Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
291 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The applicant, Mustkeem, filed a bail cancellation application (Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application No. 77 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Pinki, the daughter of a deceased, who had been in custody since February 24, 2026 in connection with Crime No. 146 of 2026. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated and that the key prosecution witness, examined as P.W.-1, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Rekha Devi, the wife of a deceased, who had been in custody since 24 February 2026 for a case under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication and highlighted that the prosecution’s key witness, examined as …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Neetu, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S. alleging abetment of suicide. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, noting the absence of any obscene material, a dying declaration, or any …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritik Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 190 of 2025) where he alleged false implication. The applicant argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the informant’s statement under Section 180 was not an eye‑witness account, and no witness …
Ram Raheesh filed a bail cancellation application (No. 420 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Radhey Shyam Yadav, did not appear to press the application. The State's counsel, G.A., was present. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant and, …
The applicant, Ram Raheesh, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 428 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the application for want of …
Smt Nisha Yadav filed an application for cancellation of bail before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State’s brief holder, Sri …
The High Court considered the bail application of Pramod Paswan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(2)(m) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the victim's age was incorrectly recorded, and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saklain in a criminal case (Crime No. 684 of 2025) under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR was lodged more than four months after the alleged incident and that no obscene …
The applicant Nadeem filed a bail application in a case involving alleged looting of Rs.1.20 crore, a pistol, cartridges and cash, claiming he was not named in the FIR and that the recovered items were falsely linked to him. The prosecution could not produce any independent witness or corroborative …
The applicant, Amanullah Khan, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 446 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application. The court noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the application for want of …
Shikha Sharma filed an application for cancellation of bail before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's brief holder, …
Shikha Sharma filed a bail cancellation application (No. 451 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mayuri Mehrotra, did not appear to press the application. The State's counsel was present. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant and dismissed …
Shiv Prasad filed a bail cancellation application (No. 470 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Nitish Shakya, did not appear to press the application. The State's counsel was present. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant and dismissed the …
The petitioner, Prachi Rathore (alias Siya Rathore), filed a bail cancellation application (No. 487 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The application was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the matter. The learned judge noted the absence of …
Smt. Dukhanti Devi filed a bail cancellation application (No. 483 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel did not appear to press the application, and no representative was present on her behalf. The State, represented by its brief holder, was present. The Court observed …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Patel, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 504 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The application was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the matter. Consequently, the court noted the absence of prosecution. The …
Sohan Singh filed an application for cancellation of his bail before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and the court noted the absence of any representation. The learned judge observed that the application could not be proceeded with …
Smt Nastaeem Parveen filed a bail cancellation application (No. 502 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. The applicant's counsel, Tarun Kedar Nath Singh and Umesh Singh, did not appear to press the application. The court noted the absence of any …
Zeenat Quraishi filed a bail cancellation application (No. 499 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's brief …
The applicant filed a bail cancellation application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of prosecution and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vivek …
Smt. Kusumlata filed a bail cancellation application (No. 511 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Ugrasen Kumar Pandey, failed to appear to press the application. No other representative appeared on behalf of the applicant. The court noted the absence of prosecution …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Narendra Sharma, who was charged under Sections 105, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. for the death of an informant. The applicant claimed false implication, noting the FIR was lodged belatedly, lacked a date and time of the incident, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anil in a criminal case under sections 115(2), 352 and 105 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out a four‑day delay in lodging the FIR and reliance on independent witnesses who said the incident was a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Khan (alias Sameer Khan) in a case registered under Section 105 B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that there was an inordinate delay in filing a Section 175(3) application, resulting in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Altaf, accused in a case under Sections 131, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 105 of the IPC for assault leading to the death of the informant. The informant’s FIR alleged that Altaf and three others, armed with danda, assaulted him, but medical reports …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramnaresh, accused under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem report could not ascertain the cause of death, the viscera report was missing, and there was no concrete evidence of his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandu Mansoori, who was charged under Section 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 5j(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged incident on 4 May 2026. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged on 14 May 2026, showing an inordinate delay, and that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pappu, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 175 of 2026). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, rendering the prosecution case weak, and that the informant’s statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pushpendra in a criminal case (Crime No. 427 of 2026) involving alleged recovery of copper slabs. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, and that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Narendra @ Bablu, who was arrested in a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide following the death of his wife by antemortem hanging. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem report and the FIR did not establish any …
