writ of certiorari to quash an ex parte order dated 08‑05‑2026 by the Vice‑Chancellor of Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University that declined the extension of affiliation for their B.Ed. programme for 2026‑27. The college argued that the order was …

PUSHPA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pushpa Devi, filed a writ petition seeking correction of her date of birth and her husband's name in her High School marksheet (Roll No. 4205352) issued by Durgdeo Janta Inter College, Jaunpur. She alleged that the marksheet incorrectly recorded her birth date and husband's name …

NITIN SAHARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nitin Sahariya, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13 May 2026 issued by the Additional Secretary of the Secondary Education Board, Regional Office, Meerut, which refused to correct his date of birth in school records. The petitioner claimed that his date of birth was …

MATLOOBversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Matloob, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35469 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 29 September 2025 issued by Respondent No. 2 under Section 47‑A of the Indian Stamp Act. The order pertained to a deficiency in stamp duty payable in a separate …

M/S BABOO LAL ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s Baboo Lal Anil Kumar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, Prayagraj, to decide the pending case REV/2870 of 2018 (M/s Baboo Lal Anil Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Others) within a reasonable time. They alleged that the …

VISHAL VARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a holder of a valid arms licence for a revolver since 2011, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to decide his renewal application filed on 16‑10‑2025. The licensing authority had requested a police character report, which disclosed three serious …

M/S TRIVENI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIES LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd., filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking disposal of its writ petition on the ground that a settlement had been reached with respondent No.3, Neeraj Tyagi, before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, U.P., Muzaffarnagar on 03‑02‑2026. …

MAHESH SINGH VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mahesh Singh Verma, holder of arms licence No. 5567, challenged the cancellation of his licence by the District Magistrate, Etawah, which was based on the registration of three FIRs involving serious criminal allegations. The petitioner argued that mere registration of FIRs, without a finding of …

SUGGI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Suggi Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to decide her application dated 09-04-2026 for renewal of a fair price shop in Gram Sabha, Behra, Varanasi. The petitioner alleged that the application remained pending without any final decision. The High Court …

RANJEET SINGHversusNEETU SINGH

The petition was filed by Ranjeet Singh, a husband‑advocate, seeking the High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to expedite a maintenance application (Section 144, BNSS 2023) against his wife, Neetu Singh, a government employee. The husband claimed he was unemployed and dependent, …

VEENA GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Veena Gupta filed a writ petition challenging two orders of the Aligarh Development Authority issued under Sections 28A(4) and 28A(1) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The petitioner later informed the Court that she does not wish to pursue the writ and intends to use …

SURENDRA PAL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent to consider and decide his representations dated 04.01.2024, 22.09.2024 and 20.03.2025 for the grant of an All‑India arms licence. The petitioner alleged that despite submitting all required …

SHIV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shiv Kumar filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 41353 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the relief sought had become infructuous. The court considered whether the …

RAKESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesk Kumar Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 43402 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Umendra Kumar Yadav, moved the Court seeking to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file any appropriate application before the …

CNH UDYOG KARAMCHARI SANGH AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, CNH Udyog Karamchari Sangh & Anr., filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter for which an alternative statutory remedy under Section 11 of the Trade Union Act was available. The respondents argued that the petition was not maintainable because the …

TANUJ JAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Tanuj Jain and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the Meerut Development Authority. The respondents argued that the petition was not maintainable because the petitioners could obtain relief under Section 41(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban …

KHALID AZIZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in filing a review petition against the State of U.P. The court found the reasons for delay bona fide and beyond the applicant's control, and therefore allowed the condonation application. The applicant, however, …

MOBIN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mobin Khan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to appoint a new Booth Level Officer (BLO) at Village Panchayat Mewa Sharfapur to prepare a clean voter list following a revenue inspector's report. The petition was based on a complaint alleging irregularities …

NARENDRA SINGH RATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State Information Commission to decide his RTI appeal filed on 30 September 2025 under Section 19(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The appeal remained pending beyond the statutory period of 30 days, extendable to 45 days, as …

LAL BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (respondent no.2) to consider and decide a statutory appeal filed on 31‑01‑2026 under Rule 6‑Ka of the U.P. Panchayat Raj (Kutumb Register Anurakshan) Niyamawali, 1970. The appeal arose because a private …

