Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

1090 judgments · newest first · showing 601–800

Dilshad @ Md. DilshadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Dilshad and Raiyan, sought bail in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they were falsely implicated in a fight over road construction. The prosecution alleged that petitioner No.1 caught the informant and petitioner No.2 inflicted a …

Ram Babu MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Babu Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 54 litres of country-made liquor. The FIR alleged that during a police raid on 22-10-2025 the petitioner fled and the …

Priyanshu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Priyanshu Singh, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 96, 3(5), 64 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly kidnapping the informant's minor daughter. The prosecution alleged that the kidnapping was part of a …

Vishal Yadav @ Vishal Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vishal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 69, 318(4), 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging sexual exploitation and harassment of the informant, who claimed the petitioner broke off multiple marriage arrangements. …

Dipu Rajvanshi @ Dipu RajbanshiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dipu Rajvanshi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 47(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 35 litres of illicit liquor and 340 kg of fermented Jawa Mahua recovered from an open place. …

Anand Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Anant Kumar (Chhotu)versusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four brothers from Chandpur village, were implicated in a case alleging that one of them assaulted the informant’s brother and the others dragged the same person and threw him into a well. The charges were framed under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (including …

Arun Kumar @ Arun Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, five young men from Dighwara, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault on an informant and others. The prosecution alleged that fourteen accused, including the petitioners, participated in …

Shivdatt @ Shivdatt Arya @ Shivdatt Prasad AryaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a 64‑year‑old man suffering from a serious brain stroke, sought bail after being implicated in a case registered under Section 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑b)(i), 26(1)(2) and 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that he was part of a gang planning kidnapping …

Balchand Yadav @ Bachan Prasad @ Balchand PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Balchand Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 4 litres of illicit liquor seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged the liquor was …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar and Sarjesh Kumar Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 105.125 litres of illicit liquor was recovered. The prosecution alleged involvement, but the petitioners argued that no incriminating …

Suran Yadav @ Surendra Yadav @ BaukaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suran Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 15 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from an open place. The prosecution alleged the offence, but no incriminating material was found in the petitioner's conscious possession …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Sections 30(a)(d) and 54(1) for the alleged possession of 25 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a lodge. The petitioner argued that the liquor was …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Anuj Kumar and Jairam Chaudhary were named accused in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 48 litres of illicit liquor seized from two motorcycles. The petitioners contended that no incriminating material was found in their …

HARIOM KUMAR @ GUDDARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Hariom Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.94 litres of illicit liquor from a bamboo orchard. The prosecution alleged the offence, but the petitioner argued that the …

Prabhakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Prabhakar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He argued that the FIR was based on a complaint case that had already been dismissed under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C., …

Dashrath SahversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, three brothers from Madhepura, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault on an informant and her family over a land dispute. One …

Md. Rizwan @ Md. Rizwan AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five residents of Simri Bakhtiyarpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault stemming from a land dispute. The FIR alleged that the petitioners, along with others, …

Mukesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mukesh Mandal and Puja Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault on an informant and his family. They contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the incident …

Chatri YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chatri Yadav, a licensed PDS dealer, was implicated in an FIR alleging large‑scale misappropriation of wheat and rice meant for the Public Distribution System, invoking Sections 303(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The …

Md. Musarif @ Md. MusarafversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Musarif, was implicated in a FIR alleging that he forcibly abducted a woman, confined her, and raped her, invoking Sections 126(2), 115(2) and 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the FIR was lodged after an …

Md. ShamimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Shamim and Md. Sajjad, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged they assaulted an informant and his brothers during a verbal dispute over road construction. The FIR listed offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The petitioners …

Madan Singh @ Madan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Madan Singh and his wife Vinay Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging land fraud involving a forged deed of gift executed after the death of the informant’s husband. The informant’s second wife, Suga Devi, filed the complaint alleging that the petitioners …

Meena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Meena Devi was apprehended for alleged involvement in the illicit liquor case (Case No.211 of 2019, Bhargama PS) where 343.125 litres of illegal liquor were recovered from a bamboo orchard. The prosecution alleged offences under IPC Sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition …

Kuwar Chauhan @ Kunwar ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kuwar Chauhan, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged involvement in the recovery of 72 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered from a roadside and that the petitioner’s name …

Punit Kumar @ Puneet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Punit Kumar, feared arrest in a dowry‑related case (Mahila Case No. 76 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 498‑A, 504, 506/34 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that after marriage the petitioner took the wife to Delhi, later the wife’s …

