UCO BANK AND ANR.versusRAJINDER LAL CAPOOR
2008 INSC 42931 March 2008Dismissed
The respondent, a UCO Bank officer, was asked to show cause for disciplinary action just before his superannuation and a disciplinary proceeding was said to be initiated, but a charge sheet was only issued two years later. The bank dismissed him and the respondent challenged the dismissal. The Supreme Court examined wh…
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK BY CHAIRMAN & ANR.versusASTAMIJA DASH
2008 INSC 56330 April 2008Disposed off
Astamija Dash, a Management Trainee at Punjab National Bank, was terminated after failing to pass the bank's confirmation test despite being given three attempts and citing pregnancy‑related health issues. She claimed discrimination because another trainee, Indubala, was allowed a fourth attempt. The High Court held in…
NAGARAJ SHIV ARAO KARJAGIversusSYNDICATE BANK HEAD OFFICE MANIPAL AND ANR.
1991 INSC 12130 April 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, a manager of Syndicate Bank, was found to have discounted a Rs 50,000 cheque for a colleague and retained the instrument for two months before the amount was recovered with interest. A departmental inquiry under the Syndicate Bank Officer Employees (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976, conducted by a…
BANK OF INDIA & ANR.versusK. MOHANDAS & ORS.
2009 INSC 41727 March 2009Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered whether employees of several public sector banks who had completed twenty years of service and retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme 2000 (VRS 2000) were entitled to the five‑year notional service addition provided by Regulation 29(5) of the Pension Regulations, 1995. The banks argu…
C.K. SASANKANversusTHE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD.
2009 INSC 27327 February 2009Case Partly allowed
The appellant, C.K. Sasankan, sought recovery of a loan taken by his father from Dhanalakshmi Bank and challenged the interest awarded by the Debt Recovery Tribunal, which was 25% from filing to judgment and 19.4% thereafter. He argued that such rates were excessive and violated Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedur…
GOPALJI KHANNAversusALLAHABAD BANK AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 32227 February 1996Dismissed
The appellant, an employee of Allahabad Bank, was disciplined and his pay scale was reduced. The Executive Director, who was temporarily holding charge of the Chairman and Managing Director posts, reviewed the penalty under Regulation 18 and enhanced it, reducing the appellant further. The appellant challenged the orde…
SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA ETC.
1980 INSC 18924 September 1980Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, which imposes a total ban on prize chit schemes. Petitioners argued that the ban violated the fundamental right to trade under Art.19(1)(g), was discriminatory under Art.14, and exceeded Parliament's l…
BANK OF INDIAversusJAGJIT SINGH MEHTA
1991 INSC 31222 November 1991Appeal(s) allowed
Jagjit Singh Mehta, a Bank of India officer, was promoted from the clerical cadre and, having undertaken to serve anywhere in India, was posted to Bihar. He later filed a writ petition seeking transfer to Chandigarh, where his wife was employed, and the Punjab and Haryana High Court ordered his transfer. The Bank appea…
C.V. RAMAN, ETC.versusMANAGEMENT OF BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER, ETC.
1988 INSC 11521 April 1988
The Supreme Court considered a series of civil appeals arising from dismissals of bank employees who sought relief under various State Shops and Establishments Acts. The banks argued that the Acts did not apply to them because they were "establishments under the Central Government" and thus fell within the exemption in…
JAI SINGH B. CHAUHANversusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS.
2005 INSC 30120 July 2005Dismissed
Jai Singh B. Chauhan, a clerk of Punjab National Bank, sought to be covered by the bank's pension scheme after missing the deadline to opt in. The pension regulations, framed under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, were published in the Official Gazette on 29 September 1995, gi…
ALLAHABAD BANKversusPREM NARAIN PANDE AND OTHERS
1995 INSC 63519 October 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The employee, a Junior Management Scale‑I officer of Allahabad Bank, was served with a charge‑sheet in 1983 and an enquiry was conducted by a Deputy General Manager (DGM). While the enquiry was pending, the employee was transferred and the Assistant General Manager (AGM) of another zone was nominated as the disciplinar…
UCO BANK AND ANR.versusRAJINDER LAL CAPOOR
2007 INSC 64818 May 2007Dismissed
The respondent, a Branch Manager of UCO Bank, was superannuated on 1 November 1996 after show‑cause notices were issued for alleged irregularities in sanctioning PMRY loans. A charge‑sheet was issued only on 13 November 1998, well after his retirement, and disciplinary proceedings were launched under Regulation 20(3)(i…
RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMAversusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR.
2007 INSC 65118 May 2007Disposed off
Ramesh Chandra Sharma, a manager of Punjab National Bank, was charged with negligence and misconduct in loan disbursement. The disciplinary authority proved the charges and dismissed him, but he superannuated before the order was finalized. The High Court substituted the dismissal with a order withholding his retiral b…
BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusUNITED BANK OF INDIA RETIREES’ WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS ETC.
