Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

1090 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Gardanibagh Case No. 651 of 2019, which alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 465, 468, 471, 472 and 120(B) for impersonating a person in an examination hall. The petitioner claimed innocence, no prior …

Pawan Kumar @ Paswan KimarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Paswan, a Panchayat Sachiv, was implicated in a case under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338 and 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for allegedly withdrawing Rs. 4,46,075 under the BRGF scheme along with the Mukhiya, Kamdeo Das. The petitioner sought anticipatory …

Animesh Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Animesh Kumar Das and his wife Neha Kumari were accused in a FIR of fraud amounting to Rs. 1,75,000 in a land sale dispute. They claimed the money was partially returned and that the matter was essentially civil, with the FIR filed belatedly. The petition sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 …

Mukhtar @ Mohd Shahzeb KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old resident of Gaya, sought bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 121(1), 132 and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging his involvement in a violent incident at a Chief Minister's inauguration. The prosecution alleged that a group of …

Angad Singh SaroyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Angad Singh Saroya and Daras Kaur Saroya, directors of Masters Development Management (India) Pvt Ltd, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) for alleged fraud involving bogus invoices and …

WALIULLAH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a civil order dated 30.05.2019 passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Kushinagar, which was based on a criminal case under Sections 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants …

AWADHESH LODHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Awadhesh Lodhi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 160 g of Alprazolam. The applicant contended that the …

Virichand Sah @ Virichan SaahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Virichand Sah, Pinku Devi and Bhola Sah, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 366A, 34 and section 8 of the POCSO Act for alleged kidnapping of a minor for marriage. They contended that they were falsely implicated because they are relatives of …

Madan Prasad @ Madan PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Madan Prasad and Arjun Prasad sought bail after being implicated in a case under sections 103 and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the alleged murder of a husband in a land‑dispute context. The FIR alleged that the accused lured the victim under the pretext of a panchayat meeting and …

Julfiquar KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Julfiquar Khan, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with an iron pipe, threats to kidnap and marry a 13‑year‑old girl, and other offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) and the POCSO Act. He contended that he has a clean record, that the allegations stem from …

Sharda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, a group of villagers from Tetaria, sought bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family. The prosecution alleged that the accused …

Mantosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mantosh Kumar, was implicated in a FIR under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for allegedly participating in an assault that led to the death of Maharaj Kumar. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, attacked the victim …

Tetar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Tetar Sahni, Soni Devi, and Vikram Kumar, were implicated in a violent incident alleged to involve assault with weapons and injuries to an informant and his family. They claimed innocence, asserting the allegations stemmed from a land dispute and that the injuries were caused by …

Sangeeta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, sought bail after being implicated in a dowry‑death case (PS Case No. 349 of 2025) under sections U/s‑103 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner’s daughter‑in‑law was subjected to cruelty and eventually killed …

Jamil @ JamileelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jamil and Fahad, sought bail after being named in a FIR alleging participation in a violent clash on 28‑06‑2025 over a land dispute, during which the informant's son was killed by an arrow allegedly fired by co‑accused Md Azam. The petitioners contended they were involved in a "free …

Rajendra Ojha @ Rajindra OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajendra Ojha sought bail in a case registered under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of the informant's husband. The FIR claimed that eleven accused assaulted the deceased with lathi and danda, …

Parma RajakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Parma Rajak, Aman Kumar and Sahil Rajak, applied for bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) relating to assault, homicide and robbery. The FIR alleged that co‑accused Mahesh Rajak and Vikram Rajak assaulted the deceased …

Shubham Kumar @ K.T.M. @ Aditya Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that on 29 August 2025, a group of hostel students assaulted an informant and his friends during a search for a …

Bhawani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhawani Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 302 and 34 for the alleged murder of an informant's son. The FIR did not name the petitioner; his name surfaced only in the confessional statement of co‑accused Nikhil Yadav, who had …

Uma Shankar Singh @ Umesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Uma Shankar Singh and Pappu Kumr Ray, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging participation in a mob that blocked a road with a dead body, attacked police, and set the road on fire, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita …

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Kaushal Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case (Mahua P.S. Case No. 409 of 2025) had been registered against him under Sections 61(2), 87, 137(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly kidnapping the informant's granddaughter. The prosecution alleged that …

