Patna High Court
Vikas Kumar @ Vikash Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail is granted subject to specified conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, was accused under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and dowry harassment by his wife. The matter was referred to mediation, which failed, leading the petitioner to seek anticipatory bail fearing arrest. He denied the allegations and offered to pay Rs. 3,000 per month as temporary maintenance, subject to any future matrimonial orders. The Court, noting the petitioner’s undertaking, allowed the anticipatory bail application with a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, imposing conditions for monthly payments and cancellation on default. The order also required the complainant to file an affidavit disclosing her bank account details for the deposits.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act?
- Whether the petitioner’s undertaking to pay maintenance suffices to justify bail?
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482(2)
- Dowry Prohibition Act — s. 4
- Indian Penal Code — s. 498A
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 498A
- dowry harassment
- maintenance
- mediation
- bail conditions
- family law
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3231 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-982 Year-2019 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT
District- West Champaran
======================================================
Vikas Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Gupta S/o Nandlal Sah Resident of Village-
Bada Pareua, P.S.- Raxaul, Dist.- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Ranjana Kumari W/o Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Gupta, D/o Kanhaiya
Prasad Resident of Mohalla- Hospital Road, Near Kalibabu ke Dawakhana,
Ganj No. 02, Ward No. 25, P.S.- Bettiah Town, Dist.- West Champaran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Gyan Prakash, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 29-06-2026 Earlier, vide order dated 29.01.2026, the matter was
referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Patna High
Court, Patna, but as per the Mediator’s Report (flag ‘M’), the
mediation has failed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered
for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian
Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
4. As per prosecution case, marriage of complainant
was solemnized with this petitioner in the year 2014. Thereafter,
it is alleged that complainant was subjected to torture and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3231 of 2026(3) dt.29-06-2026
2/3
cruelty due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while denying
the allegations levelled against him, submits that petitioner, who
is husband of the complainant, is ready to keep her with honour
and safety. Besides this, petitioner is ready to give Rs. 3000/-
per month to the complainant by way of temporary relief/solace,
starting from this month, subject to any order passed in
matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings.
6. In view of the aforesaid undertaking of learned
counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give Rs.
3000/- per month to the complainant by way of temporary
relief/solace, starting from this month, this anticipatory bail
application is allowed.
7. Let the above-named petitioner, in the event of
arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be
enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Complaint Case
No. 982 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under
Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita as
well as on the following conditions:-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3231 of 2026(3) dt.29-06-2026
3/3
‘(1) Complainant would file an affidavit before the
court below and bring on record her savings bank account
number for its communication to the petitioner.
(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid
maintenance amount per month in the savings bank account of
the complainant.
(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the
maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court
below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.
(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to
any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected
proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the
parties to resolve the issue otherwise.’
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.