Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

1090 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

NEWIN SANJAY MANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Rahul alias Bunty Dilip Bhingardive applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 140(2), 308(5) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging extortion, kidnapping for ransom, dacoity and assault with a dangerous weapon. The prosecution alleged that …

SOPAN S/O. MARUTI ANDHALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISMISSED

Petitioner Sopan filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings of the trial. The court noted that the trial was at the stage of recording the accused's statement under Section 351 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Since the petition sought relief that could not be granted at …

SUMAN NANABHAU BEDRE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The mother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the informant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 1349 of 2024 and the subsequent charge‑sheet for offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 read with Section …

NAGESH VIKRAM BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Shrihari Hardas Chavan, Nagesh Vikram Bhosale and Siddesh Sadish Kale in connection with a robbery on 24‑25 January 2025 and subsequent addition of offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOC Act). The applicants had …

AJAY AVDHUT GIRI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The nine applicants sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that they threatened a complainant and aided the main accused, Sant Harigir Dattagir Giri, in sexual relations under false pretences of marriage. The FIR charged offences under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

SNEHAL ALIAS GAYATRI RAJESH BHOLEversusKIRAN MOTIRAM BHOLE AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The petitioner, a wife, filed a private criminal complaint alleging misappropriation of her stridhan and sought to have the regular bail granted to her brother‑in‑law (respondent No.1) cancelled. The trial court had admitted the accused after a long period of absence and imposed bail with …

SHRIRAM RADHAKISAN FUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Shriram Radhakisan Funde, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (CR No. 265/2026) alleging offences under Sections 143 and 144(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 to 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The FIR was based on a police raid at a lodge …

SANTOSH KISAN KORDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Santosh Korde was arrested in April 2026 for alleged diversion of funds allocated under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, involving false muster rolls and biometric withdrawals that routed money to his bank account and those of his relatives. The prosecution presented …

SANJAY BHAGIRATHMAL AGRAWAL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, owners of a rice‑milling business, challenged two FIRs (Crimes No. 181 and 182 of 2026) registered under the Essential Commodities Act, Petroleum Act, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). They sought quashing of the crimes and interim …

SANJAY BHAGIRATHMAL AGRAWAL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, owners of a rice‑milling business, challenged two FIRs (Crimes No. 181 and 182 of 2026) registered under the Essential Commodities Act, Petroleum Act, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). They sought quashing of the crimes and interim …

ARVIND SHRIPATRAO PATILversusSEEMA ARVIND PATIL

DISMISSED

The petitioner Arvind Shripatrao Patil challenged a Family Court order that rejected his application to invoke Sections 215 and 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) against his wife for alleged non‑disclosure of a gifted property. The wife had filed a maintenance petition under …

VISHNU SARJERAO DABHADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Vishnu Sarjerao Dabhade, a fertilizer retailer, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a raid revealed alleged non‑maintenance of records and an expired licence. The prosecution alleged offences under Section 318(4) r/w Sec. 3(5) of the …

SUNIL UTTAM DHEREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Sunil Uttam Dhere was charged under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly abducting and attempting to force a marriage with a 17‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the …

DILIP ASHOK JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Dilip Ashok Jadhav, a member of the Indian National Congress, challenged an order by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate that externed him from Karveer Taluka from 3‑10 February 2026 under Section 163(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to prevent him from campaigning in a Zilla Parishad …

PRASHANT RAJU JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Prashant Raju Jadhav, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Information Technology Act. He was accused of accompanying another accused to withdraw Rs.5 lakh, which was allegedly …

FIROJ NURUDDIN SANADI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The wife (Respondent No.2) lodged an FIR alleging dowry‑related cruelty and physical assault by her husband and claimed that his parents (the petitioners) were also involved. The petitioners, who are the in‑laws, filed writ petitions seeking to quash the FIR and the charge‑sheet on the ground that …

SUREKHA PRAKASH WAGHMARE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Rejected

The Applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a murder case (Crime No. 0319 of 2026) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that the deceased Mukund was first run over by a …

