Created by Fuzzy Cloud

VIVEK SARAN

167 judgments · newest first · showing 1–167

INDRAJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged an assessment notice issued by the Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division‑I, Jalaun, claiming that a reply filed on 30 July 2026 had not been acted upon. The petitioner sought judicial intervention to compel the respondent to decide on the reply. The …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Raj Kumar, challenged Order of Recovery No.43 dated 30 July 2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Pindra, Varanasi. The recovery certificate was issued on the basis of an earlier order of the 3rd Additional Session Judge, Valsad at Vapi, in Criminal Revision No.444 of 2021. …

NEELU SOFATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neelu Sofat, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar to execute a recovery certificate dated 28‑01‑2021 issued under Section 40(1) of the Uttar Pradesh RERA Act. The petitioner alleged that despite the certificate, the …

PAYAL RAGHUVANSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Ghaziabad (Respondent No.3) to enforce a recovery certificate dated 26 March 2024 against a defaulting developer. They alleged that despite the certificate being issued by Respondent No.2, no action had …

MUKESH KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar Verma, challenged a recovery certificate dated 26 May 2026 issued by the Tehsildar of Gabhana, Aligarh. He contended that letters dated 11 November 2024 and 12 December 2024, sent by the Branch Manager of Aryavrat Bank to the Authorized Officer of the Zila Udyog …

HANSRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hansraj Singh, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a Recovery Certificate dated 07/09/2026 for a home loan, claiming the loan had been fully repaid, and requested mandamus to cancel the certificate and halt any coercive recovery measures. The court noted that the petitioner had …

VARTHANA FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

Varthana Finance Private Ltd filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute a Section 14 order of the SARFAESI Act dated 10‑11‑2025 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court decision in C. Bright v. District …

DASHRATH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dashrath and four others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing arguments, counsel for the petitioners prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The petition was not opposed by the respondent's counsel. The Court dismissed the writ petition …

RAJAN SADANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to enforce a recovery certificate dated 22‑08‑2025, issued under section 40 of the Act, and to recover Rs.14,39,562.33 plus interest from the promoter. The petitioner alleged that despite …

RAHUL JAISWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rahul Jaiswal, filed Writ No. 34689 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, requesting liberty to approach the …

VISHAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Vishal Singh filed a writ petition alleging that despite orders of the RERA authority, the respondent had not transferred possession of a flat or released funds, claiming he had deposited money but was denied possession. The petitioner later testified that he had actually taken possession …

ZABIULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking (i) a certiorari to quash a final electricity bill assessment dated 22‑11‑2025 and (ii) a mandamus directing the respondent electricity department to allow payment of Rs 2,76,965 in easy equal installments. After arguments, the petitioner limited the …

JITENDRA SINGH BAJWA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners, former directors of Godwin Construction Company, challenged a District Magistrate's order and related recovery proceedings initiated under a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order, arguing that personal recovery against erstwhile directors is impermissible per the precedent of Rakesh …

RAMA FLOOR MILL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rama Floor Mill and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners informed the Court that a final settlement had been reached between the parties. They consequently …

PARVEJ AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioners Parvej Ahmad and another filed a writ petition challenging the issuance of a sale certificate in favour of their father. The Court queried whether such a sale certificate had ever been issued. Petitioners then prayed for dismissal of the petition as not pressed, seeking liberty to file a …

SURAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Suraj filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Chief Tax Assessing Officer of Nagar Nigam Mathura Vrindavan to decide on his reply to a notice dated 8‑December‑2025. The petitioner argued that despite having submitted his reply, no decision had been taken. The Court, after hearing both …

ANILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anil, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Chief Tax Assessing Officer of Nagar Nigam Mathura Vrindavan to pass an order on the reply he had submitted to a notice dated 8 December 2025. The petitioner argued that despite having filed the reply, no decision had been taken, …

GHAMANDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ghamandi, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Chief Tax Assessing Officer (respondent No.5) to decide on the petitioner's reply to a notice dated 8‑December‑2025. The petitioner argued that despite having submitted the reply, no decision had been taken, and relied on …

VAKIL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vakil Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking quash of a recovery notice issued by D.C.B. Bank, Meerut, which directed them to deposit an amount by 31.07.2026. The petition alleged that the notice was wrongly received by the respondent's counsel and that it stemmed from a request for …

