Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
Bajanti Kumari was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 750 ml of liquor from a vehicle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that the vehicle would be …
Rakesh Kumar Azad, the owner of an e‑rickshaw, was implicated in a case where 50 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle, although he was not arrested at the spot and claims he had no knowledge of the alleged misuse. He sought anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal antecedent and …
The petitioner, Dhirendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,800 litres of liquor from the verandah of his Champaran hotel adjacent to a petrol pump. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not in …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the seizure was based on secret …
The petitioner, Prince Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and …
