Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajit khirhar @ AjIt Kumar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the prima facie doubt regarding the indiscriminate firing allegation warranted the grant of bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged firing during a land dispute, facing charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Arms Act. He contended that no bullet struck the informant's son and that no incriminating cartridges were recovered, casting doubt on the allegation of indiscriminate firing. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The court examined the factual submissions and noted a prima facie doubt regarding the indiscriminate firing allegation. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Code of Criminal Procedure. The bail order was conditioned on the petitioner surrendering within four weeks and complying with the stipulated terms.

Issues considered

  • Whether the allegations of indiscriminate firing constitute a prima facie case sufficient to deny bail
  • Whether bail can be granted under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Code of Criminal Procedure in light of the charges

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prima facie
  • indiscriminate firing
  • land dispute
  • Arms Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40194 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2026 Thana- MAHISHI District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Ajit khirhar @ AjIt Kumar Kumar Son of Hareram Khirhar Resident of
                 Village - Mahpura, Ward no. -12, Mahishi South, Maina Gram, P.S.- Mahishi,
                 District- Saharsa, Bihar.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sunny Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ram Anurag Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-06-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No.

                   58/2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of

                   the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per FIR, petitioner alleged to open fire upon son

                   of informant during the occurrence, which alleged to be taken

                   place due to land dispute between the parties.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that none of the bullet in the background

                   of indiscriminate firing was hit to the son of the informant though

                   it was alleged to be made from very close range, making the

                   allegation doubtful on its face in the background of land dispute.
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40194 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                                           2/2




                         In support of allegation no empty cartridges or anything

                         incriminating was recovered from the place of occurrence in

                         support of allegation that firing was made indiscriminately by this

                         petitioner during the course of occurrence. Petitioner claimed

                         clean antecedent.

                                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

                                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

                         taking note of overall accusations as discussed aforesaid, which

                         creates prima-facie doubt qua occurrence as far allegation of

                         indiscriminate firing is concerned, accordingly petitioner above-

                         named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

                         below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on

                         bail,     furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                         Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                         satisfaction of the learned CJM, Saharsa/concerned Court, where

                         the case is pending in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No.

                         58/2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                         482(2) of BNSS.


                                               (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
S.Tripathi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.