Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
Four labour contractors applied for anticipatory bail in a case where they were accused of cheating the sugar factory by accepting advance payments and failing to provide labour and logistics during the 2021‑2022 harvest, alleged under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant also …
Four labour contractors applied for anticipatory bail in a case where they were accused of cheating the sugar factory by accepting advance payments and failing to provide labour and logistics during the 2021‑2022 harvest, alleged under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant also …
Four labour contractors applied for anticipatory bail in a case where they were accused of cheating the sugar factory by accepting advance payments and failing to provide labour and logistics during the 2021‑2022 harvest, alleged under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant also …
The applicant, Sanjaysinh Jawantsinh Parmar, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 11207002260129 alleging offences under Sections 303(2) and 305(E) of the BNS. The State opposed, alleging that the applicant …
The petitioner, Sunilbhai Vaghani, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 108, 85 and 54 of the BNSS and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed the allegations were false, citing a …