GAUTAM NILAKA @ NELKYA KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND NAR

Dismissed

The applicant, Gautam Nilaka, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for offences of robbery and related crimes under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He is accused No.2 in a case where senior citizens were robbed of gold ornaments, and the trial court had …

RAHUL DATTATRAY CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The applicant, Rahul Dattatray Chavan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences under Sections 108, 80, 85 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from the suicide of his sister‑in‑law. The …

ABHIMAN TULSHIRAM GAT AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicant, Abhiman Tulshiram Gat, aged 78, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in Crime No.160 of 2026 for alleged assault under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged …

RAOSAHEB NANA RUPNAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Raosaheb Nana Rupnawar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case registered at Natepute Police Station, Solapur. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought a brief adjournment …

BABURAO KESHAV JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The 78‑year‑old applicant, Baburao Keshav Jadhav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary …

Kulin Jethabai ShahversusState of Maharashtra Through Manikpur Police Station

Disposed Off

Kulin Jethabhai Shah, the complainant in RCC No.134 of 2008 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vasai, filed an application under Section 447 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking relief due to prolonged delays caused by repeated adjournments sought by the accused. Shah, a …

ANKIT BAPU THOMBAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Ankit Bapu Thombare, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust and intimidation under IPC Sections 406, 420 and 506. The FIR stemmed from a commercial dispute over a …

JAHANGEER KAMARALI ANSARI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Jahangeer Kamarali Ansari and Razi Ahmad Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a fire incident at a godown that resulted in the death of a worker, Irfan Shaikh. The prosecution alleged that …

NILESH MADHUKAR ARTEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Nilesh Madhukar Arte, was arrested in July 2021 for alleged murder, conspiracy, arms offences and violations of the MCOCA Act, and has been in pre‑trial custody for over five years. The prosecution argued that he was part of a gang, participated in the crime, and posed a risk of …

JAYESH VASANT JAINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Accused No.2, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) read with Section 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 relating to the dishonour of …

AKASH DYANESHWAR BADAMEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for a 20‑year‑old accused charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The victim, a 16‑year‑old girl, …

HARUN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Harun Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 7 January 2025 in Criminal Case No. 549 of 2025, which arose from an FIR under Section 507 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant …

MAYANKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1232 of 2026) arising from a crime involving sections of the BNSS, the SC/ST Act, and the POCSO Act. During the hearing, the applicant's …

UMESH SURESH WAGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Umesh Suresh Wagh, who had been in custody for two years and nine months without charges being framed. The prosecution alleged that the applicant supplied contraband to …

BILAL GULAM MOHAMMAD PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Bilal Gulam Mohammad Patel, owns a scrap shop where an illegal cattle slaughter allegedly took place. He is charged under multiple statutes for permitting his premises to be used for the prohibited act, though he claims no direct involvement and offers cooperation with the …

GABBAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Gabbar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a judgment dated 10 September 2026 of the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in Budaun, which arose from a criminal case under Sections 452 and 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. …

DAKSH PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the Special Trial No. 1309 of 2024 arising from Crime No. 499 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 64, 333, 115(2), 351(2) of the BNSS and Section 3(2)5 of the Scheduled Castes …

JAVEDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Javed, who is accused of offences under IPC Sections 364, 302 and 201 arising from a 2017 incident. Javed has been in judicial custody since 28 January 2018 and the trial …

RAJESHWARI JAYESH JOSHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Rajeshwari Jayesh Joshi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for alleged offences under Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 318(4), 319 and 351(2) of the …

NIRMALA DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nirmala Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the criminal proceedings arising from a dowry‑related FIR. The deceased, married to the …

SALAUDDIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Salauddin and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from Case Crime No. 361 of 2025, which involved multiple offences under the BNSS. During the hearing, the applicants' counsel …

PANKAJ GONDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pankaj Gond, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 64(2)M, 352 of the B.N.S.S and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act alleging rape of a 16‑year‑old …

