Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

1090 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

LAKHAN MOHAN WASWANI @ PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Lakhan Mohan Waswani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged sword attacks causing grievous injuries. He claimed false implication and sought bail to appear for examinations, citing his student status. The State argued …

Nazim @ Mohd NazimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six male relatives of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 363, 365 of the Indian Penal Code, later amended to include Sections 302 and 201. The prosecution alleged that the informant’s daughter, married to a …

Pravesh Kumar @ Parwesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pravesh Kumar, was accused of assaulting his wife with a lathi, leading to simple injuries, and faced charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the case was fabricated due to a land dispute. …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sonu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 100 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered in plastic bags. The prosecution alleged that the liquor …

Manjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manjay Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving alleged dowry harassment, assault, and other offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 494, 406 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court had taken cognizance only of the 498A charge. The parties reached a settlement, agreeing to a …

Ramesh Shah @ Ramesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ramesh Shah, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 110, 118(1), 303(2), 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the mother of an informant with a bamboo stick. He contended that the allegations arose from a petty village …

Md. Khalik @ KhalikversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, a group of relatives of a deceased man, were implicated in a murder case under Sections 103(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita after an informant alleged they poisoned the victim and stole his mobile. The informant later filed a petition acknowledging a possible …

Krishna Manjhi @ Krishn Manjhi @ KrishnversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Krishna Manjhi was accused under Sections 126(2) and 74 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act for allegedly taking a 13‑year‑old girl to a bush and using filthy language, causing her to cry. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a …

Naseem Ansari @ Nasim AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Naseem Ansari, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a loan‑fraud scheme where the informant claimed to have been defrauded of Rs.6,69,000 in cash and Rs.9,18,000 by bank transfer. …

Sandeep KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Sandeep Kumar and Bajrangi Kumar, were implicated in a case registered under IPC sections 279, 304A, 337, 338 and 427 following a fatal motorcycle accident. They contend that they are innocent, have been falsely implicated due to village politics, and that no specific allegation or …

Prem KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Prem Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault, extortion and other offences. He claimed innocence, alleging the charges were fabricated due to a land dispute and that no incriminating material was found on him. The …

Brajesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Brajesh Kumar Singh was arrested in a case alleging that he assaulted two government surveyors and a special survey informant on 3 January 2026, leading to charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the …

Bablu Yadav @ Prabhat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bablu Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 379 and 34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that on 8 December 2023 the accused, including the petitioner, damaged an informant's motorcycle, …

Mithal Yadav @ Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mithal Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of illicit liquor. No incriminating material was found in his possession and the prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional statement of a …

Raju Rai @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 40 litres of illicit country‑made liquor were recovered from a river. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused who was apprehended at the …

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged seizure of 2025 litres of illicit liquor from a truck. He asserted that he neither owned nor drove the truck and that no incriminating …

AKASHKUMAR KALESHBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Akashkumar Kaleshbhai Parmar, filed a Special Criminal Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the order dated 05‑02‑2025 in Criminal Case No.1006 of 2023. The petitioner claimed that the matter had been amicably settled with the …

SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sureshbhai Babubhai Rabari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking protection from arrest in connection with FIR No.11996001260202 for offences under Sections 87, 64(1), 64(2)(m), 308(2), 351(3) and 54 of the …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 11.620 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he neither owned nor drove the vehicle and that …

Pradeep ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Pradeep Manjhi and Anil Manjhi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 40 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from an open place. The prosecution had no incriminating material seized from the petitioners or …

Lal Kishor Yadav @ Lal Kishor KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lal Kishor Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of illicit liquor from a …

DEVRAJBHAI VALJIBHAI GOHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, previously released on regular bail, faced a non‑bailable warrant after failing to appear in a trial because he was arrested in another case and subsequently absconded. A bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita was filed, challenging the trial …

RAVINDRABHAI PRABHUBHAI HALVADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Ravindrabhai Prabhubhai Halvadiya, who was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging extortion and related offences under several sections of the …

NARESHKUMAR DHANRAJBHAI KHARASANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by Nareshkumar Dhanrajbhai Kharasan, who was arrested in connection with a cyber gaming fraud alleged under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 317(4) of the Bharatiya …

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Kamlesh Yadav and Satyam Kumar (Shivam Kumar) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 300 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a mango orchard. They contended that no incriminating material was found …

