Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioners, members of the Sharma family, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 127(2), 190, 191(2), 117(2), 109 and 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the informant's daughters on 26 November 2025. The prosecution alleged that the assault caused head injuries, while the petitioners contended they were innocent, the injuries were minor, and they had clean antecedents except one petitioner who was on bail for a prior offence. The State and the informant opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the allegations. The Court examined the nature of the accusations, the extent of injuries, and the petitioners' backgrounds, and concluded that anticipatory bail was appropriate. Accordingly, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners under the allegations of assault?
  • Whether the petitioners are likely to tamper with evidence, influence witnesses, or abscond if bail is denied.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • bail conditions
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20323 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2025 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj Sharma Son of Late Vashishth Sharma
                  Resident of Village- Andarkila, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya Ji
           2.    Manju Devi Wife of Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj Sharma Resident of
                 Village- Andarkila, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya Ji
           3.    Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Sharma Son of Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj
                 Sharma Resident of Village- Andarkila, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya Ji
           4.    Chanda Kumari @ Chanda Sharma D/o Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj
                 Sharma Resident of Village- Andarkila, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya Ji

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P.
                 For the Informant        :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant

                   and the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 127(2), 190, 191(2),

                   117(2), 109, 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                3. As per prosecution case, on 26.11.2025 at about

                   9:30 AM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these

                   petitioners, assaulted daughters of the informant as a result of

                   which they sustained head injuries.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20323 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                          2/2




                        petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.

                        Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Doctor has found

                        the injuries to be simple. Petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 claim clean

                        antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has got one criminal antecedent

                        in which he is on bail.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned

                        counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail

                        application.

                                     6. Considering the nature of accusation and injuries,

                        this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the

                        above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender

                        before the court below within a period of eight weeks from

                        today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

                        10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

                        Judicial Magistrate VI, Gaya Ji in connection with Tekari P. S.

                        Case No. 504 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under

                        Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.