VARTHANA FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Varthana Finance Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute a Section 14 order of the SARFAESI Act dated 22 July 2025 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court decision in C. …

M/S K.V. INSTITUTE SAGARPALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, K.V. Institute and another, filed a writ petition seeking renewal of their license, which had been pending for several years before the concerned authorities. The court noted that the Regional Director’s instructions indicated the renewal matter was still under consideration. The …

RAM PRAKASH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Prakash Singh, filed Writ No. 21071 of 2023 challenging an order dated 04-02-2023 passed by Respondent No.2. The petition was heard before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The Court observed that the petitioner had not filed any written stand contesting the findings …

SMT. RUCHI GOYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Ruchi Goyal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate and Additional District Magistrate (Nazul) of Agra to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for the sanctioning of a map for a proposed layout plan. The petitioner relied on letters from the …

NIRMALA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Nirmala Devi filed a writ petition seeking to quash the District Magistrate's order dated 7 September 2024 that rejected her claim for Rs.5 lakh under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna on the ground that the claim was time‑barred. The petitioner argued that the delay was …

DECENT BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decent Buildwell Private Limited filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a recovery order dated 03.07.2026 issued by the Recovery Officer (Revenue) of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) and a recovery certificate dated 02.02.2026 issued by the …

NEENA AGARWALversusBRANCH MANAGER, IDBI BANK LIMITED AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Neena Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking relief from recovery proceedings by Idbi Bank Limited after having paid Rs.13,10,000 towards a loan. The petitioner offered to pay the remaining balance but requested a six‑month period to do so. The court noted the payment already made …

SHIV KARAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution alleging certain relief. The respondents contended that the petitioners had concealed material facts, specifically a related writ (Writ C No.39926 of 2025) and the pendency of S.A. No.220/26 with an order dated 03.09.2026. …

HEMANT KUMAR MISHRAversusUNION BANK OF INDIA, BRANCH MUMFORDGANJ BRANCH

The petitioners, nominees of the deceased Ms. Suraksha Rani Bhatia, sought a writ of mandamus directing Union Bank of India to release the amounts lying in four Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) in their favour. The bank contended that the petitioners were not the original FDR holders and raised a …

SARFARAZ ALAM AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ No. 56210 of 2009) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, petitioners informed the Court that subsequent developments had rendered the petition moot. No opposition was raised by the private …

PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Pnb Housing Finance Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later moved the court seeking to withdraw the petition while seeking liberty to file a fresh one. The respondents and the State's standing counsel did not oppose the withdrawal. The court, noting the …

CHANDRVOSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Chandrvosh, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Branch Manager of H.D.F.C. Bank Ltd., Bulandshahr to withdraw a notice dated 23.05.2026 and issue a fresh notice with the correct interest statement. The court, after hearing counsel, disposed of the petition at the …

PAWAN AGARWALversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a sale notice and auction of a property by Union Bank of India, a refund of Rs.1,53,73,440 deposited by him, restraint on forfeiture of that amount, production of title and auction records, and compensation for alleged fraud. The petition also …

DEEPAK SARASWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Deepak Saraswat filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioner sought dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed and requested liberty to approach the appropriate forum for relief. The …

M/S HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

M/s Hinduja Housing Finance Ltd. filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 26.03.2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, which dismissed various applications due to the petitioner's non‑appearance. The petitioner had earlier approached the High Court for expediting the …

RAJA JANAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Raja Janak Singh filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Executive Engineer (Commercial Vertical‑2, Madyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Bareilly) to decide on the petitioner’s reply dated 29‑08‑2026, which was filed in response to a notice dated 01‑08‑2026. The respondents argued that the …

BANK OF MAHARASHTRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

The petition titled Bank of Maharashtra v. State of U.P. and 12 Others (Writ No. 38722 of 2026) was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. After hearing the arguments, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court, …

SUKHRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sukhram, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the present petition be dismissed, allowing the filing of a fresh writ petition with improved averments and documents. The court considered the request and granted …

SMT. RANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Rani Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38761 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court, after considering the request, dismissed the present petition but …

KISHORI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 21 OTHERS

Petitioners Kishori Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Kasimabad, to decide Declaratory Suit No.119 of 2015, which has been pending since 10 February 2015. The petitioners argued that …

SHIV SAGAR SINGH SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the High Court’s intervention to ensure the speedy disposal of a civil suit (Suit No.D202102030006842) pending before the district court. The petition alleged that the suit was being unduly delayed and requested the …