Mukesh Rai @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Rai applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 90 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a river bank. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no incriminating material was found in his …

Vikash kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Satya Narayan Rai, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 576 litres of illicit liquor from a vehicle parked near his residence and implicated him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was neither the driver nor …

Dhanu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhanu Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 138(1), and 141(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, following the seizure of 3991.180 litres of illicit liquor from a truck and two …

Guli Nut @ Gulli NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Guli Nut, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 37.4 litres of illicit liquor. No incriminating material was found in his possession and he asserted that he was named merely on suspicion, citing a clean …

MOHAMMAD JAHIR MOHAMMAD TAHIR (AS PER ORDER)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 316(4), 318(4), 54 and 60 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) arising from a commercial transaction. The State and the …

SURESHBHAI ODHABHAI LAKHANKIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sureshbhai Odhabhai Lakhankiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after an FIR was lodged at Amroli Police Station for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant, described as a broker who …

MONIKA HIMANSHU SAINIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Monika Himanshu Saini, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR registered for multiple offences under the BNSS and the Information Technology Act. The applicant, who is the sister of a company director, …

AAMIR ALAM AFTAB ALAM SAIYEDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by Aamir Alam Afatb Alam Saiyed, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant, in custody since …

FAZIL S/O ABDUL MAJEED PROPRIETOR OF AIZAH TEXTILEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 316(4), 318(4), 54 and 60 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) arising from a commercial transaction. The State and the …

AFTAB ALAM S/O AHAMAD HUSSAINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 316(4), 318(4), 54 and 60 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) arising from a commercial transaction. The State and the …

ZAKIYA W/O. MOHD. NAIM - PROPRIETOR OF ZARIN FATIMA DUPATTAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 316(4), 318(4), 54 and 60 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) arising from a commercial transaction. The State and the …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in a cyber‑offence involving alleged fraud through a mobile number, with offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 379 and IT Act section 66(D). The informant had transferred Rs. 30,000 to the mobile number, later discovering the …

SOLANKI VISHWAJITSINH PRAFULBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Solanki Vishwajitsinh Prafulbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR CR No.11196002260296 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …

RAJPUROHIT INDRAJIT RANCHODLALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rajpurohit Indrajit Ranchodlal, faced an FIR (C.R. No.11191038260326 of 2026) alleging violations of Sections 4(3) and 5(Ch) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act and Section 314 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the …

ANISHKUMAR KHODIDASBHAI VADODARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Information Technology Amendment Act. The prosecution opposed bail citing the gravity of the offences. The …

JAVERBHAI MERUBHAI KANANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners Javerbhai Merubhai Kanani & ors. applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11192019260100 of 2026) alleging forgery and related offences under IPC sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). The …

KIRANBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI ROHITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant Kiranbhai Parsottambhai Rohit sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 54 and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail, …

Mukesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Mukesh Ram, Sabita Devi and Jaila Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No.237 of 2025 for multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They argued that the informant was not an eye‑witness, no specific overt act was attributed to them, and that …

Dhananjay RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Ray, applied for bail after being implicated in a murder case registered under Sections 103(2) and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the deceased’s mother suspected the petitioner among five accused persons of murdering her son, based …

Ram Bharos MishraversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Ram Bharos Mishra and his wife Ram Sati Devi, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 130(1), 80(1), 61(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleges that they, along with others, demanded dowry and, when the demand was not met, …

Dhananjay Yadav @ Dhananjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Yadav, faced arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and his friend with a knife and lathi on 8 September 2025, causing injuries. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, the …

Ravish Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Raukish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ravish Kumar, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 317(2) and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged involvement in illegal sand mining and a stolen motorcycle. The FIR was based on a secret informant’s tip that the accused were riding a motorcycle without a …

Jai Prakash RamanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jai Prakash Raman, a 60‑year‑old former teacher, was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B for allegedly securing a teaching post using forged documents, leading to his termination from service. He pleaded innocence, asserted no prior criminal record, and offered full cooperation …

Raj Kumar RoyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Roy, sought bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No.449/2022) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468/34 relating to an alleged fraudulent sale deed of ancestral land. He contended that he was merely a witness to the deed, received no consideration, …

Bihari BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Bihari Bhagat and Kanhaiya Bhagat, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 127(2), 326(g), 324(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging arson of an informant's house. The prosecution alleged that a group of 19 named accused, including the petitioners, …

