Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
742 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Twinkle @ Sagar Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court arising from a police case. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petitioner himself was absent. The State of Bihar was represented by Advocate on Record, Mr. Anish …
The petitioner, Constable Ajit Kumar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking permission to approach the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bhojpur, for adjustment of a maintenance amount of Rs.10,000 per month that he pays to the opposite party, Priyanka Kumari, for her and …
The petitioners, Md. Irfan and Md. Mojebul, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Madhepur P.S. Case No.61 of 2025) alleging assault and other offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered the informant's …
The petitioners, residents of Bhusanda village in Gaya district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.580 of 2024) filed under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 118(1), 352 and 3 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging they assaulted an informant and her child with …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.23 of 2026) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault with weapons. The prosecution’s informant claimed the petitioner and a co‑accused …
The petitioners, Md. Sohrab and Md. Bablu, sought anticipatory bail in a case arising from a fight between children that escalated into an alleged armed intrusion and stone‑pelting at an informant’s house, causing a minor injury. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered the house armed, …
The petitioners, Santosh Rai, Chandeshwar Rai, Sonam Devi and Mitti Kumari, were implicated in a kidnapping case (Raghopur P.S. Case No.227 of 2025) under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that the …
The petitioners, Chandan Kumar Thakur and Raj Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2015 case filed under IPC sections 406, 420 and 120(B) concerning the sale of a bus. The prosecution alleged that the bus was sold on installment, the driver (the petitioner's father‑in‑law) …
The petitioner, Gaurav Pandey, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged robbery, assault and damage to property under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The informant alleged that the petitioner, along with others, used a gas cutter to loot …
Petitioner Raj Kumar was implicated in a violent assault case (Patepur PS Case No.212 of 2025) under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging armed attack, intent to kill, and theft. He claimed innocence, stating the allegations stemmed from a land dispute with his …
The petitioner, Suman Kumar, an 18‑year‑old with a clean antecedent, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.40 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant's daughter and offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, citing a delayed FIR, …
The petitioner, Naveen Gupta, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 367.5 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a Tata Safari vehicle bearing registration DL9CZ1233, which he owned at the time of sale. The prosecution alleged that the vehicle was used in the contravention of …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, an Assistant Sub-Inspector of traffic police, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No.186 of 2025) alleging assault and murder of an informant's son under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He claimed innocence, asserting that he was on …
Manoj Sah, a young resident of Madhepura, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that pellets recovered from co‑accused Sajan Kumar and Gautam Kumar were procured through the petitioner, who allegedly …
The petitioners, Renu Devi and Ranju Kumari, women from Ramdani village, were implicated in a police case (PS Case No. 454 of 2025) arising from a land‑dispute‑related scuffle during which police officers were attacked and a police vehicle was damaged. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …
The petitioner, Suresh Ram, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 15.5 litres of illicit country-made liquor from his house under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the house was abandoned, he was not present at the time of seizure, and no …
The petitioner, Suraj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 22.68 litres of liquor were recovered from his house in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting he was not present at the scene …
The petitioners, three Yadav brothers from Rampur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Shivsagar PS Case No.23 of 2026) filed under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an …
The petitioner, Rakesh Gond, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 34.380 litres of illicit foreign liquor were recovered from a scooty. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the co‑accused Ashish Kumar’s statement that …
The petitioners, members of two branches of the same family, sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising from a family dispute over property partition. The original cases involved allegations of assault, theft and criminal intimidation under various IPC sections, filed by each side against the …
Petitioner Birendra Kumar Mahto sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Goraul PS Case No. 519 of 2025) filed under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused entered the informant’s house, assaulted his mother who …
The petitioner, Anrudh Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 May 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑VI, Saran, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 413, 414, 467, …
The petitioner, an employee of Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services, repossessed a tractor and attached cutter machine from a borrower who had defaulted on a loan, pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement. The borrower's brother filed a criminal complaint alleging theft under Section 379 read …
The petitioner, Rajendra Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 29 June 2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnea, which had taken cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the …