DIPOO KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dipoo Kumar, filed a civil miscellaneous amendment application seeking permission to amend the prayer and to have the pending restoration/tajbisani application decided expeditiously by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Varanasi. The State of U.P. and other respondents …

SHYAMLALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shyamlal filed a writ petition under Article 226 against the State of U.P. and others, challenging the inspection of certain land parcels (Gata Nos. 116, 132, 136) by a revenue team appointed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate. The State submitted written instructions indicating that Gata No. 116 was …

MAYA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Maya Devi filed a writ petition along with three other petitioners seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide her application filed on 15 May 2025 under Section 76 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners numbered 2, 3 and 4 withdrew their participation, and …

ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Anil Kumar and another, filed a writ seeking a certiorari to quash a notice dated 14 January 2026 that led to their eviction and demolition of a house on Gata No.79 Mi, which they claimed was an abadi area and thus protected. The State respondents argued that the eviction was based …

MOHD. YUNUS KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged an order dated 18 April 2026 issued by the Additional Collector (Finance & Revenue) of Ghazipur, alleging that the order failed to consider objections raised and merely accepted the lekhpal's report. The State's standing counsel argued the order was lawful but conceded that …

MALAKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioner, Malakh, filed a writ petition seeking the speedy disposal of an application filed on 18‑02‑2026 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. and others indicated that notices had already been issued to private respondents and the matter would proceed …

SMT. NEELAM KESARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioners, Neelam Kesari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Phoolpur, to expedite the decision on their restoration application (Case No. RST/4515 of 2023) pending in case 3807 of 2017 under Section 24 of …

SHANKARDASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner Shankardas filed a writ petition under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari and Land Revenue Act seeking certiorari to quash an order dated 20‑04‑2026 issued by the Commissioner, Chitrakoot Dham, Banda in the case of Guljari v. Shankardas & others. The petitioner alleged that …

BADKUversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

Badku filed a writ petition (Writ No. 27094 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of UP and others. The court, after hearing arguments, recorded written instructions from the Standing Counsel. The petitioner subsequently prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition, …

ASHOK GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Ashok Giri filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue authority, to register and decide an application dated 20‑01‑2026 filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s sole prayer was for the expeditious …

MUKTI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash a notice dated 02‑07‑2026 issued under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code that threatened dispossession and demolition of their house on plot No. 1286. They relied on a settlement order dated 07‑01‑2004 confirming their title to the …

SANJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanjay Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide the pending revenue case Sanjay Pathak v. State of U.P. (Case No. RST/2247/2026) filed under Section 209(Ja) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending for …

NARVADA PRASAD PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

In Writ No. 28910 of 2026, petitioner Narvada Prasad Pandey filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to respondent No.3 to decide an application dated 07‑08‑2025. The petitioner’s counsel, Vishal Tandon, specifically prayed for a time‑bound disposal of that application. …

M/S HARIOM INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

M/s Hariom Industries Ltd. filed a writ petition under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.3) to decide a pending partition suit (Case No. 44493/2025) and to restrain private respondents from altering the disputed land. …

RAMPATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rampati, filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of an application dated 06-11-2025 that was pending before the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil‑Soraon, District Prayagraj (respondent No.3). The sole relief prayed for was a direction to the officer to decide the …

KESHAV LAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Petitioner Keshav Lal and another filed a writ petition seeking that a revenue case (No. T202514360614849) pending under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 be decided expeditiously. The petitioners prayed for a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Mariahu, to dispose of …

SAFEEK MOHD AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners, owners of Gata No. 391, filed a writ petition alleging that the State respondents were attempting to create a chak marg over their land without any notice or due procedure. They had previously submitted a representation to the District Magistrate on 04.08.2026, which remained …

SIDDHARTH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Siddharth Singh, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash three orders issued in revenue mutation proceedings under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. raised a preliminary objection that such summary mutation proceedings do not determine …

SARITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sarita, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 19 September 2026 issued by the State of U.P. and others. The High Court, after receiving the standing counsel's written instructions, noted that the petition only challenged the communication and could not proceed. The …

DEEP NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Deep Narayan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide Case No. 9253 of 2026 (Deep Narayan v. Gram Sabha) pending under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a fixed time. The petition solely requested expeditious disposal of the said case. …

