Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court held that anticipatory bail may be granted subject to conditions because of the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the nature of the allegation.

Summary

The petitioner, Suraj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 22.68 litres of liquor were recovered from his house in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting he was not present at the scene and had no connection with the seized liquor, and highlighted his clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail. The Court considered the nature of the allegation, the petitioner’s clean record, and the possibility of surrender within six weeks, and ordered that anticipatory bail be granted on condition of furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The order also directed compliance with the Exclusive Special Excise Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in a case arising under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • prohibition and excise
  • liquor seizure
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 30
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29145 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2026 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Suraj Paswan S/o Bhagirath Paswan, Resident of Village - Kadhan, P.S. -
                 Kesariya, Dist. - East Champaran.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Kesariya P.S. Case No.98 of 2026 instituted under Sections

                   30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of

                   22.680 liters from the house of petitioner. It is alleged that

                   petitioner fled away from the spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that the petitioner has no connection

                   either with the alleged seized liquor or with the house from

                   where the alleged recovery has been made. Learned counsel

                   submits that petitioner was not present on the spot and no
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29145 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                          2/2




                        incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious

                        possession. He further submits that petitioner is a young boy of

                        26 years, having got clean antecedent and he undertakes to

                        cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                        anticipatory bail.

                                     6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                        case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the

                        nature of allegation leveled against the petitioner as well as his

                        clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

                        Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be

                        released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

                        (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to

                        each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise

                        Court No.-III, East Champaran, Motihari/ concerned Court in

                        connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No.98 of 2026, subject to

                        the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya

                        Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.