Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
742 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
Krishna Bhuiyan and Nandlal Bhuiyan petitioned for regular bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 329(4), 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 103(1) of the B.N.S., alleging that they entered an informant's house, assaulted and dragged the informant's father‑in‑law and caused his death. …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, filed a bail petition in the High Court of Patna. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail petition, stating that it had become infructuous. The court considered whether it could grant such permission to withdraw a pending …
Vikash Kumar was arrested in connection with a case where he and other accused allegedly assaulted two individuals with a sword, causing injuries. The prosecution alleged the assault was carried out under the pretext of a birthday celebration, and the offences were registered under Sections 126(2), …
The petitioner, Chandan Sahu, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., alleging assault and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the son of an informant during a dispute, while the petitioner claimed innocence …
The petitioner, Arvind Kumar Sah, was arrested in connection with a robbery in which Rs. 44,110, a gold chain, and a vehicle key were stolen. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, Shubham Kumar, and no stolen items or any other material evidence were …
Firoz Saffi and Rehana Khatoon were arrested in connection with a violent incident in which an informant and her husband were assaulted, the latter later dying from injuries. They were charged under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 103, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The petitioners contended …
Munna Bind was arrested in connection with a train‑coach incident in which a woman’s six‑month‑old child was taken by a co‑passenger. The prosecution alleged his involvement under Sections 137(2), 142, 143(4), 111, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 81 of the J.J. Act, but the only incriminating …
Md. Rizwan was arrested in connection with a theft of a motorcycle, the allegation arising from a confessional statement made in another case. He sought regular bail under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S., contending that he was innocent and that the FIR was based merely on suspicion. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Sankar Sah, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged forgery and cheating offences under Sections 467, 468, 470, 471 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner altered a land mutation document to evade detection by departmental software. …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with an alleged assault on an informant and his family during a Ganesh procession, which allegedly led to the death of the informant's grandfather. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the deceased died of natural causes as …
The petitioner, Yogi Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 981 of 2025) alleging possession of a country‑made pistol and live cartridge, and charged under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that …
The petitioners, aged father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law, were charged under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and dowry demand against their daughter‑in‑law, Dolly Devi. They sought quash of the magistrate’s order taking cognizance of the offences, arguing …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashal of the order of cognizance dated 26.05.2017, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504/34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against them. The case arose from a …
The petitioners sought quashing of the order of cognizance dated 04‑01‑2016 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in a case arising from alleged domestic violence under IPC sections 341, 323, 506 and 498A/34. The complainant, Mamta Devi, alleged that her husband assaulted her and their …
The petitioners, Gulshan Khatoon and Md. Kausar, filed an application seeking to quash an order dated 25 September 2017 by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, which had taken cognizance of an alleged offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code against them. They contended that the …
The petition was filed by Aklima Khatoon seeking quash of the order of cognizance dated 20‑10‑2014 taken by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against her and her son. The complaint alleged dowry demand, cruelty and …
The petitioner, Chand Muhammad, filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous No.29308 of 2018 seeking to quash an order dated 16 January 2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, which refused to confirm his provisional bail and directed him to appear before the court for a compromise, …
The petitioners, husband and in‑laws of Minakshi Kumari, challenged the order of cognizance dated 29‑06‑2017 under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the criminal case stemmed from matrimonial discord. The complainant had filed the complaint alleging dowry demands, …
The petitioner Rakesh Kumar filed a petition under Article 226 seeking to quash the order dated 05.05.2015 wherein the Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, took cognizance under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in Complaint Case No.1468 of 2013. The …
The petitioner, Jitesh Kumar Sachdeva, filed a petition seeking to quash an order dated 19 April 2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Complaint Case No. 449 of 2017. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor. The …
The petitioners, Durgesh Mishra and Usha Mishra, filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous No.18419 of 2018 seeking to quash the order dated 27‑02‑2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in trial 2126 of 2017 arising out of complaint case 4850 of 2016. The petition was filed in …