MAHARAJ SINGHversusSTATE PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for its prosecution. The State’s standing counsel was present, but no representative for the petitioner was available. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition on the ground of …

BIRESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Biresh Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to pass a reasoned order on a representation dated 23‑24 June 2025 and to provide full protection of his dignity, life, liberty and property. The …

MOHD. AKRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Mohd. Akram filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other revenue authorities to reconstruct the Sarai Wali Masjid in Rampur and to decide his pending application. The respondents contended that the dispute falls within the jurisdiction of …

M/S RIDDHI SIDDHI CONTRACTORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/s Riddhi Siddhi Contractor filed a writ petition against the State of U.P. and two others. The court examined a report submitted by the Divisional Commissioner, Agra Division, dated 15 September 2025. The petitioner sought dismissal of the petition with liberty to challenge the matter before the …

HUB LAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hub Lal and another, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Presiding Officer of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Sant Ravidas Nagar, to decide an application they had filed on 14 July 2026 in Execution Case No.70 of 2016. The Court examined whether the writ petition was …

POONAWALA FINCORP LTD.versusKRISHNA BAKERY AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Poonawala Fincorp Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑II, Kanpur Nagar, to decide Misc. Case No.1188/2026 against Krishna Bakery and others without further delay. The petitioner argued that an inordinate amount of time had …

INDIAN BANKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Indian Bank filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing arguments, the petitioner's counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The judgment also clarified that …

M/S RAM KRIPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Ram Kripal Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to pay an admitted amount for work completed in 2013, with interest, after the demand was raised only in 2023. The State contended that the claim arose ten years after …

SUSHIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sushil Kumar filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others seeking relief. The parties agreed that the relief sought had already been granted by the time of hearing. The court examined whether any further orders were necessary. Since the relief was already …

RAJVEER YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Rajveer Yadav filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 31469 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. After hearing arguments, the petitioner's counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, seeking liberty to …

ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Arun Kumar Shukla and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court and later submitted a supplementary affidavit seeking an unconditional apology for failing to disclose facts about an earlier writ petition. The court examined the petitioners' admission of the procedural …

KAILASH CHANDRA CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kailash Chandra Chaudhary, filed a writ petition challenging a recovery certificate issued by Union Bank of India directing him to pay Rs. 6,65,500. The petitioner had already deposited Rs. 1,50,000 and sought additional time to pay the balance. The court, after hearing both sides, …

RAMCHANDRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash a recovery citation dated 10‑07‑2026 and an amendment application to quash a final assessment order dated 5‑02‑2026, alleging that the final order was passed without considering a reply filed on 10‑06‑2025. The amendment application was rejected …

MANJESH KUMARversusAUTHORISED OFFICER, INDIAN BANK AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Manjesh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The Court accepted this prayer and dismissed the petition as not pressed. No substantive merits of …

M/S DIKSHA CONSTRUCTIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

M/S Diksha Construction filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and other railway authorities to provide the drawing for a railway tender work and to decide the petitioner’s pending representations. The respondents indicated that the work had been dropped following a …

SMT. PRABHAVATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Prabhavati filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to consider her representation dated 27 January 2026 within a stipulated period, and also sought the same against private individuals Ram Pratap, Krishna Pratap and Prabhavati. The …

NIZAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Nizam, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, to issue his passport within a court‑specified time. The respondents, Union of India and the Regional Passport Officer, submitted instructions indicating that two criminal cases were …

RAJ KUMARI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Kumari Devi filed a writ petition seeking to quash a District Magistrate's order dated 7 September 2024 that rejected her claim for Rs.5 lakh under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna on the ground that the claim was time‑barred. She also prayed for a mandamus directing …

MOHAMMAD YAKUBversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Yakub, sought relief against eviction from premises allotted to him. The respondents, including the State of U.P. and a Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, produced instructions indicating the premises had been used, undermining the petitioner's claim. The petitioner requested time …

MOHD BILAL ISMAIL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohd Bilal Ismail and two others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restrain a respondent and police from interfering with a boundary-raising activity on their land, and to compel the District Magistrate to decide a representation dated 16 September 2025. The petitioners limited …

RADHEY SHYAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Radhey Shyam Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to execute a recovery certificate and a non‑bailable warrant issued by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gautam Buddha Nagar. The Court …

KIRAN RATHIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kiran Rathi, sought the recovery of Rs.5,36,092 that had accumulated in the bank account of her deceased mother, Late Kamla Devi, a family pensioner of the Indian Railways. The Union Bank of India had reverted the amount to the railway authorities without prior notice, citing the …

