Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. IrfanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, Md. Irfan and Md. Mojebul, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Madhepur P.S. Case No.61 of 2025) alleging assault and other offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered the informant's courtyard armed, assaulted her and her relatives, and caused injuries. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, that the incident stemmed from a neighbour dispute resulting in mutual injuries, and highlighted their clean antecedent and willingness to cooperate with investigation. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges. Considering the facts, the petitioners' clean record, and the possibility of surrender within six weeks, the Court ordered that they be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioners' clean antecedent and the nature of the alleged offences warrant bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • bail
  • criminal law
  • assault
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 482
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31665 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2025 Thana- MADHEPUR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Irfan S/o Suleman R/o vill - Mainarahi, P.S.- Madhepur, Distt.-
                  Madhubani.
           2.    Md. Mojebul @ Majebul S/o Suleman R/o vill - Mainarahi, P.S.- Madhepur,
                 Distt.- Madhubani.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-05-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Madhepur P.S. Case No.61 of 2025 instituted under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of

                   the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant

                   was sitting in her courtyard, in the meantime all the accused

                   persons including the petitioners entered into her courtyard

                   having armed with various weapons and started abusing her.

                   When she objected the same, the accused persons assaulted her

                   by means of lathi danda. It is alleged that when she shouted, her
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31665 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                            2/3




          sister-in-law Zulekh came to rescue her but petitioner no.1 has

          assaulted her and petitioner no.2 assaulted the son of informant

          causing injury to them.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

          case. He further submits that both the parties are neighbor and

          due to petty dispute, a free fight takes place between the parties

          in which both the parties received injuries. Learned counsel

          submits that there is case and counter case between the parties

          for the same occurrence. He further submits that injuries to the

          injured is simple in nature. Learned counsel submits that

          petitioners have got clean antecedent and they undertake to

          cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the

          nature of allegation leveled against the petitioner as well as their

          clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be

          released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31665 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-III,

                        Jhanjharpur, Madhubani/ concerned Court in connection with

                        Madhepur P.S. Case No.61 of 2025, subject to the conditions

                        laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                        Sanhita, 2023.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.