Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The appellant, Rintu Kumar Yadav, was charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on 2 December 2025. He contended that the informant had falsely …
The appellant, Bikram Kumar Yadav, was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352 of the Bihar Penal Code, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly abusing and threatening an informant with a pistol …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged firing during a land dispute, facing charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Arms Act. He contended that no bullet struck the informant's son and that no incriminating cartridges were recovered, casting doubt on the …
The petitioners, Sarwan Kumar and Lalan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,647 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. They contended that they were not in possession of the liquor, did …
The appellants, six members of the Yadav family, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his labourer and for extorting money. They contended that the FIR was …
Ram Kumari Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 28.365 litres of liquor and cash were seized, feared arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, …