The petitioner, Ved Prakash Rai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 01.01.2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (VII) of Gopalganj, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, …
Dr. Kavita Kusum and Dr. Mridul Kumar Jha filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 08.01.2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 304A, 323, 341, 465 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners …
The petitioner Navin Paswan filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 22 June 2015 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Benipatti, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 468, 467 and …
The petitioners, a group of women and a man residing in Bhagalpur, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 31 March 2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, which had taken cognizance of offences …
Vijay Kumar Sinha filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 18 March 2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Patna. The order had taken cognizance of offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and …
The petitioner, Radhe Krishna Raman, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Ghosi P.S. Case No.424 of 2024) where he was alleged to have assaulted a family with a pistol, stolen jewellery and cash, and violated several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The …
The petitioner, Arjun Pandit, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 06-07-2018 passed by the Family Court, Vaishali, which required him to pay Rs.4,000 per month to his wife. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Md. Naushad, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the Union of India represented by the Directorate of Enforcement. During the hearing, the Directorate informed the court that the petitioner had died, rendering the petition infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel did not …
The petitioners, who are the parents‑in‑law and a sister‑in‑law of the complainant, were taken into cognizance by a Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act based on a FIR alleging dowry demand and cruelty. The petitioners filed an application …
The wife (OP No.2) filed a complaint alleging dowry demand for a Bolero vehicle, cruelty, assault and attempted poisoning by her husband and his family. The Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate took cognizance under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against the husband and …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Sripur Nawada, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Pakaridayal PS Case No.246 of 2025) that alleged they entered an informant's house and committed assaults with a knife and a gadasa, among other offences. The prosecution alleged that the …
The complainant, Pinki Kumari, alleged that her husband and his relatives demanded dowry and subjected her to cruelty and assault, leading to a complaint under Sections 498A, 323, 379, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under …
The petitioners – Surendra Yadav, his wife Draupati Devi and their two sons – applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No. 59 of 2025) alleging they assaulted an informant with weapons over a money dispute. The prosecution alleged that the accused, armed with various weapons, attacked the …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09‑09‑2016 passed by the IXth Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya, in a criminal appeal linked to Complaint Case No.1973 of 2012. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioners, a group of individuals identified as Vinay Kumar Sharma and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. The State of Bihar, represented by Advocate Nagendra Prasad, appeared, but no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the case. The court considered the request and, after hearing the parties, decided to grant …
The petitioner, Sanjev Kumar Sinha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Turkauliya P.S. Case No.416 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging illegal sale of land while a partition suit was pending. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Santosh Ram, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Digha P.S. Case No.369 of 2025) filed under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging theft of an Apache motorcycle registered in his brother's name. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and …
The petitioners—Subhash Yadav, Bijal Yadav and Kanchan Devi—sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No.170 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the co‑accused Manohar Yadav, a relative of …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged supply of illicit foreign liquor and illegal arms, filed under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 25(1‑b)a/26 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rests on the recovery …
The petitioner, Dharmjit Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a police case (Kalyanpur P.S. Case No.67 of 2026) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, damaged police vehicles …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6.2 litres of illicit liquor from a house belonging to Ram Pravesh Chaudhary. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner fled the …
Dharmendra Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Muffasil P.S. Case No.434 of 2025) involving alleged assault, outraging modesty of a woman, and theft of jewellery, charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Yadav, …
The petitioner, Lal Babu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging illegal storage of 3,000 C.F.T. sand, invoking Sections 379, 411, 413 of the IPC, Section 21 of the M.M. (D & R) Act, 1957 and Section 56 of the B.M. Rules, 2021. He claimed innocence, alleging political rivalry and …
Satyonjeet Sinha applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Begusarai Town PS Case No.469 of 2025) alleging his involvement in a false insurance fraud scheme under Sections 318, 318(4), 316 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended that he was merely a former …
The petitioners, Sit Kumar Mandal and Pramod Mandal, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09-04-2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Banmankhi, Purnia in connection with Case No.26M of 2018. The petitioners …