Ashok SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ashok Singh petitioned the Patna High Court for bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging that he ordered an assault on the informant’s father, who later died of septicemia and shock. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a …

Md AkbarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Md Akbar and his son Md Riyazul, were implicated in a case alleging an altercation on 06‑02‑2026 that led to injuries to an informant and the alleged theft of gold ornaments and Rs. 18,000. They filed a bail application, asserting that they are innocent, victims of village politics, …

Md. AkramversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, six residents of Shasan village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Hasanpur P.S. Case No.86 of 2026) that alleged multiple offences including assault, attempted murder and other crimes under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case was …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging molestation of a minor under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He claims innocence, stating that his name appears only in the confessional statement of a co-accused and that the victim never …

Md. Iqbal Khan @ IqbalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four brothers, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 494 of 2023) alleging forgery of a Hibba deed used to dispute a property mutation. The prosecution alleged that the brothers filed an objection using a forged deed dated 15‑09‑2014 to illegally …

Sidharth Kumar @ Piyush HunterversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sidharth Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 352, 109, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)A, 26, 35 of the Arms …

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 253.2 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a tempo. He argued that he was neither the driver nor the owner of the vehicle and that no incriminating material was found in his …

Rajnish Yadav @ Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajnish Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 1623.045 liters of illicit liquor were seized from a co-accused's house and two vehicles. The prosecution alleged his …

RANJEET PASWAN @ RANJIT PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ranjeet Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 250 litres of illicit liquor from a forest area. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no …

Dinesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 120 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a river bank. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no incriminating material was found in his possession and the …

Rajkumar Sah @ Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajkumar Sah sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 160 litres of illicit liquor seized from two motorcycles and 540 litres recovered from a spot. The prosecution alleged his …

Ranjeet RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Rai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 15 litres of illicit liquor seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered from the vehicle, but …

LUCKYRAJSINH INDRASINH PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The Gujarat High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Luckyrajsinh Indrasinh Parmar. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352 of the BNS and Section 135 of the …

Alam @ Mahbub AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Alam, Atabul Hussain and Saimful Khatun—feared arrest in a case (Kadwa PS Case No. 113 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 96, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The alleged crime was the kidnapping of a minor daughter of an informant by …

Dhuran Yadav @ Dhoran YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhuran Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 48.240 litres of illicit liquor seized from two motorcycles. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered, but the …

Arjun MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arjun Mahto applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of illicit liquor. The prosecution claimed that 160 litres of illicit liquor were seized from two motorcycles and an …

Manoj ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 40 litres of illicit liquor and registered a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner argued that no incriminating material was …

HITESHBHAI BHARATBHAI KHAMBHALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Hiteshbhai Bharatbai Khambhalia applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with an FIR alleging multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, Motor Vehicles Act and Gujarat Police Act. The complainant’s affidavit indicated that the …

SANTOKBEN KARSHANBHAI GORADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, a 69‑year‑old woman, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police Act. The State opposed …

Vikas Kumar @ Vikash Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, was accused under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and dowry harassment by his wife. The matter was referred to mediation, which failed, leading the petitioner to seek anticipatory bail fearing arrest. He denied the …

Bajrangi TamoliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bajrangi Tamoli was arrested in a case alleging kidnapping of an informant's wife and son under Sections 173(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and a clean record. The alleged victim, the informant's wife, gave a statement …

Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raju Kumar, husband of the complainant, faced an anticipatory bail application in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 341, 379 and the Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The prosecution alleged that after their 2018 marriage, the complainant was subjected to cruelty and …

Shivdyal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivdyal Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. His counsel submitted that the underlying dispute had been settled through mediation, with a mediator's report dated 18-06-2026 and a settlement agreement attached. The opposing …

Dharmendra Kumar Poddar @ Dharmendra Kumar PoddarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Poddar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act for alleged electricity theft causing a loss of Rs.2,88,978 to the government. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, used …

Arvind SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arvind Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry harassment case under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that after his 2017 marriage, the complainant was subjected to cruelty for non‑payment of dowry. The …

Dharam Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Dharam Raj Kumar, appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Exclusive Special Court under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case involving alleged caste-based abuse and assault. The FIR alleged that the appellant, along with 25 co‑accused, assaulted the …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging he kidnapped an informant's granddaughter for marriage. The petitioner asserted a consensual love relationship and presented a clean antecedent. The …