OMKANT PANDEYversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Omkant Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others not to demolish his construction on land in Mohalla Purana Ait, Tehsil Orai, District Jalaun, and to consider his representation dated 08.07.2019. The respondents countered that …

DR. SUMAN SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Dr. Suman Srivastava filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" heading. On the day of hearing, no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner except the standing counsel, and no response was filed. The …

ANGAD MALLAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner Angad Mallah filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing, but on the revised call no representative of the petitioner appeared, only the standing counsel was present. The court noted the absence and dismissed the writ petition in …

LILY ROY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Lily Roy and another filed a writ petition alleging a wrongful withdrawal of Rs.11,75,600 by cheque no.530764. The respondents, including the State of U.P. and Punjab and Sind Bank, sought production of certain documents under a letter dated 6‑Nov‑2017. The petitioners claimed they had already …

RAKESH KUMAR DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The writ petition (Writ‑C No.25969 of 2010) filed by Rakesh Kumar Dubey and another was listed for a priority hearing. No party appeared before the bench, although the State’s standing counsel was present. The Court dismissed the petition in default and vacated any interim order previously granted. …

RAMA SHANKAR SHUKLAversusALLAHABAD BANK THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS

Rama Shankar Shukla, a senior manager who retired in 2002, filed a writ petition claiming entitlement to a pension under the Allahabad Bank Employees' Pension Rules, 1995, arguing that he could opt for pension after retirement pursuant to a bipartite settlement dated 27 April 2010. The Single Judge …

YOGENDRA SINGH BOHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yogendra Singh Bohra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No party appeared before the court, although the State’s standing counsel was present. The court dismissed the petition in default and vacated any interim order previously granted. The judges directed that …

HARVINDAR KAURversusK.D.A. AND ANR.

The petitioner, Harvindar Kaur, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No party appeared before the court, although the State's standing counsel was present. The court, noting the absence of representation, dismissed the petition in default and vacated any interim order previously …

M/S ARFAT TANNERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

M/S Arfat Tanners filed a writ petition seeking to quash a recovery citation demanding market fee on turnover of finished leather products and to restrain the State from demanding market fee on hides and skins for the period 2004-2006. The respondents argued that the matter had already been decided …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Raj Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner’s counsel conceded that the relief sought had already been granted by the appropriate authority. The Court examined whether any further judicial …

SAMEENA YASMEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Sameena Yasmeen filed a writ petition seeking (i) a mandamus directing the authorities to release enhanced salary and allowance for 11 months as per a 26 October 2016 order of the U.P. Legal Services Authority, and (ii) direction to consider her candidature for appointment as a Member of …

SAGUFTA ISHRARversusPURVANCHAL VIDHUT VITRANA NIGAM LTD AND ANOTHER

Sagufta Ishrar filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35438 of 2026) against Purvanchal Vidhut Vitrana Nigam Ltd and another respondent. The respondent, represented by N.K. Tiwari, placed on record instructions dated 24‑08‑2026. After hearing arguments, the petitioner’s counsel prayed that the petition …

SATISH KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide a representation dated 20-07-2026, as mandated by a civil judge's order dated 28-01-2025. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, and this request …

MOHD. NADEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Mohd. Nadeem filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice issued by the State of U.P. and other respondents. The respondents subsequently withdrew the demand notice and submitted a letter dated 7 September 2026 to the Additional District Magistrate, Finance & Revenue, Bareilly, confirming the …

UMAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Uman Khan filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The respondents later withdrew the demand notice and submitted a letter dated 7 September 2026 to the Additional District Magistrate, Finance & Revenue, Bareilly, confirming the …

JAGAT PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jagat Pal Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that Respondent No.5 was illegally constructing on public land. He had previously submitted a representation to Respondent No.3, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, on 11‑08‑2026, seeking redress. The court examined the submissions and …

ROHIT KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow to renew his passport (No. N1904025) promptly. The Regional Passport Office had issued a letter dated 05‑08‑2026 requiring the petitioner to appear in person with relevant …

SHAILEDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shailedra Kumar challenged a notice dated 14‑08‑2026 issued by the Varanasi Municipal Corporation ordering demolition or sealing of his residential premises at Arazi No. 96, Mauza Hukulganj. He sought a writ of certiorari to quash the notice and a writ of mandamus to restrain any …