ASHOK KUMAR SONI @ ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a licensed holder of a revolver, had his arms licence cancelled by the District Magistrate under Sections 3 and 4 of the U.P. Gunda Act. He filed a statutory appeal before the Commissioner, Jhansi Region, on 20 August 2024, but the appeal remained pending for an extended period. The …

SANJAY KUMAR TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking transfer of Appeal No. 6 of 2026, originally before the Commissioner, Varanasi Division, because the officer who had passed the impugned order as District Magistrate had been posted as the Commissioner and was thus hearing the appeal. The petitioner …

SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking transfer of Appeal No. 5 of 2026, which was pending before the Commissioner, Varanasi Division, because the same officer who had passed the original order as District Magistrate had been posted as the Commissioner and was now hearing the appeal. The …

M/S MAA KHANDWARI PG COLLEGEversusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Maa Khandwari PG College, challenged an order dated 02.01.2026 that froze its bank account, alleging lack of notice, violation of natural justice, and that it had already complied by depositing Rs.11,00,000 as ordered in a 2023 judgment. The petitioner argued that coercive …

VIKAS MANI TRIATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vikas Mani Tripathi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State authorities (respondents 2 and 3) to consider and decide two applications dated 20‑08‑2020 and 02‑02‑2021, which sought implementation of a prior judgment dated 12‑04‑2019 in Writ‑C No. 7582 of 1996 …

VIRENDRA KUMAR SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a marginal farmer, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondent bank to accept repayment of his Kisan Credit Card loan of Rs. 12,23,566 in reasonable installments. He argued that his age, limited means and inability to pay the entire amount in a lump sum warranted relief. The …

ANSHUMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anshuman Singh, sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Jaunpur to grant him a firearm licence and to issue a reasoned order on his application dated 23‑12‑2025. He argued that his father, who previously held a licence, is now elderly and infirm, and that …

SANGAM LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sangam Lal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Fatehpur to decide his pending application dated 08‑01‑2026. He alleged that the licensing authority had suppressed material facts regarding a criminal case, which could affect the validity of …

NAGAR NIGAM MEERUTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Nagar Nigam Meerut filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was initially set for dismissal with exemplary costs, but the petitioner was granted time to seek further instructions. Subsequent adjournments were sought, but the petitioner failed …

AMVARWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amvarwati, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court on 28 July 2025 ordered the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 with the respondent bank and to produce proof of receipt by 20 August 2025. The petitioner sought adjournments, which were granted on 26 August …

NAVEEN PRAKASH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Azamgarh to decide a recall application dated 11 July 2022, which sought to set aside an ex parte order passed on 6 July 2022 in Statutory Appeal No. 17/2010-11. The petitioners argued that despite filing the …

GYAN PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Gyan Prakash filed a habeas corpus writ petition (No. 147 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition seeks relief on the ground of unlawful detention, although the specific factual allegations are not detailed in …

SEEMA GOELversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petition filed by Seema Goyal challenged the dismissal of her discharge application in a fraud case involving an alleged investment scam. The complainant alleged that Goyal and other accused misrepresented a real estate project, collected Rs.2.04 crore, and siphoned funds through multiple …

SMT. RESHAM PYARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt. Resham Pyari filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Family Court, Bareilly, relating to an application under Section 144 of the BNSS Act. The High Court had earlier set aside the impugned order dated 10‑Nov‑2025 and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing, directing compliance …

BRAJENDRA BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The Family Court had awarded maintenance of Rs.7,000 to the wife and Rs.3,000 to her minor son. The husband filed a revision challenging that order, but the revision was filed 415 days after the impugned order, exceeding the limitation period. The husband alleged physical and mental cruelty, …

VIVAN ALIAS VIVANSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, the minor child's maternal grandmother, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the child's production and restoration of his custody to her, alleging illegal detention by the child's grandfather and another relative. The child’s mother had died after leaving an abusive marriage, and …

MANISH GOEL @ MANISH KUMAR GOELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manish Goel (revisionist) married on 23‑Nov‑2023 and faced alleged dowry harassment, leading his wife to leave the matrimonial home. She filed an application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code on 22‑Mar‑2024 seeking maintenance, and the Family Court ordered the husband to pay Rs 15,000 …