Sufran Ansari @ Gufran AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sufran Ansari, was implicated in a FIR alleging dowry demands, sexual offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and other crimes under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The allegations stemmed from a proposed marriage between the petitioner and the informant's …

Dhirendra Kumar Sharma @ Dhirendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhirendra Kumar Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He argued that the dispute with the complainant had been settled through mediation, as evidenced by a mediator’s …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pawan Kumar, husband of Payal Kumari, faced a criminal complaint (Case No. 53 of 2023) alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest, and offered to pay Rs.5,000 per month as temporary relief to the …

Devender Kumar @ Devendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Devender Kumar, was accused under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry harassment and causing hurt to his wife. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest, while the prosecution alleged that he subjected his wife to cruelty for dowry demands. The …

Majlis Ansari @ Majlish Ansari @ Md. MajlishversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Majlis Ansari was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging assault on the informant's father, involving offences under several IPC sections. The petitioner sought bail, asserting a clean antecedent and that the injury sustained was simple. The State opposed the bail application. The court …

Rupan SadaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Khagaria, sought bail in a case alleging kidnapping, abduction, rape, and conspiracy under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 376, 120(B), 34 and section 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution’s informant claimed his minor daughter was kidnapped on 4 December 2023, but the …

Kapil Manjhi @ Kapil Kumar @ Gadar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kapil Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant. The prosecution alleged that the co‑accused, Chhotu Manjhi, abducted the child and that the petitioner, being a family member, assisted in the crime. The …

Indal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Indal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 294 litres of illicit liquor seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered from the vehicle, …

Salok Kumar @ Sholok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Salok Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 461, 379, 420, 427, and 411/34 related to an alleged ATM robbery. The prosecution’s case was based on a raid following a Mumbai Vigilance tip, during which co-accused were arrested and a sum of Rs …

Dharmendra Manjhi @ Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Manjhi, was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging participation in an unlawful assembly that seized potato sacks and assaulted an informant and his uncle. He sought bail, arguing that the specific assault allegations were directed at other co‑accused, that his …

Yogesh Yadav @ Yogesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Yogesh Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18.8 litres of illicit liquor seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused; no incriminating …

Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, sought bail in a dowry death case registered under sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). He asserted that he is the father‑in‑law of the deceased, has a clean antecedent, and is not involved in the alleged torture and murder, which the …

Jogendra Bhuiya @ Jogendra Bharti @ Yogendra BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jogendra Bhuiya was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's son, alleged to have occurred while he was working with the victim in a distillery. The prosecution's case is based solely on the informant's suspicion, with no eyewitness testimony linking the petitioner to the crime. The …

Ganesh Mahton @ Ganesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five members of the Mahto family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under numerous sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault with deadly weapons and snatching jewellery, arising from a land dispute. They contended that the FIR, which names …

Alok Paswan @ Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Alok Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault on an informant and his family. The FIR named ten accused, including the petitioner, alleging they attacked the victims with lathis and …

Babita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Babita Devi and Sulendra Rai, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a woman on a false promise of marriage and assaulting her when she pressed …

Krishna Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who were drivers or owners of several trucks loaded with mineral ore, were arrested after the police seized the trucks on 19 September 2025 for operating without valid challans. They faced charges under sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and …

Vibha Devi @ Bibha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vibha Devi was implicated in a narcotics case under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act after co-accused persons, who were apprehended with 19 kg of ganja, alleged that she had supplied the contraband. The petitioner contended that she had no conscious possession of any narcotic, no material …

Mahmud AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mahmud Alam, a scrap‑shop owner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(4), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly keeping stolen Scorpio vehicles with fake registration plates. The prosecution alleged the vehicles were stolen and stored by the …

Abhinav Kumar @ Abinav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Abhinav Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police indicated he might be arrested in connection with a shooting incident under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants fired indiscriminately, …

Dhiraj RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Ray, a brother‑in‑law of a woman who was allegedly killed in a dowry‑related case, feared arrest under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the victim’s daughter was killed after a dowry demand was not met. The petitioner contended he had …

Amit Kumar @ Subham Kumar @ Amit Yadav @ Subham YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Pakkisarai village, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging assault and attempts to outrage the modesty of an informant's mother on 25 December 2024. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the informant’s house, assaulted …

Md. Qudus @ Qudus AbidversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Qudus, a 72‑year‑old man with no criminal record, was named in an FIR alongside many others for alleged violent acts under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and that no specific allegation was …