RINKU SAH @ RAKESH KUMARversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rinku Sah, was accused of assaulting the informant during a dispute over vegetable stalls, allegedly causing a fractured hand and head injury. The FIR listed offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner argued that the dispute was a private quarrel, …

Aunj Kumar Pandey @ Chhotu PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aunj Kumar Pandey, sought anticipatory bail in a case (PS‑28/2023) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting the informant’s brother with a lathi. The petitioner contended that both parties are agnates involved in a …

Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sunil Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 33.06 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from an open field. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but the petitioner argued that no …

Ram Babu Sahni @ Ram Babu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Babu Sahni applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the manufacturing and sale of illicit country-made liquor. The police raid on a co-accused's house recovered 50 litres of illicit liquor and equipment, and the petitioner was alleged to have protested, freed an …

Barun Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Barun Kumar Mahto, the registered owner of a motorcycle, applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 8.5 litres of foreign liquor from two persons riding his bike in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that he was falsely …

Shankar Rai @ Shankar RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shankar Rai applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the seizure of 2,593.08 litres of illicit liquor from six vehicles, alleged to violate Sections 30(a), 36 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The …

Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, members of the Sharma family, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 127(2), 190, 191(2), 117(2), 109 and 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the informant's daughters on 26 November 2025. The prosecution alleged that …

Shiv Manjhi @ Shiv Dusad @ Shivji ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shiv Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged the liquor was found at an open place, but the petitioner …

Ankit KumarversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and Bablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a police seizure of 300.330 liters of illicit liquor from a vehicle and a truck, with Bablu Kumar being the registered owner of the seized auto. They argued that no incriminating material was found in their possession, they …

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar Yadav, was implicated in an excise case where 40 litres of illicit liquor were recovered. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that no incriminating material was found in his possession and that his name only surfaced during investigation. The State opposed the …

Manoj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the seizure of 7,300 litres of illicit liquor and three motorcycles, one of which he owned. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 413 and 414 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 30(c), and 41 …

Arjun Yadav @ Arjun Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arjun Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 234.36 litres of illicit liquor seized from a boat. The petitioner argued that he neither owned nor operated …

Akbar @ Md. Akbar Ali AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Akbar @ Md. Akbar Ali Ansari and another, feared arrest in a case (PS Case No. 59/2026) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for allegedly supplying fake lottery tickets. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that no lottery …

Gopal MaharajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gopal Maharaj, was charged under Sections 81, 69 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly persuading a woman to obtain a divorce by promising marriage, subsequently engaging in a year‑long consensual relationship and then refusing to marry her. The petitioner contended …

DIPENKUMAR CHAMPAKLAL DAMORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Dipenkumar Damor, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 465, 468, 471, 406, 420 and 114, including forging thumb impressions to withdraw cash. The prosecution …

PRATIK @ROHIT DAYABHAI CHOVATIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioners Pratik @Rohit Dayabhai Chovatiya and another filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash FIR No.11208057240045 (2024) registered for alleged offences under Section 66(c) of the Information Technology Act. The …

Nawendu Gautam @ Rahul PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nawendu Gautam, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged offences concerning a land and house transaction. He had sold the property to his wife, while his brother (the informant) claimed the land as …

Rajaram DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Rajaram Das was named in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant and his family. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and that the police charge‑sheet only covered bailable …

Ranjeet NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Nut, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 202 of 2023) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 15 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from an open area behind his house. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the recovery …

Rohit @ Fekan Kumar @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the recovery of 40 litres of illicit liquor, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no incriminating material was found …

Pramila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pramila Devi, is the registered owner of a motorcycle from which 1.5 litres of illicit liquor was seized, although the vehicle had been stolen prior to the incident. She apprehended arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, but argued that no incriminating …

Indrajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Indrajeet Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 855 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a Scorpio vehicle. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no incriminating material was found on him and he …

Ved Prakash @ GudduversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Ved Prakash was arrested in a case under Sections 281 and 106 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly ramming a cyclist with his car, causing the victim's death, and subsequently colliding with an electric pole. The petitioner contended that the incident was an accident that occurred …

Sobha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sobha Devi was named as an accused in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 10 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from an open area outside her house. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that no incriminating material was found in her conscious …

JamaluddinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jamaluddin, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under the NDPS Act where 12 grams of brown sugar were seized from a co-accused, Tabarak Ansari, who alleged that Jamaluddin had handed over the contraband. The prosecution’s case relied on the confessional statement of the arrested …