Rooplal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rooplal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case where he was alleged to have participated in the murder of his sister‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 323, 328, 498A, 304(B), 504, 201 and 34 of the IPC, claiming the accused killed the victim over …

Bittu KumarversusThe state of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant for the purpose of marriage, alleged under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim, now aged 18, gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS denying any kidnapping and stating that she …

Mahendra yadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mahendra Yadav and Om Prakash Yadav, were accused in a case (PS Barahat, Case No. 229 of 2025) of assaulting the daughter of an informant, with allegations of grievous injuries and outraging modesty. They contended that the accusations against them were general, omnibus, and arose …

Arula DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Arula Devi, Mohan Kumar and Kanhaiya Das, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118, 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault on 17 September 2025. The FIR specifically names …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Jawahar Prasad, filed a bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for assault and related offences. The FIR alleged that petitioner No.1 assaulted the head of the informant’s …

AJAY KIRITBHAI SHRIMALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, a 19‑year‑old male, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 69, 64(2)(M), 296(B), 351(1) and 351(3) of the same Act. He claimed innocence, stating that the allegations stemmed …

SAURABH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 09‑03‑2026 and a subsequent order refusing to accept their bail bond. The NBW and refusal were issued after a Special Judge had granted anticipatory …

ANKIT BHARDWAJ AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 227001 of 2022) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which involved offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 of the …

TASLEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused Tasleem, who was charged under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for a murder‑related offence. The applicant’s …

ARVIND KUMAR MAHTONversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appeal was filed by three deceased appellants—Arvind Kumar Mahton, Ashok Jha, and Ram Balak Rai—against the State of Bihar. The court examined letters and reports confirming the deaths of the appellants. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (mirroring Section 435 of the …

Rupesh Kumar KarnversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rupesh Kumar Karn, husband of the informant, filed an anticipatory bail petition in the Patna High Court fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that Karn and other accused …

Ram Pravesh PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Pravesh Pandey, husband of Rani Kumari, feared arrest in a criminal case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had resolved their dispute through mediation, with a mediator’s report dated 28‑04‑2026 and a settlement attached. …

Raja Jaysawal @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raja Jaysawal, husband of the opposite party, feared arrest in a criminal case (PS 300/2025) involving offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the marital dispute had been fully resolved through mediation, as evidenced by a mediator’s report …

Dareshi MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, members of the Mahto family, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that on 12 May 2025 the accused kidnapped the informant’s daughter, but the petitioners claim …

VIKASH KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ VIKASH CHOUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged murder of an informant's son. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy involving several accused, including the petitioner, to obtain money …

Shaket Mahto @ Saket Mahto @ Saket KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Shaket Mahto and his brother Munna Mahto were implicated in a criminal case arising from a land dispute that allegedly led to an assault on an informant and her daughter. The petitioners filed bail applications; Munna Mahto's bail application was withdrawn after he was arrested, while Shaket Mahto …

Rajendra SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajendra Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where his son, Satyendra Sah, was accused of cheating and assault. The FIR alleged that the son and another accused took money from an informant for a job and later assaulted him, but there was no direct allegation …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sonu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he assaulted the informant's daughter with a lathi, causing a head injury. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating the incident stemmed from a drainage dispute and …

Tedhi Yadav @ Dedhi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four Yadavs from Bakulahiya village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case arising from FIR No.119/2025 involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). They claimed innocence, alleging the charges stem from a prior land dispute and …

Manish Kumar @ Ajit Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Manish Kumar and Umesh Manjhi, were accused of assaulting an informant and his cousin under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They claimed the incident stemmed from a dispute over a mango tree branch, with both sides sustaining minor injuries, and asserted they had …

Manjesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manjesh Kumar and Ranjesh Kumar, brothers, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging they forcibly seized a Scorpio vehicle and threatened the informant. The prosecution alleged the vehicle was purchased from the first petitioner and was taken back due to non-payment of …

Karu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Karu Yadav and Mahendra Yadav sought anticipatory bail in connection with a family land dispute that escalated into a violent incident where the informant's husband was assaulted and shot. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 …