The petitioners, three individuals, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and another respondent. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, and the matter had previously been adjourned on 20-04-2026 for the same reason. The petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Mukkadar Paswan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 01.02.2018 that had framed a charge of rape under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code against him. The order was originally passed by the …
Syed Sultan Alam filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2018 against the State of Bihar and Chandan Kumar. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled dates of 26 March 2026 and 28 April 2026, while the State's assistant public prosecutor was present. The court observed that the …
Petitioners Randhir Kumar Singh and Shailendra Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 17-10-2017 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section …
Petitioner Bhola Paswan filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12 July 2018 passed by the Additional District Judge VII, Aurangabad, in connection with Sessions Trial No.256 of 2017. The petitioner argued that the …
The trial court convicted Fauzdar Yadav under Sections 325, 452 and 323 of the IPC based on the testimony of the victim’s wife, son and a neighbour, and medical evidence of a head injury, sentencing him to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment. The appellant challenged the conviction in a criminal …
The case arose from a 2002 assault in which the deceased, Jung Bahadur Singh, was attacked by Faujadar Yadav with a khanti, later dying from head injuries. The trial court convicted Yadav under Sections 325, 452 and 323 of the IPC, sentencing him to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment. The appellant …
The petitioner, director of Arena Agro Industries, entered into a rice‑milling agreement with the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation (BSFCSC) and received paddy but delivered only a fraction of the required custom‑milled rice, leading to a loss of about Rs 5 crore. He was charged under …
The petitioners (the in‑laws of the complainant) filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 CrPC seeking to set aside the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate’s order of cognizance dated 07‑06‑2014 in a dowry‑related case. The complainant, the wife of petitioner‑1, alleged dowry …
The petitioners, comprising Sudarshan Devi, Yogendra Rai, Ram Sovit Rai, Sakal Dev Rai and Radheshyam Poddar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court arising from a 2016 police case. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on two consecutive dates, 20‑04‑2026 …
The petitioner, Virendra Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 05.02.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in a criminal revision case. The trial court reported that the trial was pending for defence …
Rekha Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a 2018 case (Cr. Misc. No.60637 of 2018) before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on her behalf on the scheduled dates of 30‑03‑2026 and 28‑04‑2026, while the State’s A.P.P. was present. The court observed that the petitioner …
Dadan Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application in the Patna High Court arising from a 2018 complaint. No counsel appeared on his behalf on two consecutive dates, 20-04-2026 and 28-04-2026, while the State's A.P.P. was present. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in …
The petition in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 60440 of 2018, arising from a 2007 complaint in Rohtas, was filed by Shiv Mandir Rai against the State of Bihar and Rama Shankar Sah. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled dates of 20‑04‑2026 and 28‑04‑2026, while the State’s …
Navin Kumar was charged by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, under Sections 406, 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the magistrate's order dated 28‑11‑2016. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Hari Narain Sah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a 2017 police case. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled dates of 26 March 2026 and 28 April 2026. The State of Bihar was represented by Advocate-on-Record Nagendra Prasad. The court observed …
The petitioners, a group of relatives of Krishna Murari Prasad Laheri, filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2018. No counsel appeared for them on the hearing dates of 20‑04‑2026 and 28‑04‑2026, and they expressed no interest in pursuing the matter. The State, represented by A.P.P. Mr. Md. …
The petitioner, Rana Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a 2014 police case (PS. Case No. 142). The matter was listed before the Patna High Court, but the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing dated 26 March 2026, leading to an adjournment. On the subsequent hearing …
The petitioner, Amit Singh, was implicated in a case involving alleged cheating, kidnapping for ransom, and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 420, 364A and 120B. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and asserting that the FIR does not specifically allege an overt act under …
The petitioner, Dr. Parwez Akhtar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the FIR and all proceedings arising from a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court had taken cognizance and issued …
The petitioner, Sohit Paswan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of an FIR registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34, 498A, 494 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended …
Uday Kumar Mahto filed a criminal miscellaneous application (No. 56180 of 2018) before the Patna High Court. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on two consecutive dates, 07-04-2026 and 27-04-2026, and no counsel was appointed on his behalf. The State, represented by A.P.P. Nityanand, …
The petitioners, Janardan Dubey and family, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and Manjula Devi. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on two consecutive dates (07‑04‑2026 and 27‑04‑2026). The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State was the …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a 2014 police case (PS Case No. 287) in the High Court of Patna. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled dates of 07-04-2026 and 27-04-2026, and the petitioner did not express any …