The petitioners, who are relatives of the complainant, sought quashing of a 2015 criminal proceeding under Section 498A IPC that the Begusarai Magistrate had taken cognizance of. The complaint alleged dowry demand and torture, but during the pendency the complainant and her husband amicably settled …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 08-11-2016 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ara, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 498A, 328, 307, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition was filed after the criminal case (Case No. 240 of …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal order dated 23-08-2016 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A, 494, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners argued that the matter had become infructuous …
Vikash Kumar applied for regular bail in a criminal case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The allegations against him were that he abused an informant, while the more serious charge of firing a weapon was directed at co‑accused Avinash Kumar, who remains in …
Santosh Kumar filed a bail petition before the Patna High Court. His counsel later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The court examined the request and, exercising its inherent powers, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the bail petition was dismissed as withdrawn. …
The petitioner, Karan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated based on a co-accused's confessional statement and that his name does not appear in the FIR. The petitioner contended that no …
The petitioner, Sushil Mishra, was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 352 of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting the father of an informant with a knife after a monetary dispute. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was also injured in a counter‑case and had no prior …
The petitioner, Prabhawati Devi, was arrested after police seized 1.353 kg of ganja, five mobile phones and cash of Rs.1,48,320 from her house and charged her under several provisions of the NDPS Act. She contended that she had no conscious possession of the narcotics, that the seizure was made …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the brother of an informant, causing serious injuries. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to a village rivalry and argued that no specific overt act was alleged against him. …
The petitioner, Sukesh Kumar, a 20‑year‑old resident of Darbhanga, was arrested in connection with an alleged assault, robbery and attempted murder that occurred on 31‑Oct‑2025. The prosecution’s case is based solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no material evidence recovered …
The petitioner, Bokai Singh, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 27.6 litres of illicit liquor recovered from his house. The prosecution alleged that he fled the scene, while the petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was not …
The petitioners were arrested on 13 December 2025 after police recovered 630 litres of illicit Indian‑made foreign liquor from a pickup van and charged them under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They pleaded that they were merely the driver and labourers, had no knowledge of …
The petitioner, Rakesh Ray, was arrested after police recovered 810 litres of Nepali liquor allegedly being smuggled through his village. He was charged under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was merely a …
The petitioner Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a case of alleged transport of illicit liquor after police intercepted a motorcycle and recovered 50 litres of liquor. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Mantu Agrawal @ Sahil, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 3,948.48 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a godown in Patna, under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely a passerby, not the owner or driver of …
The petitioner, Fulwa Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police recovered 40 litres of illicit liquor near a school and alleged she was serving it. She fled the scene and was taken into custody on 11‑01‑2026. The petitioner argued she had …
The petitioner, Kunal Kumar, a student with no prior criminal record, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 636.120 litres of illicit liquor from his under‑construction house, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to …
The petitioner, Karan Kumar Mishra, was arrested for alleged possession of 15.480 litres of foreign liquor found in the toolbox of his e‑rickshaw, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, arguing that he was merely the owner of the vehicle and had no …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 224.640 litres of foreign liquor from a pick‑up van in Arwal. He claimed to be merely a passenger with no knowledge or control over the liquor, and asserted that no incriminating material was found on his person. The State …
The petitioner, Manjay Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his red TVS motorcycle seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 after 50 litres of illicit country‑made liquor were recovered from it. He requested liberty to file an application under Rule 12A …
Petitioner Karu Pasi sought de‑sealing of his house after it was sealed following a raid that recovered five litres of illicit liquor from a room used by his son, Pappu Chaudhary, who was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner argued that he was not …
The petitioner sought liberty to file an application for the release of premises that had been sealed under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 after the recovery of illicit liquor. The petitioner requested that the application be filed under Rule 12B of the Bihar Prohibition …
The petitioner, Musheer Miyan, filed a writ petition challenging a confiscation order and a subsequent appellate order under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner sought liberty to file a revision petition under Section 93 of the Act against the appellate order. The Court …
Paras Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the release of his Tata Motors Yodha pick‑up vehicle seized by the Excise Department for allegedly carrying 1.125 litres of illicit liquor. The seizure was made under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and the Indian Penal Code, and the authorities …
Santosh Kumar filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to set aside a confiscation order dated 13 June 2025, which seized his Bolero Max pick‑up vehicle on the basis of alleged recovery of illicit foreign liquor. The vehicle was seized under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar …
The petitioner, Gyaneshwar Prasad, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his TVS Apache motorcycle seized by the Saran Excise authorities in connection with a case involving 1.50 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a co‑accused, Satish Kumar, who was riding the bike. The seizure was made …
Lokesh Kumar filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18‑10‑2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Kaimur, which was issued under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(3) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 180 litres of illicit liquor. The …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar Thakur, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his motorcycle which was stolen on 13‑09‑2024 and later seized on 22‑05‑2025 in connection with an excise case for illicit liquor. The seizure was made under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, …
The petitioner, Mohammad Afshad Ahmad, owned a Mahindra Bolero Maxx pickup that was seized after 2,500 litres of illicit beer were recovered from it during a search under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The Sub‑Divisional Officer ordered the vehicle’s release only upon …
The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 18‑10‑2025 of the Collector‑cum‑District Magistrate, Kaimur, which confiscated his vehicle (Registration No. BR03AB0025) on grounds of alleged transport of illicit liquor. The vehicle was seized following FIR No. …
The petitioners, Saroj Singh and Pawan Kumar, were released on bail with a condition to surrender before the concerned court within six weeks. Due to unavoidable circumstances they were unable to comply within the stipulated period and filed an application seeking an additional four weeks to …
The petitioner, A.P. Mishra, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 July 2014 passed by the Special Judge Vigilance, Muzaffarpur. The order had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 409, 420, 465, 467, 468, …
Awadhesh Singh and others filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12 April 2017 passed by the Fast Track Court in Sessions Trial No. 336 of 2001. The petitioners argued that the case could be disposed of, and the State of Bihar, represented …
The petitioner, Sushila Devi, filed an interlocutory application seeking condonation of delay in filing a restoration petition for Civil Revision No. 177 of 2018, which had been dismissed on 19 September 2023 for want of prosecution. The application was supported by an affidavit and detailed reasons …
The petitioner, Sunar Ram, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 June 2018 passed by the Additional District Judge, Vth, Gopalganj, which was related to a criminal revision (No. 761 of 2013) arising from an earlier order dated 27 August …
Gaurav and Prem Kumar filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Harsh Singh, sought to withdraw the pending application while preserving the right to pursue any appropriate remedy later. …
The petitioner, Ramkali Devi, sought regular bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. This was her second bail application after a prior petition was rejected on merit. Counsel argued that she had been in custody for nine months, would cooperate with the trial, and …
Vijay Rajak was arrested in connection with offences under Section 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, and multiple sections of the Arms Act. He had been in custody for about a year and the charges were formally framed on 8 …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 03-06-2016 that framed charges under Sections 498(A), 494, 341, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against them. …
The petitioner, Sikandar Chauhan, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12 April 2018 of the Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, which had granted anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) CrPC in a complaint under Section 498A IPC. The petition …
The petitioner, Shashi Ranjan Kumar, filed a petition under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an order dated 04.05.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had rejected his earlier petition filed under the same provision in connection with a 2011 case. The …
The petitioners, Suma Devi and Anant Kumar, sought to quash an order dated 23 August 2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code against them. The petition argued that the matter had …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two earlier orders – one dated 18‑04‑2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Vaishali, and another dated 29‑11‑2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, …
The petitioners, Syed Zeyarat Hussain, his wife Akhtari Bano and son Syed Sujat Hussain, filed an application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Farjana Anjum. The application was scheduled for hearing on 28 January 2026 and again on 12 February 2026. On both occasions, no …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Choudhary, filed a petition seeking quash of FIR No. 300 of 2016 registered under sections 420, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the allegations were false, manipulated and concocted by the complainant, Pankaj Pal. The State of Bihar, as respondent, …
The petitioners sought to quash the criminal proceeding (Goraul PS Case No.216 of 2016) pending before the SDJM, Hajipur. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and the State was represented by A.P.P. Narsingh Tanti. The Court noted the petitioners’ failure to appear on two consecutive …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking to quash an order dated 20 February 2018 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in Ara Nagar case No. 237 of 2012. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and the State of Bihar was represented by Advocate on …
The petitioner, Kumar Sipaj Dular, filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. No counsel or representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated notices. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Bihar was present. The Court …
Mukesh Kumar Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated notices. The State’s assistant public prosecutor, Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, was present. The court noted the petitioner’s failure to …
