Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dilkhush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The petitioner is entitled to regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after a co‑accused, Ravi Kumar, named him in a confession. The alleged incident involved unknown gun‑armed miscreants looting a bike, and no Third Information Report was filed. The charge‑sheet had already been submitted and a similarly situated co‑accused, Sintu Kumar, had been granted regular bail. The petitioner had been in custody since 23‑Oct‑2025, had no prior criminal record, and pledged to cooperate with the trial, presenting no risk of tampering with evidence or absconding. The State opposed bail, but the court considered the filed charge‑sheet, the grant of bail to the co‑accused, the petitioner’s clean antecedent, and the length of custody. Consequently, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on regular bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted when the charge‑sheet is filed and a co‑accused has been released on bail
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of tampering with evidence or absconding
  • Whether the absence of a Third Information Report affects the bail application

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • charge‑sheet
  • clean antecedent
  • co‑accused
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 309

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11937 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2025 Thana- Ghogha District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Dilkhush Kumar son of Sri Chandeshwari Yadav Resident of village-
                 Jagatpur, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Bhagalpur

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered

                   for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita.

                                3. It is alleged that while informant was returning

                   home, some unknown miscreants, on the point of gun, looted his

                   bike.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. Further submission is that the F.I.R. was lodged

                   against unknown miscreants. On the basis of confession of co-

                   accused Ravi Kumar, the name of the petitioner has been

                   transpired in this case. No T.I.P. has been conducted.                            The

                   charge-sheet has already been submitted after completion of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11937 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      investigation. Similarly situated co-accused person, namely,

                      Sintu Kumar has already been granted regular bail by a Co-

                      ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.02.2026 passed

                      in Cr. Misc. No. 6749 of 2026. Petitioner is in custody since

                      23.10.2025 having no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to

                      co-operate in the trial. There is no chance of tampering with the

                      evidence or absconding of the petitioner.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail

                      application of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                      of the case as well as the fact that charge-sheet has been

                      submitted, similarly situated co-accused person has been

                      granted bail, clean antecedent of the petitioner and period of

                      custody undergone, let the above named petitioner be released

                      on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                      learned        Additional          Chief        Judicial   Magistrate-II,

                      Bhagalpur/concerned Court in connection with Ghogha P.S.

                      Case No. 131 of 2025.



                                              (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.