Chand Mohan Pal @ Chandra Mohan Pal @ Chandramohan PalversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7528 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2025 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Chand Mohan Pal @ Chandra Mohan Pal @ Chandramohan Pal S/O Baldeo
                 Pal R/O Village- Lalapur, Ward No. 12, Jahanabad, P.S and P.O- Kudra,
                 Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabua), State- Bihar, Pin- 821108.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-04-2026                           Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                     2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered under Sections 8(c), 21(b)(ii)(B), 29 and 27(a) of the

                   N.D.P.S. Act.

                                   3.     As per the F.I.R., 16.739 kg Ganja was

                   recovered from co-accused Mritunjay Pandey and Anita Devi

                   and during the inquiry, they took the name of the petitioner

                   alleging that petitioner has ordered them to bring ganja from

                   one co-accused Sanjay Singh.

                                   4.    Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely

                   been implicated in the present case due to two criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7528 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                            2/3




          antecedents relating to Excise Act, in which he is on bail.

          Further submission is that there is no material against the

          petitioner except the disclosure statements made by the co-

          accused persons. The alleged quantity of ganja does not come

          under the commercial quantity. Petitioner has no concern with

          the seized ganja or the motorcycle. Petitioner undertakes to

          cooperate in the investigation and trial.

                           5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer

          for bail.

                          6. Having considered the facts and circumstances

          of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and

          nature of allegation, let the above named petitioner be released

          on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned

          court below within a period of six weeks from today, on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Kaimur (Bhabua) in

          connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 412 of 2025, subject to the

          conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya

          Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita with further conditions:-

                       (i) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall

          remain present on each and every date during trial and in his
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7528 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      absence on two consecutive dates, the trial court is at liberty to

                      cancel his bail bond.

                                   (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty

                      to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.



                                              (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-

U       T