Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Archana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

The Court held that no prima facie case exists against the petitioner and therefore granted anticipatory bail.

Summary

Archana Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case (PS No.12 of 2026) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 20 litres of country‑made liquor was recovered from a tin‑tati (jhopri) linked to her. She contended that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, she had no involvement in the recovery, and she only possessed a single prior criminal antecedent. The State opposed her application for anticipatory bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court examined whether a prima facie case existed against her, noting that the seizure occurred from a structure not belonging to the petitioner. Concluding that no prima facie case was made out, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC/Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in the absence of a prima facie case.
  • Whether the recovery of liquor from a tin‑tati not owned by the petitioner establishes her involvement in the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • prohibition act
  • excise law
  • prima facie case
  • liquor seizure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29115 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2026 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Archana Devi Wife of Santosh Choudhary @ Fantush R/o Village - Rani
                 Ghat, Dam, Near - Gaushala, P.O.- Katihar, P.S.- Sahayak, Dist.- Katihar.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Umesh Kumar Yadav, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Sucheta Yadav, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-05-2026                     Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection

                   with Katihar Town (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026 registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act.

                                 3. The prosecution case is that 20 liters of country made

                   liquor was recovered from the Tin-Tati (Jhopri) of the accused

                   petitioner.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present

                   case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the

                   conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no

                   concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner has got

                   one criminal antecedent.

                                 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29115 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the

                     case that the recovery was made from Tin-Tati (Jhopri) which does

                     not belong to the petitioner and thus no prima facie case is made out

                     against petitioner, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to

                     the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her

                     arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty

                     days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on

                     furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Exclusive Sepcail Excise II, Katihar in connection with Katihar Town

                     (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid

                     down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure /

                     Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

                                  8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima

                     facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the

                     present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an

                     expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or

                     any other proceedings in any manner.



                                                       (Ansul, J)
abhishekkr/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.