Shivangi Vishwakarma was arrested in connection with a death alleged to be a suicide, and charged under Sections 108 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that the post‑mortem showed death by hanging and that there was no evidence of abetment, arguing that the alleged suicide note and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Khushboo, the wife of a deceased man alleged to have committed suicide, under Section 108 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued she was falsely implicated and that the post‑mortem showed death by ante‑mortem hanging, with no evidence of her …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra and Durgadeen, brothers‑in‑law of a deceased, in Criminal Case No. 130 of 2026 under Section 108 of the B.N.S. Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, pointing out a five‑month delay between the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aditya, who was arrested in Crime No.73 of 2026 under several IPC sections and sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated based on an informer's tip, and that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlauti Chauhan, the wife of a deceased man alleged to have committed suicide by hanging. The applicant was charged under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abetment to suicide, based on a suicide note and other …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil @ Akash, who was arrested under Sections 115(2) CrPC and 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant contended that the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, the alleged video evidence was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Prasad, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 105 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged with an inordinate delay, and that the prosecution …
The applicant, Sarfaraj, filed a bail application in a cyber‑crime case (Cr. No. 37 of 2025) alleging that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated by a co‑accused’s statement, which the court found unreliable. No independent witness or corroborative evidence linked him to the alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Varis, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 108, 308(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a …
The applicant, Subhash Chandra Sharma, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 01 of 2026) under Section 105 of the B.N.S. and Section 3/27/25 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the accidental discharge of a firearm during celebratory firing. He relied on …
The applicant, Ravendra, husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide, was arrested under Sections 85, 108 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. He contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the death, that the investigation showed no suicide note or material …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Mishra (alias Udit Narayan), who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide that occurred on 18 October 2024. The informant’s initial complaint on the same date made no allegation against the applicant, and …
Mohammad Qasim was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 205 of 2026) alleging violations of Sections 318(4), 105 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 34 of the Indian Medical Council Act. He contended that he is not a doctor and was falsely implicated, noting that the deceased infant’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yaseen in a criminal case (Cr.No. 581 of 2025) involving alleged assault and subsequent death of an informant's sister‑in‑law. Yaseen argued that he was never named in the FIR and that the informant’s later statement implicating him was …
Jony, the husband of a deceased woman, was arrested under Sections 85, 105 and 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. He contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the incident, the charge of Section 105 was later dropped, and the evidence, including the post‑mortem report and a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Mishra in a cyber‑crime case (Criminal No. 0031 of 2026) under IPC sections 317(2), 317(5), 318(4) and 111(2). The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated based on an informer’s tip, and that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hari Narayan Alias Munna, accused under Section 304 IPC for the murder of his wife. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s case relied solely on hearsay, with the only witnesses being the deceased’s son and daughter, who were not …
Reena, the sister‑in‑law of a deceased person, was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide. She filed a bail application, contending that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, and there was no suicide note or material linking her to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gyan Chandra @ Pradumman in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, with the FIR containing vague allegations against him and no corroborative evidence linking him …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. for Rakesh Babu, who was charged under IPC sections 351(3), 352, 137(2), 87 and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim’s age was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahgaz, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Sections 85, 108 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged nine days after the alleged incident, that the delay undermined the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shivalaya, who was in custody for a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act fitting the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of Ravi Chaudhari, who was charged under Sections 3(1), 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 2(b)(xiv) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmveer, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 77 of 2026) alleging assault that led to the death of an informant's father. The FIR charges him under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 105 of the Indian Penal Code and a provision of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faim alias Fahim in a criminal case under Section 105 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a three‑day delay in lodging the FIR and that the informant’s statement under Section 180 indicated intoxication and no prior …