Rajiv Ranjan Kumar @ Rajiv RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajiv Ranjan Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Phulwarisharif Case No. 187 of 2015) alleging offences under Sections 498A and 494 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged marital discord, the death of a newborn, and extortion. The petitioner claimed innocence …

Hiralal RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Hiralal Ram, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Belaon PS Case No. 33 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that after marrying the informant in 2017, the petitioner and co‑accused …

PRAKASHBHAI BABULAL GELOTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, the original accused, filed a special criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) seeking the quashal of FIR No.11195019251204 registered at Deesa Rural Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 108, 351(3) and 54 of the BNS. The …

Roshni Khatoon @ RoshniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Maheshkhut village, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a land dispute case where they were alleged to have forged a deed and forcibly occupied the informant's land, assaulting him and his family with weapons, causing injuries to six persons. …

Akbar AbbasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Akbar Abbas and Khalid Abbas, were accused of cheating the informant of Rs 5 lakhs in connection with an alleged arms‑license scam, invoking Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners received Rs 3 lakhs, collected …

Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Uday Kumar and Sunil Kumar were named in an FIR for alleged assault, robbery and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The State and the informant opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The court examined the nature of …

Saket KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Saket Kumar, former branch manager of Aashirwad Micro Finance, was accused in an FIR of embezzling Rs.43,754, alleged to have been taken but not deposited in the company locker. The FIR was lodged 19 months after the alleged incident. Kumar applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he had …

Harendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four members of the Paswan family, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged they assaulted an informant's family with an iron rod and a gun butt over a wage dispute. The FIR named them among 18-20 accused and charged them under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

Arjun Rai @ Arjun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arjun Rai applied for bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the Arms Act. The FIR and seizure list show 752.6 litres of foreign liquor recovered from a boat, not from the …

Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Pramod Singh and his son Govind Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging extortion, robbery and assault under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). They contended that the allegations were false, arising from a dispute with …

Usha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Usha Devi, a resident of Patna, was implicated in a case under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 60 kg of Mahua flower was seized from a motorcycle she owned. She claimed the motorcycle had …

Saroj Yadav @ Saroj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saroj Yadav, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, for alleged possession of large quantities of illicit liquor and brewing materials. He contended that the allegations were based on …

Tej Narayan Singh @ Tejan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Tej Narayan Singh, a 75‑year‑old caretaker, applied for anticipatory bail in a theft case (Police Station Case No. 236 of 2025) where he was alleged to have conspired with his son to steal jewellery and a motorcycle from the informant’s house. The FIR charges him under Sections 331(4), 305 and …

Ashok YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ashok Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he was alleged to have assaulted Murari Yadav with an axe, causing injury to the leg. The FIR, stemming from a land dispute, listed several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner argued that the injury was to a non‑vital …

Nitin Kumar @ Nitin Rider @ Nitin Raj @ KaruversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitin Kumar, aged 18, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault on an informant with a knife and other weapons, under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR described a violent incident where the petitioner, along with a large group, allegedly …

Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ajay Singh was arrested in a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife, who reportedly died after being tortured over a demand for a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that the marriage took place in 2004 and the death in 2009 was due to …

MD. JAKIRversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Jakir and Md. Ekram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for allegedly keeping three stolen tractors in front of their shop. They contended that one tractor belonged to them, supported by a …

Lallan Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five individuals from Rasula village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they assaulted an informant and …

Yousuf AkhtarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Yousuf Akhtar feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged knife assault on the informant's son. The FIR named 13 persons, but the petitioner’s name does not appear; he was only mentioned later in a co‑accused’s …

Biran Paswan @ Viran PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Biran Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, where the FIR alleged recovery of 160 litres of spirit, empty plastic bottles and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycle, the …

Santosh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault on police and obstruction of a public servant. The FIR alleged that Mahto, along with others, attacked police …

Neyaz Alam @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neyaz Alam was implicated in a road‑accident case originally registered under bailable offences under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code. After three years of investigation, the police added non‑bailable charges under Sections 341, 304 and 504, alleging that the deceased was pushed …

Wajid @ Md. Wajid AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of seven men from Sheikhtoli village, were implicated in a case arising from a land dispute where they were alleged to have assaulted an informant and others with various weapons on 06.07.2025. The FIR listed offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

Bikash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Bikash Yadav was arrested in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to a local land dispute and political rivalry, asserting his innocence and clean …

Nibha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Nibha Kumari and Deep Narayan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 140(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging extortion and kidnapping of a son. The prosecution alleged that a call demanded Rs.40 lakhs for …

