Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
38 judgments · newest first · showing 1–38
The petitioners, Brijnath Rai and Ashok Rai, were charged with murder, kidnapping and conspiracy under Sections 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita in connection with the death of the informant's son. The prosecution alleged that the accused kidnapped and strangled the victim, whose …
The petitioner, Tuntun Ray, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging assault on an informant and his family under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 191(3), 109 and 352 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. The petitioner contended that the informant had forged the injury report, misdating the assault to …
The petitioners, ten members of the Singh family, were arrested in connection with Tajpur Police Station Case No. 148 of 2025 for alleged assault on an informant and her family, charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. They contended that the incident was a "free fight" arising …
Surendra Kumar was arrested on 7 March 2026 in connection with a POCSO case alleging rape of a minor. He applied for regular bail, claiming the FIR was fabricated. The State opposed, noting that his anticipatory bail had been denied and the Supreme Court dismissed his SLP, directing surrender. The …
The petitioners, Shakuntala Devi and Minta Devi, were accused in Mahnar P.S. Case No. 419 of 2025 for offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, including assault and related crimes. They sought bail fearing arrest, arguing that the allegations were general and omnibus. The court …
The petitioners Bina Devi, Suraj Paswan and Bappy Paswan were arrested in connection with a case of assault alleged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. They contended that the incident was a "free fight" in which both sides sustained …
The petitioner, Md. Ashif Alam, was charged under Section 85 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged mental and physical cruelty and demanding a dowry of Rs.5 lakh and a motorcycle. He sought bail, arguing that the complaint lacked an supporting affidavit …
The petitioners, ten individuals named in FIR No. 727 of 2025, were charged under Sections 191(1), 126(1), 115(1), 109(1) and 74 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita for assaulting an informant, her husband and family members, causing injuries and firing a weapon. They contended that they were merely part …
The petitioners, nine members of the Ray family, were named in FIR No. 387 of 2025 for alleged abduction and illicit intercourse with a minor, offences punishable under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. During investigation, the minor was recovered and gave a statement under …
The petitioners, members of the family of accused Gaurav Kumar, were apprehending arrest in a dowry‑demand case (Sections 64(1), 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita). The FIR alleged that the family demanded dowry and that Gaurav Kumar had a false pretext of marriage to establish a …
The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar Singh, was not named in the FIR relating to a cyber fraud case involving illegal UPI withdrawals of Rs. 82,000. During investigation, a mobile used in the fraud was seized from a co-accused's shop, and the petitioner was implicated solely on the basis of a single Rs. …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a murder case (PS Case No. 618 of 2025) involving offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. Petitioners 1 and 2 withdrew their bail applications after surrendering before the trial court, leading to dismissal of their petitions as …
The petitioners, members of the Mandal family, were accused in Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 406 of 2025 of assaulting an informant and his family over a land dispute, with charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. The petitioners argued that the FIR was lodged two days after the …
Vikash Kumar was arrested for allegedly stabbing an informant with a knife during an altercation on a boat on 20 June 2025. The petitioner argued that the act was a sudden, unpremeditated assault resulting in only a simple injury, with no bone damage, and that he had no prior criminal record. The …
The petitioners, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. The allegations stem from a love marriage between the deceased and Sujit Sah, during which a dowry demand of Rs. four lakh …
The petitioners, Ram Singh and Pandav Singh, were arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 1,600.2 liters of illicit foreign liquor from a truck. They claimed to be merely the driver and cleaner and were unaware that the consignment contained prohibited liquor. The prosecution …
The petitioners, Krishna Kumar Bhagat and Phool Kumar Bhagat, applied for bail in a case (Singhwara P.S. Case No. 289 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, including assault and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted the …
The petitioner, Indal Manjhi, was charged under Sections 105, 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita for allegedly assaulting a woman and her grandfather, resulting in the grandfather's death. The informant alleged that the petitioner and a co‑accused misbehaved with the woman and …
