Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Karu TuriyaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court allowed the bail application, granting bail to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, Karu Turiya and Sanoj Kumar, were implicated in an excise case for alleged recovery of 73.5 litres of foreign liquor and 12 litres of canned beer from four motorcycles found in Chafail forest. They argued that the seized vehicles did not belong to them and that no incriminating articles were found in their possession or residence, claiming they were falsely implicated based on secret information. The State opposed their bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The High Court, after considering the facts and submissions, granted bail to both petitioners upon furnishing bonds and sureties, subject to conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The bail order also imposed specific compliance requirements for petitioner no. 2, including cooperation in trial and restrictions on tampering with evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail in an excise case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
  • Whether the circumstances of the seizure justify denial of bail under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioners' alleged lack of possession of the seized liquor negates the ground for arrest.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise offence
  • illegal liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 47
  • Section 482(2)
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29219 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
           1.     Karu Turiya S/O Tukan Turiya R/O Vill.- Basraun, P.S.- Rajauli, Dist.-
                  Nawada.
           2.    Sanoj Kumar S/O Deval Prasad Yadav @ Devender Kumar R/O Vill.-
                 Kumharua, P.S.- Rajauli, Dist.- Nawada.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with

                   Excise PS. Case No. 203 of 2026 dated 23.2.2026 instituted

                   under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act, 2016.

                                3. The allegation is of recovery of 73.500 litres of

                   foreign liquor and 12 litres of canned beer from four different

                   motorcycles. It is alleged that all the four motorcycles were

                   found standing on the Chafail forest and no one was arrested at

                   the spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29219 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in

          the present case. It is further submitted that no incriminating

          article has been recovered either from the conscious possession

          of the petitioners or from their house; rather, the seized illicit

          liquor and canned beer were recovered from four different

          motorcycles in the Chafail forest and the said seized

          motorcycles do not belong to the petitioners. The petitioners

          have been made accused in this case only on the basis of secret

          information. Lastly, it is submitted that petitioner no. 1 has no

          criminal antecedents, whereas petitioner no. 2 has one criminal

          case pending against him.

                       5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

          the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in

          the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within

          six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned Exclusive Special Court Excise-II, Nawada, in Excise

          PS. Case No. 203 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down in

          Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

          and further (i) that petitioner no. 2 shall co-operate in the trial
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29219 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed

                     by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates

                     without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the

                     court below, (ii) that one of the bailors will be the own blood

                     relation of petitioner no. 2, preferably father, mother, brother,

                     sister and/or wife, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit

                     that he will inform the court concerned if petitioner no. 2 is

                     made accused in any other case of similar nature after his

                     release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be

                     at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the

                     ground of misuse, and (iv) that if petitioner no. 2 tampers with

                     the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will

                     be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

                                  7. The application stands allowed.



                                                  (Khatim Reza, J)
shyambihari/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.