Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
742 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The petitioners, three brothers from Mathiya village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2018 case (PS No.87) that alleged assault, grievous hurt, robbery and other offences under multiple sections of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that they assaulted the informant’s wife and daughters …
Ram Chandra Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on his behalf on two consecutive dates, 12 February 2026 and 7 April 2026. The petitioner apparently chose not to pursue the matter. The court, noting the absence …
The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Gupta, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 21 May 2018 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bhojpur, in a maintenance proceeding (Case No. 16 of 2017). The petitioner later expressed that he no longer wishes to pursue the …
The petitioner, Preeti Kumar, filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous No. 57344 of 2018 seeking to quash an order dated 15 May 2018 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Lakhisarai, in Maintenance Case No. 13 of 2017. The petitioner later expressed that she no longer wishes to …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, filed a quashing application before the Patna High Court seeking dismissal of the criminal proceedings arising from PS case No. 3273 of 2014. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State of Bihar was represented by Advocate Ahmad Ali. The …
The petitioner, Usha Devi, mother‑in‑law of the complainant, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a 2015 order of cognizance taken by the Magistrate for offences under Sections 494, 498A and 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged cruelty and a second …
The petitioners, in‑laws of the deceased Sangeeta Kumari, sought to quash a 2001 order of a Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate that had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The victim had allegedly suffered dowry‑related cruelty, but …
Rekha Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a 2015 case (PS Case No.1554) before the Patna High Court. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on two consecutive dates, 12 February 2026 and 7 April 2026, despite the presence of counsel for the State. The court noted …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12-13 December 2016 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, which had taken cognizance under IPC Sections 366, 323 and 34 against the …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Tehta Bazar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20-12-2017 passed by the Sub‑divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323 …
The petitioner, Ujjwal Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 98 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). The prosecution alleged that Singh participated in an assault on an informant during a land dispute, …
The petitioner, Ashok Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Maniyari PS Case No.266 of 2025) registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging he was falsely implicated in the alleged dowry‑related murder of the informant’s sister. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioners, Abhilash Kumar Bhat and Abhishek Bhat, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (PS Vidyapatinagar Case No. 90 of 2025) filed under Sections 329(4), 324(4), 326(f), 109(1), 118(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The prosecution alleges that …
The petitioners, Nirmala Devi and Bitto Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case involving a minor, filed under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the minor daughter of an …
The petitioners filed an application in the High Court of Judicature at Patna under Criminal Miscellaneous No.42277 of 2018 arising from a police case. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioners to argue the application. The respondent was represented by Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan. The …
The petitioners, Sanjay Shankar and Jai Shankar, filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous to quash an order dated 26 July 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑IV, Patna City in Complaint Case No. C.A.1052 of 2015. They later informed the court that they no longer wished to …
The petitioners, a group of neighbours, were implicated in a criminal case (Baisi P.S. Case No.390 of 2025) alleging forcible entry, assault, vandalism, and theft of Rs.6,000, under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, …
Petitioner Raja Kumar (Raja Raut) sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Sheohar P.S. Case No.260 of 2025, which alleges assault, robbery and other offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleges that four accused stole a mobile phone and …
The petitioner, Rakesh Sah, was granted six weeks to surrender before the concerned court as part of a bail order dated 21-05-2025. He was unable to surrender within that period due to unavoidable circumstances and applied for an extension. The State of Bihar, represented by an A.P.P., raised no …
Kailash Rai was granted anticipatory bail on 22 December 2025 in Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025. He filed a petition alleging clerical mistakes: his father's name was recorded as "Ramanand Rai" instead of "Ramanand Rai @ Ram Nandan" and the sections of the FIR were incorrectly listed as "Section 30(a) …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of an FIR (Bakhtiyarpur PS Case No.371 of 2017) that alleged offences including cruelty, assault, dowry harassment and Section 498A IPC. The complainant, Mausami Kumari, claimed she was married …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Village-Parta, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 20‑08‑2018 of the Assistant Sessions Judge‑II, Aurangabad, which had rejected their discharge petition filed under Section 228(i) CrPC. The …
The petitioner, Vishnu Sanker Pandey, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 01‑09‑2016 by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Buxar that converted proceedings under Section 144 CrPC into Section 145 CrPC. The petitioner argued that the matter …
The petitioner, Paripurnanand Jha, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20 August 2018, in which the Additional District & Sessions Judge had rejected his application under Section 227 CrPC. The petitioner argued that the case had become …