2018 INSC 52216 May 2018Case Partly allowed
The case concerned the computation of dearness relief (DA) on pension for United Bank of India retirees. The retirees argued that the bank’s practice of granting a higher, tapering DA rate to those who retired before 1 Nov 2002 and a lower flat rate of 0.18% to post‑Nov 2002 retirees was arbitrary and violated the 1993…
INDIAN BANKversusGODHARA NAGRIK COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. AND ANOTHER
2008 INSC 71716 May 2008Case Partly allowed
The cooperative societies had placed fixed deposits with Indian Bank and Bank of Baroda through commission agents, and the banks later refused to honour the deposits, claiming the amounts had been used to grant loans and that a fraud involving bank officers had occurred. The societies filed writ petitions under Article…
UCO BANK & ORS.versusSUSHIL KUMAR SAHA
2012 INSC 47415 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a senior manager of UCO Bank, was transferred to the head office where the bank discovered serious loan sanctioning irregularities committed during his tenure at a branch. The bank issued a charge‑sheet and, under a 2004 note and circular, the Assistant General Manager (AGM) of the former branch initiat…
STATE BANK'S STAFF UNION (MADRAS CIRCLE)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2005 INSC 41915 September 2005Dismissed
The Central Government Industrial Tribunal awarded a customary bonus to State Bank of India employees, which the bank’s management challenged. While the award was pending, Parliament enacted the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, inserting provisions in the State Bank Act and related statutes that prohibited any bonus…
ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS' CONFEDERATION AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1989 INSC 24514 August 1989Case Allowed
The All India Bank Officers' Confederation challenged a 23 August 1982 circular that allowed the Central Government to appoint any non‑workmen officer to the board of a nationalised bank, bypassing the panel of three names submitted by the majority association of non‑workmen employees. The petitioners argued that the c…
YASHWANT SINGH KOTHARI ETC. ETC.versusSTATE BANK OF INDORE AND ORS.
1993 INSC 1714 January 1993Dismissed
The appellants, former employees of Bank of Indore Limited who were transferred to the State Bank of Indore under the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959, were retired after completing 30 years of service, before reaching the statutory retirement age of 58 prescribed in Section 11(1) of the Act. They chall…
UCO BANK AND OTHERSversusM.B. MOTWANI (DEAD) THR. LRS. & OTHERS
2023 INSC 90812 October 2023Dismissed
The appellant UCO Bank dismissed its former manager, M.B. Motwani, after he attained superannuation, issuing a charge‑sheet only on 7 December 1991. The employee had been served a show‑cause notice and suspended before retirement, but no formal disciplinary proceeding was deemed pending at the time of his superannuatio…
UNION BANK OF INDIAversusVENKATESH GOPAL MAHISHI AND ANR.
2007 INSC 3712 January 2007Appeal(s) allowed
Venkatesh Gopal Mahishi, an award staff of Union Bank of India, retired on medical grounds in November 1993 and secured a compassionate appointment for his son. The Bank later framed the Union Bank of India (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995, offering pension to employees who voluntarily retired between 1 January 1…
BANK OF INDIAversusVIJAY TRANSPORT AND OTHERS
1987 INSC 32611 November 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The Bank of India sued Vijay Transport and its partners to recover a cash‑credit loan of Rs.18,14,817.91, claiming mortgages over several properties. The Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938 provides that debts of agriculturists may be "scaled down" under section 13, but section 4(e) excludes de…
UCO BANK AND ORS.versusSANWAR MAL
2004 INSC 16411 March 2004Appeal(s) allowed
Sanwar Mal, a former Class‑IV employee of UCO Bank who resigned in 1988, sought to join the bank's Employees' Pension Scheme introduced in 1995 under a 1993 settlement. The bank refused, invoking Regulation 22 which disqualifies any employee who has resigned, been dismissed or removed from pension benefits. The employe…
M. GOPALAKRISHNANversusSTATE BY ADDL. S.P. CBI, B.S. & F.C., BANGALORE
2009 INSC 14111 February 2009Dismissed
The CBI filed a case under Sections 120B and 420 of the IPC and Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act against M. Gopalakrishnan, then Executive Director, Chairman and Managing Director of Indian Bank. Gopalakrishnan sought to quash the proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure…
PNB FINANCE LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, NEW DELHI
2008 INSC 12536 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed
B.S. YADAV & ANR.versusCHIEF MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
1987 INSC 1485 May 1987
The petitioners, officers of the Central Bank of India appointed after the 1969 nationalisation, challenged their forced retirement at age 58 under Rule 3 of the Bank's Rules for Age of Retirement, arguing that having two different retirement ages (60 for pre‑July 19, 1969 officers and 58 for post‑July 19, 1969 officer…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANOTHER ETC.versusS.S. SRIVASTAVA & OTHERS
1987 INSC 1495 May 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the constitutional validity of Regulation 19(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960, as amended in 1977, which required employees appointed on or after 1 September 1956 and belonging to Class I or II to retire at age 58, with a provision for retirement at 50 in the co…
UNION BANK OF INDIAversusRAJAT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ORS. AND M/S. SUNVIEW ASSETS PVT. LTD.
2023 INSC 8694 October 2023Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered a Miscellaneous Application filed by Sunview Assets Pvt. Ltd., the auction purchaser, seeking a sale certificate from Union Bank of India on the ground that it had fully paid the auction price with interest as ordered on 12 May 2020. The Court examined whether the successive extensions of t…
M.R. PRABHAKAR AND OTHERSversusCANARA BANK AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 4433 October 2012Dismissed
The appellants were officers of Canara Bank who resigned between 1986 and June 1993, i.e., before the statutory settlement dated 29‑Oct‑1993 and the Canara Bank Employees' Pension Regulations, 1995 came into force. They claimed entitlement to a pension in lieu of the Contributory Providable Fund, relying on the pension…
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.versusRADHEY SHYAM PANDEY
2020 INSC 2382 March 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether employees who retired under the State Bank of India Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) of 2000 and had completed fifteen years of service were entitled to a proportionate pension under the SBI Employees' Pension Fund Rules. The Court held that the Central Board of Directors' approval o…