Raj Shekhar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 238 of 2026, alleging false implication and lack of independent witnesses to the recovery of two mobile phones and Rs.500. The applicant argued that no corroborative evidence linked him to the offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Krishna Jatav under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the definition of "gang" or "gangster", and that he …
The applicant, Krishna Kumar, sought bail under Section 483 of the CrPC for a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the definition of a "gang" or "gangster", and that he had already …
The applicant, Mohd Hamid @ Saddam, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the definition of "gang" or "gangster", and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Satyam Tiwari in a case under Sections 248(1), 238(1), 3(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the only allegation against him was participation in a conspiracy, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, concerning Pradeep @ Deepak Sharma, who was in custody since 21‑04‑2026. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not allege any act fitting the …
Aley Hasan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 209 of 2026) alleging violations of the Cow Slaughter Act and the Arms Act, stemming from an alleged firing on police where no police officer was injured but a co-accused, Javed, sustained a leg injury. The applicant claimed the recovered pistol, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shubham Singh, who was charged under Sections 105, 115(2), 303(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code in a case arising from an incident at Bidhnu police station. The applicant argued that he was not named in the original FIR and that his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Irshad in a case under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 5.008 kg of ganja. The applicant argued that the recovery was false, there was no independent witness, the quantity was below commercial level and mandatory …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Suraj Yadav in a case involving alleged possession of a pistol, cartridges, a mobile phone and Rs.3,200 under various sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Farman in criminal case No. 179 of 2026, alleged under IPC Section 105 and CrPC Section 223(2). The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, there was no prior enmity with the deceased, and the allegations were vague with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Baleshwar Ram, who was arrested in connection with a suicide case originally registered under Section 125 of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act, but later amended to Section 108 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rameshwar Tiwari and Sarojani Devi, who are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have committed suicide by hanging. The FIR, lodged on 26‑11‑2025, alleged dowry demand and harassment but was filed 15 days after the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nazim (applicant) in Criminal Case No. 148 of 2026 under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the prosecution's key witnesses – the mother of the deceased (PW‑1) and the injured party (PW‑2) – …
The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application of Arif, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the FIR was vague, did not allege any act falling within the statutory definition of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant, Kallu alias Ashok Yadav, argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Yadav under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for Rev. Deepak Kumar, who was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act in a property dispute. The applicant argued that the matter was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Lokesh @ Tausi, who is charged under IPC sections 354 Ka, 354 Kha, 376 AB and POCSO Act sections 5M/6, 9M/10 for alleged indecent acts with a minor. The applicant claimed false implication and no prior criminal record, while the State …
The applicant, Jauni, was arrested in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 25210 of 2026 in connection with Crime No. 245 of 2026, alleged to have participated in an assault that resulted in the death of the informant's son. The FIR was lodged on 31 May 2026, four days after the incident, and the …
Rizwan and Shahid were arrested in connection with a case involving alleged recovery of a mobile phone, Aadhaar card and SIM card, and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. The applicants argued that they were falsely implicated, noting the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 27646 of 2026 filed by Ashok Kumar, accused in Crime No. 186 of 2026. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, is not a medical practitioner, and that post‑mortem and viscera reports showed no external injury or poison, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shomil Modanwal and Abhay Maurya in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 50 of 2025) involving alleged recovery of various documents and valuables. The applicants contended that the recovered items were falsely planted and that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shravan Kumar Yadav in a criminal case (Crime No. 118 of 2025) where he was not named in the FIR and was allegedly implicated five months after the incident. The applicant argued lack of corroborative evidence, no criminal antecedents, and parity …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramu Yadav in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31534 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 553 of 2025 under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, his name only appeared during investigation, no tractors were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhure in Criminal Case No. 277 of 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that the allegations were vague, that he was falsely implicated, and that there was no specific …
The applicant, Radhe Shyam, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 53 of 2026) in which nine persons were alleged to have assaulted the informant's father and grandfather, the latter dying from head injuries. The FIR named the applicant among the accused but did not assign him a …
The applicant, Mukesh Kumar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.202 of 2024) involving offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The informant’s counsel informed the court that the trial had already concluded and the applicant had been convicted …