The petitioners, Md. Sageer and his son Md. Sayeed, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 15 November 2017 that had rejected their earlier petition for discharge under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. The order in …
The petitioners, Nibha Kumari and Deep Narayan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 140(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging extortion and kidnapping of a son. The prosecution alleged that a call demanded Rs.40 lakhs for …
The petitioner, Pompa Choudhuri, mother‑in‑law of an informant from Bangladesh, was implicated in a dowry‑related case (Patliputra P.S. Case No. 383 of 2025) under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The informant alleged that the petitioner and her son tortured her for dowry, …
The petitioner, Sukhlal Manjhi, was implicated in a 2004 kidnapping and ransom case under Sections 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have abducted the minor daughter of the complainant and demanded Rs.50,000. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that he is married to …
The petitioners applied for bail in a complaint case (No. 862 of 2024) involving alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault, criminal intimidation, and damage to property. The allegations stem from a land dispute where petitioner No. 3 allegedly sold …
The petitioners, Salman Khurshid and Md. Ehsan Khurshid, applied for bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they were falsely implicated in an assault on the informant's sons stemming from a land dispute. The State opposed the bail, arguing the …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting his uncle during a land dispute. He claimed innocence, stating the injury was minor and that the dispute was a family matter. The State opposed his bail …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested in connection with the underlying case. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The …
The petitioner, Ankit Sada, was accused of kidnapping a minor girl with intent to marry her and of offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. He contended that the allegations were false, arising from a property dispute, and that the victim was his niece who had …
The petitioner, Sikandar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two orders dated 10-02-2009 and 01-02-2017 passed by the Magistrate in a complaint case. During the hearing on 31-03-2026, the petitioner informed the court …
Syed Rizwanul Haque filed a petition under criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction seeking to quash an order dated 05.12.2017 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Patna, and an order dated 13.04.2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Patna, in a complaint case. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioners, Pinki Devi, Rakesh Kumar and Neha Kumari, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and Chandani Devi. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled hearing date of 31-03-2026, nor on previous dates, leading to repeated adjournments. …
The petitioners, Kashi Saw and Asha Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2018 but failed to appear before the Patna High Court on multiple dates. The State, represented by an A.P.P., was present, while no counsel appeared for the petitioners. The court noted that the petitioners …
The petitioner, Harsha Vardhan, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 06-08-2018 of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, which had rejected his discharge petition under Section 245 Cr.P.C. and ordered that charges be framed …
The petitioner, Prince Kumar Rai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08‑08‑2018 that had rejected his earlier petition filed on 25‑05‑2018. During the hearing on 30‑03‑2026, the petitioner expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the …
The petitioner, Gautam Yadav, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 06‑09‑2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Jamui, in case No. 59 of 2015. The petitioner argued that the matter could be disposed of by allowing him to raise all …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application in the Patna High Court but failed to appear before the court on multiple occasions. The State, represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor, was the only party present. The court noted that the petitioners showed no interest in pursuing …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Singh challenged an order dated 27-02-2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑VI, Patna, which had taken cognizance of a complaint against him under Sections 500, 501, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section …
The petitioner, Ghanshyam Tiwari, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12 June 2012 by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Patna City, which had set aside his earlier discharge and directed further proceedings in a criminal case. The …
The petitioners, Vikas Kumar and Anita Devi, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30‑01‑2018 passed by the Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the …
Prem Chandra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 18‑06‑2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Vaishali. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that he no longer wishes to pursue the petition and …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Sinha, filed a petition under Cr. Misc. No.59530 of 2018 seeking to quash the order dated 19-06-2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, and the order dated 12-04-2018 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate. During the hearing on 30-03-2026, counsel for the …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 16‑08‑2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, which had taken cognizance of offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Drugs and Cosmetics …
The petitioner, Jeevan Singh, filed a petition under criminal miscellaneous proceedings seeking to quash an order dated 06‑08‑2018 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saran, in Mahila Police Station Case No. 10 of 2018. The petitioner later informed the court that he no longer wished …
The petitioner, Vinod Rai, failed to appear before the Patna High Court on multiple dates for a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a 1999 case. No counsel represented the petitioner, and the State was represented by A.P.P. Shailendra Kumar. The court noted that the petitioner showed no …
