Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lakshmi Devi @ Sonashri RajversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners subject to bond, sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioners, Lakshmi Devi and Manish Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, assaulted the informant's family when the informant was absent. The petitioners contended they were innocent, falsely implicated due to a family dispute, and highlighted a five‑day delay in filing the FIR, their clean criminal record, and an amicable settlement between the parties. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the nature of the allegations, the petitioners' antecedents, the settlement, and the procedural delay, the court ordered bail on the condition of a bond and sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the serious charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act
  • Whether the delay in lodging the FIR and the amicable settlement justify bail
  • Whether the petitioners' clean antecedent and cooperation with investigation affect the bail decision

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • family dispute
  • amicable settlement
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27377 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-963 Year-2025 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Lakshmi Devi @ Sonashri Raj Wife of Ranjan Kumar D/o Raj Kishor Ray,
                  Resident of village - Tahal Tola, P.S.- Garkha, District - Saran at Chapra.
           2.     Manish Kumar Son of Raj Kishor Ray Resident of village Aloni, P.S.-
                  Garkha, District - Saran at Chapra
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   06-05-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 79, 74, 351(3),

                   352, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1-B)(i)

                   and 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, on the alleged date and

                   time of occurrence, when informant was not at his house, all the

                   accused persons including the petitioners came at his house and

                   assaulted his family members.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Further

                   submission is that petitioner no. 1 is daughter-in-law of the

                   informant and petitioner no. 2 is brother of petitioner no. 1 and

                   due to family dispute, they have been falsely implicated in this
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27377 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      case. There is delay of 5 days in lodging the F.I.R. and now

                      amicable settlement has been arrived between the parties.

                      Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They undertake to

                      cooperate in the investigation and trial.

                                      5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State

                      opposed the bail application.

                                      6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

                      the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature

                      of allegation, fair antecedent of the petitioners as well as the fact

                      that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, let

                      the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of

                      arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a

                      period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of

                      Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of

                      the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial

                      Magistrate-I, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S.

                      Case No. 963 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down

                      under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                      Sanhita.



                                              (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.