Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ujjwal Kumar Singh @ Ujjwal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court held that, in view of the lack of corroboration of the prosecution’s allegations and the existence of a counter‑case, anticipatory bail could be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Ujjwal Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 98 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). The prosecution alleged that Singh participated in an assault on an informant during a land dispute, resulting in a head injury and theft of Rs. 5,000. Singh contended he was falsely implicated, the injury was minor and not corroborated, and he had a pending criminal case for which he was on bail. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the charges. The Court, noting the lack of corroborative evidence, the existence of a counter‑case, and Singh’s willingness to cooperate, granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.
  • Whether the prosecution's allegations are sufficiently corroborated by the injury report.
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • false implication
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2885 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2025 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Ujjwal Kumar Singh @ Ujjwal Kumar Son of Brijnandan Singh Resident of
                 village - Barharwa Khurd, Ps- Dumariyaghat, Dist- East Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   07-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025, instituted under

                   Sections 126(2), 308(2), 352, 351(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1),

                   303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, on the date of

                   occurrence all the F.I.R. named accused persons including the

                   petitioner came and co-accused Brijnandan Singh asked him to

                   deliver the said land to him. On protest, co-accused Ravindra

                   Singh ordered to kill the informant, on which petitioner

                   assaulted the informant with farsa causing head injury. Other

                   accused persons also assaulted the informant. They snatched
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2885 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026
                                            2/3




          cash of Rs. 5,000/- from the informant's pocket.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case. Due to land dispute altercation took place between the

          parties in which both the parties got injures for which there is

          case and counter case. Both the parties are neighbours. Injuries

          of the informant is found to be simple in nature caused by hard

          and blunt substance and the same does not corroborate the

          prosecution case. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent in

          which he is on bail. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the

          investigation and trial.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          submission of learned counsel for the parties, case and counter

          case between the parties and allegation against the petitioner not

          corroborated with injury report, in the event of arrest or

          surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today,

          the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial

          Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2885 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026
                                                          3/3




                        Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025, subject to the

                        conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik

                        Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
rakhi/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.