The petitioners, Yadu Singh, Pintu Singh and Neelam Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2018 but failed to appear before the court on multiple dates, including 07-04-2026 and 27-04-2026. No counsel represented the petitioners, and the State was represented by A.P.P. Anuj Kumar …
Amar Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf on two consecutive dates (07-04-2026 and 27-04-2026). The State of Bihar was represented by an A.P.P. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the …
The petitioners, comprising M/s Taj Technotech Ltd., M/s Taj Autochem Ltd., and an individual, filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2018. Hearings were scheduled in 2026, but no representative appeared for the petitioners on two consecutive dates. The State of Bihar, represented by A.P.P. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 24‑10‑2016 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 406, 417, 420, 421, 426, 463 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court, in a separate …
The petitioners, a group of relatives of the deceased Mishri Saw, filed a miscellaneous application in the Patna High Court concerning a criminal case (Cr. Misc. No.43447 of 2018) that was at the evidence stage in the trial court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and the State was …
M/s Nesh India Infrastructure Private Ltd. filed a civil review against Savita Sah and Sita Ram Singh. Both parties negotiated and executed a joint compromise, filing a supplementary affidavit and a copy of the compromise petition. They also executed and registered exchange deeds on 23-02-2026, …
Mukesh Pandit filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of a series of orders issued by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, which included a bailable warrant, a non‑bailable warrant, proclamation under Section 82 and attachment under Section 83, ultimately …
Lalita Devi applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 12(c) of the NDPS Act. This was her second bail application after an earlier one was rejected. The trial court report indicated that only the investigating …
The petitioner, Bablu Singh, applied for regular bail in a special criminal excise case under Section 30(f) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. This was his second bail application after a prior one was rejected. The trial court report indicated that only one of four witnesses had been examined …
The petition was filed by Priyanka Devi and co‑accused seeking to quash an order dated 5 January 2024 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Patna Sadar in case No. 1428 (M) of 2023. The petitioners argued that the SDO’s order was erroneous and asked the High Court to set it aside. The State …
Shivchandra Sahni filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The sole issue before the Court was whether such permission could be granted. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra, …
The petitioners, Md Ansar and Kamar Jahan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kewati PS Case No.285 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that they, along with co‑accused, attempted to construct a house on land …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was accused of extorting Rs.2,30,000 from the informant's daughter by threatening to release compromising videos and threatening her life. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating the money was an advance for land and that no such videos existed, and highlighted his …
The petitioner, Mohammed Sirajul, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. Subsequently, his counsel, Mr. Sunil Prasad, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw that application. The issue before the Court was whether it could grant permission to withdraw a pending …
Mukesh Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No 292 of 2025) involving offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, including assault and causing injury. The prosecution alleged that he threw hot oil on two women, causing injuries, …
The petitioner, Md. Gaffar, sought anticipatory bail after being named in a case alleging that he, along with others, demanded money, assaulted an informant with the butt of a pistol, and fired a country-made pistol, causing head injury. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 126(2), …
The petitioner, Shankar Mandal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of FIR No. 169 of 2017 registered under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 406, 420 and 120B. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be disposed of, granting him liberty to raise any objections to …
The petitioners, Shankar Mandal and Hari Lal Mandal, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashment of FIR No. 169 of 2017 registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 406, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. They argued that the FIR was improper and requested that the court …
Kumar Gaurav filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 28-08-2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali. During the hearing on 23-04-2026, the petitioner expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the …
The petitioners, four residents of Mathia Khas, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order taking cognizance dated 14 December 2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Gopalganj. The order had initiated criminal proceedings in case No. 83 of 2017. The …
The petitioners sought quashing of a criminal proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C. that had been converted from an earlier Section 144 proceeding concerning a land dispute. The High Court noted that the same parties and subject matter had already been dealt with in earlier Section 144 …
The petitioner Alok Kumar was charged under Section 498A IPC based on a complaint by his wife alleging dowry demand and cruelty. The trial court, after a Section 202 inquiry, took cognizance and issued summons. The petitioner filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking quashal, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Yashin Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a May 15, 2012 order of the Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 498(A) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The …
Mukesh Kumar Barnwal sought relief fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case where the informant alleged assault by her husband and in‑laws for non‑payment of a Rs.5 lakh dowry demand. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and that the dispute had been amicably resolved through mediation, …
