Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh Rai @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, given the nature of the accusation and the absence of incriminating material on the petitioner, anticipatory bail could be granted under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

Mukesh Rai applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 90 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a river bank. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no incriminating material was found in his possession and he was accused merely on suspicion, despite having a prior criminal case pending on bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he had no direct connection to the recovered liquor and should not be detained. The court considered the nature of the accusation and the location of the recovery and decided to grant anticipatory bail, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The order directs that if arrested within eight weeks, the petitioner be released on bail upon compliance with the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether mere suspicion and recovery of illicit liquor from a river bank suffices to deny anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482(2)
  • criminal procedure
  • suspicion

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41336 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2026 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Mukesh Rai @ Mukesh Kumar S/o Harendra Rai R/o Village - Baburbani, P.S
                 - Sonepur, District - Saran at Chapra

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-07-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for

                   the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, 90 litres illicit liquor was

                   recovered from the bank of river.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no

                   incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

                   possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no concern with

                   the alleged recovery and he has been made accused in this case

                   merely on suspicion. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent

                   in which he is on bail.

                                5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail

                   application.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41336 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  6. Considering nature of accusation and place of

                     recovery, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that

                     let the above named petitioner in the event of his

                     arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight

                     weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond

                     of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

                     Excise Judge-2, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur P.

                     S. Case No. 460 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down

                     under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                     Sanhita.



                                           (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/Sanjay-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.