Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Salok Kumar @ Sholok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Salok Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 461, 379, 420, 427, and 411/34 related to an alleged ATM robbery. The prosecution’s case was based on a raid following a Mumbai Vigilance tip, during which co-accused were arrested and a sum of Rs 20,000 and a steel weapon were seized. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that his name surfaced only through a co-accused’s confessional statement and that no stolen money was found on him. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, after considering the material on record and the circumstances, granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within eight weeks and to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the case
  • Whether the conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 are applicable

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • ATM robbery
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36326 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-363 Year-2020 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Salok Kumar @ Sholok Kumar S/o Yogendra Singh R/o Village - Pakri, Post
                 and Police Station - Fatehpur, District - Gaya.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-06-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   State.

                                2. The petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in

                   a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 461,

                   379, 420, 427, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. As per prosecution case, on receiving information

                   from the office of Mumbai Vigilance that money was being

                   extracted illegally by breaking and committing forgery from

                   ATM machine, a raid was conducted and                     co-accused persons

                   were arrested on the spot and from the possession of co-accused

                   Chunnu Kumar Rs 20,000/- was recovered and some weapon of

                   steel used in extracting money from ATM was also recovered.

                                4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner

                   is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged. The name
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36326 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
                                                      2/2




                    of the petitioner transpired during investigation in the

                    confessional statement of co-accused Dharmendra Kumar. No

                    stolen currency notes has been recovered from the possession of

                    this petitioner.

                                  5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                    the bail application .

                                 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, materials available

                    on record and circumstances of the case , this anticipatory bail is

                    allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in

                    the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within

                    a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on

                    furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with

                    two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Begusarai in Barauni P.S. Case no.

                    363/2020, subject to condition as laid down under Section

                    482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                          (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/Alok
Raj-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.