Md. Kasim @ Kashim AliversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Kasim, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault on an informant and his family under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the allegation of striking the informant with a farsa was unsupported by medical evidence and that the FIR was filed with …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manish Kumar was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly abducting the minor daughter of an informant. The petitioner contended that the girl, who claimed to be 19 years old, voluntarily stayed with him and made no allegation …

Shyam Kumar @ Shyam Sundar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shyam Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS. Case No. 454 of 2025) alleging that he and several others smoked ganja in a revenue office and assaulted an informant with lathi and an iron rod, causing injuries. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and …

Ashok RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three residents of Lagma village, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a criminal case registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that they fraudulently acquired land belonging to an …

Jivan Mukhiya @ Jivan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jivan Mukhiya, filed an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in a murder case (PS Case No. 58 of 2025) where he is accused under Sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that the …

Dilip Patel @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dilip Patel and Ram Janam Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a police case (No. 493 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. They claimed innocence, alleging false implication due to political rivalry and …

Shubham Sah @ Subham Kumar @ Subham SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shubham Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case arising from a road accident where a mob allegedly attacked police. The FIR alleged his participation in the mob but provided only general, omnibus accusations without specific incriminating material. The petitioner …

Lakshmi Devi @ Sonashri RajversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Lakshmi Devi and Manish Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, assaulted the informant's family when the informant was absent. …

Sushil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, a 20‑year‑old student, was arrested in connection with an alleged assault on an informant, charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the case was fabricated out of a petty dispute with the …

Rajiv Kumar Mandal @ Rajiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Mandal and Jitendra Mandal, applied for bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning alleged dowry harassment and the death of a sister-in-law. The prosecution alleged that the informant's sister …

Karu TuriyaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Karu Turiya and Sanoj Kumar, were implicated in an excise case for alleged recovery of 73.5 litres of foreign liquor and 12 litres of canned beer from four motorcycles found in Chafail forest. They argued that the seized vehicles did not belong to them and that no incriminating …

Upendra Kumar Yadav @ Upendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three Yadav brothers from Rampur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Shivsagar PS Case No.23 of 2026) filed under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an …

Rehana KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rehana Khatoon applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case (Tiyar P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026) where the informant alleged she had called co‑accused to assault the victim. The prosecution alleged that several persons assaulted and killed the informant’s husband, and the only …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 379, 411 and 120(B) of the IPC, Section 21 of the M.M. (D.R.) Act and Section 56 of the B.M. (C.P.I.M.T. & S) Rules, alleging theft of sand. The FIR named him based solely on the statement of a local …

SHYAM SHIVHAREversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shyam Shivhare, who is accused in an NDPS case for alleged possession of 81 kg of ganja recovered from a car. The applicant argued that he was falsely …

SHAHID @ SAHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shahid @ Sahil, who was charged under Sections 317(2) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …

DHANIRAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused Dhaniram, who was charged in Crime No. 29 of 2017 under IPC sections 411, 413, 414 and 420. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

KISHORversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Kishor, who was arrested in connection with a 2021 incident and charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B. The applicant argued that the …

BINTU KASHYAP @ TUINYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bintu Kashyap @ Tuinya, who was arrested in a case involving offences under IPC Section 333, BNS Section 74 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed …

ALISHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Alisher, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking release on bail in thirteen pending cases relating to electricity theft and related offences. He alleged that the charges were based on a confessional statement before police, which he …

AMIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Amir, who was charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act in a case registered in 2025. Amir claimed innocence, stating that no narcotics were recovered from his …

CHATURBHUJI MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Chaturbhuji Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 593 of 2025, which arose from a charge under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003 relating to alleged …

NITIN YADAV @ KALUWAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Nitin Yadav, who is charged under IPC Sections 307 and 504 and the Arms Act (Sections 4 and 25). The applicant had been in custody for four years and his earlier bail plea …

PRAMOD GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pramod Goswami, who is accused under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 191.6 kg of ganja recovered from a truck where he was seated …

SATYENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Satyendra Kumar filed an Article 227 petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to set aside an order dated 21 March 2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge and a subsequent order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 20 November 2023, which had dismissed his protest petition in a …

DVARIKA JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dvarika Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No. 2619 of 2017, which were instituted under Section 461 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Indian Telegraph Act. The …