Rampani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Rampani Kumar and Dinesh Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 100 litres of illicit liquor was recovered. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a co‑accused’s confessional statement, with no …

Aditya Kumar @ Aditya SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Aditya Kumar and Chandralok Kumar, were accused of assaulting an informant and his son over a disputed loan of Rs. 30,000, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and alleging …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 20 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from an open place. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statement of a co-accused who was apprehended at the scene, with no …

Pravej Dewan @ Pravej SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of relatives, filed a pre‑arrest bail application in a case arising from an alleged assault and robbery during a land dispute. Petitioners 1, 3 and 6 withdrew their bail petitions, which the court permitted. The State opposed bail for petitioner 5, who is alleged to have …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and Sanni Kumar, were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) for allegedly assaulting the son and husband of an informant, causing simple injuries. They filed a bail petition fearing arrest. The State opposed the bail. The Court …

Jai Prakash SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Jai Prakash Sah was arrested in a case under sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for allegedly buying a gold Lakshmi Chakti that was stolen by co‑accused Aman Kumar. The prosecution relied on the co‑accused’s confession that he sold the stolen gold to the …

Sanjay RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Sanjay Ray and his son Prince Kumar sought bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging theft of Rs. 90,500 and assault with an iron rod, invoking several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) and the Arms Act. They contended that the incident stemmed from a bilateral …

Nagendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nagendra Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 111 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from sand used for construction. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no incriminating material was found in his conscious …

Kheli Sahani @ Khelee SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kheli Sahani, was apprehended in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 50 litres of country-made liquor were recovered from an open place. The prosecution’s case relied on the petitioner’s name appearing in the confessional statements of the …

Prince Paswan @ Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, members of the Paswan family, were implicated in a FIR dated 20-04-2026 alleging assault, robbery and damage to property against an informant, with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that they were innocent, that the allegations were vague …

Panpati Devi @ Panpatiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, two women from Kaloi village, sought bail after being implicated in a 2018 assault case arising from a land dispute, with the FIR alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code. They argued they had clean antecedents and that the allegations were general and omnibus. The …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 371 of 2025) registered under multiple offences of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). The FIR alleged that he assaulted the informant with a "farsa" causing a simple injury. The petitioner asserted a …

Tuntun PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Tuntun Prasad and his son Niranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. They claimed the underlying dispute had …

Deepak Yadav @ Deepak Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Yadav, sought bail in a criminal case registered under sections 96 and 137 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging kidnapping for marriage. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had taken the informant's daughter for marriage after she failed to return …

Chandrashekhar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Jha, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry harassment case filed under Sections 115(2) and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that after marrying the complainant, the petitioner subjected her to torture and cruelty for non‑payment of dowry. The …

Suleman AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suleman Ansari, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, stemming from a dowry dispute with his wife, the informant. The prosecution alleged torture and cruelty for non‑payment of dowry, invoking sections relating to domestic …

Istakhar Alam @ Iftakhar Ahmad @ IftekharversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Istakhar Alam sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that he had entered into a sexual relationship with the informant by falsely promising marriage and later refused to marry, invoking Sections 69 and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant, an adult, contended that the …

Bhushan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bhushan Rai, the petitioner, faced an anticipatory bail application in a dowry harassment case under Sections 498A/34 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage took place in 2015 and the complainant alleged cruelty for non‑payment of dowry. Mediation ordered by the court …

Puja Rani @ ChandanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three transgender individuals, were accused in an FIR for assaulting an informant and others, resulting in minor injuries to four persons, and faced charges under multiple IPC sections including 447, 341, 323, 307, 427, 448, 380, 504, 506 and 34. They filed a bail petition fearing …

Md. Aftab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Aftab Alam, Rustam Ali and Afroj Alam, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 555 of 2018) involving alleged offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 506 of the IPC, section 27 of the Arms Act and other charges. The prosecution alleged that during an …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was arrested in connection with an assault case (PS Case No. 230/2025) alleging that he and co‑accused attacked an informant and her son with lathis and iron rods on 17‑08‑2025. The petitioner contended that the incident was a mutual fight, that the FIR was lodged 14 …

Raj Kumar Singh @ Raj Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Singh, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Didarganj Case No. 48 of 2025) involving offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 109, 329(3), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. He alleged that the …