Vimla Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for bail in a case originally filed under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act, which was later amended to charge her under Section 108 and Section 92 of the B.N.S. Act for alleged abetment to suicide. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Joni, the husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Sections 85 and 108 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident and was later amended, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aviral Yadav in a case under Sections 309(6), 317(2), 317(5), 109(1), 111 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the co‑accused’s statements implicating him were unreliable, with no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Azad, who was arrested in connection with a murder case under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the informant was not an eye‑witness, with witnesses indicating a spontaneous …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul Yadav, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, that the post‑mortem showed death due …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandrapal Singh Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a suicide case under Sections 108, 308(5) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, citing a post‑mortem report indicating death by asphyxia due to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amitosh in a case registered under Sections 125, 352, 351(2), 105 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a delayed FIR and a hostile prosecution witness who did not support the prosecution. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hariom Pandey, who was arrested in a case originally registered under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and later converted to Section 107 B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing out a five‑day delay …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya Lal @ Lallu, who was arrested in a case involving alleged assault and the death of the informant's wife. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR contained only vague allegations against him, with no corroborative …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Supriya Pathak, accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abetment of suicide in a case arising from the death of her husband. The applicant argued that the death was due to antemortem hanging and that she had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Harikesh Lodhi @ Kharkhar, who was charged under several IPC sections for an alleged assault that resulted in the death of a victim. The applicant argued that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's case and that the allegations …
The applicant, Dwarika Kannaujiya, was arrested in a case under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging abetment of suicide following the death of a person by hanging. He contended that he was falsely implicated, arguing that the post‑mortem report, the suicide note, and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kusum Devi and Ramsamujh Nishad, who were charged under Section 105 of the B.N.S. for the alleged murder of an informant's husband. The FIR was lodged four days after the incident, and the charge was later altered from Section 103(1) to Section …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramreet, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 53 of 2026) involving alleged assault on the informant’s father and grandfather, the latter dying from head injuries. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that …
The applicant, Irfan Ali, filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Earlier, his first anticipatory bail application was withdrawn with a direction to surrender, but he failed to …
Avadhesh Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 534 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 323 and 307 IPC. He contended that the allegations were vague, the injuries were minor, he had cooperated with the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhola Rajbhar and Rajesh Rajbhar in a case under Sections 105 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging they assaulted an informant’s son who later died of hemorrhagic shock. The applicants claimed false implication, absence of any weapon, lack …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Omkar Verma in a case of alleged abetment to suicide under Section 108 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, that the post‑mortem showed death by hanging, and that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bharat Lodhi, who was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting the nephew and sister‑in‑law of an informant, resulting in the nephew's death. The applicant contended that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Subhash Chandra, who was accused under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide following the death of his wife. The applicant argued that the FIR and investigation did not establish any act of instigation, conspiracy or …
Harsh @ Golu was arrested in Crime No. 389 of 2026 for allegedly assaulting a deceased with a pointed object, leading to death. The FIR was lodged on 16‑07‑2026, four days after the alleged incident, and the informant was the brother of the deceased, not an eye‑witness. Statements of the deceased’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Paras, accused under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, the suicide note did not show any positive act of instigation, and that the essential ingredients …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aviraj Sharma in a case (Crime No. 285 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that he was never named in the FIR, had no direct or indirect involvement with the firms or co‑accused, and possessed no …
The applicant, Dharmendra @ Pappu, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 1997) involving IPC sections 364A, 511 and 394. The trial court had already concluded the trial and acquitted the applicant on 27 January 2026. The High Court, after receiving a report confirming …
The applicant, Chhotu @ Rajendra Kumar, sought bail in a case (Crime No. 61 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 307, 376(3), 506 and sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant committed rape of a minor, supported by the victim's statements under Sections 161 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Payal and Urmila, who were accused under IPC sections 351(3) and 352 and Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act for alleged abetment to suicide. The applicants argued that the post‑mortem report could not determine the cause of death …