VISHAL SHARMA ALIAS BANTI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 3401 of 2025, which arose from a criminal complaint involving offences under the BNSS, the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Act. After hearing, the …

Mahendra RayversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The petitioners, members of the Ray family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC) involving the informant's daughter. They argued they were falsely implicated, had no connection with the victim, and possessed a clean antecedent. The State opposed the …

Sethi Singh @ Kunal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sethi Singh (Kunal Kumar), sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 351(3), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused fired upon the son of an …

Awnish Kumar @ Avanish Kumar @ Lalan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Awnish Kumar and Vishal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 109, 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that Vishal Kumar tied the legs of Vaidyanath Paswan, while other co‑accused were accused of …

Hari Shankar Sah @ Hari Shankar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners filed an application for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to assault and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the accused, who were agnates involved in a land dispute, had attacked the informant's family …

PRIYANSHIKUMARI PRADIPBHAI CHAUDHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The applicant, Priyanshikumari Pradipbhai Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging kidnapping, forced apology, and the subsequent suicide of Jenil. The prosecution alleged that the applicant facilitated …

DR ANITA RATHAURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dr. Anita Rathaur, who was charged with multiple offences including fraud, forgery, and medical negligence under various IPC sections and the Indian Medical Council Act. …

SANJEEV KUSHWAHAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sanjeev Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a September 2024 order of the Special Judge that dismissed his request for release of money in a narcotics trial. The order being challenged related to Session Trial No. …

RAMA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rama Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 252 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant argued …

MAHAVIR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings and bail, alleging that they had not yet been arrested and that the lower court's order of detention was unwarranted. The High Court examined the allegations, noting that they pertained to …

BADALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Badan, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 1.034 kg of charas. The applicant contended that the recovery was …

Radhe Krishna RamanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Radhe Krishna Raman, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Ghosi P.S. Case No.424 of 2024) where he was alleged to have assaulted a family with a pistol, stolen jewellery and cash, and violated several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The …

Rajendra PanditversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners Rajendra Pandit, Surati Devi, Ajit Pandit and Priyanka Devi were charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault on an informant and his family. Petitioners sought bail, while the counsel for petitioner Ajit Pandit withdrew his bail application, …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was implicated in a theft case under Sections 303(2) and 334(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after an informant alleged that the accused broke into his shop and stole Rs.15,000. The petitioner contended that he was not present at the scene, had no criminal record, and …

Yotendra Kumar Singh @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Yotendra Kumar Singh, was implicated in an FIR alleging assault and firing upon an informant, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that no one suffered firearm injury and that there was no specific overt act …

Rajendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajendra Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 50 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged the liquor was linked to the petitioner, but he was neither the driver nor the owner and no …

Tarabul @ Md. JauwadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tarabul (also known as Md. Jauwad), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 288 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a …

Bhim Kumar (Driver)versusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhim Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 567 litres of illicit liquor from a vehicle, alleged under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that no incriminating material was found on his person, he was …

Dinesh Kumar GondversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Gond, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 44 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but the petitioner was neither the driver nor the …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 0.75 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from his Swift Dzire. He contended that the liquor was possessed by the driver without his knowledge or consent and that he had no prior criminal …

Jagdish PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners Jagdish Prasad, Soni Patel and Ravi Patel were implicated in an FIR under Sections 420, 409 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged defalcation of a Rs.300 lakh loan granted by Bank of Baroda. The bank alleged that the loan amount was embezzled through asset stripping and …

Soni PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jagdish Prasad, the proprietor of M/s Tirupati Refrigeration, and two guarantors, Soni Patel and Ravi Patel, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 409 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged …

Parmatma Kumar @ Parmatma SaoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Parmatma Kumar, faced a complaint (Case No. 308/2024) alleging that he and others demanded a dowry of Rs. 2 lakh, tortured the complainant, and evicted her from the matrimonial home. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he was falsely implicated and that the allegations …

RAJ KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought quashing of the Special Judge's cognizance and summoning order in Complaint Case No.57 of 2025, alleging that the order was passed without granting the accused an opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and violated …

AKASH KOSTHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Akash Kostha who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