Ranju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ranju Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 85, 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging that she and others killed the informant’s sister over a dowry dispute. She contended that she was falsely implicated, had no criminal …

Uday Prasad @ Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Uday Prasad, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 85, 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, where the FIR alleged that a dowry dispute led to the murder of the informant's sister. He contended that he was merely a neighbour of the deceased, had no involvement …

Sukhlal ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sukhlal Manjhi, was implicated in a 2004 kidnapping and ransom case under Sections 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have abducted the minor daughter of the complainant and demanded Rs.50,000. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that he is married to …

Satish Kumar Jha @ Satish Kumar @ Satish JhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners applied for bail in a complaint case (No. 862 of 2024) involving alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault, criminal intimidation, and damage to property. The allegations stem from a land dispute where petitioner No. 3 allegedly sold …

Salman KhurshidversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Salman Khurshid and Md. Ehsan Khurshid, applied for bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they were falsely implicated in an assault on the informant's sons stemming from a land dispute. The State opposed the bail, arguing the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 137, 87, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging kidnapping of an informant's daughter. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. indicated she went with the petitioner voluntarily and made no …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting his uncle during a land dispute. He claimed innocence, stating the injury was minor and that the dispute was a family matter. The State opposed his bail …

Chand Mohan Pal @ Chandra Mohan Pal @ Chandramohan PalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chand Mohan Pal, was implicated in an NDPS case after co‑accused Mritunjay Pandey and Anita Devi alleged that he ordered them to procure 16.739 kg of ganja from another co‑accused. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the only evidence against him were the co‑accused’s …

Shivchandra Ray @ Shivchandra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivchandra Ray and Vijay Ray applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 1163.7 litres of illicit liquor were recovered. The prosecution alleged their involvement, but the petitioners argued that no incriminating material …

Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 100 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from an open field. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered in connection with a case registered under …

Kapildev YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kapildev Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he and a co‑accused verbally abused the informant’s mother and forcibly took a child’s neckcloth, invoking multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting the incident …

Rajeev Raj @ BadmashversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajeev Raj, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 1794.375 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a co‑accused. He argued that no incriminating material was found in his possession, his name only surfaced during investigation, …

Naushad AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Naushad Alam, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry case (Case No. 38 of 2025) alleging that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution alleged dowry demand, torture, and a second marriage, invoking several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

Dheeraj Kumar ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar Chauhan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging he was falsely implicated in dowry‑related harassment and torture of his wife. The prosecution alleged that the …

Namonarayan JhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Namonarayan Jha, sought anticipatory bail in a case arising from a land sale dispute where he was implicated under IPC sections 406, 419, 420 and 120B. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and an associate had received Rs.58 lakh for land, with Rs.22 lakh remaining unpaid, …

ASHUTOSH KUMAR PATHAK ALIAS ASHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashutosh Kumar Pathak, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 433 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 50, 354(gha) IPC, Sections 11/12 of the POCSO Act, and Section 67(b) …

Baidya Nath Mishra @ Bukku MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ashutosh Kumar and Sarita Sangam, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that they had abducted and assaulted a 10‑year‑old boy from the informant’s family and committed various offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The petitioners contended that the …

Nikhat PraveenversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nikhat Praveen, a PDS shop owner, was implicated in a case alleging shortage of 312.42 quintals of rice and 18.42 quintals of wheat, purportedly amounting to black‑marketing of subsidised food grains under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 7 of the Essential …

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Saw @ Pappu SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Pappu Kumar and his wife Rajani Devi, parents of alleged kidnapper Shubham Kumar, feared arrest in a case involving the kidnapping of a minor. They were implicated under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the POCSO Act, …

MOHAMMAD RASHEEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant, husband of the respondent, filed an application under Section 340 CrPC/Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) alleging that the respondent gave a false affidavit regarding his employment with the Northern Central Railway. The Family Court rejected the application …

BRAJESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Brajesh Singh, husband of the respondent, filed an application under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code (now Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) alleging that the respondent made false statements in an affidavit filed in a Section 125 CrPC case. The Family …

Ashok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ashok Kumar, a wholesale medicine dealer, was alleged to have received medicines worth Rs. 30,675 from the complainant and failed to pay the amount, leading to a complaint under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Anticipating arrest, the petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, stating his …

Kalpana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kalpana Devi and Niraj Kumar Mandal, mother‑in‑law and husband of Veena Devi respectively, filed a petition fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleges that after Veena Devi's marriage …