The applicant sought bail in a criminal case filed under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, and a medical report dated 22 May 2026 established the victim as a 19‑year‑old …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas in Crime No. 313 of 2025, charged under Section 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5m/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged a year after the alleged incident, indicating a fatal delay, and that the victim, a minor, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nanhe in Criminal Case No. 196 of 2026, which involved charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing out a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and a victim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shani Sharma in a case under Sections 137(2), 87 of the CrPC, Section 65(1) of the B.N.S., and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was lodged belatedly, and that there were material …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Awadhesh, who was charged under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 105 in a murder case. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing to a seven‑day delay between the alleged incident and the filing of the FIR and arguing …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pintu alias Vikas and Ravindra Singh in a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging abetment to suicide. The applicants, related to the deceased, claimed they were falsely implicated and that the post‑mortem showed death by asphyxia due to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajad (N.K. Sharma) in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 70(2), 75, 79, 351(3), 308(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(g), 6, 7, 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a material …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Singh Yadav in a case registered as Crime No. 91 of 2026 under Sections 316(2), 3(5), 61(2) and 108/56 of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the alleged offence under Section 108 B.N.S. – which …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC filed by Bhura alias Tej Bahadur, who was accused of offences under Sections 452, 376AB of the IPC and sections 5m/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim’s statement and medical …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case arising from a matrimonial dispute, wherein the complainant had filed FIRs alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections …
Amod Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging false implication in a suicide‑abetment charge. The applicant argued that he was not named in the alleged suicide note and that the FIR and investigation material did not establish the essential ingredients of …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a matrimonial dispute, wherein the complainant alleged offences under Sections 498A, 494, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vasudha, the step‑mother of a deceased person, who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged nine days after the death, indicating a fatal delay, and that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 64 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, concerning alleged rape. The applicant argued that the FIR and the victim’s statement under Section 180 of the B.N.S. did not allege …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dheeraj Gaur in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, that the victim voluntarily left home, married the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Imran, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.56 of 2026) under sections 318(4), 111(6), 317(2), 338, 340(2) of the B.N.S. and section 66D of the Income Tax Act. Imran alleged that the recovery of a mobile phone, two pass‑books, an …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Gupta (alias Nitish Kumar) in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 105 of the IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, noting a delayed FIR, vague allegations, and lack of clarity about …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramesh Chandra Gupta and Aditya Gupta in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed they were falsely implicated and highlighted the belated filing of …
Saleem, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by hanging, was arrested under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR and investigation did not establish any act of instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, and that he has …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Geeta Devi, the sister‑in‑law of a deceased person, who was charged under Sections 108 and 85 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident and that the post‑mortem …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was charged under Sections 74, 78, 107, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing a medical report that the alleged victim survived the incident, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak @ Rohit, who was arrested in Crime No.151 of 2026 under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing a five‑month delay in lodging the FIR and a lack of corroborative evidence linking him to the alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Chauhan, who was accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abetment to suicide of a deceased individual. The applicant, a sister of the second wife of the deceased, argued that the death was a hanging …
Shanti Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for bail in a case filed under Sections 85, 108, 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged belatedly, and that the prosecution had not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kumar, who was arrested in connection with an accidental drowning that resulted in the death of an informant's wife. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a six‑day delay between the incident (23‑06‑2026) and the filing of the FIR …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramjeet Lodhi in a case involving alleged assault and death of a victim. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's claim that the assault caused the victim's …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jang Bahadur Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Priti in a criminal case under Section 108 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging abetment of suicide. The prosecution’s case rested on alleged illicit relations with a co‑accused and marital discord, while the post‑mortem report showed …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Mohit Kumar Vasaney and four relatives seeking to quash a criminal complaint (No. 577 of 2017) filed by Neha Vashaney under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …
The applicants, a wife and her father‑in‑law, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (including a charge‑sheet and cognizance order) filed under Sections 392, 504 and 506 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute. They contended that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra in a case under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim, a minor, had misrepresented her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pravesh Kumar alias Golu in a case under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., alleging a sexual offence. The applicant contended that the relationship with the informant was consensual and that the FIR was lodged belatedly, arguing that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Yogesh Kumar, who was charged in Criminal Case No. 100 of 2026 under IPC sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 64(1). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, being the brother of co‑accused Pramod Kumar, and that the FIR was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pravendra Singh, who is alleged to be involved in a criminal offence arising from a land dispute. The applicant argued that he is the brother‑in‑law of the informant and uncle of the victim, and highlighted material inconsistencies between the …
