Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
58 judgments · newest first · showing 1–58
The petitioner, Parashkumar Hargovanhbai Patel, a jaggery shopkeeper, was implicated in an FIR alleging supply of rotten jaggery and offences under the Prohibition Act and sections 111(3) and 111(4) of the Bharatiya Nayay Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the …
Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving the 15‑year‑old daughter of an informant. The petitioner claimed the girl left home voluntarily out of love and travelled with him, arguing that this negated any kidnapping allegation. The State, through the Additional Public …
The petitioners, seven members of the Yadav family, were arrested in connection with FIR No. 483 of 2025 for alleged assault causing head injuries during a land dispute. They were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023 and the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioners contended …
The petitioner, Bindeshwar Sah, was implicated in FIR No. 146 of 2025 for allegedly operating an unregistered hospital, invoking sections 319(2), 318(1), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 125(a) and 125 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting no criminal antecedent and …
The petitioners, seven Yadavs, were arrested in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 547 of 2025 for alleged assault with a sword, iron rod and lathi during a land‑dispute, alleged to be with intent to cause death under various sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the …
The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and his wife Nitu Kumari, were named in an FIR (PS 68/2026) for alleged assault on an informant's family using weapons such as iron rods and lathis. They contended that the case was false, arising from an inimical relationship with the informant, and that they were not …
Amit Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant and others. The petitioner contended that the incident was a mutual "free fight" and that …
The petitioner, Nagendra Ram, was arrested in connection with PS case No.403 of 2025 for alleged assault on his mother‑in‑law and her daughter, alleged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023. He contended that the incident arose from a family quarrel, resulting only in minor …
The petitioner, Kauslender Kumar, was named in an FIR for assault, extortion and related offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023. He contended that the FIR was based on hearsay and that the injuries inflicted on the informant were not on vital parts and did not show an …
The petitioner, Ram Sabad Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a FIR (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 364 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault in a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant’s husband …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was implicated in a case involving alleged criminal trespass and theft based on the testimony of a co-accused. He argued that the allegations were unfounded, noting that he was found outside the house and his name was disclosed only by the co-accused. The prosecution …
The petitioners—Santosh Paswan (brother‑in‑law), Mahendra Paswan (father‑in‑law) and Rinku Devi (sister‑in‑law)—filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case under Sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 relating to the alleged suicide of a woman. The …
The petitioners Mahendra Singh and Juli Devi applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 94 of 2025 alleging assault with an iron rod that caused the death of the informant's father. They contended that the FIR was filed out of a family feud and that the allegations were general and …
The petitioners Mahendra Singh and Juli Devi applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 94 of 2025 alleging assault with an iron rod that caused the death of the informant's father. They contended that the FIR was filed out of a family feud and that the allegations were general and …
The petitioner, Kundan Mahato, a 22‑year‑old student and brother‑in‑law of the alleged victim, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, relating to alleged dowry‑related harassment. The prosecution alleged …
Maheshwar Prasad Singh was arrested in connection with a criminal complaint alleging fraudulent transfer of his father's ancestral and self‑acquired property to his wife. The petitioner contended that the dispute arose from a pending partition suit and was essentially civil in nature. The State …
Santosh Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery of Rs 22 lakhs alleged under Section 309(4) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case is based on a statement by the informant and a confessional statement made by the petitioner while in custody, which implicated him and five …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was not named in the FIR but was later identified by a local watchman and video footage as part of a crowd involved in vandalism and arson of a fire‑brigade vehicle in Beldaur. He argued that the allegation was vague, based solely on suspicion of being in the crowd, and …
The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, was implicated in a theft case (PS Mirganj Case No. 158 of 2025) for allegedly purchasing a stolen motorcycle from a co-accused. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5) and 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023. The petitioner argued that, apart …
Sudhir Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a family property dispute where the informant alleged assault on her parents, resulting in simple head injuries. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing the injuries were minor and he had no …
The petitioners, Kedar Yadav and Vikash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a FIR (Kajra P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025) filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351, 352, 190, 191(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that the petitioners opened …
The petitioners, a group of family members from Hanuman Nagar, were apprehended in connection with a police case (No. 227 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023, including assault and unlawful restraint. The FIR alleged that they prevented a police …
Anand Srivastava sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Case No. 475 of 2025) alleged that he cheated a contractor by diverting funds meant for an FCI godown construction, amounting to about Rs. 7.46 crore. The informant claimed the petitioner received the money, slowed the work, and stopped further …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging assault with a knife and the alleged raising of a pistol during a dispute over an obscene video. He contended that the allegations were vague, that the FIR was not filed under the Arms Act, and that the physical assault …
The petitioners, Ranjit Rawat and Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jamui P.S. Case No. 794 of 2024) filed under Sections 125(a), 351(2), 351(3), 191(2), 190 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they pelted bricks and …
The petitioner, Dr. Lalan Prasad, a registered medical practitioner, was implicated in an FIR (Case No. 98 of 2025) under Section 105 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 after the wife of the informant, Mahesh Yadav, died following treatment by the petitioner. The informant alleged negligence, but …
The petitioners, Ravi Kumar and Bhola Prasad, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 171 of 2025) filed under Section 96 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging the disappearance of a minor. The informant, Anuranjan Kumar, claimed the girl had …
The petitioners, Bablu Kumar Singh and Prince Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging they assaulted the informant’s father with a stick, causing fatal head injuries that led to his death on 20‑08‑2025. The FIR, registered under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), …