The petitioner, Prem Prakash, filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2018. No counsel appeared on his behalf for multiple hearings, including the hearing on 30-03-2026. The State of Bihar was represented by Advocate Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P. The court noted the petitioner's repeated absence and …
The petitioner, Viveka Nand Tiwari, filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous to quash an order dated 28 March 2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur, in case No. 599 of 2016. The petitioner later expressed that he no longer wishes to pursue the matter and requested the court to …
Birendra Kumar Mandal was taken into cognizance by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Banka, under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the magistrate’s order and to be …
Santosh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 04-04-2018 of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, which had taken cognizance under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code against him and others. …
The petitioners, a group of members of the Tiwary family, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 29-08-2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Areraj, which had taken cognizance of offences under …
Vijay Kumar Jha filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a criminal complaint filed by his former wife, Amita Devi, alleging cruelty, dowry demand, assault and fraud. The parties had obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 10 October 2012, which became final on 1 …
The petitioners, Sabita Devi and Parshuram Rai, sought discharge under Section 239 of the CrPC from a criminal case filed by their daughter‑in‑law Bandana Kumari alleging cruelty, dowry demand and offences under the IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial court had rejected the discharge petition, …
The petitioner, Onkar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jhajha PS Case No.335 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted an informant and his uncles while …
Petitioners Kishori Rai and Sanjeet Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault and robbery stemming from a land dispute, while petitioner Shashi Rai withdrew his application. The prosecution alleged that the accused, armed with deadly weapons, attacked an informant and …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No.294 of 2025) involving alleged robbery, assault, and possession of illicit liquor, with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Sanjit Kumar Rao, sought bail in a criminal case registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for alleged shortfall of 421.58 quintals of foodgrains during a PDS shop inspection. He contended that the FIR was lodged after a five‑year delay without proper verification …
Vineet Kumar, a 21‑year‑old student, was implicated in a FIR alleging that he, while intoxicated, assaulted the son of an informant with a lathi. He sought bail, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that the injuries were minor. The State opposed the bail. The court noted the …
The petitioner, Indrajeet Kumar Sinha, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126, 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, where the prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused assaulted the informant's son, daughter‑in‑law and brother. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Anil Kumar Mahato and Raja Ram Mahto, sought bail in a criminal case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the informant's wife with a stick, causing injury. They contended that they were falsely implicated due to a land dispute, …
The petitioner, Pinku Sharma, was apprehended for alleged theft of a scooter, with the case registered under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the only incriminating evidence was the confessional statement of co‑accused Sonal Kumar and that no material was …
Wasiullah, a 20‑year‑old resident of Bhagwatipur, was implicated in a case (Pandaul PS Case No.8 of 2026) alleging assault, use of a sharp weapon, and attempt to outrage the modesty of an informant over a garbage‑throwing dispute. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, …
The petitioner, Ehtesam Saif, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Araria PS Case No.428 of 2025) involving alleged kidnapping of an infant after delivery, with accusations under Sections 137(2), 142, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 81 of the Juvenile …
Manoj Kumar Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 11 March 2014 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna. During the hearing on 24 March 2026, the petitioner expressed that he no longer wished …
The petitioner, Kamni Devi, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash a revisional court order that had set aside a trial court’s cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial court had taken cognizance of alleged cruelty, …
The petitioner filed a petition under criminal miscellaneous proceedings seeking to quash an order dated 10 March 2011 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in complaint case No. 1247 of 2010. The petition alleged that the order should be set aside and requested liberty to raise …
The petitioner, Dr. Shipika, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 05‑01‑2018 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, which had taken cognizance of an offence under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Jibachha Ray, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12 February 2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Muzaffarpur, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous No. 62674 of 2018 seeking to quash an order dated 16 July 2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Arwal, in connection with case No. 112 of 2015. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner no …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 17 June 2017 passed by the SDJM, Biharsharif, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 493 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal …
The petitioners, a mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law, were charged under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act based on a FIR alleging dowry demand and cruelty by the complainant, who had married her husband by love marriage. The petitioners moved the High Court to quash …