SARTHAK S/O LAKSHMAN DESHMUKHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sarthak, a student accused of raping a 16‑year‑old girl under Sections 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The prosecution alleged that the applicant forcefully …

AMAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Aman Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 2305 of 2025) arising from charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNSS, Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(V) …

KULDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Kuldeep filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the pending Special Case No. 1642 of 2025, which arose from a crime under Sections 363 and 376(2)(N) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5I, 5J(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act. The case was at the …

SHAMSHAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, Shamshad and another, appealed against a summoning order dated 21 January 2026 issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST Act in Complaint Case No. 29 of 2025 (Ramchandra vs. Shamshad). The order was based on sections 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) …

VISHNU JANGID @ VISHNU KUMAR JANGIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Vishnu Jangid, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the Session Trial No. 254 of 2026 and related POCSO proceedings. The charges framed included offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(2)(m) of the BNSS and Sections 5L, …

VIKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Vikash filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a criminal case (Crime No. 198 of 2026) that alleged offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 351(3), 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 5N/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged …

MUKUL DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 3 OTHERS

Mukul Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 481 of 2020, which involved charges under IPC Section 376-D and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The application was presented before the High Court …

RAJU KEWAT @ RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 1133 of 2025, which involved offences under the BNS and the POCSO Act. The case was at an advanced stage, and the first informant's statement had …

VIKRANT PRASAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vikrant Prasad and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 781 of 2023) arising from a 2020 case involving multiple IPC offences and the POCSO Act. The application …

ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Rohit filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 981 of 2026, which arose from Crime No. 137 of 2025 and involved sections 87, 137(2), and 64(1) of the BNS as well as a pending POCSO case. …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vijay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 49 of 2026, which arose from a POCSO matter involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 61(2)(a), 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 …

VINOD PATEL @ TILLU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the Session Trial No. 76 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 103(1) and 61(2)(A) of the BNSS and the Arms Act. The learned Additional Government Advocate highlighted that the …

KAMLESH MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Kamlesh Maurya filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash an order dated 5 September 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge under the POCSO Act in a case involving alleged offences of rape, kidnapping and …

AMAR BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amar Bahadur, who is charged with offences under Sections 452 and 376 of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67 of the Income Tax Act for an alleged rape of his aunt, a married …

VINAY REVAN BABAR PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 520 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 of the CrPC) seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1685 of 2025, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471. The underlying civil dispute between the …

SUNIL SUNDAR GANDHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Sundar Gandhi, a senior citizen tuition teacher accused under Sections 4, 8, 10 and 18 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly assaulting a 10th‑standard student between September and October 2024. The FIR …

SAVANSINGH KALUSINGH JUNNIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Savansingh Kalusingh Junni, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging assault with weapons during a family dispute. The FIR charges him under Sections 25 and 4 of the Arms Act, 1959, …

PUROSHOTTAM GAJANAN PATANKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay heard a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Puroshottam Gajanan Patankar, who was charged under several IPC sections including 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 472 read with Section 34. The applicant’s relatives …

ANIKET PANDEY CARPORALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Aniket Pandey Carporal filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 1511 of 2023) arising from charges under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 377, 504 and 506. The application was heard before Justice …

AMIT KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Amit Kumar and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 2029 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 514 of 2024 under Sections 103(1), 238 and 140(1) of the BNSS. The …

SHAKIR @ MOHD SHAKIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shakir @ Mohd Shakir, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No.2327 of 2025, which arose from Crime No.95 of 2025 under Sections 64, 351(3) and 123 of the BNS. The application was filed …

UMER MOIN QURESHI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in a case where the FIR originally listed bailable offences but later added non‑bailable charges. The FIR alleged that the applicants assaulted …

SMT POONAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghaziabad, to decide a pending maintenance proceeding (Case No. 840 of 2022 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code) without …

RAJENDRA PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.2, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, to dispose of Complaint Case No.2007 of 2020 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …

VIJENDRA SINGH CHANDELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kasganj, to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 180 of 2020, which had been pending since 2020 under Section 127 of the Criminal Procedure Code. …