Dhiraj Kumar @ Alok PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of residents of Saristabad, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No.85 of 2026) registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The prosecution alleges that on 28 January 2026 the accused, armed with weapons, …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought bail in a case alleging offences under sections 69, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, stemming from a purported false promise of marriage and subsequent sexual relations with the informant. The prosecution alleged …

Sita Ram YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sita Ram Yadav, Shankar Yadav and Raj Kumar Yadav, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault and related offences. The FIR alleged that the accused, while intoxicated, …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was arrested in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 531 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 498‑A and 34. He feared further arrest and applied for anticipatory bail, denying the allegations. The petitioner offered to pay a temporary maintenance …

MD. JIYAFATversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jiyafat, was accused of dowry harassment under Sections 115(2) and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita following a complaint by his wife, Misrana Khatoon. The petitioner denied the allegations and offered to pay Rs. 3,000 per month as temporary maintenance, subject to any future …

Rahul kumar Singh @ Rahul SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh, feared arrest in a criminal complaint (Case No. 796 of 2025) alleging offences under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the marital dispute underlying the complaint had been settled through …

Md. Sameer AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sameer Ali, was accused of offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act following allegations of dowry-related cruelty by his wife. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his willingness to provide monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,000 to the …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under sections 376, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly sexually exploiting his sister‑in‑law, Nibha Devi, after the death of her husband and refusing to marry her. He contended that the relationship was consensual, both …

Sadre AlamversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sadre Alam, sought anticipatory bail after being charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and dowry demands following his 2019 marriage. The prosecution alleged that the …

Md. Hatim @ Hatim Alam @ Md. Hatim AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Hatim Alam, was accused in a criminal case under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and dowry demands. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, claiming apprehension of arrest and offering to pay a monthly maintenance of …

Lalan Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lalan Kumar Thakur and Vinay Thakur petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a complaint alleging assault, robbery, forgery and misappropriation of government funds under multiple sections of the IPC. The prosecution claimed the petitioners, with unidentified accomplices, attacked the …

Lalmuni BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five members of the Bind family, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an assault case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that on 20 November 2025 the accused entered the informant's house and assaulted him and his …

Sunil Kumar Mahto @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging kidnapping of the informant's minor daughter and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. He contended that the FIR was fabricated and that the victim, in a statement recorded …

Indu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of ten individuals from Arthauli village, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 for alleged assault, outrage of modesty, robbery, and property damage on 29 September 2025. The prosecution …

Md. AnwarulversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Md. Anwarul sought bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Bathnaha, Araria) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) and the D.P Act. The dispute between the petitioner and his wife, Bibi Runa Khatoon, had been settled through mediation, and a …

Ravi Kumar KediyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Kediya, was accused of dowry harassment under Sections 115(2), 3(5) and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita following a complaint by his wife. Mediation ordered by the High Court failed, and the petitioner feared arrest. He offered to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as temporary …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Barh, Patna, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging theft and assault on an informant’s household. The prosecution alleged that all accused entered the informant’s house, attempted theft and …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, was accused under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and dowry demands after his marriage in 2021. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he was ready to provide the complainant Rs 3,000 …

Minta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Minta Devi, mother of a co-accused in a cyber‑crime case, filed a bail petition fearing arrest under sections 303(2), 319(2), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and sections 66C, 66D of the Information Technology Act. She asserted that she had not committed any offence, had a clean …

LAKHUBHAI ABUBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioners, who are the original accused, filed a special criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking the quashing of FIR No.11215029260144 registered at Tarapur Police Station, Anand for alleged violations of Sections 4(3), 5(C) and 5(E) of the …

PADHIAR HARDEEPSINH KUMARSINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Padhiar HardeepSinh Kumarsinh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The State opposed …

RIZVANSHA YASINMOHAMMAD DIVANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The husband and wife applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita after an FIR was lodged for offences under Sections 336(2), 337, 340 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. They argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, they would cooperate …

JAYDEEPKUMAR PUNJALAL PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jaydeepkumar Punjalal Parmar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 67, 85, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay …

Sitaram RajakversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, who are close relatives of the informant, were accused in a land‑dispute case of assault, molestation and robbery under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023. The informant alleged that the petitioners attacked and molested her, while the petitioners …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Arvind Kumar was arrested in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and his son with an iron rod and a stick during a land dispute. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, that the incident was a mutual fight arising from a …

