H.S. SRINIVASA RAGHAVACHAR ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
1987 INSC 12823 April 1987Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1974, which removed a landlord's right to resume tenanted land for personal cultivation, omitted protective provisions for certain classes, created tribunals with members of unspecified qualifications, and barred advocates from appearing before them…
DHEERAJ MORversusHON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
2017 INSC 6419 February 2020Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined whether members of the subordinate judicial service who had previously practiced as advocates for seven years could compete for District Judge vacancies under the quota reserved for advocates as per Article 233(2) of the Constitution. It held that such judicial officers are ineligible for dir…
MAHESH CHANDRA GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2009 INSC 8676 July 2009Dismissed
Mahesh Chandra Gupta filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of respondent No.3 as an Additional Judge of the Allahabad High Court, alleging that he lacked the ten‑year practice requirement under Article 217(2)(b) of the Constitution. The Court examined whether "actual practice" or merely the "right to practi…
LINGAPPA POCHANNA APPELWAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ETC.
1984 INSC 2264 December 1984Dismissed
The appellant purchased agricultural land from a tribal seller with collector's permission, but the Sub‑Divisional Officer, invoking the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974, ordered restoration of possession to the tribal buyer. The appellant appealed, arguing that sections 3(1) and 4 of the …