KRISHNA MOHAN TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Special Judge of the NI Act Court to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 1745 of 2020) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint had remained …

ASHA GAUDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Asha Gaud, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 3, Gorakhpur, to dispose of a pending criminal case (Case No. 1718 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC …

ALOK RAJPUTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Alok Rajput filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to set aside the charge‑sheet (M.A. No. 190/2026) and the notice and order dated 21 July 2026 issued by the Special Judge, Poxo Act/Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar, in a case under …

SIDDHARTH RAMESH PAWAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioners, three young men, were charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) and the Maharashtra Police Act for assaulting a complainant who worked nearby. The prosecution alleged that the complainant repeatedly used the petitioners' perfume bottle, …

VICKY MANOHAR LADGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Vicky Manohar Ladge, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he merely purchased a plot of land and was not involved in the alleged forgery and fraud. The prosecution alleged that the sale deed was …

MOHAMED NADEEM HIDAYATULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Vicky Manohar Ladge, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he merely purchased a plot of land and was not involved in the alleged forgery and fraud. The prosecution alleged that the sale deed was …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sunil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No. 68536 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 386, 420, 506 and 342 of the IPC. The application was filed before the High …

DEVESH YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4‑April‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 371 of 2026, which arose from an FIR dated 14‑Sept‑2025 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of …

SALMAN HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a Special Judge's order that affirmed a Judicial Magistrate's dismissal of a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw …

RAJMANI @ BHOLA PANDEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that dismissed their discharge application in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323 and 326 of the IPC. The order being …

MD OQAIS AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Md Oqais Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26-07-2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4), 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

KHAJAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Khajan Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 06‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 420 and 120B of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited their relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. …

MADHUR SRIVASTAV @ MADHUR PRAKASH SRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Madhur Srivastav filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 19 July 2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the SC/ST Act, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held …

VIPIN BANSALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vipin Bansal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1965. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the Code of Criminal …

GAUTAM KUMARversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Gautam Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 74 and 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

MITHLESH YADAV @ DADA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U. P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mithlesh Yadav @ Dada and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 110, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While initially asking for …

RAJKAPOOR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajkapoor and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 08‑07‑2026 under sections 74, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

AJAY KUMAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Ajay Kumar Gautam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2020 that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 504 IPC. While the original prayer was to set aside the FIR, the petitioner later limited relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC and …

MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mukesh filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 794 of 2026, which arose from a POCSO matter involving Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 65(2) of the BNSS. During the hearing, counsel for the …

MANOJ SAINI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 12‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4), 333, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While the petition later limited its relief to protection under section 35 of the …

MANOJ SAINI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Saini and seven others filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 14‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 191(1), 316(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petition was later limited to a request for protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

MANOJ SAINI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 191(1), 316(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioners limited their relief to protection under section …

MANOJ SAINI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 351(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioners limited their relief to protection under section 35 of …

ANURAG GOYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Anurag Goyal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 08‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to a protection order under …

RAVINDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Ravindra Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 02‑03‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 318(4), 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66C of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The relief was later limited to protection …

AADHAR CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Aadhar Choudhary filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 31.07.2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The Court examined the …

Raviraj Anil JadhavversusThe State of Maharashtra

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Raviraj Anil Jadhav under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences alleged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case was based on a witness …

SANTOSH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Santosh Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case involving a minor victim. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statements under Section …

RAHUL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul Kumar, who was implicated in a rape case involving a minor aged 13 years and 10 months. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the same …

ROHIT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Rohit Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 4‑8‑2026 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 35 of the …

FIRDAUS AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Firdaus and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 12 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under section …

RAJESH KUMAR GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Goswami filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑02‑2026 under sections 125(b) and 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under section 41‑A of the CrPC and section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

KAPIL DHAMA AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kapil Dhama and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26 July 2026 that alleged offences under sections 351(2), 352, 351(3) and 351(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While initially seeking quashal, they later limited their relief to …

SAGAR MATHEWversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sagar Mathew, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 564 of 2022) arising from a POCSO case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. …