Lakhindra Singh @ Lakhindra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four residents of Paharpur village, were implicated in a violent incident at the informant's house where assault, robbery and the death of the informant's husband were alleged. The prosecution charged them under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, while the petitioners …

Santosh ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Choudhary, a 19‑year‑old resident of Madhubani, sought bail after the police alleged his involvement in an incident where a pistol was dropped from a motorcycle rider who fled the scene. The FIR did not name him, and the prosecution’s case was based only on a statement that he had been using …

Jayant Kumar Suman @ Jay Jay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jayant Kumar Suman, was implicated in a violent incident involving firing between two groups in his village, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. He contended that he was innocent, that no one was injured, no cartridges were …

Arbind Singh @ Arvind Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Arbind Singh was arrested on allegations of creating fake social media accounts to defame an informant's daughter and disrupt her marriage, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that the case was fabricated due to a matrimonial …

Shashikant Kumar @ Shashikant MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shashikant Kumar, was accused of raping a woman and threatening her brother under Sections 64 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the FIR was lodged five months after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence of sexual …

Dhirendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhirendra Ray, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case where a mob allegedly obstructed police attempting to arrest another accused. The prosecution alleged that Ray instigated the crowd, leading to assaults on police and injuries. The petitioner contended he was …

Sachin PanditversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Sachin Pandit, Raghunath Pandit and Nilam Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case alleging assault with weapons and a violation of the Arms Act. The FIR implicated them alongside a co-accused, …

Manoj singhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR for possession of 5.384 kg of ganja. He was not named in the FIR; the only link was that the seized motorcycle was registered in his name and had been …

Abhishek Kumar @ Anchlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of 63.518 kg of ganja under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act and Section 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving alleged possession of 63.518 kg of ganja under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act and Section 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. …

VISHWESHWAR @ RAMESH BADRI MAHESHWARI @ VAIGANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Vishweshwar, was charged under Sections 376(2), 354, 354-A, 506 of the IPC and Sections 5(l), 6, 7, 8 of the POCSO Act in a special POCSO case. He had already filed four bail applications before the trial court and sought a fifth bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

RAVINDRA SHARMA @ RAVINDER SHARMAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ravindra Sharma, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in Jehanabad for offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 457 and 376D arising from a night-time intrusion, assault and gang‑rape alleged to have occurred on 30 June 2019. The trial court relied on the testimony of the …

RAGHUVIRSINH PRATAPSINH JADEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Raghuvirsinh Pratapsinh Jadeja, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay …

RAVI @MORARI KESABHAI MATANGversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The accused, Ravi @Morari Keshabhai Matang and others, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police Act. Their earlier anticipatory bail …

CHUNARA BHARATBHAI PUNJABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The applicant, Chunara Bharatbhai Punjabbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No.11191016260038 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The …

Nitesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving the alleged recovery of 291.375 litres of foreign liquor from the dicky of his Hyundai car. The prosecution alleged that …

Savita Devi @ Savita KumariversusThe State of BIhar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Savita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging her involvement in the abduction of a minor for a forced marriage, offences being under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The prosecution claimed the accused forcibly …

Gajendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of villagers from Parsauni, were implicated in a FIR (Case No. 406 of 2024) alleging that they formed an unlawful assembly and assaulted the informant’s relatives, causing injuries and theft of a gold chain during a land dispute. They argued that they were innocent, the FIR …

KESHAVBHAI BHALABHAI MALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The accused, Keshavbhai Bhalabhai Mali, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No.11996001260158 alleging offences under Sections 87, 64(1), 64(2)(M), 351(3) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The …

MANTHAN PARESHKUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The accused applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(4), 318(3) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he …

NITIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Nitin Kumar, who is accused in a case under Section 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant asserted his innocence, highlighted a deposit of Rs.90,697 …

HARENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Harendra, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences including assault and grievous injury to an 84‑year‑old informant. The applicant claimed …

IZHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused Izhar, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (including 281, 125(A), 125(b), 109, 117(2), 191(2), 191(3), …

SMT SUSHMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Sushma filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 3034 of 2024) arising from an alleged fraud under IPC Section 420 and the Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme Act. The applicant admitted that …

KAMRAN SHAHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kamran Shah, who was arrested in connection with a 2019 case involving alleged counterfeiting of clothing and related offences under the IPC, Copyright Act and Trademark …

SITARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sitaram filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued by the Special Judge, Mathura, in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The warrant had already been executed, resulting in the …