AJAY VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ajay Verma, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 14‑08‑2026 issued by the Varanasi Municipal Corporation ordering demolition or sealing of his residential premises at Arazi No. 96, Mauza Hukulganj. He sought a certiorari to quash the notice and a mandamus directing the …

RAJ KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Kumar Verma challenged a notice dated 14‑08‑2026 issued by the Varanasi Municipal Corporation ordering demolition or sealing of his residential premises. He sought a writ of certiorari to quash the notice and a mandamus directing the respondents not to dispossess him without authority …

SHALUversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Shalu filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 17‑08‑2026 and 18‑02‑2026 that were passed under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner argued that the orders were illegal and sought relief from …

INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, India Shelter Finance Corporation Ltd., sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to ensure physical possession of a mortgaged property after an order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act was passed by the Additional District Magistrate. The petition argued that the …

SUBHASH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners Subhash and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition sought relief, but counsel for the petitioners requested that the petition be dismissed with liberty to approach the …

RAJNI MISHRAversusPANKAJ RAJHANS

The appellant, Rajni Mishra, filed an appeal against a trial court order that dismissed her husband’s divorce suit filed under the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of cruelty. She argued that the order adversely affected her because her husband had remarried during their subsistence of marriage and …

SAURABH GUPTAversusSMT SHALINI RAI

The appellant, Saurabh Gupta, appealed after a mutual consent divorce under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, wherein a settlement required him to pay Rs.90 lakhs to the respondent, Shalini Rai. During mediation, a demand draft of Rs.45 lakhs (No. 411770 dated 04‑04‑2025) was issued by …

KAMLAPATI DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kamlapati Dixit, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 17909 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later filed a supplementary affidavit expressing the desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition. Counsel for the petitioner, Sangeeta …

DAMODAR HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Damodar Housing Co‑Operative Society Ltd., filed a writ appeal before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently moved that the appeal be withdrawn, seeking liberty to pursue any other legal remedies. The court considered the petitioner's request and, finding no objection, allowed the …

GURMUKH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gurmukh Singh, a sugarcane grower, filed a writ petition alleging non-payment of dues by respondent No.6, a private sugarcane buyer. The petitioner also claimed that a representation filed before respondent No.2 was pending decision. Respondent No.6 contended that 50% of the amount …

AMINAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amina, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief while a related complaint filed by her on 5 July 2025 before Respondent No.2 was still pending. The petitioner argued that the pending complaint should be decided before the writ petition proceeds. The court …

BADALE SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Badale Singh and four others filed Writ Petition No. 44882 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel Akshara Rai and Sujeet Kumar Rai, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition …

ANURAGversusSMT. SONI

The appellant husband appealed against a trial court order that granted his wife maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, in addition to an existing Rs.3,000 per month awarded under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The husband argued that the total …

RAJESH KUMAR MISHRAversusMANSHA RAM MISHRA AND 2 OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ-C No. 27488 of 2021) was filed by Rajesh Kumar Mishra against Mansha Ram Mishra and others. The petitioner failed to appear before the court even after a revised call. The court noted the non‑appearance and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits …

BHARAT TOMARversusSMT. NEETU

The appellant, Bharat Tomar, filed a first appeal (No. 770 of 2022) against a decision involving Smt. Neetu. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the appeal. The court, noting the request, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were …

SARITAversusRAJESH KUMAR YADAV

The appellant, Sarita, filed a first appeal but later expressed a desire not to pursue the matter. Counsel for the appellant informed the court that the appeal should be treated as withdrawn. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered the request and, finding no objection, dismissed the …

ALOK KUMAR SINGHversusARTI SINGH

Alok Kumar Singh filed an appeal against a decree and later, through his counsel Lavlesh Kumar Shukla and Mahesh Kumar, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The appellant filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 04 of 2025) before the Allahabad High …

SMT POONAM KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Poonam Kumari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioners on the revised call. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Atul …

RAM CHANDRAversusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GORAKHPUR AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Chandra, filed Writ No. 17906 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Arun Kumar Verma, requested that the writ petition be withdrawn because the respondents …

TEJ BAHADURversusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GORAKHPUR MANDAL AND 9 OTHERS

Petitioner Tej Bahadur filed Writ Petition No. 17932 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur Mandal and others. The petition was found to be bereft of necessary details and the requisite order, rendering it procedurally defective. Counsel …