POONAM PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Poonam Pal, who was accused of offences under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code relating to an alleged fraudulent sale deed. The applicant contended …

Parsidh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, three members of the Yadav family, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(1), 126(2), 115(2) and 109(1) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly …

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged seizure of 40 litres of illicit mahua liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …

Md. Ahsan Ali @ Md. AhsanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, three residents of Barahpura, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a 2018 case (PS Lodipur Case No.65) involving alleged assault and theft of cash, ATM card, Aadhar, PAN and a mobile phone. The FIR named …

Kishori RaiversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Petitioners Kishori Rai and Sanjeet Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault and robbery stemming from a land dispute, while petitioner Shashi Rai withdrew his application. The prosecution alleged that the accused, armed with deadly weapons, attacked an informant and …

Md. Jafar Ali @ Md. Jafar @ Md. ZafarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jafar Ali, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a complaint filed in 2019 alleging offences under Sections 323, 341, 354, 504, 506 and 376 IPC. The complaint dated 1990 was taken up by the court in December …

SANJIT KUMAR RAOversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanjit Kumar Rao, sought bail in a criminal case registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for alleged shortfall of 421.58 quintals of foodgrains during a PDS shop inspection. He contended that the FIR was lodged after a five‑year delay without proper verification …

Vineet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vineet Kumar, a 21‑year‑old student, was implicated in a FIR alleging that he, while intoxicated, assaulted the son of an informant with a lathi. He sought bail, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that the injuries were minor. The State opposed the bail. The court noted the …

Prashant TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Prashant Tiwari sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS No. 164 of 2025) alleging his involvement in assaulting the informant's parents. He claimed innocence, a clean antecedent, and that the alleged assault caused no grievous injury. The State opposed the bail, but the court …

Ravi PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ravi Prakash, a junior engineer, was implicated in a complaint alleging misuse of government funds allocated for a school building, invoking Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was never a member of the committee overseeing the construction, was not posted at the …

Indrajeet Kumar @ Indrajeet Kumar SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Indrajeet Kumar Sinha, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126, 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, where the prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused assaulted the informant's son, daughter‑in‑law and brother. The petitioner …

Anil Kumar Mahato @ Pinku MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Anil Kumar Mahato and Raja Ram Mahto, sought bail in a criminal case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the informant's wife with a stick, causing injury. They contended that they were falsely implicated due to a land dispute, …

Pinku Sharma @ Pinku Singh @ Pinku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pinku Sharma, was apprehended for alleged theft of a scooter, with the case registered under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the only incriminating evidence was the confessional statement of co‑accused Sonal Kumar and that no material was …

Fattu @ Triveni Yadav @ Triveni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Fattu @ Triveni Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged murder of the informant's brother. The deceased was found dead and the informant alleged that the petitioner, along with …

Raja Manjhi @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raja Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging his participation in a violent assault that led to the death of an informant's husband. The FIR listed several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, but the petitioner argued that the accusations …

Deepak Kumar @ Dipak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, where the prosecution alleged that he kidnapped a minor girl. The victim, aged 17, was later recovered and, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, …

MAHEMUDABEN W/O RAFIQ HASANBHAI GHOGHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

The High Court of Gujarat heard a criminal revision application filed by Mahemudaben challenging an order of a subordinate court in a double murder case. The applicant’s counsel argued that no case existed to even frame a charge, while the Additional Public Prosecutor contended that the matter …

Shekhar Paswan @ Shekhar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Shekhar Paswan and Chandan Paswan, sought bail in a case registered under Section 354(A) of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging they were falsely implicated due to a land dispute and enmity. They argued that the complaint was filed after an inordinate delay of more than …

Awadh Bihari @ Awadh Bihari Rai @ Nand Bihari PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, a group of fourteen individuals from Sobaiya village, were accused of assaulting a grocery shop owner, his family, and destroying property over a credit dispute, with charges under numerous sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that more than one hundred …

Ritik Kumar Thakur @ Ritik KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ritik Kumar Thakur, a 22‑year‑old, was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the same code indicated that she had …

Santosh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Singh sought bail after anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly stockpiling 7,400 cubic feet of illegal sand. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was found in his possession, and that …

Sayeda Begum @ Sayeda KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sayeda Begum, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly abusing and assaulting an informant, causing a simple injury. She contended that the allegations were false, arising …

Fida HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, relatives of a married couple, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case alleging dowry demand, forced marriage and the administration of poison leading to the death of the informant's daughter. The FIR, …

