Patna High Court
Archana DeviversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ANSUL
Holding
The Court held that no prima facie case exists against the petitioner and therefore granted anticipatory bail.
Summary
Archana Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case (PS No.12 of 2026) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 20 litres of country‑made liquor was recovered from a tin‑tati (jhopri) linked to her. She contended that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, she had no involvement in the recovery, and she only possessed a single prior criminal antecedent. The State opposed her application for anticipatory bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court examined whether a prima facie case existed against her, noting that the seizure occurred from a structure not belonging to the petitioner. Concluding that no prima facie case was made out, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC/Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in the absence of a prima facie case.
- Whether the recovery of liquor from a tin‑tati not owned by the petitioner establishes her involvement in the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- prohibition act
- excise law
- prima facie case
- liquor seizure
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29115 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2026 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar
======================================================
Archana Devi Wife of Santosh Choudhary @ Fantush R/o Village - Rani
Ghat, Dam, Near - Gaushala, P.O.- Katihar, P.S.- Sahayak, Dist.- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar Yadav, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sucheta Yadav, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
ORAL ORDER
3 13-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection
with Katihar Town (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026 registered for
the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case is that 20 liters of country made
liquor was recovered from the Tin-Tati (Jhopri) of the accused
petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present
case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the
conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no
concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner has got
one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29115 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
2/2
prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the
case that the recovery was made from Tin-Tati (Jhopri) which does
not belong to the petitioner and thus no prima facie case is made out
against petitioner, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to
the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her
arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty
days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Exclusive Sepcail Excise II, Katihar in connection with Katihar Town
(Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid
down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure /
Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima
facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the
present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an
expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or
any other proceedings in any manner.
(Ansul, J)
abhishekkr/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.