The petitioners, Md. Rizwan and Md. Siddique, filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a 2016 complaint case in the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf on the scheduled hearing dates, and the petitioners themselves did not appear. The State and the second opposite …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Village Ram Math, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and Punam Devi concerning a 2018 case. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and the matter was repeatedly adjourned. The learned Additional Public …
The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application (No.1004 of 2018) arising out of a 2016 complaint case. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled hearing dates, and the petitioner expressed no interest in pursuing the matter. The State, represented by …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 24-12-2014, wherein cognizance under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was taken against them. They contended that the matter had been amicably compromised …
The petitioners, members of the Verma family, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and Shiwani Verma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and the State’s counsel was the only party present. The court noted that the petitioners had previously failed to …
The petitioners, Amit Kumar Arya, Bindu Devi and Upendra Sah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 27 March 2017 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 498(A), 504 of the Indian Penal Code and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application (No. 9682 of 2018) before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar and Subhan Ansari. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled date of 23-03-2026, nor had they appeared on earlier dates, …
The petitioner, Anirudh Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20 February 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 16th, Gopalganj, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1756 of 2017. The …
The petitioners, Shekhar Paswan and Chandan Paswan, sought bail in a case registered under Section 354(A) of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging they were falsely implicated due to a land dispute and enmity. They argued that the complaint was filed after an inordinate delay of more than …
Kamaran Ansari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Vishambharpur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2021) involving alleged assault under several IPC sections. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted an informant and his family with weapons, causing injuries. The …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Kumar Ray and Sachin Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Mehsi P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). The prosecution alleged that during a Moharram …
The petitioners, Bikash Singh and his son Jeevan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2021 case involving alleged assault, robbery and other offences under Sections 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with …
The petitioners, a group of fourteen individuals from Sobaiya village, were accused of assaulting a grocery shop owner, his family, and destroying property over a credit dispute, with charges under numerous sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that more than one hundred …
The petitioner, Ritik Kumar Thakur, a 22‑year‑old, was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the same code indicated that she had …
The petitioners, Shamshad Ansari and his wife Shah Jeera Khatoon, filed anticipatory bail applications in a narcotics case arising from Basmatiya Police Station Case No.16 of 2025 under the NDPS Act. The first petitioner sought to withdraw his application and was permitted to do so, resulting in …
The petitioner, Vinit Kumar, was accused of assault, attempted kidnapping, and theft of gold chains under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He claimed innocence, stating that a minor motorcycle accident led to a confrontation where he was assaulted by the …
The petitioner, Md. Mozaffar, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash a maintenance order dated 26‑02‑2018 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Begusarai, which required him to pay Rs.2,000 per month to the second opposite party. He stated that he no longer wishes to …
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 28-03-2018 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bettiah. The order required the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,500 per month as maintenance for …
The petitioner, Ram Udgar Sah, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several officials. He sought a direction that the case be disposed of while granting him liberty to pursue his remedy before the appropriate authority or court. The State’s counsel raised no objection …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Yadav, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered in 2014. He applied for regular bail, arguing that only four of the eleven prosecution witnesses had been examined, the injured witness had turned …
The petitioners, Vinit Kumar Ishwar and Manish Kumar Ishwar, filed a civil review challenging a previous order dated 18‑03‑2026. They pointed out a clerical mistake in the second line of paragraph 5 where “Cr. Misc. Application” was written instead of “Civil Review”. The petitioner sought correction …
Ankit Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 7 February 2025 and earlier sought bail, which was denied on 3 September 2025. The petitioner argued that no …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar Singh, failed to appear before the Patna High Court on two consecutive dates for a criminal miscellaneous application filed in 2018. No counsel represented the petitioner, and the State of Bihar was represented by an A.P.P. No representation was made for the second …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 17 March 2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑8, Darbhanga, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 364, 365, 211 and 120(B) of the …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 13-02-2018 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Nalanda. The petitioner argued that the maintenance case …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Singh, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash the order dated 16‑04‑2018 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patna, which had framed charges under Sections 341, 376, 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The …