The petitioners, seven residents of Bakarchak village, applied for bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 147, 341, 323, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly demanding extortion of Rs.20‑25 thousand and assaulting an informant and his brother. They …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar Chaudhary, was arrested in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting members of the informant's family, resulting in one grievous and several simple injuries. The petitioner contended …
Munna Paswan, the owner of a motorcycle from which 20 litres of illicit liquor was seized, applied for bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the vehicle was being used by a third party, Chadrama Pasi, without his knowledge or consent, and that he had no …
Sunil Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Panapur PS Case No.311 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault with weapons and damage to property. The prosecution alleged that Ray and co‑accused attacked an informant and …
The petitioners, members of the Ray family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No.39 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault, robbery and grievous injuries to an informant’s family. The prosecution …
The petitioners, five villagers, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault, robbery and attempted outrage of modesty. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the informant's house armed, with co‑accused Anil …
The petitioner, Bhutun Bind, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 75 litres of illicit liquor recovered from Panari Ghat. The co‑accused, Ramakant Prasad, identified the petitioner and another co‑accused as having fled the …
Bullet Malik was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 160 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from an open area in Ahirwa Tola. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but he claimed he was not present at the scene and had no possession of the …
The petitioner, Akash Kumar Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of country-made liquor, with the prosecution relying solely on the disclosure statement of a co-accused. The petitioner contended that no …
Manoj Kumar was apprehended as a co-accused in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 180 ml of illicit liquor was seized from co-accused Mithlesh Rai, and his motorcycle was also recovered from the scene. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, asserting …
The petitioner, Nandkishor Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 34 for allegedly using a forged school transfer certificate to gain admission and be declared a juvenile before the Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya. He contended that he was a minor at the relevant time, had no …
The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No. 532 of 2025) filed under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he threatened the informant and her family. The informant alleged that co‑accused Sunil Prasad and Mannay Prasad …
Mahendra Saw sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 111(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in connection with the recovery of 750 litres of illicit country‑made liquor, a motorcycle and a mobile phone. The …
The petitioner, Raghunandan Yadav, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly inciting the killing of an informant during a land‑dispute altercation. He contended that he merely shouted and was not directly involved …
The petitioners, Meera Devi and Vikash Sharma, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑related case (PS Case No.84 of 2025) where the deceased daughter of an informant allegedly died after alleged abuse and dowry demands. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners were involved in the assault and …
Rambrikash Rajvanshi and Rubi Devi petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case where police recovered illicit country‑made liquor from temporary huts associated with them and a co‑accused. The petitioners asserted that they were not present at the site, had …
Manoj Thakur was named in an FIR alleging participation in an unlawful assembly that obstructed police duties, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to local politics and that no specific overt act was alleged against him. …
The petitioners, four members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Goradih P.S. Case No.27 of 2026) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in a series of …
The petitioner, Suresh Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 2 litres of country-made liquor were recovered near his house. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner claimed innocence, stating the liquor was …
The petitioner, Sadam Hussain, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged involvement in the seizure of 31.17 litres of illicit foreign liquor. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the statement of a local chowkidar, with no material …
The petitioner, Dinesh Sahani, faced arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 30 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from an open area in his village. Villagers identified him as …
Sudhir Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 120 litres of illicit beer were seized from a Scorpio vehicle. A co‑accused, Mithlesh Kumar, identified Sudhir and another person as having fled the scene, but no liquor or any other …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 36 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a cottage‑type bathan allegedly belonging to him. He asserted that he was not present at the location, had no possession of the …
The petitioner, Sriram Rajwar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 200 litres of illicit liquor and a motorcycle used to transport it. The prosecution’s evidence consisted mainly of a recovery of the liquor and vehicle and a …
Geeta Devi sought bail after a case was registered against her under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of illicit liquor from an animal feeding room outside her house. She contended that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, she had …
The petitioners, Sikandar Sahani and Lakhan Jaiswal, sought bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 313.845 litres of illicit liquor was seized from co‑accused Bikhar Mahato. They contended that they were not present at the scene, had no …
