Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914

11 judgments · newest first · showing 1–11

Krishna Kumar Singh @ Krishna SinghversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

Krishna Kumar Singh filed a writ petition challenging the issuance of a warrant in Certificate Case No. 09/16-17, alleging that the authority failed to observe the 30‑day notice requirement under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914. He sought to quash the proceedings …

Sachendra Sharma @ Shatyendra SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachendra Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 12-02-2026 issued by the Certificate Officer under Section 10 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914, which directed payment of Rs. 1,27,90,425. The Court, without examining the …

Ranjan Kumar RatnakarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Ranjan Kumar Ratnakar appealed a High Court order that had dismissed his writ petition seeking to quash certificate proceedings initiated under Section 4 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914. The Single Judge had held that the appellant had not filed a statutory appeal under …

Shambhu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shambhu Kumar, proprietor of a rice mill, filed a writ petition challenging a warrant of arrest issued by the District Certificate Officer under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914. He argued that the warrant was issued without the mandatory final order under Section 10, despite …

Abdul RahmanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Abdul Rahman filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914, and had already raised objections under Section 9 of the same Act. The Patna High Court, without examining the merits, disposed of the petition at the admission …

Asgar Ali SidiquiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asgar Ali Sidiqui, challenged a notice issued under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914, alleging it was improper. He had already filed objections to the notice under Section 9 of the same Act. The High Court, without examining the merits, disposed of …

Faiyaz AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Faiyaz Ahmad filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914, and had already raised objections under Section 9 of the same Act. The Patna High Court, without examining the merits, disposed of the petition at the admission …

Ravindra Sharma @ Ravindra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Sharma, filed a writ petition challenging a warrant of attachment issued on 17‑03‑2025 by the District Certificate Officer, Gaya, for recovery of Rs 64,500, alleging that the authorities had not served the mandatory notice under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public …

THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.versusM/S TRIBRO AD BUREAU & ORS.

2024 INSC 784Disposed off

The Patna Municipal Corporation (PMC) sought to recover payments from advertising agencies for hoardings, asserting a tax/fee/royalty demand. The agencies challenged the demand, arguing that it was a tax levied without legislative authority under Article 265 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court …