The petitioner, Sony Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 August 2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, which had set aside a previous order and directed the production of minor children before a …
The petitioners, M/s S.A. Glass and its proprietor S.Q. Hassan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order of cognizance and summons dated 15 March 2016 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XI, Bhagalpur in …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20‑09‑2017 in which a complaint (Case No.108 of 2017) was taken cognizance of under IPC Sections 147, 323 and 379. The learned magistrate’s report indicated …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 04.01.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Saran, which attached his property in connection with S.Tr. No. 373 of 2018 arising out of PS Case No. 38 of 2008. The petitioner argued that …
Anant Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 23 July 2018 passed by a Special Judge, which had rejected his Section 311 application to recall witnesses. He contended that the matter had become …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07-04-2018 of the First Trial Court, which had rejected their request to recall prosecution witnesses for further cross‑examination. The petitioners argued that the matter had become …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 28-10-2016 by the S.D.M., Rosera, which converted a proceeding under section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code to one under section 145, and also to set aside a subsequent order of the Additional Sessions Judge dismissing the petition. The petition …
The petitioner, Rajiv Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court relating to a 2016 complaint case. No counsel appeared on his behalf for the hearing, and the same occurred on the previous date. The trial court is scheduled for argument, but the petitioner …
The petitioners, Sohan Yadav and Mohan Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 05-03-2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, which had taken cognizance of offences under several sections …
The petitioner Kunal Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 16-03-2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 307, 313, 504, …
The petitioners – Abulaish Mian and his family members – filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09‑05‑2018 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, which had taken cognizance of offences under several sections of the Indian …
The petitioner, Prabhunath Tiwary, filed a petition under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 06-02-2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had rejected the prosecution's petition. The order arose from a criminal case (Barauli PS Case No. 101 of …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Jha, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 17 May 2018 of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhubani, which had directed him to pay interim maintenance of Rs.4,000 per month to his wife. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Radhe Shyam Roy, filed a discharge petition in the Judicial Magistrate Court which was rejected. He then filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash that order. The State of Bihar did not oppose the petitioner's request for liberty to approach …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07‑04‑2018, wherein cognizance was taken against them for offences under Sections 147, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the criminal proceedings …
The petitioners Hukum Kumar Singh, Sunaina Devi, Nitu Kumari and Birendra Kumar filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 11-12-2017 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, which had taken cognizance of offences under …
The petitioner sought a review of the High Court’s order dismissing his civil miscellaneous petition, which had upheld a trial court’s decision to close the defence evidence in a title suit pending since 1987 because a defence witness failed to appear on 15 September 2022. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, M.K. Deshpande, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings initiated under Section 6 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. The proceedings stemmed from a prosecution report filed by the Labour Enforcement Officer (Central) …
The petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings instituted against them under sections 498A, 323, 341, 504, 342, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition was filed before the Patna High Court, arguing that the case had become infructuous. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Rani Devi and Dharmendra Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07‑08‑2018 that had rejected their earlier petition filed under Section 205 CrPC. The impugned order was passed by the Additional Chief …
The petitioners, Lorik Manjhi, Saif Fatah and Md. Tarique Fatah, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 27 February 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, which had rejected their earlier petition under Section …
The petitioner, a registered contractor, challenged a blacklisting order issued by the Rural Works Department of Bihar under the Bihar Contractors Registration Rules, 2007, on the ground that he had been convicted of a minor offence (IPC Section 323) and that an appeal against the conviction was …
Petitioner Chandeshwar Paswan alleged that he was taken into police custody on 09-01-2026 in violation of a stay order dated 11-11-2025 that barred any coercive action against him. He sought a habeas corpus writ directing the SHO to release him, compliance with the stay order, and compensation of …
New Hope AAS Consultants Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of its technical bid by the Technical Bid Evaluation Committee and seeking mandamus to declare its bid responsive. The petitioner also contested the subsequent opening of the financial bid and alleged that …
The petitioners, Ranjesh Kumar and Raushan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they were falsely implicated due to local political and land‑dispute motives. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …
The petitioners, Dhamanti Devi and Bachulal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging they demanded dowry and participated in the murder of the informant’s sister. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners were involved in a dowry‑related homicide under Sections 103(1), 80(2), 61(2) and …
The petitioners, Shailanath Singh and Dilip Singh, aged 67 and 64, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) alleging assault with a sharp-edged weapon. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS‑71/2025) alleging assault on an informant with weapons, under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the informant’s statement was recorded after an eight‑day delay without explanation, and that he was falsely …
The petitioners, Khogen Mahaldar and Amit Mahaldar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Roshna P.S. No.108 of 2025) filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. They alleged that the FIR was lodged 17 days after the incident and that …
Mukesh Rai was named in an FIR for allegedly attempting to snatch a vehicle and its key along with four other accused, invoking IPC sections 341, 342, 504, 420, 386 and 387/34. He pleaded that he was falsely implicated due to village politics, had no criminal antecedent and posed no risk of …
Petitioner Mohammad Alam sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for alleged possession of country‑made liquor recovered from a motorcycle and a scooty. He …
The petitioners, Aman Kumar and Subodh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Beldour Police Station Case No. 98 of 2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act for allegedly uploading intimate photographs of a woman to social media. He contended that the photographs were taken …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of illicit liquor from behind the house of Kushila Devi. The prosecution’s case is based solely on a watchman’s statement …
Amarjeet Kumar was implicated in a case (Konch P.S. Case No. 180 of 2023) involving assault, causing a fracture, and theft of jewellery, alleged to have occurred on 08‑04‑2023. The petitioner claimed innocence, highlighting a 13‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of incriminating material, no …
Lakshman Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 266 of 2025) filed under Sections 318(4), 336(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that a person named Jitu Kumar was caught in place of the petitioner during a Home Guard selection …
The petitioners, Sarswati Devi and Pinki Kumari, were implicated in a case (PS No. 163 of 2025) alleging assault, robbery and other offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioners, entered an informant’s …
The petitioner, Shiv Dhyan Mahto, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 2,970 litres of illicit liquor from a Mahindra pick‑up van, the driver of which fled the scene. He contended that he merely owned the vehicle, had transferred it to the driver, and had no knowledge of the liquor or …
The petitioners, Dinesh Yadav and Birendra Yadav, were accused of forcibly obtaining Rs.2 lakh from an informant by promising to supply labourers for a brick kiln, alleged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. They contend that they had a long‑standing …
The petitioner, Suresh Chaudhary, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and her relatives. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and highlighted a three‑day delay in filing the FIR without explanation. …
The petitioner, Rubi Devi, was already in custody when she filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking relief. She later approached the court requesting permission to withdraw that application. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw the pending …
The petitioner, Sahana Khatun, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, to produce and release her 16‑year‑old son, Mohammad Salman, who she alleged was being illegally detained by miscreants. The petition also requested …
Manish Pandit filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the production of his wife, Sweta Kumari, who he alleges has been abducted by a private respondent since September 2025. The petition argued that the respondents, including police officials, were preventing her return. …
The petitioner, Rina Singh, filed a writ petition seeking execution of a tender agreement and the quashing of a later letter (No. 341 dated 12‑02‑2026) that cancelled the earlier Letter of Acceptance. The petitioner alleged that the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by cancelling the …
The petitioner, Ramesh Paswan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 21 July 2025. He claimed to have complied with a prior direction dated 30 January 2026 by depositing Rs. 3,000 in the Advocates' Association account on 12 February 2026. The court …
Petitioner Renu Devi filed a writ petition seeking a habeas corpus writ to have her son, Pramod Kumar, recovered, alleging that he had eloped. Two FIRs were registered: one by the father of the alleged victim girl and another by the petitioner herself. The High Court examined the petition and …
Petitioner Raushan Kumar Singh filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking the production of his wife and minor child before the Patna High Court. The State, represented by counsel, submitted that the alleged victim had been recovered and had voluntarily left her house, with her statement recorded under …
ESEPL Group, a partnership firm, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its education bodies. The petition sought relief against the Director‑SCERT and related officials. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Jha, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 22 September 2017 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in Complaint Case No. 292 of 2017. The cognizance order had taken the petitioner into …
The petitioner, Devi Prasad Gupta, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a January 3, 2018 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 384, 446, 323, 504 and 506. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Amit Choudhary, filed a petition under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20 June 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had dismissed his earlier petition. The petitioner argued that the matter had become infructuous and should be …