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2)) and the Arms Act, 2023 (section 27). The FIR alleges that on 5 March 2025 the petitioner, along with co‑accused, …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar, a 20‑year‑old college student, was named in FIR No. 379/2025 for alleged assault, threatening with firearms and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the mobile number cited did not belong to him and that …

Chotan Kumar @ Himanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chotan Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging that he, along with others, forcibly took Rs.12,000, a gold ring and a locket, and was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the FIR was false, …

Sanjay ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, parents of the main accused Kumarjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in a case where the accused allegedly fled with a minor to solemnise a marriage. The FIR did not specifically …

Deepak Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Patel, was arrested for alleged possession of 10.4 kg of ganja, a quantity higher than a small amount but less than commercial quantity, under the NDPS Act. Earlier bail applications were rejected on 03-10-2024 and 16-05-2025. The petitioner argued that his antecedents …

BUDHABHAI @ NARESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI AAHIR @ DANGARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioners, who were the original accused, filed a Special Criminal Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash FIR No.11198067250907 registered at Vartej Police Station, Bhavnagar for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Money …

MITHUN LONAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Mithun Lona, who was in custody for alleged violations of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 (Sections 3, 5A, 8) and the Animal Cruelty (Prevention) Act, 1960 …

RAJAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Raja, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 187 of 2025 involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was …

MOHIT KUMAR JATAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohit Kumar Jatav, who was charged under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant pleaded innocence, …

SUJEET YADAV @ GOLU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Sujeet Yadav, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant …

PHOOLCHANDRA AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings of Criminal Case Nil of 2025, which originated from Crime No. 37 of 2025. The contention was that the cognizance order issued by the Judicial Magistrate was undated and …

MOHITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohit, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed …

KAILASH AGRAHARI @ KAILASH CHANDRA DASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Kailash Agrahari, who was charged under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, had …

RAM UJAGIR @ MUNNU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1825 of 2023) and a non‑bailable warrant issued against them while they were on bail. They contended that the warrant was issued without first …

RAMJI VERMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ramji Verma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a 28 September 2012 order of the Sessions Judge, Chandauli, which had affirmed the dismissal of a release application in Crime No. 319 of 2011. After hearing, …

Reshav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Reshav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 109, 140, 111 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that on 16 September 2025 the accused attempted to kill the petitioner, but the petitioner was not named in the …

Bhim Singh @ NeerajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhim Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 25(9) of the Arms Act for allegedly supplying a pistol to co‑accused Amarjeet Chaudhary. The prosecution’s case …

Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Raghopur Pashchami, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that petitioners 1 and 2 assaulted an informant with an iron rod causing simple injuries, while petitioner 3 assaulted the informant’s brother causing grievous injury. The case involved …

Aftab Alam @ Md. Aftab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aftab Alam, was accused of dowry harassment and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from his marriage to the complainant. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in the complaint case. The petitioner offered to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. 3000 to …

Surendra Paswan @ Sulo PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Surendra Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR, filed by an informant, alleged that co‑accused Shivam Kumar and Sonu Kumar had kidnapped the informant's minor daughter …

Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning the disappearance of a 15‑year‑old girl, the informant’s daughter. The girl’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita …

Rahul SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rahul Singh, husband of the complainant, was charged under Sections 498A and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry harassment and fraud. He contended that the case stemmed from a petty family dispute, he had a clean antecedent, and the matter was triable by a magistrate. Relying …

Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that they brutally assaulted an informant and her husband, looted cash and ornaments, and were charged under multiple IPC sections. The petitioners contended that the case was false, arising from a land …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 378 of 2025) alleging kidnapping of the minor daughter of an informant, under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail, contending his innocence and …

Dharmendra Kumar Chaudhary @ Dharmendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 364, 364A, 368, 367 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that co‑accused had assaulted an informant, demanded money and forged a …

SANNI KUMAR @ SANNI MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers, were accused of uploading objectionable photographs of an informant's daughter on social media, violating several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming that only the third …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape, wrongful restraint, hurt, insult and common intention under Sections 376, 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the IPC, and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner sought bail after an earlier anticipatory bail application had been …

Raja Mahto @ Raja Mahton @ Raj Kumar BindversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raja Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Patarghat PS Case No. 68 of 2025) involving alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault, robbery and attempts to outrage modesty. The FIR alleged that a group of 23 persons, …

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case arising from FIR No. 291 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR described an incident where the petitioner and others allegedly abused a …

Satyendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satyendra Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case arising from a neighbourhood quarrel that escalated into a physical altercation on 28 July 2025. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault with a lathi‑danda, use of …

Ranjesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Ranjesh Kumar and Raushan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they were falsely implicated due to local political and land‑dispute motives. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS‑71/2025) alleging assault on an informant with weapons, under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the informant’s statement was recorded after an eight‑day delay without explanation, and that he was falsely …

Mukesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mukesh Rai was named in an FIR for allegedly attempting to snatch a vehicle and its key along with four other accused, invoking IPC sections 341, 342, 504, 420, 386 and 387/34. He pleaded that he was falsely implicated due to village politics, had no criminal antecedent and posed no risk of …

Md. Kausher Ali @ Md. Kausher @ Kausher AliversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brothers‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 85, 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleges that the deceased …

Nawal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, members of the Paswan family, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged assault and other offences. The prosecution alleged that a co‑accused, Pankaj Kumar, sexually exploited a victim and that the …

Surendhar Rai @ Surendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Surendhar Rai and Babu Saheb, applied for bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they assaulted the informant's husband and his brother with an iron rod. The prosecution alleged that petitioner No.1 caused injury to …

Suresh chaudhary @ Suresh ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Suresh Chaudhary, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and her relatives. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and highlighted a three‑day delay in filing the FIR without explanation. …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Yadav and Mukesh Yadav were named in an FIR for alleged firing in a land dispute, alongside 15 others. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming innocence and noting the FIR shows no victim. The State opposed bail, …

Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

Monu Kumar filed a modification application seeking to avail an appropriate legal remedy, contending that Section 403 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) imposes a bar on his relief. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Rakesh Bihari Singh, argued that the bar should not preclude his …

Rinki DeviversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

Petitioner Rinki Devi filed a modification application seeking to avail a legal remedy despite a statutory bar under Section 403 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The State of Bihar opposed the application. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the bar should not preclude the remedy …

SHOAIB MOHAMMAD YUSUF DOLAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Shoiab Mohammad Yusuf Dola, was arrested in July 2025 for alleged offences under the IPC relating to a large-scale MGNREGA fraud. After several denied bail applications, the Chief Judicial Magistrate granted regular bail on 8 October 2025 following the filing of a charge‑sheet. The …

SALEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Saleem, who is accused in Crime No. 333 of 2024 under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. Saleem claimed innocence and …

Ravi Kumar @ Ranvir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ravi Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Purnea police case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act, where 11.05 grams of narcotic material was recovered from co‑accused Vishal Kumar. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no contraband was found on him and that he was …

Durgesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Durgesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case arising from a land dispute where he was alleged to have assaulted his neighbour with iron knuckles, causing a head injury. The FIR listed offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

VIVEK DUAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Vivek Dua, who was charged under Sections 3(5), 109(1), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 30 of the Arms Act. The …

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Kumar, husband of the second respondent, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 283 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the trial court had taken cognizance of the offences without granting him a …

Paritosh Mandal @ Pritosh Kumar @ PeritoshversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Paritosh Mandal, sought bail after fearing arrest in a theft case involving the crown of a Lord Hanuman idol, alleged under Sections 334(1), 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The FIR named unknown persons, and the petitioner’s name appeared only in a …

CHIKU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail in a 2018 case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 394, 504 and 34 of the IPC for alleged assault and robbery. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a group that surrounded an informant on motorcycles and looted his belongings, but the …

Subodh Paswan @ Subodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Subodh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where the FIR alleged that he assaulted the informant's son with an iron rod, causing a minor head injury. The dispute arose between co‑villagers during the informant's daughter's marriage procession, involving alleged damage to …

Mithun Paswan @ Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mithun Paswan and Santosh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Lakho PS Case No. 178 of 2025) alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault, arson and robbery. The FIR, lodged three months after the alleged incident, …

Brjesh Sharma @ Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Brajesh Sharma was arrested in a case where co‑accused Chunnu Panday and Ankit Pandey fired a pistol at an informant, causing injuries. The FIR alleges Sharma instigated the firing, charging him under Sections 190(1), 118(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, but no …

Md. Riyajul @ Sarvar @ SukharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six residents of Banki village, were named in an FIR alleging that they, armed with iron rods, assaulted an informant and his family, causing injuries and theft of cash and valuables. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that they were falsely implicated due to …

Guddu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Guddu Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.12776 of 2026 arising from PS case No.398 of 2025, Dhanaha, West Champaran. He feared arrest for offences under Sections 190, 191(2), 329(3), 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352 and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

