Patna High Court
Sanjay Shankar and AnrversusState Of Bihar and Anr
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The petition is disposed of as not pressed because the petitioner withdrew the request for quashing.
Summary
The petitioners, Sanjay Shankar and Jai Shankar, filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous to quash an order dated 26 July 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑IV, Patna City in Complaint Case No. C.A.1052 of 2015. They later informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the matter. The State of Bihar, through its A.P.P., raised no objection to the petitioner's request. After hearing the parties, the court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition. No substantive legal issue was examined, and the case was closed as not pressed.
Subjects
- petition for quashing
- withdrawal of proceedings
- court disposal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67085 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1052 Year-2015 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
Patna
======================================================
1. Sanjay Shankar Son of Late Kameshwar Lal Das,
2. Jai Shankar, Son of Late Kameshwar Lal Das, Both resident of
Village/Mohallah- Maharani Colony, Agamkuan, Kamaldah Path, P.S.- By-
Pass, District- Patna Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Nirbhay Shankar, Son of Late Kameshwar Lal Das, Resident of
Village/Mohallah- Maharani Colony, Kamaldah Path, P.S.- Bypass, District-
Patna Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. This petition has been filed for quashing the order
dated 26.07.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate-IV, Patna City in Complaint Case No. C.A.1052 of
2015.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
does not want to pursue this matter, therefore, this case may be
disposed of.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67085 of 2018(2) dt.06-04-2026
2/2
prayer of the petitioner.
5. In view of the submissions of learned counsel for
the petitioner, this case stands disposed of as not pressed.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-
U T
Checking your session…