The petitioners, Raju Kumar and his father Vishwanath Rai, were charged under Sections 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita for the alleged kidnapping and murder of the informant's son, whose body was reportedly hung in front of the informant's house. The prosecution relied on a witness …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a POCSO case (Sarai PS Case No. 135 of 2025) alleging that he held an 11‑year‑old girl by the waist and attempted to lure her to a school, as recorded in the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. The …
The petitioners, Raju Kumar and his father Vishwanath Rai, were charged under Sections 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita for the alleged kidnapping and murder of the informant's son. The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired with others to strangle the victim and display his …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 137(2), 140(3), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita) arising from an alleged assault during a Ravan Dahan event on 03‑10‑2025, after which his alleged victim's husband went missing and was later found dead. The …
The petitioner, Vipin Paswan, was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault case (Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 163 of 2025) under Section 310 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, had been detained since 21‑08‑2025 based solely on a co‑accused's …
The petitioners, Sambhu Yadav and Somu Yadav, were arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, including offences of murder, assault, and kidnapping. The prosecution alleged that petitioner No.1 incited a killing, while co‑accused Gulshan Kumar …
Amarjeet Yadav was arrested in connection with a violent incident at a cultural programme where he, along with co‑accused, allegedly opened fire, injuring two persons and damaging a vehicle. The prosecution charged him under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms …
The petitioners, Uma Shankar Rai and Ramjee Rai, were arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging participation in an unlawful assembly that fired rounds and injured an informant. The prosecution alleged …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a theft case (PS Case No. 268 of 2025) involving the alleged stealing of a gas cylinder, cash, and personal documents. The prosecution alleged that the informant’s door lock was broken and the items were missing. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 305(a) and 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita concerning a burglary and theft. The prosecution alleged that unknown thieves broke into an informant's house and stole items, and the petitioner was implicated solely …
The petitioner, Suman Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 111 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita concerning alleged involvement in the sale of stolen motorcycles. The prosecution’s case is based on information that criminals assembled to sell motorcycles, …
The petitioner, Vijay Singh Bhokta, was arrested in connection with a case alleging he was riding a stolen motorcycle, violating Sections 303(2) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. He claimed to have purchased the bike in good faith from Chhotu Kumar for Rs.20,000 and was unaware it was …
Shiv Kumar Ray was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault on an informant, his son, and the informant's wife, as well as the theft of Rs.20,000. The prosecution alleged that Ray and co‑accused used weapons and force during the incident. Ray's counsel argued that the assault …
The petitioner, Ritik Raj Gupta, was arrested in connection with a theft of a motorcycle that was later recovered from a scrap shop where he was allegedly seen dismantling parts. The prosecution alleged that he, along with another accused, was involved in the theft under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and …
Shambhu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 187 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant and a shooting that resulted in a chest wound. The petitioner contended that the allegation of him firing the pistol was a super‑addition, noting that no empty cartridges were recovered and …
Rupesh Kumar and Kamlesh Kumar were implicated in a cyber‑crime FIR alleging fraud through forged online advertisements for loans and escort services, with several offences listed under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. The petitioners contended that no direct incriminating evidence linked them to the …
The petitioners, Jagdish Ram and Chinta Devi, and Dinesh Kumar, Ranju Devi and Nilu Kumari, are the parents of co-accused individuals in a rape and video‑sharing case registered as Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025. The FIR alleges that the co‑accused committed rape, married the victim, and …
The petitioners, parents of a co-accused in a rape and video‑sharing case, sought bail after being implicated as supporters of the alleged offender. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 64, 123, 318(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the Information …
Petitioner Kaif Alam was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging assault with a knife that caused head and lip injuries to his cousin, the informant, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail petition, …
The petitioner, Vimlendu Kr. Singh, was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging that he cheated an informant and her daughter of Rs 16 lakh by taking a loan and issuing a cheque that later bounced. The FIR was filed under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, although …