PRATEEK GROUP BAKERY INDUSTRYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Prateek Group Bakery Industry filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 not to interfere with construction on a plot in Deoria and to decide the petitioner's representation dated 16‑03‑2026 and 22‑04‑2026. The State's standing counsel argued that the petition …

SHOBHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shobha Singh, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Board of Revenue to expedite the disposal of Revision No. REV/3272/2025, which was pending before it. The State respondents argued that the revision itself was not maintainable, but the court held that the issue of …

POONAM SONGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Poonam Singh filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of her restoration application pending before the Tehsildar, Sadar Deoria, under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition sought a time‑bound decision on the application filed in 2022. The State’s …

AJAY KUMAR @ AJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 18 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Rudrapur, to decide a revenue case (Case No.RST/11072/2025) that had been pending since January 2021 and, after a remand, since March 2025. The petition invoked Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, …

VIJAY AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Vijay and six others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue) of Gorakhpur to decide a pending recall/restoration application and a stay application in case No.9001/2025, filed under Section 38(2) of the Uttar Pradesh …

LATURI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Laturi Singh challenged an order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Up‑Ziladhikari (Judicial) of Tehsil‑Patiyali under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging it was issued ex‑parte without giving him an opportunity to be heard. The respondents contended that the proviso to …

AISHRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Aishraj filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of his application dated 24‑02‑2026 filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which was pending beyond the prescribed time‑bound period. The sole relief prayed for was a direction to the respondent to decide the …

KAMAL SEN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Kamal Sen Singh filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash orders dated 31‑05‑2025 and 25‑11‑2024 issued by the District Magistrate and Assistant Collector, Jaunpur, under section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the inspection report was ex parte and that he was …

ABHISHEK RAIversusSMT. RINKI RAI

The appellant, Abhishek Rai, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. No further arguments or evidence were presented. The respondent, Smt. Rinki Rai, was …

SMT. PRERNA SHRIVASTAVAversusMOHIT SHRIVASTAVA

Smt. Prerna Shrivastava filed an appeal against Mohit Shrivastava in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel, Yatharth Nath Pathak, failed to appear even after a revised call. The Court noted the non‑appearance and held that the appeal could not be prosecuted. Consequently, the judges …

SMT. SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Sunita Devi, filed Writ Petition No. 6984 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The State's standing counsel raised no …

robin sainiversussmt.soonali saini

Robin Saini filed an appeal against Smt. Soonali Saini in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel failed to appear for the hearing, and even after a revised call, no appearance was made. The court, noting the non‑appearance, dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. No …

SHYAM NARAIN YADAVversusTHE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND ANOTHER

Shyam Narain Yadav filed a special appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the District Inspector of Schools. The respondent's counsel submitted an illness slip, but the appellant failed to appear for the hearing, even after a revised call. The court noted the appellant's non-appearance as a …

SMT RUPALI DWIVEDIversusNAVNEET KUMAR DWIVEDI

The High Court of Allahabad heard an appeal by Smt. Rupali Dwivedi against a trial court order that granted her husband, Navneet Kumar Dwivedi, a divorce. The appellant was not contesting the divorce itself but sought maintenance, which the trial court had not awarded. The court observed that …

ANUJ SONIversusCHANCHAL SONI

The appellant, Anuj Soni, filed a first appeal against Chanchal Soni in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Shri Prakash Dwivedi, expressed that the appellant does not wish to pursue the appeal. The court considered the request and noted that the appeal was not …

PYARE LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pyare Lal, a sugarcane grower, filed a writ petition alleging that a private company (respondent no. 6) had failed to pay dues owed for supplied sugarcane. The petitioner claimed that a representation filed with respondent no. 2 was still pending decision, and that no payment had …

PARVATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Parvati Devi, a sugarcane grower, filed a writ petition alleging non‑payment of dues by a private company (respondent No.6) and contended that a representation filed before respondent No.2 was still pending. The petitioner claimed that no payment had been received, while respondent No.5 …

ANUPAM DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anupam Dwivedi, filed a public interest litigation seeking eviction of private respondents from Arazi No.2213/0.137 hectare, despite a pending civil suit (Mansoor Ahmad v. State of U.P., Suit No.1277 of 1999) and an interim status‑quo order dated 20‑12‑1999. The earlier writ petition …