ASHOK YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ashok Yadav and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 7‑8‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 351(3), 304 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under …

SANDEEP RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sandeep Rajbhar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking relief from a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the District and Sessions Judge, Azamgarh, on 12‑06‑2025 in connection with a trial under the Arms Act (Section 4/25). The …

ANIL PATEL @ ANIL KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash an order dated 08‑03‑2021 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a criminal case initiated under Section 381 of the Bharatiya Dand Sanhita and Sections 65/66 of the …

SHYAM SINGH YADAV URF SHYAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 272, 273, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 59 of the Food Safety and Standards Act. The applicant argued that no offence was made out and the prosecution was …

AMIT @ AMIT SIKARWAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Amit Sikarwar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking bail after an FIR dated 11‑08‑2023 alleged offences under IPC sections 332, 353, 504 and 506 and the Public Property Damage Prevention Act. The Judicial …

TUSHAR SHIVAJI UGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a police constable, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashal of FIR No. 333/2025 registered for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR arose from a family land‑sale dispute in which …

TUSHAR SHIVAJI UGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a police constable, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashal of FIR No. 333/2025 registered for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR arose from a family land‑sale dispute in which …

JAYESH JEEVAN KAMBLI AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash FIR No. 717 of 2024 registered at Pantnagar Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 115, 118(1) and 117 of the BNSS. The FIR was lodged by the …

ARVIND BHARATBHUSHAN AGARWAL AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (mirroring Section 482 of the CrPC) seeking to quash FIR No. 1613/2024, which arose from a commercial dispute. The parties have since reconciled, filed a consent affidavit, and the complainant urged the …

AKSHAY KISHAN SONAWANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Akshay Kishan Sonawane applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR (C.R. No.199 of 2026) alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was not involved in the …

AJAJ AHMED SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRAAND ANR

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning charges under Sections 10 and 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The applicant, the father of a five‑year‑old victim, …

NASIR HUSAIN MOHAMMAD ALI ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

ABU HORAIRA MOHAMMAD IBRAHIMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

ZAINAB MOHAMMEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed on back‑dated dates. The prosecution alleged that thirteen …

ZAHID HUSAIN MOHAMMAD ALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

AALIA MOHAMMED MUSTAFA AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

SHAIKH SARIYA ATHAR HUSAIN AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

AFEEFA AAFREEN MOHAMMAD AMEENversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

ANIL RATAN KACHRAVATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Anil Ratan Kachravat, was arrested on 25‑12‑2020 for a double murder alleged to have occurred behind Jay Malhar Hotel, where he allegedly killed Salim Shaikh and later the injured Tausif Shaikh using an iron clamp. The case, registered as C.R. No.727/2020, charges him under IPC s.302, …

DEEPAK BHEEMRAO KATARKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Bheemrao Katarkar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a sexual assault case (CR No.37 of 2026) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant …

TAUSIF @ CHUHA JAMEER SAYYEDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Tausif @ Chuha Jameer Sayyed, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for offences including sections 310(4) and 223 of the same Act, sections 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, provisions of the Maharashtra Police Act, Arms Act and MCOC Act. He had been in …

SANDEEP SITARAM AMBREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL REJECTED

The applicant, Sandeep Sitaram Ambre, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a cheating case (Crime No. 217 of 2026) registered under Sections 316(4), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

RAMESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI LAFA (BRAHMAN)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rameshbhai Bhikhabhai Lafa, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) fearing arrest in connection with FIR C.R. No.11996006260600 for offences under Sections 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS. The …

PUSHPABEN BHARATBHAI BANTYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 61(2) and 55 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State and the original complainant opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the …

MAHENDRABHAI @ MUNNO RAMKUBHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mahendrabhai @ Munno Ramkui Vala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR charging him with multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the …

BHUPATBHAI GABHRUBHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Bhupatbhai Gabhrubhai Vala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiy Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the …

SUNIL SHIVAJI PAGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Sunil Shivaji Pagare applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No. 321 of 2026 alleging theft of cement poles during a boundary dispute with his cousin. The applicant sought to withdraw the application to file a fresh one, …