The petitioners, three brothers, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 06-02-2017 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 323, 504, 506, 379 and 34 of the IPC and issued …
Ram Lal Singh filed an anticipatory bail petition before the Patna High Court. He later sought to withdraw the petition so that he could surrender before the trial court. The State and the complainant did not oppose his request. The Court, after hearing the parties, allowed the withdrawal and …
The petitioners, a group of fifteen individuals from Bagdar village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Amour P.S. Case No.294 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, amid a …
The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No.405 of 2024) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging he impersonated another candidate in a CTET examination. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioners, Devendra Sharma and Savita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Barhariya P.S. Case No.275 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an informant with a bamboo …
The petitioners, six members of the Rai family, sought bail after the State charged them under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the sons and husband of an informant with weapons, causing a head injury. The petitioners contended that they were falsely …
The petitioners, Ashok Manjhi and Nanhe Manjhi, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the husband of the informant and others. They contended that they were falsely implicated due to village rivalry, that the …
The petitioners, Rahul Kumar, Raghuvar Pandey and Gautam Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging they assaulted an informant. The prosecution alleged that the accused abused and injured the informant, while the petitioners contended …
Ganpati Mishra, a 68‑year‑old resident of Mahinam, was named as an accused in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) for allegedly assaulting his cousin, the informant, with a lathi. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had no …
Karan Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Satyaveer Jha, while the State of Bihar was represented by Ms. Suman Kumari Singh. The court exercised its …
The petitioners, members of the Kumar family, sought bail after being implicated in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault, theft and threats against an informant and her family. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners abused and assaulted …
The petitioners Sukhal Singh and Rajeev Kumar Singh were arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, threats, and other offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, stemming from a land dispute. They contended that they were falsely implicated, had no prior criminal …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. Subsequently, he approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the application, stating that it had become infructuous. The principal issue was whether the Court could grant permission to …
The petitioners, Kameshwar Singh and Chandeshwar Kumar, were implicated in a case (Sahebganj P.S. Case No.238 of 2025) involving alleged assault, robbery and other offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and a prior enmity with …
The petitioners, three brothers from Mandana village, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) for allegedly assaulting an informant with iron rods and a lathi-danda, causing simple injuries. The prosecution …
Aryan Khan, a 19‑year‑old resident of Nawada, was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging that he abused an informant and assaulted him with a knife, causing a simple injury. He was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Pravin Kumar, was accused of assaulting an informant and firing a pistol that injured the informant’s waist, under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and alleging political victimisation, while …
The petitioner, Chunnu Sahani, was named in an FIR alleging participation in a large‑scale robbery, arson and assault allegedly orchestrated by a relative over a land dispute. He contended that the FIR was lodged after an unjustified four‑day delay, lacked an injury report, and that the allegations …
The petitioner, Malkit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging robbery, theft, and molestation under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with two others, entered the informant's …
Amarjeet Paswan was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault with a knife, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed the allegations were false, stemming from a personal grudge, and argued that the injury was minor and not corroborated by medical evidence. The …
Suraj Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2) and 109 of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting the husband of informant Aarti Kumari with an iron rod and further attacks with bricks, causing grievous …
The petitioner, Junaid Ansari, a 21‑year‑old, was implicated in a case under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act for allegedly making a video of illegal arms go viral. He contended that he had no knowledge of any such video, no weapon was recovered from his possession, and he had not disseminated any …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, was implicated in a kidnapping and theft case (Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 58 of 2025) under Sections 87, 137(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. He alleged that the minor victim’s statement under Section 180 did not accuse him and that there was no medical …
Petitioner Rajendra Kamal filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order dated 30-06-2017 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Paswan and family members, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash two orders dated 24 November 2016 and 29 November 2017 that had allowed an application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by the respondent, Anamika Devi. The petition …
