Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Arbitration Act, 1996

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

BIHAR STATE MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPN. AND ANR.versusENCON BUILDERS (I) PVT. LTD.

2003 INSC 40921 August 2003Dismissed

Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation (appellant) awarded a contract to ENCON Builders (respondent) for excavation work. The respondent failed to perform, leading the corporation to re‑allocate the work and incur losses. Clause 60 of the contract stipulated that any dispute would be decided by the Managing Direct

M/S. KAMAKSHI BUILDERSversusM/.S. AMBEDKAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ORS.

2007 INSC 63718 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kamakshi Builders, entered into a partnership with the owner of a property (Respondent No.3) and, through an arbitration award, acquired ownership of the premises that had been leased to Ambedkar Educational Society (Respondent No.1). The society claimed title to the property on the basis of an alleged o

RASHTRIYA !SPAT NIGAM LTD.versusM/S. PRATHYUSHA RESOURCES & INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.

2016 INSC 15912 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., a Government of India undertaking, awarded a transport contract to Prathyusha Resources & Infra Pvt. Ltd. The contract was extended and a dispute arose over the base year for price escalation, leading to arbitration where the arbitrator ruled in favour of the respondent. The district court s

SOHAN LAL GUPTA (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ORS.versusSMT ASHA DEVI GUPTA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 4421 September 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a dispute between two family groups over shared assets, which was referred to a sole arbitrator who issued two awards. Seven members of one group objected, claiming they had not received reasonable notice and that the arbitrator’s request for a letter not to challenge the award violated natural justic

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search