RAVI ALIAS RAVINDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ravi alias Ravindra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 18‑Oct‑2024 in a trial for offences under Sections 307 and 504 IPC. The High Court examined the procedural …

AJAY KUMAR @ TINKUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a charge-sheet order dated 17‑08‑2023 and a subsequent bail‑warrant order dated 20‑11‑2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Garotha, Jhansi. The applicant argued that …

VIVEK SHRIVASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vivek Shrivas, who was charged under Sections 319(2) and 318(4) of the same Act and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act for alleged receipt and …

LALLAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Lallan Kumar, who was arrested in a complaint case involving IPC sections 323, 498-A, 377, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely …

SAHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sahil, who was arrested in a NDPS case involving 3.2 kg of opium and 156 g of smack. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul, who is charged with offences under Sections 304, 308, 452, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR …

ASHOK DANGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashok Dangi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1232 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 354-A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. After hearing, …

ARSHAD ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants, Arshad Ali and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 923 of 2025, which arose from a criminal case under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. During the hearing, the …

Bindeshwar Yadav @ Vineshwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bindeshwar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 150 litres of illicit liquor. He contended that the liquor was not found in his personal possession and that the accusation rested …

Rajballabh Kumar @ RajuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajballabh Kumar, sought provisional bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) arising from matrimonial discord, along with several other offences. He asserted willingness to keep his wife with dignity at his native …

Rakesh Giri @ Rakesh BharativersusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Giri, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that 225 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from a vehicle, implicating him based solely on a co-accused's confessional statement with no independent witnesses to the seizure. The petitioner argued that there …

KISHOR RAJESH PARDEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kishor Rajesh Parde applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a commercial dispute over a turmeric transaction. The …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR records a firearm injury inflicted by co‑accused Abhishek Kumar, and the petitioner’s name only emerged from the …

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was named as one of 19 accused in a case arising from a road accident where a mob allegedly pelted stones at police, causing injuries and vehicle damage. Identification of the petitioner was based solely on the testimony of a local watchman, and the FIR indicates that …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Sonu Kumar and Ganesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault on an informant. The FIR contained a general and omnibus allegation against them, while the grievous injury …

Prashant Kumar @ Manjhla Babu @ Prabhat SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Prashant Kumar and Chandra Shekhar Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case arising from a land dispute between two Gotiyas. The FIR alleges that the accused, including the petitioners, formed an unlawful assembly, entered the informant's house, assaulted family members, …

Raunak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raunak Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for offences under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The only basis for his inclusion was a confessional statement of co‑accused Manish Mandal, from whose mango orchard a country‑made pistol and two live …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar, the registered owner of a vehicle from which 375 ml of illicit liquor was seized, faced charges under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had sold the vehicle to Raghav Jha, that the sale was not transferred in his name, and that he had no …

Rambabu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rambabu Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 22 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a river bank. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no material was found in his possession and he asserted a clean …

Vinod SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vinod Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 201 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from an open field. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no incriminating material was found in his possession and he asserted a clean …

Chhoti Patel @ Rajanikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhoti Patel (alias Rajanikant Kumar), was implicated in a theft case involving Rs 80,000 cash, a gold chain and other jewellery, alleged under Section 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Fearing arrest, he filed an anticipatory bail application, asserting his innocence, lack of …

Madhusudan kumarversusThe state of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Madhusudan Kumar was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 203.250 litres of illicit liquor from a vehicle, although he was neither the driver nor the owner and no incriminating material was found in his possession. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional statement of a …

VAGHARI ISHWARBHAI SOMABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vaghari Ishwarbhai Somabhai filed a criminal revision application against an order of a subordinate court and a criminal miscellaneous application seeking an early hearing. The applicant's counsel indicated that the revision would not be pressed and requested liberty to pursue an alternative remedy …

SAYYED AAKIF SAYYAD ZAFARUDDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sayyed Aakif Sayyad Zafaruddin, filed an interim bail application under Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release pending the hearing of his appeal against a life‑sentence conviction for offences under the UAPA, MCOC Act and IPC. The trial court had …

Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Manoj Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving offences under the IPC and the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR contained only general allegations against all accused …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sunil Kumar and Rajnandan Ray, were implicated in a case of assault arising from a street‑measurement dispute, alleged to have violated several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). They applied for anticipatory bail, asserting innocence, clean antecedents, and …

Sanjev Kumar SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjev Kumar Sinha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Turkauliya P.S. Case No.416 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging illegal sale of land while a partition suit was pending. The petitioner …

Md. Manjoor @ Manjur AlamversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, six residents of Amour, Purnea, were implicated in FIR No.411 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault with sharp‑edged weapons. They applied for anticipatory bail, asserting innocence and arguing that the …

Ravikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravikant Kumar, was accused of kidnapping under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after allegedly taking away a 17‑year‑old girl for marriage. The girl, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, denied being kidnapped and said she …

Md. Mustafa Khan @ Hunni KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Mustafa Khan, father of a co‑accused in a kidnapping case, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 96, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the co‑accused Sammi Khan kidnapped a minor and that the petitioner threatened the …

Md ArbazversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, seven residents of Minapur village, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleges that petitioner No.1 attacked an informant with a sword, caused grievous injury, threatened to kill, …

Gawari Shankar Mahto @ Gouri MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gawari Shankar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 10 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from behind his house. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was illicit but no incriminating …

Md. DanishversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Danish, was accused under Sections 69 and 89 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly entering a relationship under false pretence, refusing to marry the informant after she became pregnant, and providing abortion pills. The prosecution’s case was based on the informant’s …

Aadarsh Pratap @ Adarsh PratapversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aadarsh Pratap, faced arrest in a case registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging involvement in the death of the informant's son. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had an illicit relationship with the deceased's wife, leading to a …

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kr. Yadav @ Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault and indiscriminate firing under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s version is that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted the complainant’s …

Chotu Yadav @ Chhotu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chotu Yadav was arrested in connection with an illegal sand mining case (PS No. 466 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 379, 411/34 of the IPC, Section 56 of the Bihar Minerals Rules, 2019 and Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Pawan Kumar and Rahul Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case where co‑accused allegedly fired on the nephew of an informant, resulting in death. The prosecution alleged the petitioners were involved in reconnaissance for the crime, but no specific overt act was attributed to them. The …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 12.96 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a cow shed. He argued that no incriminating material was found in his conscious possession and that the recovery was from an …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging kidnapping and rape of a 19‑year‑old woman, alleged under Sections 70(1), 140(3) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that the allegations stemmed from a consensual love relationship and that the victim’s statement …

Ricky @ GoluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ricky Golu, was named as an accused in a kidnapping case under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, based on the allegation that he abducted the minor daughter of an informant on 10 September 2024. The victim was later recovered and, under Section 183 of the …

Ganesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ganesh Ram and Pahlad Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging their involvement as conspirators in the murder of an informant's father, for which offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act were alleged. The prosecution claimed that co‑accused …

Asha Devi @ Asha GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Asha Devi (Asha Gupta), mother‑in‑law of the complainant, was implicated in a dowry harassment case under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She sought anticipatory bail, asserting that she had no involvement in the alleged cruelty and that the …

Vikesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act involving a 16‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged 15 days after the alleged incident, and the petitioner claimed false implication. The victim’s statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. …

Triloki RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Triloki Ram, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) concerning the death of his sister-in-law. The prosecution alleged that the deceased's husband, Bajrangi Kumar, may have caused her death, while …

Deep Prakash GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deep Prakash Gupta, was charged in a 2011 case for offences including cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and criminal conspiracy under various IPC sections. An informant from State Bank of India alleged that Gupta and co‑accused opened fraudulent Kisan Credit Card accounts …

Suraj Malik @ Suraj MllikversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Suraj Malik and Bipat Malik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault and homicide during a funeral ash immersion on the Ganga river. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along …

Sundar Das Mukhiya @ Sundar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sundar Das Mukhiya, sought bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged possession of 351 litres of Nepali liquor, alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise …

Siko Manjhi @ Shiko ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Siko Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that 125 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from his house and that he fled the scene. The FIR named him based solely on identification by a local watchman, with no seizure of liquor from his personal …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 129.450 litres of country-made liquor, although the FIR named an unknown person and the petitioner was identified only as the driver, with no personal …