Isteyaque Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 01‑06‑2018 of the SDJM Motihari, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 13-03-2018 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bhojpur, which granted interim maintenance of Rs.10,000 per month to the respondent wife and her son. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Tuna Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 27-02-2018 issued by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Saran, which required her to pay Rs.2,000 per month for her …
The petitioners, Kailash Prasad Singh and Neelam Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging an order dated 19‑11‑2017 of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 427 and 436/34. The petitioners contended …
The petitioners filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 12 March 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Danapur, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 120‑B and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …
The petitioners, Nishant Kumar Patel and Awadh Kishore Paswan, police officers, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 13-03-2018 of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 417 and 465 …
The petitioners, aged parents of the accused son, sought quashing of a magistrate's order taking cognizance of offences under Sections 498A and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act filed by their former daughter‑in‑law. The complainant alleged continuous cruelty and dowry …
The petitioner, Abdullah Khan, filed a petition under criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction seeking to quash an order dated 29‑05‑2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kaimur, which had set aside an earlier order dated 08‑11‑2017 in a domestic‑violence proceeding and directed the petitioner to …
The petitioners Deo Narayan Yadav and Krishna Kumar Yadav filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 31.01.2018 passed by the Sub‑Judge VII cum A.C.J.M., Patna, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 366(A) and 120(B) of the …
Petitioner Prahlad Kumar Paswan filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 20‑04‑2018 of the Additional & District Sessions Judge, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 302, 376(d), 201, 120(B), 34 of the IPC and Sections …
The petitioners, Aditya Anand and Abhishek Anand, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 06-10-2017 passed by the Sub‑divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 304B and 120B of the Indian …
Petitioners Dinesh Singh and Akhilesh Singh filed an application seeking to quash an order dated 17 July 2018 that dismissed their earlier petition for a re‑examination of prosecution witnesses in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the IPC. The High …
The petitioner, Vikky Bhawal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash charges dated 04-12-2013 in Sadar P.S. Case No.07 of 2013, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 506 and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner argued that the case had …
The petitioner, Awadh Kishore Pandey, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09.03.2018 passed by the Fast Track Court, which had refused to recall a prosecution witness (PW‑8) and to mark an exhibit of a court‑witness deposition. The …
The petitioner, Manoj Singh Patel, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 12 June 2017 passed by the Special Judge Excise Act, Kaimur, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) …
The petitioner, Arjun Yadav, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash two orders dated 08.05.2018 and 08.06.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya. The petitioner argued that the trial against him had already concluded and the matter was …
Petitioner Alka Kumari filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 05-12-2017 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323/34, 352/34 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code …
The petitioner, Ashish Kumar, was charged under Sections 376(2)(N), 314 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code in Sathi P.S. Case No. 77 of 2024. He filed a third anticipatory bail petition, claiming that he had married the victim, Nisha Kumari, and that the matter was compromised. The State opposed the …
Chandan Kumar was charged under Section 21C of the NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He had been in custody for about eleven months and earlier filed a bail petition that was rejected on merit. He filed a second regular bail petition, arguing that the trial would …
The petitioner Sanjeev Kumar was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs.95,000 that was dishonoured. The complainant alleged a loan of Rs.1,00,000, issuance of the cheque for discharge of the debt, and that a statutory legal notice was served, which …
The appellant Vishal Gupta appealed against an ex‑parte divorce decree granted by the Family Court, Vaishali, on the ground that the summons were not properly served and that the decree was based on unsubstantiated cruelty despite the parties having a mutual consent to divorce. The marriage, …
The appellant, Ramwakil Singh, appealed against the acquittal of six accused in a case involving alleged attempts to murder him and his brother. The trial court had convicted only one accused under Section 325 IPC and acquitted all others of the more serious charge under Section 307 IPC, finding …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 15‑03‑2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 504, 406, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Choudhari, filed an application seeking modification of the order dated 22 September 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 58479 of 2025. The petitioner claimed that, pursuant to an order dated 16 January 2026, he had deposited Rs. 3,000 in the Advocates' Association account …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar Thakur, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 16 May 2018 of the Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, which had taken cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties …
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax filed three miscellaneous appeals (Nos. 954, 952 and 953 of 2018) against the Executive Engineer, RCD, Government of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant in any of the appeals, while counsel for the respondent was present. The High Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30 May 2017 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Manjhaul, which allowed the addition of three witnesses in a criminal case (Case No. 14 of 2015). The …
