Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court ordered the petitioner to be released on bail upon surrender within six weeks, subject to the stipulated bond and conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Rajesh Ram feared arrest in a case filed under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, alleging that he and others had taken the informant's son to a dance party from which he did not return. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to village politics and that the informant’s son habitually runs away, leading to a mistaken identification. The informant later admitted the mistake and filed a compromise petition, and the petitioner has no prior criminal record. Both parties' counsel agreed that the allegation stemmed from a misunderstanding. The court, considering the clean antecedent and the informant’s concession, ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon surrender within six weeks, subject to a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner pending trial under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Whether the circumstances, including the informant’s admission of mistake and the petitioner’s clean record, justify bail under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • village politics
  • compromise petition
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 137
  • Section 140
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24156 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2025 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Rajesh Ram Son of Late Raghu Ram Resident of Village- Rohua Paschimi,
                 P.S.- Waris Nagar, District- Samastipur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Shiv Dulari Devi W/o Late Ram Balak Sahni Resident of Village- Purnahi
                 ward no. 7, P.S.- Waris Nagar, District- Samastipur

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Abhishek Aryans, Advocate
                 For the State            :       Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 For the O.P. No. 2       :       Mr. Sonia Narayan Sinha, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-04-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 210 of 2025, instituted under

                   Sections 137(2), 140(3) of the B.N.S.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, F.I.R. named accused

                   persons including the petitioner came at the house of the

                   informant and told her son Sanjeet Kumar to accompany them

                   to a dance party who went with them but he did not return back

                   to home.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24156 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case due to village politics. Son of the informant is in the habit

          of running away from his home without informing his parents

          and on suspicion informant named the petitioner in this case.

          When the informant realized her fault, she filed a compromise

          petition before the Court concerned. Certified copy of the same

          has been filed on the record. It is alleged that the alleged

          incident took place on 20.07.2025, however, F.I.R. was filed on

          06.08.2025 without any plausible explanation. Petitioner has no

          criminal antecedent. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the

          investigation and trial.

                       5. Learned counsel for the informant conceded the

          said fact stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due

          to misunderstanding informant has named the petitioner in this

          case.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and clean

          antecedent of the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender

          before the Court below within six weeks from today, the

          petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate IInd Class,
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24156 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026
                                                          3/3




                        Samastipur in connection with Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 210

                        of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2)

                        of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
rakhi/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.