Krishna Kumar @ Krishna SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishna Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging assault on an informant and his family over a drainage dispute between pattidars. The FIR charges him under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for assault, including sections 126(2), …

Anuj Kumar @ Anuj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anuj Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly delivering 85 litres of illicit liquor via a motorcycle. He contended that he had no connection to the vehicle or the liquor and that his name was supplied solely by …

C.K. Singh @ Chakshay Kumar Singh @ Chakshay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, four relatives from Jallahare Rampur, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 293 of 2025 alleging assault under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. One petitioner, Lalchand Singh, was arrested during the pendency, …

Praveen Kumar @ Pravin YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Praveen Kumar sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Arms Act, arising from a communal disturbance allegedly linked to a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a …

Bablu Sah @ Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bablu Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case (Gopalpur PS Case No. 258 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, including forcible land …

Dilan Kumar @ Dilan DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, seven residents of Bakarchak village, applied for bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 147, 341, 323, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly demanding extortion of Rs.20‑25 thousand and assaulting an informant and his brother. They …

Rupesh Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar Chaudhary, was arrested in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting members of the informant's family, resulting in one grievous and several simple injuries. The petitioner contended …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a shooting incident that occurred on 26‑02‑2025 near a petrol pump, where bullets injured an informant and another person. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya …

Ram Ayodhya SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, members of the Sah family, were implicated in a police case arising from a land dispute, with the FIR alleging assault and theft on 8 January 2026. They contended that they had attempted to lodge a counter‑FIR against the informant, which was rejected, leading to the present …

Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, five villagers, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault, robbery and attempted outrage of modesty. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the informant's house armed, with co‑accused Anil …

Nandkishor KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nandkishor Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 34 for allegedly using a forged school transfer certificate to gain admission and be declared a juvenile before the Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya. He contended that he was a minor at the relevant time, had no …

Mahendra SawversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mahendra Saw sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 111(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in connection with the recovery of 750 litres of illicit country‑made liquor, a motorcycle and a mobile phone. The …

Raghunandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raghunandan Yadav, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly inciting the killing of an informant during a land‑dispute altercation. He contended that he merely shouted and was not directly involved …

Manoj ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Thakur was named in an FIR alleging participation in an unlawful assembly that obstructed police duties, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to local politics and that no specific overt act was alleged against him. …

PAWAN KUMAR @ AKHILESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 53 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366-A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, as well as a pending order of …

ANAND KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Anand Kumar Verma, who was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, …

YADRAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yadram, who was arrested in connection with a 2017 case alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant, an employee of a …

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pramod Yadav, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with weapons, causing bodily injury and theft, under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He claimed innocence, stating that the specific assault on the informant’s head was committed by a co‑accused and that there …

Sukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sukesh Kumar, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant with the alleged intent of marrying her, invoking offences under IPC Sections 363, 366‑A and 34, and POCSO Act Section 8. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC, asserted that she …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Sao @ Sonu @ Bikash ShawversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he and his family tortured his wife, Shivani Kumari Soni, for additional dowry after their marriage on 25‑01‑2023. The petitioner …

Rajiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rajiya Devi and Bhogi Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, killed the informant’s daughter over dowry demands, …

Roma Khatoon @ Rama KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Roma Khatoon and Mo Sabina Khatoon, were implicated in a case where 26 accused allegedly assaulted an informant’s family, resulting in the death of Sattar Ansari. They contend they have no criminal antecedent, were not specifically identified in any overt act, and one is a mother of …

Prithwi Raj VermaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Prithwi Raj Verma, feared arrest in a criminal case filed under several IPC provisions (341, 323, 324, 498A, 504, 506, 34) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging dowry‑related torture and cruelty. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner failed to meet dowry demands …

Md. Fayjain Ansari @ Md Faijan AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Fayjain Ansari, was accused of operating a brick kiln without depositing the required mining royalty for the past two to three years, attracting charges under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, the …

Dinesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Prasad, was accused of embezzling 34.44 quintals of wheat and 75.09 quintals of rice, offences alleged under Sections 318(4) and 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. Fearing arrest, he filed a bail application and submitted a …

