Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
13 judgments · newest first · showing 1–13
Petitioner Pradip Mishra sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He has two prior cases, one involving alleged recovery of 777.600 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles, but was not arrested on the spot …
The petitioner, Raju Kushawaha, sought anticipatory bail after a police raid recovered 882 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle he owned, alleging he was not in possession and was unaware of the driver’s misuse. He argued that he has a clean criminal record and that ownership of the vehicle alone …
Lokesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 70.560 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned, implicating him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he was not present at the seizure, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, feared arrest in a case involving the alleged recovery of about 12 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He claimed innocence, asserting that the liquor was intended for his delivery and that he was falsely …
Shiv Kumar Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilawe River. The petitioner argued that he was not …
The petitioner, Gautam Yadav, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 17 litres of country‑made liquor seized during a police raid. The FIR alleged that the liquor was linked to the petitioner based solely on …
The petitioner, Rajendra Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 102.240 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Sah, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 87.51 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 54.69 litres of liquor from an auto-rickshaw and 1.8 litres from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his …
Manoj Sinha, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him for alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving the recovery of 99 litres of liquor from a car …
The petitioner, Sanjay Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from his house and related premises. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was …
Vijay Kumar was arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 35.4 litres of liquor at his brother Sanjay Kumar’s house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner, who has a clean antecedent, argued that he was not in …
Ashish Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 6.75 litres of liquor from an Indio car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not found in his …