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged kidnapping and murder of several persons, with bodies later found on a railway track. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including Pramod Kumar, had abducted the victims, but the …

Satendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satendra Yadav and Ritesh Kumar, owner and driver of a tractor, were implicated in illegal sand‑mining and charged under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioners feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that they had already paid a fine of Rs …

Rupesh Yadav @ Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rupesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 225 litres of illicit liquor from a bush. The prosecution alleged the offence but no incriminating …

Satyendra Singh @ Satendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satyendra Singh, was implicated in an FIR alleging that he assaulted the informant's father with a knife, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting innocence, a clean antecedent, and that the altercation arose during a land …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sudhir Kumar was arrested in a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family and attempting to outrage the modesty of female members. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a land dispute, asserted his innocence, and …

Narad Mahto @ Birbal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Narad Mahto, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for assault, robbery and attempt to murder. The FIR named other accused, but later witness statements implicated the petitioner, although he was not originally named. The petitioner, who …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged illegal sale of stolen vehicles under Sections 317(2), 318(4), 336(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case rested solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rita Devi, a resident of Barchhi Bigha, sought anticipatory bail after the police raided illegal sand mining operations in the West Panchne river area and seized five tractors, one of which she owned. She contended that she merely hired out the tractor and was not involved in its day‑to‑day …

Santosh Kumar Jha @ Baua JhaversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar Jha sought anticipatory bail after a complaint (Case No. 326 of 2024) alleged that he owed Rs. 4,60,000 to the complainant and had paid only Rs. 2,15,000, evading the balance. The charges were under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner …

Md. JibrailversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Md. Jibrail and his son Md. Akbar, sought bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault with an iron rod, outraging the modesty of the informant’s wife, and theft of a silver chain, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. …

Babita Devi @ Babita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Babita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal complaint (Muzaffarpur Case No. 486 of 2016) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 323/34 related to the alleged sale of family property. A civil suit between the parties was also pending. The …

Daya Shankar DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Daya Shankar Dubey, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Krishnabraham P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026) for offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468 and 120B, alleged to have obtained a job using a forged certificate. The petitioner claimed the original document was …

Sanjay Saw @ Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Saw, was apprehended of arrest in connection with a case under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 alleging financial loss to the Electricity Department. He claimed the premises involved were owned by his mother and rented to a third‑party, and sought anticipatory …

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Mukesh Kumar Singh and Singho Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in PS Mohiuddin Nagar Case No. 76 of 2025, which alleges their involvement in property damage and looting on 20‑04‑2025 and, separately, the killing of an informant's husband on 24‑04‑2025. The petitioners …

Archana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Archana Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case (PS No.12 of 2026) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 20 litres of country‑made liquor was recovered from a tin‑tati (jhopri) linked to her. She contended that the liquor was not in her conscious …

Gopal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gopal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Munger Muffasil P.S. Case No. 392 of 2024) involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The allegations against him pertained solely to the alleged snatching of a gold …

Md. AslamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Aslam, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging possession of 2,175 bottles of 100 ml cough syrup containing codeine phosphate and triprolidine hydrochloride, alleged to be offences under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. He contended that the syrup falls within …

Vishal Paswan @ Vishal kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vishal Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Rahui P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026) alleging assault on an informant under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He claimed innocence, asserting that he was falsely implicated in a dispute …

Ahad Hussain @ Ahat HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ahad Hussain, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kishanganj PS Case No. 630 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 418 and 409 IPC. The FIR originally named only Harsh Kumar, but during investigation the petitioner’s name was added. The petitioner claimed innocence …

Vishun Yadav @ Vishundeo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a 70‑year‑old father and his two sons, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR (Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 565 of 2025) for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that the police were assaulted while attempting to arrest a third person, Ajay …

Satyendra Prasad SinhaversusThe State of Bihar through Vigilance

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satyendra Prasad Sinha, a retired execution engineer, feared arrest in a vigilance case (PS No. 36 of 2013) alleging offences under Sections 13(2) r/w and 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, with a disproportionate assets claim of about Rs. 1.60 crore. An earlier …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anand Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS No. 234 of 2025) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where four persons allegedly assaulted an informant and looted his belongings. The petitioner argued that the injuries were simple, his mother …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Barahiya P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault and attempt to murder. The allegations stem from a land dispute where the petitioner allegedly …