Patna High Court
Animesh Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to conditions.
Summary
Animesh Kumar Das and his wife Neha Kumari were accused in a FIR of fraud amounting to Rs. 1,75,000 in a land sale dispute. They claimed the money was partially returned and that the matter was essentially civil, with the FIR filed belatedly. The petition sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, arguing that Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) was inapplicable. The court noted the clean antecedents of the petitioners, the return of Rs. 1,00,000, and the civil nature of the dispute, and therefore inclined to grant anticipatory bail. The court ordered bail on furnishing a Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties, subject to cooperation with investigation and verification of criminal antecedents.
Issues considered
- Whether the allegations constitute a cognizable offence justifying denial of anticipatory bail
- Whether Section 318(4) of the BNS applies to the present civil dispute
- Whether the petitioners' clean antecedents and partial return of money warrant grant of anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 115(2), 126, 318(4), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 482(2)
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- fraud
- land sale dispute
- civil nature
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- Criminal Procedure Code
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31536 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2025 Thana- Manikpur District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
1. Animesh Kumar Das S/o Dinesh Das R/o Village - Konipar, P.S. - Manikpur,
Dist. - Lakhisarai.
2. Neha Kumari Wife of Animesh Kumar Das R/o Village - Konipar, P.S. -
Manikpur, Dist. - Lakhisarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Bihar
2. Sanjay Kumar S/o Ramotar Mahto R/o Village - Bakarchak, P.S. - Manikpur,
Dist. - Lakhisarai.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manohar Prasad Singh
For the State : Mr.Sanjay Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case
registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126,
115(2), 318(4), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS in connection with
Manikpur P.S.Case No. 17 of 2025.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the
petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the
present case. This is a case of civil nature and section 318(4) of
the BNS is not applicable to the present case.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31536 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
2/3
anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
5. From the reading of the FIR, it appears that
allegation against the petitioners is of taking money to the tune
of Rs. 1,75,000/- by fraud with regard to sale of land to the
informant. The amount of Rs. 50,000/- was transferred by the
informant to petitioner no. 1 through Mobile PhonePe. Another
Rs. 50,000/- was also paid to the petitioner no. 1 on 05.04.2024,
and it is also alleged that the informant paid further Rs. 75,000/-
in cash, of which there is no proof.
6. It is contended by the learned counsel for
petitioners that Rs. 1,00,000/- has already been returned to the
informant, and the documents with regard to payment have been
brought on record by way of Annexure- P/2 series. The
antecedents of both the petitioners are clean.
7. Manifestly, the dispute arose between informant
and the petitioners relating to the purchase/sale of the land and
also the FIR has been belatedly filed on 03.03.2025, whereas the
occurrence is alleged to have taken place on 02.02.2025.
Considering these aspects of the matter, I am inclined to grant
privilege of anticipatory bail to both the petitioners.
8. Let the petitioners, as named above, in the event of
their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31536 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
3/3
enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
Ten Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each
to the satisfaction learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-
II, Lakhisarai in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 17 of
2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and subject to further
condition that:-
(i) the petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation/
trial.
(ii) the learned court below would, however, verify
the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, and in case it is
found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal
antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of
bail bonds of the petitioners. However, it is expected that the
verification process would be done expeditiously without
causing any delay.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
HR/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.