The petitioner, Md. Azmat, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30 May 2018 by the Additional District Judge (II) of Sitamarhi, which had directed that two criminal cases (Case No. 122 of 2016 and Case No. 181 of 2016) be clubbed and tried …
The petitioners, Uday Rajak and Ramashish Rajak, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 01-06-2011 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, which rejected their discharge and fixed a date to frame charges under Sections 323 and 379 of …
The petitioner, Shivjee Singh, filed a petition under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a part of the order dated 23 August 2017 passed by the Fast Track Court‑II, Gopalganj, which had allowed the call for an injury report from B.R.D. Medical College but denied a call for …
The petitioner, Amar Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 22 June 2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Patna, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 376, 506 and 420 of the …
The petitioner, Isteyaq Khan, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 12 July 2018 of the Additional Sessions Judge which rejected his discharge petition under Section 227. The petitioner argued that the criminal proceeding had become …
Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery and shooting at a State Bank of India CSP, charged under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based mainly on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, Dilip Kumar, while the petitioner …
The petitioners, Mukhdeo Singh Bhokta and Sunil Bharat, applied for regular bail in a case (Chhakarbandha P.S. Case No.06 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the …
Manoj Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged altercation at Mamta Food Plaza where, after a dispute over cold drinks, he and others allegedly fired a weapon causing damage to property. He was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The …
The petitioner, Md. Murad, was arrested in connection with a theft of Rs.58,000 and charged under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, no stolen property was recovered from him, and no TIP was conducted. The …
The petitioner, Vimal Ray, was charged under Sections 316(2), 318(3), 3(5), 109, 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a pistol at an informant during a land‑related dispute. The prosecution alleged that after a land sale, the informant discovered the land …
The petitioner, Harsh Mishra, was accused of offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(5), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly threatening, assaulting and extorting an informant. He claimed the case was fabricated to dispossess him of his land and pointed to a two‑day …
The petitioners, Madhav Mukhiya and Yadav Mukhiya, were charged under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307, 354, 504 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant, her husband and a third person. They contended that they were falsely implicated, the injuries were simple, the …
The petitioner, Nesar Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a firing incident arising from a land dispute, for which he was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others were involved in the incident, which resulted in injuries …
The petitioners, Bheem Singh and Yogendra Singh, were arrested in connection with a case alleging that they, along with others, assaulted and kidnapped the cousin of the informant over a disputed payment for a JCB machine. The informant claimed the accused threatened the victim’s life unless the …
The petitioner, Nandu Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, killed Dhananjay Kumar, but no eye‑witness or incriminating material was found in his possession. The …
Vikash Mishra filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking modification of an earlier order dated 01‑09‑2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.55690 of 2025. The petitioner claimed that, in compliance with an order dated 18‑02‑2026, he had deposited Rs 2,000 in the Advocates’ Association account on …
Petitioner Rajesh Ram, father‑in‑law of the deceased Priyanka Kumari, was arrested in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. He claimed innocence, stating he lived separately from the accused husband and had no involvement in the family …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar Jha, applied for regular bail in a theft case (Pandaul P.S. Case No.02 of 2026) where he was charged under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that an unknown person broke into several rooms and stole valuables worth Rs.3,50,000, and the …
Kundan Kumar was arrested in a case under Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol, live cartridges and mobiles seized at a litchi orchard. The petitioner claimed he was a laborer and caretaker of the orchard, falsely implicated due to village politics, …
The petitioner, Pintu Sao, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he and co‑accused forced an informant's aunt to execute a sale deed, assaulted her with a rod causing head injury, and stole money. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that the specific assault allegation …
Madan Giri was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., including assault on an informant, his mother, and other violent acts that allegedly led to the mother’s death. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that no specific assault was attributed to him and …
The petitioners, Soni Devi and Nisha Kumari, mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Sakatpur P.S. Case No.94 of 2025) under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed and …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after a co‑accused, Ravi Kumar, named him in a confession. The alleged incident involved unknown gun‑armed miscreants looting a bike, and no Third Information Report was filed. The …
Madhurendra Singh was charged under Sections 329(4), 109, 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly threatening an informant with a gun and for possession of two pistols and eight cartridges. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.1345 of 2024 arising from a 2023 case at Rosera. During the hearing, counsel for the appellants sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as …
The appellant Rishi Kumar was arrested on 18 August 2010 after police claimed to have recovered 11.5 kg of ganja from a bag he was carrying. The trial court convicted him under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, imposing five years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the High Court …