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax filed three miscellaneous appeals (Nos. 954, 952 and 953 of 2018) against the Executive Engineer, RCD, Government of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant in any of the appeals, while counsel for the respondent was present. The High Court …
Petitioners Pramod Yadav and Shila Devi filed a petition under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code seeking to quash the order dated 07.05.2016 that had taken cognizance of the offence and issued summons against them. They argued that the criminal proceeding had become infructuous and therefore the …
The petitioner, Md. Shakir @ Raja, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 14 February 2017 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 24 November 2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Katihar, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498(A), 385/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition argued that the matter had become …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Vaishali, filed a petition challenging the order dated 25 June 2018 of the Sessions Judge and the order dated 20 November 2017 of the Magistrate, which had dismissed their discharge petition in complaint case No. 1620 of 2012. The petition sought relief …
Jitendra Kumar Singh filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Arwal, which had taken cognizance under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the proceedings had become …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 25 November 2016 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, which had taken cognizance of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act …
The petitioner Rohit Ram filed a petition under criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction seeking to quash an order dated 01‑07‑2017 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nagachia, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 323, 506, 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The petitioner, Jagdish Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 04.01.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had rejected his petition and denied him the opportunity to examine witnesses, including the injured and the …
The petitioners, Shashi Kant Shukla and relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 07‑09‑2017 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑IV, Saran, which had taken cognizance of a complaint under Section …
The petitioner, Hareram Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and requested permission to withdraw it. The court …
The petitioners, Bishnudev Yadav and Sanjay Yadav, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08-11-2017 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Banka, which attached disputed land under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. and appointed an Anchal Adhikari …
Petitioners Dilip Kumar Sanjit and Radhika Devi filed petitions under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09‑08‑2017 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498(A), 323, 379, 406, 120B of the Indian …
Petitioners Dilip Kumar Sanjit and Radhika Devi filed petitions under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09‑08‑2017 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498(A), 323, 379, 406, 120B of the Indian …
Sunil Kumar Jha filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 342 of 2017, which alleged offences under Sections 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the case had become infructuous and should be …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Chak Bahauddin, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30 March 2016 that had taken cognizance against them under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a July 3, 2017 order of the Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, which had taken cognizance of a case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code against them. The petitioners argued …
The petitioner, Shabnam Ara, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07‑08‑2017 that had framed charges under Sections 498(A), 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code against her and another person. The petition argued …
The petitioners, three brothers, filed a petition under Section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to dispense with their personal appearance in a criminal trial concerning offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 406, 498A and 120B of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The petitioners, Kausar Perween and Rehana Khatoon, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 4 October 2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Katihar, which had dismissed their revision petition against an order of …
The petitioner, Ram Nath Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19 September 2017 that had rejected his request to reconstruct the trial record by admitting a photo copy of a supplementary case and a …
The petitioners Subhasis Tripathi, Ashish Tripathi and Ram Mukherji filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order dated 14‑12‑2007 that took cognizance of offences under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 138 of the Negotiable …
Petitioner Jawahar Yadav filed a petition in the Patna High Court challenging the cancellation of his bail bond by orders dated 14 November 2017 and 30 May 2017. The petitioner argued that the matter could be disposed of as it had become infructuous. The State, represented by an A.P.P., raised no …
The petitioner, Shyam Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 16 May 2016 of the 2nd Class Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 03-04-2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saharsa, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 147, 323, 448, 379, 504 and 506 of the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Thakur, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a 2016 order of a Judicial Magistrate that had taken cognizance of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that he …
The petitioners Kamlesh Singh and Gita Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19‑04‑2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 376, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and summoned them to …