The petitioner, Sanju Bhuiyan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case (Case No.268 of 2025) under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where police recovered 368 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle near a public guava tree. The petitioner claimed …
Arhuliya Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was implicated in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that she, along with others, participated in the murder of the victim by setting her ablaze after dowry demands …
The petitioner, Pramod Yadav, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with weapons, causing bodily injury and theft, under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He claimed innocence, stating that the specific assault on the informant’s head was committed by a co‑accused and that there …
The petitioner, Anand Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being named in a theft case (PS‑226/2025) under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that on 9 September 2025 unknown miscreants broke into the informant’s house, stole valuables and fled, during …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he and his family tortured his wife, Shivani Kumari Soni, for additional dowry after their marriage on 25‑01‑2023. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Roma Khatoon and Mo Sabina Khatoon, were implicated in a case where 26 accused allegedly assaulted an informant’s family, resulting in the death of Sattar Ansari. They contend they have no criminal antecedent, were not specifically identified in any overt act, and one is a mother of …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was facing criminal proceedings under case No.5249 of 2026 arising from PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025. He applied to the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the case and to surrender before the concerned court within four weeks. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested in a case involving alleged dowry demands, assault (IPC §§ 323, 498A) and violations of the Dowry Prohibition Act (ss. 3, 4). The prosecution alleged that after marrying the complainant in 2013, the petitioner and his family demanded dowry, tortured the …
The petitioners, six residents of Meghauna village, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 487 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, …
The petitioner, Md. Gulfam Mustafa, was granted provisional anticipatory bail by this Court in 2015, which was confirmed by the Special District Judge, Khagaria, in 2016 subject to conditions including the absence of proof of a second marriage. The complainant alleged that the petitioner had …
The petitioner, Bisheshwar Ray, was an executive member of Baruara PACS but resigned in September 2010, well before alleged fraudulent transactions in 2012‑13 involving cheques for paddy and wheat purchases. He was charged under IPC Sections 409, 420 and 34 for alleged misappropriation of …
Jyoti Devi filed a dowry‑related complaint alleging cruelty, assault and dowry demands against her husband Vikash Kumar and his parents, Ram Swaroop Gupta and Rita Devi. The Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 323, 504, 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry …
The petitioner, Sohail Anjum, filed a petition under Cr. Misc. No. 23430 of 2018 seeking to quash the order dated 13 September 2017 of the Special Judge CBI-1-cum-A.C.J.M., Patna, which refused to confirm the provisional anticipatory bail previously granted by the Patna High Court on 19 May 2015. …
The petitioner, Vijay Prasad, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 05-09-2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate-I, Bettiah, in connection with case No. 200 of 2013. The petitioner argued that the proceedings had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The State …
The petitioner, Puja Kumari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the trial court's order taking cognizance of offences alleged against her in a case filed by Prachi Priyam. The FIR alleged offences under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 494 read with 34 and Dowry …
The complainant, Bindu Devi, alleged that her husband and his relatives demanded a motorcycle and Rs.2,00,000 as dowry, subjecting her to physical and mental cruelty, assault, miscarriage, and ouster from her matrimonial home. The trial court took cognizance of offences under Section 498-A IPC and …
The petitioners, Rakhi Devi and Arjun Sao, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08‑03‑2016 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They requested that the petition be disposed of with …
The petitioner, Lalan Pathak, was named in a complaint alleging cheating under IPC Section 420 and a dishonoured cheque under NI Act Section 138 arising from a disputed land sale. The complainant had paid part consideration to the accused seller, Babita Devi, and a cheque issued for refund was …
Petitioners Vikki Paswan and Mina Devi filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 01-10-2016 that framed charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 504 and 34. The petition argued that the criminal proceeding had become infructuous and should …
The petitioners, a family of Ram Baran Prasad, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 04-12-2017 of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and …
Surendra Kumar Yadav filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two orders: one dated 10-08-2018 by the Sessions Judge dismissing his revision petition, and another dated 10-07-2017 by the SDJM rejecting his petition under Section 239. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Naresh Pandit, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 28‑02‑2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara, in connection with case SL No.2(F) of 2015. The petitioner argued that the trial had already concluded …
The petitioner, Faruque Abdullah, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 24 January 2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. The petition was filed after the petitioner’s death, and the court was informed that the proceedings …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 02.05.2017 that summoned them to trial under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition argued that the underlying complaint case (No. 215-C of 2014) had already been …