Petitioner Lalu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, and withdrew his anticipatory bail petition. Petitioner Chandan Kumar sought anticipatory bail for the same case, alleging that the FIR alleged he opened fire and stole a golden …
The petitioners, Bablu Singh and Rajiv Ranjan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged by informant Mukesh Singh alleging they assaulted him over a dispute involving soil removal from a JCB. The FIR charged them under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (2023) …
The petitioner, Dinesh Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Majhauliya PS Case No. 265 of 2025) was lodged under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault, outraging modesty, and theft. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner struck the informant …
Petitioner Pradip Paswan was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of informant Manik Chandra Mahaldar for the purpose of marriage, leading to an FIR under sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. The victim girl testified that she was forcibly taken away in a Bolero …
Raushan Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged assault and threat to a 19‑year‑old informant in a case where the co‑accused was accused of rape. The petitioner argued that the allegations against him were vague, that he had a clean antecedent, and that the serious rape charge did not pertain to him. …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 alleging assault, robbery and outraging modesty. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner inflicted a head injury and stole money, while the petitioner claimed …
The petitioners, three brothers, were named in an FIR (Puraini PS Case No. 128 of 2025) under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 for assaulting members of the informant’s side during a land‑dispute Panchayat. Petitioners Md. Mukhtar (also known as Md. Muktar) and Md. Akhtar sought …
The petitioners, three members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Roh PS Case No. 252 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 alleging family‑related assault. The prosecution alleged that Ramashish Yadav assaulted his brother …
The petitioners, a family from Chhatauna village, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Mufassil P.S. Case No.410 of 2025) was lodged by informant Priyanka Kumari alleging that Deepak Mahto entered her house, assaulted her and injured family members while trying to retrieve a dhoti. The FIR …
Ramanand Ray sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Banjariya PS Case No. 526 of 2025) alleging assault with a knife over a land dispute. The informant claimed a knife injury, but the injury report and the Sessions Judge’s observation described it as simple. The petitioner's counsel argued the …
The petitioners, Radhe Shyam Sah and Krishana Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Biraul PS Case No. 226 of 2025) alleged they assaulted a complainant and attempted to outrage her modesty, while the main allegation centered on another accused, Santosh Yadav. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioner, Riyaz Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kadwa P.S. Case No. 85 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner participated in an assault, a shooting (attributed to Md. Khurshid), and other …
The petitioners Patiram Bhakt, Anil Bhagat and Sujit Bhagat sought anticipatory bail in a case (Siswan P.S. Case No. 308 of 2025) alleging they assaulted the informant and his relatives, causing both simple and grievous injuries under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. The …
Petitioner Bablu Yadav was implicated in a theft case (Kawakole PS Case No. 346 of 2025) under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, after an informant alleged that the petitioner had seen and later taken Rs.26,000 kept in his room. The police recovered Rs.3,000 from …
Petitioner Rajiv Gupta was arrested in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 81, 115(2), 118(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, based on a complaint by Sweta Kumari that he had a physical relationship with her and later reneged on a promise of marriage. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Ghanshyam Mishra and Dipak Mishra, filed an anticipatory bail petition in the Patna High Court under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest. During the hearing, they sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, seven members of the same family, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 79 of 2025 filed under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. The informant alleged that during a land measurement exercise the petitioners attacked him and others, causing …
The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 103 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act alleging they opened fire and killed a man. The informant, Sangeeta Devi, claimed the accused acted with common intention, …
The petitioners, three accused in a land‑dispute related case (Maniyari P.S. Case No.304 of 2024), sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. The FIR alleged that petitioner 3 pointed a pistol at the informant, petitioner 2 inflicted a blow with an iron rod, and petitioner 1 attempted …
The petitioners, Badshah Khan and Farhan Khan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 312 of 2025 alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the informant's son was shot by a …
The petitioner, Uday Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail petition fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. He later sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender before the trial court for regular bail. The learned …
The petitioner, Pramod Mukhiya, filed a petition fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Dumaria P.S. Case No. 40 of 2025) that alleged offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. The petition was filed on 1 May 2025 based on an …
Lalbabu Prasad, a teacher, was arrested in connection with a case alleging non‑penetrative sexual assault and sexual harassment of the minor daughter of an informant, under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023 and the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that the alleged assault was actually committed by …
The petitioner, Sheikh Sajeed Anwar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he inflicted a grievous injury on the informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant, causing serious …
The petitioner, Sharvan Ram, was arrested in connection with an offence under Section 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. He filed an anticipatory bail petition in the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, five members of the Thakur family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 162 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 concerning an assault over a water dispute. The FIR alleged that Krishnandan Thakur and Mantosh Kumar inflicted …
Four family members were implicated in a FIR (Case No. 236 of 2025) filed under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault, outraging modesty and theft. The first three petitioners, who had already been arrested, withdrew their anticipatory bail applications. The fourth …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking relief against an impending arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 109 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. During the pendency of the petition, the …
Vinod Rai and Sudhan Rai were in judicial custody for alleged assault offences arising from a land dispute, charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023. They applied for bail, asserting no prior criminal record and that the injuries reported were simple. The State, through …
Manoj Kumar, the son of Basanti Devi, was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging forgery of a 1970 sale deed and related offences under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023. The petitioner contended that he was merely an identifier of the deed and not a beneficiary, arguing that the dispute was …