VEENA OMPRAKASH GARGversusRAJESH RATANLAL SULTANIYA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Veena Omprakash Garg, filed a criminal writ petition (No. 3036 of 2026) and later moved the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw that petition. She also requested liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings under Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The …

JETSINHBHAI KALUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jetsinhbhai Kalubhai Patel, a bank manager, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(2), 336(3), 340 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, …

JAYDEEPKUMAR ASHOKBHAI THAKKAR (JAYDIP @JAYESH THAKKAR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Jaydeepkumar Ashokbhai Thakkar in connection with FIR C.R. No.11201018260025 alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyay …

KETAN ASHOKBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ketan Ashokbhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking protection from arrest in connection with a cyber‑crime FIR alleging offences under various BNSS sections and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the IT …

ALPESH HARSHADBHAI CHOKSIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Alpesh Harshadbhaai Choksi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 11210068260293 filed at Vesu Police Station, Surat, alleging offences under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The allegation stems …

KULDIP BRAJESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kuldip Brijesh Sharma, an Assistant Production Manager at Waaree Power Private Limited, was implicated in alleged misappropriation of company funds transferred to his wife's account, leading to an FIR under Sections 316(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail …

MILAN KISHORBHAI MEWADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by Milan Kishorbhai Mewada in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e) and 81 of the Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that …

TURK TANJIL ASGARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging multiple serious offences under the BNSS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the gravity of the …

KUSUM RAKESH RADHESHYAM MALIWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under sections 316(2), 318(2) and 54 of the BNSS, which the court perceived to arise from a commercial dispute rather than a genuine criminal matter. …

NARESH KAMALSINGH CHAUHAN (AS PER FIR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Naresh Kamalsingh Chauhan, who was alleged to be a supplier of contraband under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The applicant had been in custody since 15 July …

ADITYA SACHIN VYASversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Aditya Sachin Vyas, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging criminal breach of trust under Section 406 of the IPC. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence. …

NISHANT HITESHBHAI SANGHVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences under Sections 8(C), 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The State opposed bail, citing recovery of 1,798 bottles of contraband, sales to a co‑accused and UPI transactions, arguing …

MITHUN PRABHUDAS KHALASIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mithun Prabhudas Khalasi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11215012200047 of 2020) alleging multiple IPC offences and a violation of the …

SANJAY VASHRAM DOMADIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sanjay Vashram Domadia, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 411, 413 and 120B. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the gravity of the …

PINKY KAILASH AGARWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Pinky Kailash Agarwal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 54 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS). The …

NARSHIBHAI ARJANBHAI MARWADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Narshibhai Arjanbhai Marwadi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Prohibition Act and the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The …

ANIL PRAMODBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Anil Pramodbhai Patel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11201018250032 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 317(2), 318(4), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 66(d) of the Information …

PRASANT VIJAY AGRAWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Prasant Vijay Agrawal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11200051260817) alleging offences under Section 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) for failing to marry a complainant …

SAHILSHA @IRFANSHA CHINGISHA @AMINSHA BANWAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The Gujarat High Court examined a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by the accused, who faced charges of murder under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The prosecution alleged …

LAXMANBHAI GANGJIBHAI MORIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Laxmanbhai Ganjibhai Mori, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 7, 12, 13(1) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The State opposed the bail, …

MANJULABEN W/O KAMLESHKUMAR PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

52-TRANSFERRED TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT

Manjulaben, the wife of respondent No.2, filed a complaint under Sections 498‑A, 114 IPC and Sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act alleging physical and mental harassment, dowry demand and abetment by respondents No.3‑5. The trial court acquitted the accused and the appellant appealed the …

VISHAL @ VEER KISHORBHAI SONDARVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vishal @ Veer Kishorbhai Sondarva, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Gujarat Money Lenders Act and the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness …

HAFIZUR ABDUL MAULYA @SOHELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by Hafizur Abdul Maulya, accused of offences under Sections 8(c), 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged trafficking of mephedrone. The State opposed the bail, …