Petitioner Prakash Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19 September 2016 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed that he no longer wished to …
The petitioners, Md. Abul Kaise and his wife Sarwari Begam, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑06‑2018 that framed charges under Sections 341, 323, 406, 420, 504/34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Mishra, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 05‑08‑2017 of the District & Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, which had dismissed a revision petition and refused to interfere with a cognizance order dated 13‑02‑2017. …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.384 of 2025) under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged involvement in illegal liquor trade. The prosecution alleged that police recovered 120 litres of illicit country-made …
The petitioner, Shekh Ahmad, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Birpur P.S. Case No.189 of 2025) under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault, theft, and indecent behavior during a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the …
Akash Kumar, a 19‑year‑old with no prior criminal record, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 305(a), 331(4) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning a burglary at his residence. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement emerged from the confessional …
The petitioners, three brothers from Bakulari village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Guthani P.S. Case No.395 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an informant with an iron …
Petitioner Nutan Devi, wife of Raj Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Sahebpur Kamal Case No.15 of 2026) filed under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that she and her husband …
The petitioners, Fajal Ali Khan and Md. Shahnawaz Ahmad Khan, sought bail after an FIR was lodged alleging assault on an informant during a property dispute, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that petitioner No.1 struck the informant with an …
The petitioner, Priya Ranjan, was implicated in a case (Chhatauni P.S. Case No.357 of 2022) alleging conspiracy to withhold smart meters and demand a ransom of Rs.10 lakh, invoking Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. He contended that the allegations stemmed from a monetary dispute with his employer, …
The petitioner, Gula Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 54.845 litres of illicit liquor were seized and a co‑accused identified him as having fled the scene. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, alleging that the accusation …
The petitioner, Angad Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 71.250 liters of illicit liquor recovered from a field belonging to him. He contended that the liquor was found in an open, public area and that he had no conscious possession …
The petitioner, Sujit Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 42.84 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a sack tied to a motorcycle. He contended that he was not present at the scene, had no possession of the liquor or the motorcycle, and was being …
The petitioners, Sonu Singh and Bishnu Singh, were apprehended for alleged assault on an informant under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with unknown persons, abused and assaulted the informant, with petitioner no. 2 allegedly …
The petitioners, Shashi Singh and Radhey Singh, were accused of assaulting the husband of an informant with a stick and a club, resulting in simple injuries, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They claimed innocence, alleging that the …
The petitioner, Basant Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 100 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and alleged his involvement. Paswan contended he had no possession of the liquor and was falsely implicated, citing his two prior criminal …
Sobhi Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Sheikhpura PS Case No. 14 of 2026) alleging his involvement in an examination fraud where a co‑accused, Kundan Kumar, used Sobhi's admit card to sit for the exam in exchange for Rs. 50,000. The prosecution relied on the …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. He contended that the alleged kidnapping did not occur, asserting that the victim voluntarily traveled to Allahabad, contacted him, …
Golu Dhangar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal transportation and sale of liquor, with 110 litres seized near a police centre. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was not present at the scene and no incriminating …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Maharajganj P.S. Case No.183 of 2021) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault, robbery and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged seizure of 418.80 litres of Nepali Saufi liquor from two unregistered motorcycles. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on a disclosure statement by co‑accused Lakhindra …
Petitioner Pavan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 63 litres of foreign liquor from a bamboo clamp near his poultry farm. He contended that he had no possession of the liquor, was falsely implicated by …
The petitioners, Dilshad and Raiyan, sought bail in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they were falsely implicated in a fight over road construction. The prosecution alleged that petitioner No.1 caught the informant and petitioner No.2 inflicted a …
Petitioners Santu Yadav and Munni Yadav sought anticipatory bail in connection with Excise Case No. 802 of 2024, filed under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, after police recovered 210 litres of illicit liquor and a motorcycle. The petitioners contended that they …
Babu Sahab Paswan sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for possession of 40 litres of illicit Mahua liquor seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a disclosure statement by co‑accused Rohit …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sasaram Town P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026) involving alleged assault on an informant and her husband and theft of a golden chain, filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). The prosecution alleged …