The petitioners, members of the Keshri family, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 25 May 2018 that had rejected their earlier petition for discharge under Section 239. The order in question pertained to Sessions …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a 25 July 2018 order of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate‑XII, Mahua, which had rejected his petition to be discharged under several IPC offences. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16-07-2018 that framed charges under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(b) of the NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition Excise …
Ashok Modi filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 29 August 2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai, which had dismissed his earlier application for discharge under Section 239 of the CrPC. The petitioner …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 01‑09‑2018 that had framed an additional charge of Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code against him. The petitioner argued that the underlying trial (Sessions …
The petitioner filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel requested the court’s leave to withdraw, and the court considered whether such permission could be granted. The bench, after hearing the …
The petitioners filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court's leave to withdraw. The court, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 05-11-2018 in which the Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar, refused to discharge them from charges under IPC sections 363, 366(a), 376, 504/34 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The petition was filed after the underlying criminal case had already been …
The petitioner, Jyotish Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Fast Track Court order dated 02 July 2018 that had rejected his earlier petition under Section 311 for a summons to the informant for cross‑examination. The …
The petitioner filed an application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed …
The petitioners, Rajeev Kumar Tamboli, Shyam Prasad Tamboli and Bachchi Devi, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 26 June 2018 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in complaint case No. 2754 of 2017. The order had taken cognizance of …
The petitioner, Omkar Paswan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20 August 2018 that had rejected his earlier petition for discharge. The order in question pertained to Sessions Trial No. 421 of 2017 arising …
The petitioner, Umesh Prasad Jaiswal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 19 September 2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Explosive …
The petitioner, Sita Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the proceedings, alleging that the case had become infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Binod Kumar, requested the court’s leave to withdraw the application. The …
The petitioner, Ghutar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 11 September 2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 341, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The status …
The petitioner, Shambhu Shankar Tiwari, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash a part of the order dated 15‑10‑2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, which had rejected his earlier petition for discharge in a criminal case (PS Case No.470 of 2013). The petition was heard on …
The petitioner, Ali Reza, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 15-12-2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, 353, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19-07-2017 that had taken cognizance against them under Sections 307, 385, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The order being challenged was issued by the …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Fast Track Court order that had taken cognizance against him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The order was originally set aside by a …
The petitioner, Rajendra Prasad Keshri, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 24-08-2018 that had rejected his earlier petition for discharge under Section 227. The order in question was passed by the Fast Track …
Petitioner Supriya Rani filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No.19098 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 09‑12‑2025. The petitioner submitted reasons and explanations supporting restoration. The High Court examined whether a …
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash part of an order dated 05-12-2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Khagaria, which had taken cognizance of offences against certain accused in Complaint Case No. 343 of 2017. The status report indicated that the …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 05‑07‑2017 passed by the learned CJM, Begusarai, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 494 and 498A of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The underlying criminal case …
Petitioners Rajiv Kumar Agrawal and Anirudh Agrawal filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 04-07-2015 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The petition argued that the underlying criminal case (Begusarai Town PS Case No.305 of 2014) …
The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 05‑08‑2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, which had taken cognizance of a complaint against them under Sections 147 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Sinha, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 31 March 2017, wherein a Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 504 and 417 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the criminal case …
The petitioners, members of the Basir Khan family, filed an application seeking to quash a 15 September 2009 order that had taken cognizance against them under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They further requested that the trial court be directed to …
The petitioners, a group of residents from Saran district, filed a writ petition against the State of Bihar and several officials seeking relief concerning a letter (No.667 dated 25‑11‑2025) issued by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sonpur. The State contended that the High Court’s earlier order …