Kanchan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Four villagers—Kanchan Kumar, Piyush Kumar, Ravi Kumar and Vikesh Kumar—applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly consuming opium and assaulting an informant with sticks. They contended that the dispute was …

Bhaday Saw @ Bhaday SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhaday Saw, was implicated in an alleged electricity theft case under Section 135 of the Bihar Electricity Act, with a claimed loss of Rs. 12,72,053 to the government. He admitted to depositing 50% of the alleged amount but contested the total loss. Fearing arrest, he applied for …

PARIKH SANDEEPKUMAR NAVINCHANDRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Parikh Sandeepkumar Navinchandra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He argued that the maximum …

POOJA W/O. SAINATH PISKEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Pooja, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 317(4), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhinta, 2023 involving alleged financial fraud of Rs. 11,50,000. The …

YOGESHWAR HARIBHAU SODAGARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Yogeshwar Haribhau Sodagar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No. 11213094250908 alleging offences under Sections 317(4), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya …

INDRAPAL URF NIDHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Indrapal Urf Nidha, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had …

SHANKAR LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Shankar Lal filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging a order dated 24‑03‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Jaunpur, and a criminal revision order dated 27‑01‑2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jaunpur. The applicant …

NITIN BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nitin Babu, who was arrested in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the same Act and Section 13 of the Public Gambling …

ANIL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anil Singh, who was arrested in a narcotics case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 400 g of heroin. The applicant claimed innocence, …

ANUP AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Sudha and Sapna filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a provisional order dated 23‑01‑2026 passed by the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate of Bhognipur, Kanpur Dehat in FIR No. 1736 of 2023 under IPC Sections 354 and 506. The High Court …

GOVIND KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Govind Kushwaha, who was arrested on 19‑12‑2025 in connection with offences under Sections 3 to 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Section 99 of the BNS. The …

ALLADIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to stay the criminal proceedings arising from a dispute over a transaction, as recorded in Criminal Appeal No. 929 of 2017. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that the matter is a civil …

YOGESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yogesh Kumar, who was arrested for alleged possession of 28.100 kg of ganja under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that mandatory provisions of …

NAZAMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nazama, who is charged under Sections 8 and 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 5.075 kg of charas. The …

SANJAY @ PINTUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Sanjay @ Pintu, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant’s counsel contended that he was falsely …

RAZABversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused Razaz, who was charged with multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant’s counsel argued that the FIR contained only …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Akash Kumar, a 19‑year‑old with no prior criminal record, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 305(a), 331(4) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning a burglary at his residence. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement emerged from the confessional …

FAJAL ALI KHAN @ MD. AFJAL ALI KHAN @ AFJAL ALI KHAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Fajal Ali Khan and Md. Shahnawaz Ahmad Khan, sought bail after an FIR was lodged alleging assault on an informant during a property dispute, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that petitioner No.1 struck the informant with an …

Bachhu RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six residents of Deokuli village, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging assault under IPC sections 147, 149, 504, 323, 307 and 325. The FIR was filed ten days after the alleged incident, which arose from a neighbour dispute, and the injuries were described as …

Phulgen Paswan @ Phulgain PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Mahinathpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Arms Act. The FIR does not name them; their alleged involvement emerged later from CCTV footage, but no specific …

Sonu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Sonu Singh and Bishnu Singh, were apprehended for alleged assault on an informant under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with unknown persons, abused and assaulted the informant, with petitioner no. 2 allegedly …

Shekhar Thakur @ Shekhar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shekhar Thakur, a staff member of a Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) agent, feared arrest in a case alleging embezzlement of Rs.26,57,348 under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and IT Act sections 65, 66C, 66D. The alleged fraud involved office boys and employees of the LIC Raxaul …

Shashi Singh @ Shashikant Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Shashi Singh and Radhey Singh, were accused of assaulting the husband of an informant with a stick and a club, resulting in simple injuries, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They claimed innocence, alleging that the …

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. He contended that the alleged kidnapping did not occur, asserting that the victim voluntarily traveled to Allahabad, contacted him, …

Ramayan OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ramayan Ojha, a 78‑year‑old resident of Buxar, was named in an FIR under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting a man who died on the spot. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that the police investigation had concluded without specific allegations …