The applicant, Dhanpal, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 69 of the B.N.S., alleging sexual intercourse by deceit with a married woman. He contended that the relationship was consensual and that the FIR was filed belatedly, with no corroborative evidence linking him to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Girjesh Kumar, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Sections 108 and 85 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the death was due to antemortem hanging and that there was no positive act of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Surendra Kumar alias Moola in a case under Section 107 of the B.N.S., alleging abetment to suicide. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out a three‑day delay in lodging the FIR and the lack of any direct act of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dablu Kumar Sunar in a criminal case (Crime No.230 of 2026) under Sections 317(2), 317(4) and 111(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was arrested based on an informer's tip, and that the recovered ornaments …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sapna Gupta, the wife of a deceased person, who was charged under Sections 108, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged abetment of suicide and related offences. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the post‑mortem …
Baijnath Yadav was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 105, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have caused the death of an informant's father by pushing him. The post‑mortem report showed no ante‑mortem injuries and the cause of death could not be ascertained, leading …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yogeshwar Jaiswal in a case under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 111(2)(b) of the IPC and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, which was lodged five days after the alleged incident, and that the recovery of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jasveer Singh @ Gupta, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged offences. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of over three and a half months and that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jasveer Singh in a case under IPC sections 352, 351(3), 318(4), 319(2) and CrPC sections 61(2)(a) and 111(4). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after a delay of more than five months, that there was no corroborative evidence linking …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhay Tiwari under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a case registered as Crime No. 40 of 2021. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not allege any act falling within the …
The applicant, Khadak Singh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 140 of 2024) alleging offences under several IPC sections, the B.N.S Act and the POCSO Act. The Special Judge (POCSO) had already concluded the trial and delivered a conviction on 30 September 2025. The State's brief …
The applicant, Shobhnath, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 239 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 64(2)(M) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5J(II)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that the trial court had already acquitted the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritik Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 37 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 105, 351(3), 191(2) and 3(5) of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that the FIR was lodged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajit Yadav under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving alleged violations of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act and the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the recovered mobile …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Rahul Kohli, accused in a case under IPC Sections 105 and 115(2). The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR was lodged belatedly, there were no eye‑witnesses, and the only …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 111(2)(kha), 318(4), 61(2) of the IPC, the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 and Section 66D of the IT Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Kumar in Criminal Case No. 69 of 2026, where he was charged under IPC sections 62, 74, 108, 351(2) and sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The applicant alleged that the alleged incident occurred …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilshad Shabban, who was not named in the original FIR but was later implicated during investigation in a case involving multiple IPC offences and other statutes. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were vague, he had no …
Mukesh Singh applied for bail in a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging he abetted the suicide of a deceased who had taken a gold loan. The FIR was lodged on 2 April 2026 for an incident that allegedly occurred on 26 March 2026, creating a significant delay that the applicant argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pramod Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a death alleged to be a suicide and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 108 (abetment of suicide). The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged two days …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shubham Kumar Kashyap in a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging abetment of suicide of three persons. The applicant contended that the deaths were suicides resulting from personal debt and that the prosecution evidence – …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjana, the wife of a deceased man, who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for allegedly abetting his suicide. Sanjana contended that she was falsely implicated, pointing out a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and a post‑mortem report …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Santosh Singh, accused under Sections 85 and 108 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act for alleged dowry harassment leading to the suicide of his wife. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged three days after the incident, that …
The applicant Vikas filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45291 of 2024, seeking release on bail in Crime No. 409 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 147 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel, Kapil Tyagi, informed the court …