The petitioners, four residents of Simari Dudhi Patti, filed a writ petition against the State of Bihar and its officials, challenging an order dated 23 May 2025 passed by the Circle Officer, Simari. The State contended that the High Court's earlier order had been complied with and that the Circle …
The Patna High Court heard a Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 filed by ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company challenging the compensation awarded by the Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal to the widow and minor children of the deceased Subodh Mahto. The …
The petitioner filed a review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the High Court’s dismissal of his specific performance suit. He claimed the 25‑January‑2002 agreement for sale was valid and that the original 18‑September‑2001 deed, allegedly in the defendant’s …
The petitioner, Md. Kalam, was released on bail on 14-10-2025 with a condition to surrender to the concerned court within six weeks. He was unable to do so due to unavoidable circumstances and applied for an extension of four weeks to comply with the surrender condition. The State, represented by an …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was granted bail on 13-10-2025 with a condition to surrender to the concerned court within six weeks. He was unable to comply due to unavoidable circumstances and applied for a modification of the bail order to obtain an additional four weeks to surrender. The State of …
The petitioner, Basudeo Mukhiya, filed an application seeking modification of a bail order dated 09-09-2025, requesting additional time to surrender before the concerned court. He had deposited Rs.3,000 with the Advocates’ Association and cited unavoidable circumstances for not surrendering within …
The appellant, Pradip Kumar Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by an affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police dated 20 January 2026. The court considered whether the death of the sole appellant …
The appellants Prakash Singh, Kuwar Singh and Dinesh Singh filed criminal appeals before the Patna High Court challenging their convictions. While the appeals were pending, the Superintendent of Police submitted a report stating that all three appellants had died. The Court examined whether the …
The appellants Prakash Singh, Kuwar Singh and Dinesh Singh filed separate criminal appeals before the Patna High Court against convictions by the State of Bihar. The court issued a notice on 17 July 2025 requesting a living status report of the accused. The Superintendent of Police submitted a …
The appellants Prakash Singh, Kuwar Singh and Dinesh Singh filed separate criminal appeals before the Patna High Court against convictions by the State of Bihar. The court issued a notice on 17 July 2025 requesting a living status report of the accused. The Superintendent of Police submitted a …
Sudhir Mandan filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.705 of 2004 before the Patna High Court. While the appeal was pending, a living status report was ordered on 09-12-2025. The Superintendent of Police submitted a report on 07-01-2026 stating that the appellant had died. The Court held that the death of …
Sheo Baitha filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 07-06-2016 passed by the ACJM‑cum‑Sub Judge and the subsequent order dated 11-09-2017 passed by the Sessions Judge in a case arising under sections 386, 392, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the orders …
The petitioner, Jyoti Prakash Pandey, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash a Family Court order dated 04‑05‑2018 that directed him to pay monthly maintenance of Rs 10,000 and Rs 20,000 for litigation costs. The petitioner argued that the underlying criminal case (PS case No‑20, …
The petitioner, Sunil Pandit, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of the order dated 28 July 2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under various sections of the IPC and the POCSO Act against him and another accused. The petition argued that the matter had become …
The petitioners Arvind Singh, Bablu Singh and Heera Shankar Singh filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 04.08.2017/18.08.2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate in Complaint Case No. 657 of 2016. The State opposed the petition, …
The petitioner, Ganesh Rai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 02-08-2018 of the Sessions Judge which had rejected his earlier petition under Section 227 CrPC. The petition argued that the matter had become infructuous because the …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar Pandey, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 13 August 2018 that had taken cognizance against him under Sections 498(A), 307 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition argued that he had already been …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19 June 2018, wherein the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance against them under Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The petitioner, Anil Ojha, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 21 August 2018 of the 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 311 CrPC for recalling witnesses PW‑2 and PW‑3 for …
Riya Singh filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 22 September 2017 passed by the First‑Tier Court (FTC‑II) Buxar, which had set aside the cognizance taken by the SDJM under Section 498A IPC. The petition argued that the underlying …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.20985 of 2018) seeking to quash an order of cognizance dated 19 April 2016. During the hearing on 28 January 2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The learned judge considered …
The petitioners, who were acquitted in a criminal case (Sessions Trial No. 85 of 2017) arising from a 2012 complaint, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 21.02.2018 that had rejected their earlier Section 227 petition. The High Court …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar Sharma, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 February 2018 passed by the Fast Track Court‑I, Khagaria, after his earlier petition under Section 227 was rejected. The petition was filed because the …