ASHU DUBEYversusPREETI DUBEY

Ashu Dubey appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking relief from an order directing the release of Rs 2,00,000 deposited with the court’s Mediation Centre. The parties had earlier been referred to mediation, where they settled their matrimonial dispute, filed a joint divorce petition under …

ASHU DUBEYversusPREETI DUBEY

Ashu Dubey appealed against the dissolution of his marriage to Preeti Dubey. The respondent filed a joint petition under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Family Court, Jaunpur (Case No.1465 of 2023), which was granted on 27 May 2025, dissolving the marriage. The appellant …

VISHWAJEET SHARMAversusADITI PANDEY

The appellant, Vishwajeet Sharma, filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.3 of 2026) seeking to withdraw his appeal against Aditi Pandey. The application was supported by an affidavit. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, comprising Judges Atul Sreedharan and …

UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERSversusVINOD KUMAR CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Union of India and four others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined this submission and found no merit in continuing the petition. …

SMT SALINI JAINversusSACHIN JAIN

The appellant, Smt Salini Jain, filed an application seeking to withdraw the appeal filed against Sachin Jain. The application was supported by an affidavit explaining the desire to withdraw. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered the request and found no objection to the withdrawal. …

MOHAN SINGHversusDR. BHIM RAO AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY THRU ITS V.C. AND OTHERS

Dismiss

The appellant, Mohan Singh, failed to appear before the High Court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, Atul Sreedharan and Vivek Saran, granted the appellant a one‑month period to file a restoration …

JAGMOHAN DUTT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jagmohan Dutt Sharma, filed Writ No. 38233 of 2015 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf at the revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted and consequently dismissed it. The judges granted the petitioner liberty to file a …

SMT. RANJANA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusROHIT SINGH AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Smt. Ranjana Singh, the first wife of Rohit Singh, filed a suit under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking to declare her husband's second marriage to a woman identified as "X" void. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding that only a party to the second marriage could …

MADANMOHANversusUNION BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Madanmohan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction from Union Bank of India to clarify his outstanding loan amount and to permit repayment in easy installments. The Allahabad High Court held that a writ petition cannot be maintained against a private finance company, relying on …

DR NEERAJ KISHORE MISHRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

Dr. Neeraj Kishore Mishra filed an intra‑court appeal seeking to set aside a single judge’s order dismissing his petition for a first or second service increment. The appeal was filed 23 days late, but the delay was condoned. The court examined whether the appellant had any legal entitlement to the …

M/S JADAUN BROTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/S Jadaun Brothers filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 16‑08‑2024 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The respondents contended that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the adjudication order. The …

M/S RUPA TRADERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/S Rupa Traders filed a writ petition challenging two ex‑parte adjudication orders dated 22‑04‑2024 and 03‑02‑2023 that were passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The respondents argued that the petitioner had a statutory right to appeal the adjudication …

MOTI LAL GOELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

Moti Lal Goel filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner did not appear, and the court directed him to engage new counsel. An office report later revealed that the petitioner had died, and no application for substitution was filed. Since the sole petitioner was deceased …

MOTI LAL GOELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

Moti Lal Goel filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner died before the hearing and no application for substitution of legal representative was filed. The court noted that notices had been dispatched but the original petitioner was deceased. In the absence of a substitute …

DR. DHANANJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Dr. Dhananjay Singh appealed against the State of U.P. and five others in a civil miscellaneous matter. The appellant filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 19 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the appeal. The respondents, represented by Brajesh Kumar Chaturvedi and …

RAVINDRA KUMAR AWASTHIversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The appellant, Ravindra Kumar Awasthi, filed a special appeal challenging a decision of the lower court. The High Court noted that an earlier case with identical facts, Ravindra Kumar Awasthi vs. State of U.P. and 5 others (2026), had been allowed. Relying on that precedent, the Court found no …

SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Dismiss

The appellants Santosh Kumar Shukla and others filed Special Appeal Defective No. 272 of 2013 against the Union of India and others. Counsel for the appellants, Alok Mishra, submitted that the appeal had become infructuous. The respondents were represented by A.S.G.I., Ritvik Upadhya, Rizwan Ali …

I.I.E. COLLEGE OF NURSINGversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petition was filed by I.I.E. College of Nursing challenging the denial of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) by the Uttar Pradesh State Medical Faculty, which cited deficiencies after three inspections. The petitioner argued that the inspection findings were erroneous and submitted documents to …