VIJAYBHAI JIVABHAI BARAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners Vijaybhai Baraiya and another applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 11198066260061 concerning offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the G.P. Act. The State opposed the bail, …

NARENDRABHAI LOTANBHAI PATILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Naren­drabhai Lotan­bhai Patil, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with an FIR registered at Bardoli Town Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 75(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. …

RAHUL PANDITRAO AHIRRAOversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rahul Panditrao Ahirrao, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11824004261085) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Prohibition Act. The …

PREETIBEN KEVALRAM VAGHVANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Preetiben Kevalram Vagbhani, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No. 11189003261336 alleging offences under Sections 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay …

KOTADIYA DEVAJI MOHANJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No.11195061260467 alleging offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. They contended that they are merely brokers …

JITENDRASINH LALITSINH RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

42-RULE DISCHARGED @ FH

The applicant, a practising doctor, was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act for allegedly performing an illegal abortion on a minor victim and destroying related evidence. The victim, a girl aged between 16 and 18, had been sexually exploited by her landlord, became pregnant, …

MEETKUMAR DINESHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Meetkumar Dineshbhai Patel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210015250139 of 2025) alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e) and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that custodial …

VIJAY BABULAL MEGHVALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vijay Babulal Meghval applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11191002260193) alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, …

REKHABEN DILIPBHAI VANZARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rekhaben Dilipbhai Vanzara filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, …

PREMCHAND BHABUTAJI KALALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Premchand Bhabutaji Kalal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after an FIR was lodged against him for offences under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116(B) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the bail, citing the …

RAHULBHAI KHETABHAI MERABHAI GOLTARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rahulbhai Khetabhai Merabhai Goltar, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. He claimed innocence, no prior record, and that the investigation was substantially …

BAHADURSINH @BHAVANSINH LAXMANSINGH JOGSINGH RAJPUT (RAVLOT)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Bahadursinh Laxmansinh Rajput, was arrested on 17 July 2026 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11195036250534 alleging offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and Section 345(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). He claimed innocence, had no prior criminal record, and …

IMRAN @DARIYO KADARBHAI SAIYADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Imran @Dariyo Kadarbhai Saiyad, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act alleging illegal storage of contraband liquor. The State opposed bail, citing the applicant's past …

RUPESH RAMSAJIVANLAL SONIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

Rupesh Ramsajivanlal Soni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 639 of 2026) registered under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that the dispute was …

SACHIN NANDUPRASAD KUMARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sachin Nanduprasad Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (CR No. 407 of 2025) in which his co‑accused, Sameer Jadhav, allegedly killed his wife and burned the body. The prosecution’s case against the applicant rests mainly on a confession made by Jadhav while in police …

BHANUMATIBEN @KOKILABEN MAVJIBHAI RESIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Bhanumatiben @Kokilaben Mavjibhai Resiya and co‑accused filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and …

AJAYBHAI DINESHBHAI BHATTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bhatt, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 108, 351(2), 352, 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat …

ILIYASHUSSAIN FAKIRMOHAMMAD SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court …

KANHAIYALAL BHAVARLAL KALALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kanhaiyalal Bhavarlal Kalal, the owner of Ramdev Gas Agency, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 287 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential …

ARJUNBHAI MOHANLAL @MANCHHAJI RAJPUROHITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Arjunbhai Mohanlal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 4(3) and 5(E) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing Prohibition Act and Section 314 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed …

VALIKHAN BHIKHUBHAI PATHAN(AS PER ORDER)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging impersonation of LCB officials, extortion and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant, Valikhan …

HIRAJI @ HIRLO HALUJI HAPAJI ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Hiraji Haluji Zala, was arrested on a non‑bailable warrant after failing to appear in a trial for offences including robbery, assault and criminal conspiracy. He had previously been released on regular bail but missed court dates due to personal reasons. The applicant filed a bail …