The petitioner, Nawal Mahto, was implicated in a case where 30 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered behind his hutment, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He filed an application for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. He asserted that he was not present at …
The petitioners, Rishi Yadav and Shiv Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Digha P.S. Case No. 979 of 2025) alleging extortion, robbery and other offences under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with a …
Petitioner Rajesh Ram feared arrest in a case filed under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, alleging that he and others had taken the informant's son to a dance party from which he did not return. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to village …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Bihar and its Minor Irrigation Department. After filing, the petitioner sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the writ application. The Court examined its …
M/s Laxmi Enterprises filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials and entities. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It held that the petitioner was …
Jamal, a resident of Gilhabari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged preparation of fake Aadhar cards and related offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid on a neighbour's house …
The petitioner, Pankaj Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (PS Case No.354 of 2020) involving sections 413, 414, 34 of the IPC and several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, committed theft and a pistol with live …
The petitioners, four brothers from Chandpur village, were implicated in a case alleging that one of them assaulted the informant’s brother and the others dragged the same person and threw him into a well. The charges were framed under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (including …
The petitioners, five young men from Dighwara, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault on an informant and others. The prosecution alleged that fourteen accused, including the petitioners, participated in …
Rahul Kumar, a 21‑year‑old with a clean antecedent, applied for anticipatory bail in a case of alleged theft of a motorcycle under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional statement of co‑accused Rakesh Kumar, with no …
Kalanand Yadav was charged under IPC sections 341, 308, 504 and 506 in a case arising from Pipra P.S. Case No. 72 of 2016. The trial court took cognizance and the matter proceeded through various orders, including a revision. The petitioner was acquitted by the Sessions Court on 1 August 2025. He …
The petitioners, Arun Yadav and Rajesh Yadav, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two lower‑court orders: one dated 06‑12‑2016 by the Sessions Judge rejecting their Section 245 petition, and another dated 12‑06‑2015 by the Judicial Magistrate in …
The petitioner, Shiv Nandan Yadav, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking restoration of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3521 of 2019, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 27 March 2025. The opposite parties raised no objection to the restoration. The court examined the …
Md. Matiur Rahman was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he, along with others, assaulted Md. Rabbani Alam with a sharp weapon (Dabia), causing grievous injuries to the victim's neck and hand. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Sunil Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Sheikhpura PS Case No. 326 of 2025) involving alleged assault and kidnapping of a minor, charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.) and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The petitioner, Shailesh Kumar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 25 June 2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The petitioners, five individuals from Kishanganj district, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07-02-2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate of Kishanganj, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 385 and 34 of the Indian …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 18 April 2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The petition was filed after a report indicated that the trial had …
The petitioners, three residents of Hanshapir village, were charged in a criminal case (SC/ST No. 38 of 2018) under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34 and Section 3(1)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to …
The petitioner, Mahammad Nazrul, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 25‑03‑2017 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court in a maintenance proceeding. The petitioner later informed the Court that he no longer wishes to pursue the matter. The State of …
The petitioner, Yashpal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a maintenance order dated 24 September 2018, which required him to pay Rs.10,000 per month to his wife and two minor sons. During the hearing on 9 April 2026, the petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioners, a group of family members, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 24 March 2017, in which the Siwan Chief Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance against them under Sections 376 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. They …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 27-04-2018 issued by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, which directed the issuance of summons for their appearance based on a complaint filed under Section 319 CrPC. The …
Manoj Kumar Chaudhary filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the orders dated 11 September 2018 and 12 September 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑XIV, Hajipur in case No. 354 of 2018. The petitioner argued that the orders were erroneous and that he should be …
Manju Kumari filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous proceeding seeking to quash an order dated 27 August 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑XI, Vaishali. The petitioner argued that the order could be set aside and that she should be permitted to raise all objections in …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking to quash an order dated 29‑08‑2018 of the District and Sessions Judge and another order dated 11‑09‑2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. Both parties appeared before the Patna High Court, with counsel for the petitioners …