The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, sought regular bail in a case under Sections 21(B) and 21(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, where six cartons of Codiwell cough syrup were recovered from his tempo. The petitioner argued that he was merely a tempo driver, had no control …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving false advertisements on Facebook and Instagram to obtain PM Mudra loans, alleged to have defrauded victims of Rs.4,000‑25,000. He was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (318(2), 318(4), …
The petitioners, aged 80 and 75, applied for regular bail in a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) where their son, Kudish Manjhi, was the principal accused. The prosecution alleged that Kudish assaulted the informant's husband, who later died, and the petitioners were implicated merely as parents. …
The petitioners, Baleshwar Bind and his sons, were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for assaulting an informant and his wife during a neighbour dispute over a missing buffalo. They sought bail, claiming innocence, a settled compromise between the parties, and a clean …
Deepak Kumar was arrested in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. for allegedly stopping an informant, snatching his motorcycle and mobile phone, and attempting to kill him. He sought regular bail, asserting his innocence, lack of any recovered stolen property, no criminal …
The petitioner, Jiyalal Ram, sought regular bail in a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) arising from the death of his wife, Manju Devi. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and his sons discovered the dead body and that unknown persons, possibly including the petitioner, were involved. The …
The petitioner, Md. Asfaque, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act, alleging that a pistol was recovered from his pocket during a police raid based on secret information. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no specific allegations …
The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, was arrested after police recovered a country-made pistol and a live cartridge from his residence during a search. He applied for regular bail under Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act, claiming he was falsely implicated, has no criminal antecedents, and that the …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was arrested under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. for allegedly participating in a robbery of Rs. 2.5 lakh from an SBI cash van, along with co‑accused. He contended that he was falsely implicated, relying on the confessional statement of another accused and the absence of …
The petitioner, Amit Pandey, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing two rounds that missed a victim and assaulting family members with a lathi and pistol. He claimed innocence, stating the case stemmed from a land dispute and that he had …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Singh, was charged under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly participating in a robbery of a CNG vehicle. The prosecution’s case was based on the testimony of the vehicle driver, who identified six unknown persons, but no material was recovered …
The appellants, members of the Chaurasiya family, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly entering an informant's house, abusing her by caste name and assaulting her and her husband, causing injuries. They sought bail, arguing …
The petitioner, Raj Kishore Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly stabbing an informant, causing a simple injury. He had been in custody since 19 February 2025 and claimed innocence, asserting that he was falsely implicated and had no prior criminal …
The petitioners, who are in‑laws of the deceased, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Barsoi P.S. Case No. 233 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners killed the informant's daughter, while the petitioners claimed they were …
The petitioner, Vinod Baitha, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to the alleged murder of his brother. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in an assault on the informant’s son during a theft, …
The petitioner, Karamat Mian, applied for regular bail in a murder case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, stating there was no eye‑witness or material evidence against him, and that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. The State …
Lalan Kumar, a 22‑year‑old, was arrested on 25 July 2025 in connection with an alleged kidnapping of the minor daughter of an informant. He was charged under Sections 96 and 3(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and a statement from the victim was recorded under Section 183 of the same code. The …
Parwati Devi, a 20‑year‑old woman, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2) and 96/3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act arising from a case in Bithan Police Station. The prosecution alleged that she had taken the informant’s daughter with ulterior motives, but the victim …
The petitioner, Md. Naushad, sought regular bail for offences under Sections 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., arising from the death of the informant's son. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, father of co‑accused Md. Afroz, was involved in the killing, but there was no eye‑witness and …
The petitioner, Mithu Manjhi, applied for regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault with a lathi. He claimed innocence, stating the incident stemmed from a land dispute and that he was falsely implicated. The petitioner had been in …
Amresh Kumar, a 22‑year‑old with no prior record, was arrested on 12‑Nov‑2025 in connection with a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant, charged under Sections 132(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the victim’s …
The petitioner, Jitu Sahani, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 for the alleged kidnapping and death of an informant's son during a Tazia procession. He contended that he was not present at the incident, was working in Punjab, and that the case was lodged after an inordinate …
The petitioners – Anish Kumar, Prashant Pathak and Ramanshu Kumar Singh – were charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly taking part in a firing incident. The prosecution’s case was based on police information that two groups were …