RAVIKANT PANDURANG RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Ravikant Pandurang Rathod, accused No.2 in a case (C.R. No. 893 of 2024) involving alleged cheating and fraud under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The …

RAJESHBHAI MOHANBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rajeshbhai Mohanbhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with FIR C.R. No.11210001260009 alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. He argued that custodial …

JEMISHBHAI NAVINBHAI KHALASHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jemishbai Navinbhai Khalashi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after an FIR was lodged against him for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he …

MUKESHBHAI AGRABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mukeshbhai Agrabhai Patel filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR charging him with numerous offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in …

JAY JAGDISHBHAI GAJERAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Jay Jagdishbhai Gajera, filed a special criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash FIR No. 11208051220813 registered in 2022 for offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 409, 454, 380, 114 and Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police …

BAHELIM SADIKKHAN RASIDKHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Bahelim Sadikhan Rasidkhan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352, 351(3) and 54 of the BNSS. The …

SAHIL JAYANTIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sahil Jayantibhai Patel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after an FIR (C.R. No.11191022260542) was lodged against him for an alleged offence under Section 69 of the BNSS. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was …

GANGARAMBHAI KHIMABHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, GangaramBhai Khimabhai Vala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11211010260161 for several serious offences under the BNS and the Gujarat Police Act. The prosecution opposed …

VIPUL JAGDISH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vipul Jagdish Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with FIR No. 11191023260205 alleging offences under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, arising from a suicide case where he was accused of threatening the …

ANIRUDDHSINH SHIVUBHA ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Aniruddhsinh Shivubha Zala applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNSS. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he would …

MITHABHAI @MITHALAL POKHRAJBHAI DAVEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several BNS sections and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined …

VINODBHAI MITHALAL DAVEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several BNS sections and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined …

JAYANTIBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI BABARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several BNS sections and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined …

VIKRAM @ VIKO LALJIBHAI KOLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vikram @ Viko Laljibhai Koli, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging theft of 36 mobile phones under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State opposed bail, …

VISHNU KHICHAD S/O RAMKENversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Vishnu Khichad filed a special criminal application under Article 226, Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 497 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking release of his Maruti Suzuki Brezza (Reg. No. GJ-08-BS-5443) seized in connection with FIR No.11195050240930 for alleged possession …

NILKANT JAGESHWAR KASARUJI GAZBHIYEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Nilkant Jageshwar Kasaruji Gazbhiye, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita after a charge‑sheet was filed for alleged cyber‑fraud offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. …

VIKRAMBHAI JESINGBHAI JOGRANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vikrambhai Jograna, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 351(3), 352 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR initially did not name him, but he was later implicated for …

Himanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Himanshu Kumar, was accused of offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 354B, 379 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, stemming from alleged cruelty and dowry demands by his wife, Kumari Nidhi. He feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail, offering to pay Rs 3000 per …

Niraj Kumar SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar Sinha, was accused under Sections 423 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry harassment and cheating. He applied for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in the complaint case. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner subjected his wife to cruelty for dowry …

PRAKASH MOHANLAL LOLversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Prakash Mohanlal Lol, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11189002260120 alleging offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The FIR does not name the applicant; it …

SHUBHAM RAJESHBHAI SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Shubham Rajeshbai Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) to pre‑empt arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210062250053) alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 66‑D of the IT …

Ram Nath SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 76‑year‑old father‑in‑law, applied for anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case (PS No.603/2025) where he was alleged to have participated in the killing of his daughter‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged the death was a homicide motivated by dowry demands, while the defence argued the …

PANKAJKUMAR VANMALIDAS KAMLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Pankajkumar Vanmalidas Kamli, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 3 of the …

VENUSKUMAR KIRITKUMAR PALSANAWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Venus Kumar Kiritkumar Palsanawala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No.11210047260013 concerning offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 54 and 351(3) of …

VISHAL RATNAKAR HEGDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Vishal Ratnakar Hegde, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State, through its Assistant Public Prosecutor, sought the issuance of a fresh notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, against the applicant. The …