Manoj Ram was arrested on 28 August 2024 on the basis of information from an informer, although his name was not mentioned in the original FIR filed on that date. The charge‑sheet later amended the case to include sections 105, 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code, but the prosecution …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Singh, who was charged under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged abetment of suicide, after the case was originally registered under Section 376D IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the prosecution had not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishal Rajpoot, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 108 of the Indian Penal Code (abetment of suicide). The applicant alleged that the FIR was lodged with an inordinate delay—first information report filed on 14 December 2025 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh and Shailendra in Criminal Case No. 424 of 2024, where they were charged under Sections 105 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the son of an informant, who later died from his injuries. The applicants contended that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Roshan Kumar in a cyber‑crime case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14920 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2005. The applicant argued that he was …
The applicant Arvind Kumar sought cancellation of bail that had been granted to the second opposite party in a criminal case under Sections 109(1), 333 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The bail was originally ordered by the Sessions Judge, Saharanpur on 1 Oct 2025. After hearing, counsel for the applicant, …
A bail application was filed in Criminal Case No. 612 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 308(5), 115(2), 127(4) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code at Meerganj Police Station, Bareilly. The applicant sought enlargement of bail during the pendency of the trial. Counsel for …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Asif Khan, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 192 of 2025) based solely on a co-accused's statement, as his name was absent from the FIR. The applicant argued that the statement was unreliable and there was no corroborative evidence …
Subhan Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 130 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the First Information Report (FIR) and that the FIR was lodged eight days after the alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Sushil Kumar Shukla, who was implicated in a case involving alleged fraudulent sale deeds and multiple IPC offences. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, the FIR was lodged with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devki Nandan in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 303(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 111(2)(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the alleged tractor was not recovered from his …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Aalim Urf Nanhka in Criminal Case No. 517 of 2026 under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he had previously been granted bail in several gang‑related cases …
Arjun Thakur applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.56 of 2026) where he was implicated based on statements of co‑accused. He argued that the allegations were false, there was no independent witness, and the recovered items did not link him to any offence. The State opposed bail but could not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhotelal alias Dinesh in a case under several IPC sections and B.N.S. 61(2). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the allegations were vague, and there was no independent witness linking him to the recovered items, asserting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilkhush Chaudhary in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the original FIR, that the FIR was lodged a year after the alleged incident, and that medical evidence …
The applicant, Azmal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 197 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC. He contended that his name did not appear in the FIR and that he was implicated only through a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azmal in a case involving offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated through a statement of co‑accused Sayda Parveen …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azmal, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 196 of 2025) based solely on a statement made by co‑accused Ms Nazmeen Jahan while in police custody. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no connection with the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azmal in a criminal case (Crime No. 202 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated …
The applicant, Vishal Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant, Saurabh Kumar Pandey, subsequently prayed for withdrawal of the application, seeking liberty to file a fresh application under Section 389(2) …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sumit Negi, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 309(4), 352, 351(3) and 308(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged more than a month after the alleged incident, creating a fatal delay for …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prashant Mishra @ Mangal, who was arrested under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that there was a delay between the alleged incident and the FIR, and …
Rohit Sharma applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10136 of 2026, seeking release in case No. 49 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. His counsel argued that the FIR was vague, did not fall within the definition of …
Shiv Mangal, a 72‑year‑old retired teacher, was arrested in a case involving alleged misappropriation of an excess pension amount of Rs.5,37,408 and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(D) of the IT Act. He contended that the excess amount was inadvertently credited …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faheem Uddin, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the B.N.S. Act and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act for alleged forgery and related offences. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that the …
The applicant, Yogesh @ Mukul, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences including Sections 309(6), 311, 312, 317(2), 3(5), 109(1) of the BNSS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the only evidence against him was his own …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Abid Ahmad (alias Shakil), who had been in custody since September 2017 for an alleged murder under Section 304 IPC. The applicant argued that the trial had been unduly delayed, with only three of ten prosecution witnesses …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 13713 of 2026 filed by Umashankar Yadav under Sections 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the CrPC for Nitish Kumar Dwivedi, who was charged in a cyber‑crime case involving alleged money laundering and offences under Sections 318(4), 308(2), 61(2) of the IPC and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant argued that …
The applicant Yogendra Singh filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act, alleging false implication in the recovery of 10 kg of ganja from a motorcycle. He contended that there was no independent witness, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shoaib alias Billu, who was arrested under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, lacking specific allegations that fit the statutory definition of a …