Pratima DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the Chairman, Manager and members of the Lodipur PACS, were charged under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for allegedly embezzling Rs 41,81,069 during the procurement and sale of paddy. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing …

Tarique AnwarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four brothers and a sister-in-law from Tekari, Gaya, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Case No. 313 of 2025) alleged that they assaulted the informant, her daughter, and other family members with a sharp-edged weapon, committing offences under several sections of the …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikash Kumar and Umesh Kumar, sons of Kanhaiya Raut, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The FIR named an unknown perpetrator and the petitioners' names were not mentioned therein; they …

Khushbu Khatun @ JuliversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Khushbu Khatun and Sharfaraj Ragib, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging kidnapping of a minor for prostitution. The prosecution’s FIR, based on an informant’s …

Golu Kumar @ Golu Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was accused of kidnapping the minor granddaughter of an informant under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the victim, in a statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, denied the prosecution's …

Mansi Kumari @ Priyanka@ Prishka KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mansi Kumari, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry death case where the husband of the deceased is already in custody. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a conspiracy to kill the deceased for dowry demands under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The …

Vindeshwari MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vindeshwari Mahato, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that she assaulted an informant with a bhala, invoking multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner contended that she was innocent and that any injury caused was simple in nature. The State …

Neeraj Kumar @ Neeraj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neeraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault, rioting, and illegal possession of arms under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his …

Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was accused of stabbing an informant, leading to charges under IPC sections 341, 504, 323 and 308. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting innocence, that the injury was simple, and that he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness …

AMAVAS PAL AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the cognizance order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case arising from an alleged demolition of a toilet, assault and criminal intimidation over a land dispute. They argued that the …

Harinandan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, members of the Sah family, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case concerning the death of an informant’s daughter. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, together with other accused, strangled the victim for non‑fulfilment of a demand, invoking …

Sunny Mahto @ Utkarsh RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sunny Mahto sought bail in a criminal case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 307 and 34, alleging that he and co‑accused assaulted an informant who later sustained simple injuries. The FIR described a waylaying and assault with a wicket. Counsel for the petitioner argued that …

Shivam PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivam Pandey filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (PS Gopalganj No.299/2023) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 406 and 34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The trial court had ordered mediation, and the parties reached a compromise documented in a mediation report …

AKHILESH KUMAR SAHANI @ AKHILESH KUMAR SAHNIversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging he tortured his wife, Babita Kumari, both mentally and physically for dowry, invoking IPC sections 323, 341, 452, 307, 313, 504 and 498A. The husband contended he was ready to care for his wife with dignity, …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging kidnapping and forced marriage under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sahnita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner abducted the informant’s granddaughter with intent to marry her, while the victim’s …

Brahm Deo SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, co‑sharers in a land dispute, were accused of assaulting an informant and his family, causing injuries to twelve persons, including grievous injuries to two victims. The FIR alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners argued that the …

Tipu SultanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tipu Sultan, was accused of multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including dowry harassment and cruelty, arising from a dispute with his wife, the informant. The informant alleged that she was subjected to torture and cruelty for non‑payment of dowry, leading to a …

Mohd. Jamshed Azhar @ Md Jamshed AjharversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mohd Jamshed Azhar and his wife, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal complaint alleging offences under several IPC sections, including dowry harassment, criminal intimidation, and sexual assault. The FIR alleged that their son, Md Ruhullah, had a physical …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar sought bail after an FIR alleged that he assaulted Dilip Kumar with a sword, causing a simple injury. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and the State opposed bail. The court examined the nature of the injury, the petitioner’s clean record, and the circumstances of the …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an NDNDPS case where 5.58 kg of ganja was seized from a motorcycle and a co-accused named him. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the co-accused’s confessional statement, with no incriminating material recovered from the …

Sanoj Das @ Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanoj Das, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he assaulted the husband of an informant and placed a pistol in his mouth, causing a simple injury. He sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences listed under …

Sajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sajan Kumar, sought bail after fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 126(2), 127(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) and section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that two persons on a motorcycle fired at the informant on 24‑06‑2025, and …

Baby DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of relatives from Chakle Waini, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The FIR alleged that on 11‑08‑2025 they assaulted and disrobed an informant, causing …

Ram Balak RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Balak Ram, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died in a dowry‑death case, filed a bail petition after being implicated under sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The prosecution alleged that he, along with other accused, tortured the victim for dowry and …